RamOfPeace
@RamOfPeace
10 Years1,000+ Posts
Comments: 379 · Posts: 2442 · Topics: 172
Patriarchal or matriarchal society?
You are on page out of 2 | Reverse Order
Neither. Both can go fuck themselves. I believe in social hierarchy. Helluva a lot better and less retarded since anyone can advance. I don't want women running my life and I don't want Alpha men trying to run another Alpha's life.
Posted by SensitiveBlues
I think women are generally wiser then men
By biology it' says women are a lot more emotional than men. But that doesn't make em wiser.
Posted by SensitiveBlues
Matriarchal societies aren't anti men it's just that women get to make many of the decisions!
This is healthy because women think of all men think of themselves
That is actually not true. I don't think you should make assumptions. Plenty of women who thought of themselves and did nothing but evil, for example- Queen Mary I of England, Magaret Thatcher (at least I think she was a bad leader), Empress Wu Zetian, Isabella I of Castile, Ranavalona I of Madagascar, Elizabeth Bathory. Must I go on?
Let's not forget. You need a man and a woman to make a baby. If men are nothing then there's no future except a mass population drop (which is great).
Posted by SensitiveBluesPosted by HellDoradoWell the future will tell
saying "women are everything" means that "men are nothing."
do the math.click to expand
The future won't tell anything when there's no one left alive to enjoy it. The solution to the mathematical equation.
Posted by SensitiveBluesPosted by Sn1p3r187Not in a decade or two!
Let's not forget. You need a man and a woman to make a baby. If men are nothing then there's no future except a mass population drop (which is great).
Scienceclick to expand
Not going to do you any well when there's no sperm to use when it's all gone. Or better yet someone destroys it, or even better- someone decides hell no and rebels against it. no men, no children, no future, we all die, peace reigns, and the life goes on.
Posted by starloverPosted by Sn1p3r187
Let's not forget. You need a man and a woman to make a baby. If men are nothing then there's no future except a mass population drop (which is great).
Who says men are nothing?click to expand
If women are "everything". Where does that leave men to be a part of that "everything". Implying that we are nothing when there's no space to be a part of everything. So pushed off to the side and treated like third class citizens or we are nothing and have no part of the society that someone envisions. Sorry but power stays in the hands of whoever can use it fairly and it won't be limited to sex.
Posted by SensitiveBluesPosted by HellDoradoHa-ha I love men but this is bs!Posted by SensitiveBlueswhy wait for the future? the past and present already prove the irrationality of your statements.Posted by HellDoradoWell the future will tell
saying "women are everything" means that "men are nothing."
do the math.
men and women evolved alongside one another. women to protect the eggs. men to protect the women. the truth is that women cannot protect themselves. thats not sexism. think about the vulnerability of a pregnant woman. why does everyone give up seats for the pregnant woman?
because they are weak. and thats not a bad thing.
Seriously! Women don't need men we want men!
Get with itclick to expand
Well if you want a future with people still walking the planet then you need men. What part of that doesn't click with you? Just like how you need to live, you need men or women just to have a future.
Posted by SensitiveBluesPosted by HellDoradoHa-ha I love men but this is bs!Posted by SensitiveBlueswhy wait for the future? the past and present already prove the irrationality of your statements.Posted by HellDoradoWell the future will tell
saying "women are everything" means that "men are nothing."
do the math.
men and women evolved alongside one another. women to protect the eggs. men to protect the women. the truth is that women cannot protect themselves. thats not sexism. think about the vulnerability of a pregnant woman. why does everyone give up seats for the pregnant woman?
because they are weak. and thats not a bad thing.
Seriously! Women don't need men we want men!
Get with itclick to expand
Well if you want a future with people still walking the planet then you need men. What part of that doesn't click with you? Just like how you need water to live, you need men or women just to have a future.
Posted by SensitiveBlues
Men are no longer needed to create sperm. Unfortunately
Actually yes they are. What proof do you have? Waiting...
Posted by tizianiPosted by JahliaAnd we have patriarchy to blame for thatPosted by Sn1p3r187Agreed. I'm really sick the selfless stereotype of women. It's just not true.Posted by SensitiveBlues
Matriarchal societies aren't anti men it's just that women get to make many of the decisions!
