Aquarius_confused
@Aquarius_confused
9 Years
Comments: 1 · Posts: 45 · Topics: 3



Posted by Capri-sunPosted by BuffaloBills28
Whoever says "I'm glad your mother is dead", just shows a person who has an extremely evil, evil soul. I'd cross a person like that out of my life immediately. That's way crossing the line.. That must be one pathetic individual to be talking about a persons dead mother. (or any family member for that matter). Wow. Only a rat like person can sink to lows like that, that's a sewer type of low. It's really, really low. Lacks character immensely.
THANK YOU!!!!!
click to expand

Posted by Impulsvoh geezes - you got divorced while going through cancer treatment ? wow - my ex sounds similar so I can certainly sympathize
I'll use my example I told ex I hated him
N he divorced shortly after.
Didn't take into consideration I had my last chemo weeks early
Had jaw pain n I feared it might be cancer.
I had to plan a move from my home
I had to figure out a way to muster energy to paint my home to put it for rent.
Did I over react maybe but could he not see all I was going through
Was it true yes in that moment

Posted by daron76
Wouldn't be so quick to label a person evil. While that statement is indefensible, many people are capable of saying things they wouldn't otherwise say in the moment, especially if they have been hurt (there is no more dangerous an animal than a wounded one). You have only provided his words to you, not what you said or did prior to that statement. Again, that doesn't make his words ok, but I wouldn't slap someone with the "evil" tag until there is more context.

Posted by Aquarius_confusedAgain, story stays focused on his words/actions- even when asked specifically about yours. I will stress again that anything you did or said doesn't justify his statement, yet it does allow a 3rd party make a more objective analysis of the scenario at hand and thereby offer you a better opinion as to what may be going on. Think of it this way; context is what separates murder from self-defense -- we all acknowledge that killing someone is horrible yet context makes one punishable, the other less so( if at all).
Trust me I wouldn't use the word evil lightly. Nor would I call someone evil unless I had good cause. But that is why I'm confused. I'm confused because of the good he has done but confused from the bad that he has done.
I know everyone has problems in relationships but he messed with my head so much I don't know which person he really is.
I even wrote on another part of this site about if someone could be demon possessed. Yes it might seem far fetched but if you read what I wrote you would be wondering also.
But when you are with someone you love them for there good and the bad traits because no one is perfect. But he referred to him self as Hyde, and when Hyde was mad watch out. The things he would say wasn't right nor normal and I let him know after he said something about where my sister needed to be I told him to never say something like that again and I don't want to see this person Hyde come out anymore. And he kept him at bay. But yes he would refer to him self as Hyde..... Maybe he does have multiple personality disorder but when he asked me what I thought of the real him, well let's just say it wasn't normal. Very weird and scary actually. But I will know which person he is when I talk to him. Then I will have my closure.....

Posted by DonumDeiWell, you may be the one person left on this earth to not have made a mistake but, for the rest of us human beings, it is a wonderful thing that we judge the behavior of each other on the totally of the circumstances and not just one person's version of events. Additionally, I did not rationalize his behavior- at all. On the contrary, I clearly stated (which you quote) that his statement was indefensible. Please try reading the things you quote fully before forming an opinion as to what they say.Posted by daron76
Wouldn't be so quick to label a person evil. While that statement is indefensible, many people are capable of saying things they wouldn't otherwise say in the moment, especially if they have been hurt (there is no more dangerous an animal than a wounded one). You have only provided his words to you, not what you said or did prior to that statement. Again, that doesn't make his words ok, but I wouldn't slap someone with the "evil" tag until there is more context.![]()
All that these kinds of rationalizations and justifications for despicable behavior/actions serve is further encourage mistreatment while keeping the recipients of said treatment in perpetual limbo of cognitive dissonance. JC...*smdh*click to expand



Posted by DonumDeiSeeing as I only wrote 4 sentences and the first one was directed at your "saintly" self , I guess you are implying that I contradicted my self in the second sentence and the third, which, given those statements doesn't seem likely. Further, it is incumbent upon the OP to provided the details and context of their own story, not upon us the readers, to search all the forums and do research on the back story- which is why people keep asking for more information. Finally, if you want to label him evil based upon what you know, that is perfectly fine and as a valid an opinion as anyone else's. Criticizing others for not being privy to the same information you may or may not have and not offering an opinion until more info is provided , seems a bit much. This sort of hyper-reaction makes it seem like you may be prone to flying off the handle also-- much like someone else mentioned in this thread. Would be a shame if we levied judgment on you as a person based on this example, wouldn't it?Posted by daron76At least you have one thing right...I am infallible! Saintly even! My avi is the indisputable evidence of it. But I'm afraid my divinity isn't the subject of the discussion at hand.
Well, you may be the one person left on this earth to not have made a mistake but, for the rest of us human beings, it is a wonderful thing that we judge the behavior of each other on the totally of the circumstances and not just one person's version of events. Additionally, I did not rationalize his behavior- at all. On the contrary, I clearly stated (which you quote) that his statement was indefensible. Please try reading the things you quote fully before forming an opinion as to what they say.
What is, however, is, once again, justification of previously mentioned behavior by means of questioning OP's sincerity in addition to contradicting yourself within the first two sentences. While I do not advocate trusting blindly, all the context one will have presently at disposal, is the masses of posts OP has already created. I'm also afraid her side of the story is the only one that will remain unless her object of obsession joins the discussion.
With that said, considering this caps age (54 if my memory serves me correct) and the context OP provided thus far, his actions remain evil.click to expand

