What star signs make good candidates when they're in a position of power?

Profile picture of EtherealTraveler
DividedWeCapricorn
@EtherealTraveler
8 Years1,000+ PostsCapricorn

Comments: 261 · Posts: 1160 · Topics: 39
Kinda a discussion thread here since I want to see results.

Typically speaking in my opinion, Cardinal and Fixed signs make the best people in power, and mutable signs make the worst, reason being they're more at their elements to lead and fixed signs are mostly obsessed with power (Leo/Scorps).

In my list of good candidates, I put:

1) Libra

2) Capricorn

3) Scorpio

4) Leo

5) Aries

6) Cancer

7) Taurus

8) Aqua

9) Virgo

10) Sag

11) Gemini

12) Pisces

What do you all think?
Profile picture of EtherealTraveler
DividedWeCapricorn
@EtherealTraveler
8 Years1,000+ PostsCapricorn

Comments: 261 · Posts: 1160 · Topics: 39
Posted by sierraleoone
Posted by Rozaeon
Posted by sierraleoone
i think cap moons were born to rule the world

washington, lincoln, alexander, napoleon, charlemagne, holy roman emperor charles v, etc.

it's the moon of kings
I love this post sooo much 😄
cap moon spotted!

they deserve to sit on the Iron Throne 😆
click to expand

No it's the Cap suns since they're the real Caps 😄
Profile picture of EtherealTraveler
DividedWeCapricorn
@EtherealTraveler
8 Years1,000+ PostsCapricorn

Comments: 261 · Posts: 1160 · Topics: 39
Posted by DMV
Totally disagree with your reasoning.

Mutable can be in power positions due to them being both a learner and a teacher.

Mutable gain knowledge and pass it on, thus bringing everyone up to a higher level.

Mutable adapt and by textbook are communication.

Mutable make great leaders especially in positions that put them in touch directly with people.
History didn't suggest that though. Very few leaders fall under the mutable section.