This is healthy because women think of all men think of themselves
That is actually not true. I don't think you should make assumptions. Plenty of women who thought of themselves and did nothing but evil, for example- Queen Mary I of England, Magaret Thatcher (at least I think she was a bad leader), Empress Wu Zetian, Isabella I of Castile, Ranavalona I of Madagascar, Elizabeth Bathory. Must I go on?click to expand
How can we blame a patriarchy for that? If anything is to blame it's royalty and no limitation of their powers at the time and what they could do.
That and the selfish decision to carry upon themselves that they could do whatever they want with their power because their royalty and you have to agree. Same behavior noted in men, the only thing that stopped them were armed uprisings, people stabbing them in the back, and the senate/congress/council removing them of their power.
Posted by HellDoradoPosted by SensitiveBluesdont tell me to calm down. you're the one who is thinking with her emotions, not me.Posted by HellDoradoLooooool that's kind of true! But men are needed to change the lightbulb.Posted by SensitiveBluesyou dont love men, you love dick.Posted by HellDoradoHa-ha I love men but this is bs!Posted by SensitiveBlueswhy wait for the future? the past and present already prove the irrationality of your statements.Posted by HellDoradoWell the future will tell
saying "women are everything" means that "men are nothing."
do the math.
men and women evolved alongside one another. women to protect the eggs. men to protect the women. the truth is that women cannot protect themselves. thats not sexism. think about the vulnerability of a pregnant woman. why does everyone give up seats for the pregnant woman?
because they are weak. and thats not a bad thing.
Seriously! Women don't need men we want men!
Get with it
if you loved men, you would never suggest that women dont need men.
Calm down.
Y'all be OK for a few more decades you're safeclick to expand
I don't think we should worry. I think this is just Magenta's troll account. Considering they have Blue in their name and they both follow the same idiotic principles.
Posted by JahliaPosted by Sn1p3r187Elaborate?Posted by tizianiPosted by JahliaAnd we have patriarchy to blame for thatPosted by Sn1p3r187Agreed. I'm really sick the selfless stereotype of women. It's just not true.Posted by SensitiveBlues
Matriarchal societies aren't anti men it's just that women get to make many of the decisions!
This is healthy because women think of all men think of themselves
That is actually not true. I don't think you should make assumptions. Plenty of women who thought of themselves and did nothing but evil, for example- Queen Mary I of England, Magaret Thatcher (at least I think she was a bad leader), Empress Wu Zetian, Isabella I of Castile, Ranavalona I of Madagascar, Elizabeth Bathory. Must I go on?
How can we blame a patriarchy for that? If anything is to blame it's royalty and no limitation of their powers at the time and what they could do.click to expand
Going on from the abuse of powers of other people over time. Those who are suddenly given a position of power don't exactly know what to do with said power especially when you're given the power of millions lives in your hand. Most of them get their poor examples from the people who led before them or from a ruler who happened to do poorly and they sought to correct and right the wrongs, bring something new to the table, or do exactly as I said above and go crazy with the amount of power they have or have the potential to gain. Some even do it out of restoration of dominant ideas or religious faith in the case of Queen Mary I of England so they follow their own example on how they should be handled or do what everyone else does and kill them. A patriarchy isn't to blame. It's simple ill will, good intentions gone bad, or a simply having so much power they don't know what to do with it and in the end the power controls them. It's comes down to nature vs nurture. Not patriarchy
Posted by tizianiPosted by Sn1p3r187That still takes place in a world where royalty is given power to rule by God, and in that narrative the ultimate expression of power and femininity is sacrifice and selflessness like Christ. Same thing in Hollywood scripts.Posted by tizianiPosted by JahliaAnd we have patriarchy to blame for thatPosted by Sn1p3r187Agreed. I'm really sick the selfless stereotype of women. It's just not true.Posted by SensitiveBlues
Matriarchal societies aren't anti men it's just that women get to make many of the decisions!
This is healthy because women think of all men think of themselves
That is actually not true. I don't think you should make assumptions. Plenty of women who thought of themselves and did nothing but evil, for example- Queen Mary I of England, Magaret Thatcher (at least I think she was a bad leader), Empress Wu Zetian, Isabella I of Castile, Ranavalona I of Madagascar, Elizabeth Bathory. Must I go on?
How can we blame a patriarchy for that? If anything is to blame it's royalty and no limitation of their powers at the time and what they could do.click to expand
If that was truly the case then I guess God gave Queen Mary I and Queen Elizabeth I and the current queen power not caring about sex because they had all those qualities?
Emotionally charged leaders make me raise my brow. Important decisions must be considered rationally. In any case, neither.