Posted by daron76Posted by DonumDeiWell, you may be the one person left on this earth to not have made a mistake but, for the rest of us human beings, it is a wonderful thing that we judge the behavior of each other on the totally of the circumstances and not just one person's version of events. Additionally, I did not rationalize his behavior- at all. On the contrary, I clearly stated (which you quote) that his statement was indefensible. Please try reading the things you quote fully before forming an opinion as to what they say.Posted by daron76
Wouldn't be so quick to label a person evil. While that statement is indefensible, many people are capable of saying things they wouldn't otherwise say in the moment, especially if they have been hurt (there is no more dangerous an animal than a wounded one). You have only provided his words to you, not what you said or did prior to that statement. Again, that doesn't make his words ok, but I wouldn't slap someone with the "evil" tag until there is more context.![]()
All that these kinds of rationalizations and justifications for despicable behavior/actions serve is further encourage mistreatment while keeping the recipients of said treatment in perpetual limbo of cognitive dissonance. JC...*smdh*click to expand
Posted by DonumDeiIm sorry for causing so much confusion me but thank you for taking up for me. At least I think that is what you were doing. LolPosted by daron76Contradiction I was referring to can be found in your original post; not the one directed at me personally thus i happen to be implying diddly squat. You on the other hand, in a predictable fashion and in an effort of discrediting opposing view, chose to go the rout of insidious character assassination.Posted by DonumDeiSeeing as I only wrote 4 sentences and the first one was directed at your "saintly" self , I guess you are implying that I contradicted my self in the second sentence and the third, which, given those statements doesn't seem likely. Further, it is incumbent upon the OP to provided the details and context of their own story, not upon us the readers, to search all the forums and do research on the back story- which is why people keep asking for more information. Finally, if you want to label him evil based upon what you know, that is perfectly fine and as a valid an opinion as anyone else's. Criticizing others for not being privy to the same information you may or may not have and not offering an opinion until more info is provided , seems a bit much. This sort of hyper-reaction makes it seem like you may be prone to flying off the handle also-- much like someone else mentioned in this thread. Would be a shame if we levied judgment on you as a person based on this example, wouldn't it?Posted by daron76At least you have one thing right...I am infallible! Saintly even! My avi is the indisputable evidence of it. But I'm afraid my divinity isn't the subject of the discussion at hand.
Well, you may be the one person left on this earth to not have made a mistake but, for the rest of us human beings, it is a wonderful thing that we judge the behavior of each other on the totally of the circumstances and not just one person's version of events. Additionally, I did not rationalize his behavior- at all. On the contrary, I clearly stated (which you quote) that his statement was indefensible. Please try reading the things you quote fully before forming an opinion as to what they say.
What is, however, is, once again, justification of previously mentioned behavior by means of questioning OP's sincerity in addition to contradicting yourself within the first two sentences. While I do not advocate trusting blindly, all the context one will have presently at disposal, is the masses of posts OP has already created. I'm also afraid her side of the story is the only one that will remain unless her object of obsession joins the discussion.
With that said, considering this caps age (54 if my memory serves me correct) and the context OP provided thus far, his actions remain evil.
Furthermore, as you so eloquently stated, if you or whoever else chooses to cast whatever judgment upon my person, it does not rob me of my sleep for the only judgement I do care for is that of my loved ones. All of us are judged on a daily basis one way or another. *shrugs*
As far as it being incumbent upon the OP to provide the context, again, she already did. Never mind that most people don't even bother reading lengthy post (cue TLDR). Damned if you do; damned if you don't! Oh, and one more thing before I bounce...you read my comment regarding her previous posts as criticism?! Oh dear...
click to expand
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
Among many other mean things, But do you believe he or she means those thing they say or do they really say them to hurt you?
Now me, if I say something to you when I'm mad then it is true. I'm not just tying to hurt your feelings I'm being 100% honest.
But I'm honest with people 99.9% of the time.
Just some food for thought. ??