Posted by tizianiPosted by Sn1p3r187Well how you're going to separate hierarchy and the concept of "noblesse oblige" from royalty is going to be a neat trick, if you manage to pull that off.
That and the selfish decision to carry upon themselves that they could do whatever they want with their power because their royalty and you have to agree. Same behavior noted in men, the only thing that stopped them were armed uprisings, people stabbing them in the back, and the senate/congress/council removing them of their power.click to expand
I'm sorry Tiz i didn't get your question. Could you re-phrase that man?
Patriarchal
Way back when we started off as a matriarchal society. Once cattle started to be used as property and for trade, it turned patriarchal since men wanted all the goods and property they were getting from this trade to be passed down. If they didn't do that, they wouldnt be able to pass their property down to their kin. After that, the roles switched and females couldn't pass down property. Just a little history.
Personally, an egalitarian society sounds better than either.
Personally, an egalitarian society sounds better than either.
Posted by YourFavoriteDXPMemberAnd it's nothing without a woman
You idiots need to remember the legendary words of the late great James Brown.
"This is a man's world."
Posted by JahliaPosted by Sn1p3r187But patriarchy was the flawed and dangerous idea that they created. It was pervasive and it contaminated most, if not all aspects of society. Even if abuse of power is the root problem, the fact remains that patriarchy is the destructive and sexist institution that was created. So I think thaPosted by JahliaPosted by Sn1p3r187Elaborate?Posted by tizianiPosted by JahliaAnd we have patriarchy to blame for thatPosted by Sn1p3r187Agreed. I'm really sick the selfless stereotype of women. It's just not true.Posted by SensitiveBlues
Matriarchal societies aren't anti men it's just that women get to make many of the decisions!
This is healthy because women think of all men think of themselves
That is actually not true. I don't think you should make assumptions. Plenty of women who thought of themselves and did nothing but evil, for example- Queen Mary I of England, Magaret Thatcher (at least I think she was a bad leader), Empress Wu Zetian, Isabella I of Castile, Ranavalona I of Madagascar, Elizabeth Bathory. Must I go on?
How can we blame a patriarchy for that? If anything is to blame it's royalty and no limitation of their powers at the time and what they could do.
Going on from the abuse of powers of other people over time. Those who are suddenly given a position of power don't exactly know what to do with said power especially when you're given the power of millions lives in your hand. Most of them get their poor examples from the people who led before them or from a ruler who happened to do poorly and they sought to correct and right the wrongs, bring something new to the table, or do exactly as I said above and go crazy with the amount of power they have or have the potential to gain. Some even do it out of restoration of dominant ideas or religious faith in the case of Queen Mary I of England so they follow their own example on how they should be handled or do what everyone else does and kill them. A patriarchy isn't to blame. It's simple ill will, good intentions gone bad, or a simply having so much power they don't know what to do with it and in the end the power controls them. It's comes down to nature vs nurture. Not patriarchyclick to expand
@Jahlia Okay I see your point, but how is it the dangerous idea they created? How could it have been created? What influenced it to take spread? Why did no one throw an armed uprising at three of England's Queens? Maybe there was a never a law in place in Renaissance era England that stopped women from becoming Queens. Maybe you can say a patriarchy fell apart when you have Elizabeth I there to prove how great of a leader she is with her leadership skills matched second to none, same can be said about Elizabeth II. Dammit why am I on about England? Anyway yeah
Posted by Rambunctious76Posted by Sn1p3r187The list of male leaders who did just as much evil is twice as long. Let's start with the Roman Empire. Caligula, Nero...Posted by SensitiveBlues
Matriarchal societies aren't anti men it's just that women get to make many of the decisions!
This is healthy because women think of all men think of themselves
That is actually not true. I don't think you should make assumptions. Plenty of women who thought of themselves and did nothing but evil, for example- Queen Mary I of England, Magaret Thatcher (at least I think she was a bad leader), Empress Wu Zetian, Isabella I of Castile, Ranavalona I of Madagascar, Elizabeth Bathory. Must I go on?
On the one hand you have Elizabeth Bathory, on the other you have Gilles de Rais.click to expand
Why the hell does it matter? Evil is evil. It doesn't matter how great it is or how long it is. The fact remains they were terrible leaders and the women in charge are no different than men when it comes to screwing up or being tyrannical monsters.
Posted by tizianiPosted by Sn1p3r187Let's say you have a society based on hierarchy like you want. How are you going to make sure the people at the very top of your hierarchy don't abuse their power? Or that anyone from below doesn't suddenly come into power themselves? That's a natural risk of hierarchy.Posted by tizianiPosted by Sn1p3r187Well how you're going to separate hierarchy and the concept of "noblesse oblige" from royalty is going to be a neat trick, if you manage to pull that off.
That and the selfish decision to carry upon themselves that they could do whatever they want with their power because their royalty and you have to agree. Same behavior noted in men, the only thing that stopped them were armed uprisings, people stabbing them in the back, and the senate/congress/council removing them of their power.
I'm sorry Tiz i didn't get your question. Could you re-phrase that man?click to expand
There's no honest way to make sure no one does abuse their power but putting them through peer evaluation and limiting over just exactly what they have power over via checks and balances is a good way to limit the power abuse. And you can always engrave something in stone that says "this shit has to get by a council of ten people before it can be passed" which can guarantee that there won't be an override of power from the top. If the council don't approve then it's not happening. For below, they could always go through a process that puts them in line as a successor to the top dog via evaluation of their leadership skills and what they can handle. Damn I think I just described U.S congress lol
Posted by Scenic
Way back when we started off as a matriarchal society. Once cattle started to be used as property and for trade, it turned patriarchal since men wanted all the goods and property they were getting from this trade to be passed down. If they didn't do that, they wouldnt be able to pass their property down to their kin. After that, the roles switched and females couldn't pass down property. Just a little history.
Personally, an egalitarian society sounds better than either.
Uh huh. What proof do you have?
Posted by tizianiPosted by Sn1p3r187As you said, there's a lot of dishonesty in that in reality. The law in countries that have a parliament or congress is built to be exploited through loopholes. Effectively it's not really hierarchy in it's purest form.Posted by tizianiPosted by Sn1p3r187Let's say you have a society based on hierarchy like you want. How are you going to make sure the people at the very top of your hierarchy don't abuse their power? Or that anyone from below doesn't suddenly come into power themselves? That's a natural risk of hierarchy.Posted by tizianiPosted by Sn1p3r187Well how you're going to separate hierarchy and the concept of "noblesse oblige" from royalty is going to be a neat trick, if you manage to pull that off.
That and the selfish decision to carry upon themselves that they could do whatever they want with their power because their royalty and you have to agree. Same behavior noted in men, the only thing that stopped them were armed uprisings, people stabbing them in the back, and the senate/congress/council removing them of their power.
I'm sorry Tiz i didn't get your question. Could you re-phrase that man?
There's no honest way to make sure no one does abuse their power but putting them through peer evaluation and limiting over just exactly what they have power over via checks and balances is a good way to limit the power abuse. And you can always engrave something in stone that says "this shit has to get by a council of ten people before it can be passed" which can guarantee that there won't be an override of power from the top. If the council don't approve then it's not happening. For below, they could always go through a process that puts them in line as a successor to the top dog via evaluation of their leadership skills and what they can handle. Damn I think I just described U.S congress lolclick to expand
But it's good enough that it works better than matriarchy or patriarchy. So why not let society stick with it,
Posted by tiziani
I'd have to disagree. Look at in in practice, where the law spends more time workings for criminals than working against them lol. It's clear "good enough" just isn't good enough imo.
That's not always the case. The Checks and balances have to be very heavy and everything would need to be micromanaged to work properly. France ain't too bad. They don't seem corrupt there,
Posted by YourFavoriteDXPMemberNo faxtural. It's the rest of the lyrics.Posted by ListenlearnteachHmmm, maybe....Posted by YourFavoriteDXPMemberAnd it's nothing without a woman
You idiots need to remember the legendary words of the late great James Brown.
"This is a man's world."click to expand
Posted by ListenlearnteachFactualPosted by YourFavoriteDXPMemberNo faxtural. It's the rest of the lyrics.Posted by ListenlearnteachHmmm, maybe....Posted by YourFavoriteDXPMemberAnd it's nothing without a woman
You idiots need to remember the legendary words of the late great James Brown.
"This is a man's world."click to expand
Posted by tizianiPosted by Sn1p3r187Fair point.Posted by tiziani
I'd have to disagree. Look at in in practice, where the law spends more time workings for criminals than working against them lol. It's clear "good enough" just isn't good enough imo.
That's not always the case. The Checks and balances have to be very heavy and everything would need to be micromanaged to work properly. France ain't too bad. They don't seem corrupt there,click to expand
I know from experience. I could live anywhere else in Europe, it'd either be France, Scotland, England, or Switzerland
*If I could live anywhere else.
*puts the popcorn bowl aside*
We have a wise saying in Russia that goes something like "Man is the head, and woman is the neck", yet it is still traditoinally interpreted as patriarchal model of a man being the leader and provider, while woman keeps the hearth. In a way, Slav women let their men lead the way, but in such a way that if we need something done our way, we let men believe that it's them who are in charge. We don't practice range shooting at the male ego in public, nor even 1 to 1. It's an art of female subtlety of suggestion.
In biological and lengthy historical sense, it is the way to go.
As far as USA goes, I'd love to see it revert back to something close of the 60s society model, with perhaps some modernized concepts here and there.
Female dominance is a pretty disgusting concept, unless you're serious, and planning to go all the way and do the Mr(s) Jenner thang to solidify the statement.
We have a wise saying in Russia that goes something like "Man is the head, and woman is the neck", yet it is still traditoinally interpreted as patriarchal model of a man being the leader and provider, while woman keeps the hearth. In a way, Slav women let their men lead the way, but in such a way that if we need something done our way, we let men believe that it's them who are in charge. We don't practice range shooting at the male ego in public, nor even 1 to 1. It's an art of female subtlety of suggestion.
In biological and lengthy historical sense, it is the way to go.
As far as USA goes, I'd love to see it revert back to something close of the 60s society model, with perhaps some modernized concepts here and there.
Female dominance is a pretty disgusting concept, unless you're serious, and planning to go all the way and do the Mr(s) Jenner thang to solidify the statement.
Posted by Sn1p3r187Proof? It's history. Just look it upPosted by Scenic
Way back when we started off as a matriarchal society. Once cattle started to be used as property and for trade, it turned patriarchal since men wanted all the goods and property they were getting from this trade to be passed down. If they didn't do that, they wouldnt be able to pass their property down to their kin. After that, the roles switched and females couldn't pass down property. Just a little history.
Personally, an egalitarian society sounds better than either.
Uh huh. What proof do you have?click to expand
Posted by tizianiActually no, most hung up people like that are predominantly feminist women in modern matriarchal USA.Posted by GreyWizThose people are hung up, in a patriarchal society.......
I can accept some women rulers who possess that great leadership ability or society can accept a women with great yang energy. However my default positions would still be patriarchy. it is much more natural and has lot more power behind it from multiple places. social acceptance of that woman will be tough though even from women. most people are so hung up on complete equality.
click to expand
Posted by ScenicPosted by Sn1p3r187Proof? It's history. Just look it upPosted by Scenic
Way back when we started off as a matriarchal society. Once cattle started to be used as property and for trade, it turned patriarchal since men wanted all the goods and property they were getting from this trade to be passed down. If they didn't do that, they wouldnt be able to pass their property down to their kin. After that, the roles switched and females couldn't pass down property. Just a little history.
Personally, an egalitarian society sounds better than either.
Uh huh. What proof do you have?click to expand
Uh no. You either provide proof in the form of link or video or point is invalid.
Posted by tizianiIt used to be. With every passing year that I live here, it gets more and more matriarchal. And I mean I have something to compare it with, being raised in both soceities for approx 50% of my lifetime in each, at this point in time.Posted by RamOfPeaceAgain, no... that is a patriarchal society.Posted by tizianiActually no, most hung up people like that are predominantly feminist women in modern matriarchal USA.Posted by GreyWizThose people are hung up, in a patriarchal society.......
I can accept some women rulers who possess that great leadership ability or society can accept a women with great yang energy. However my default positions would still be patriarchy. it is much more natural and has lot more power behind it from multiple places. social acceptance of that woman will be tough though even from women. most people are so hung up on complete equality.
click to expand
Posted by Sn1p3r187On my phone. If you want to learn you can do it yourself. I didn't make this post for you.Posted by ScenicPosted by Sn1p3r187Proof? It's history. Just look it upPosted by Scenic
Way back when we started off as a matriarchal society. Once cattle started to be used as property and for trade, it turned patriarchal since men wanted all the goods and property they were getting from this trade to be passed down. If they didn't do that, they wouldnt be able to pass their property down to their kin. After that, the roles switched and females couldn't pass down property. Just a little history.
Personally, an egalitarian society sounds better than either.
Uh huh. What proof do you have?
Uh no. You either provide proof in the form of link or video or point is invalid.click to expand
i like patriarchial society but hopefully the men who are leaders are good men. not corrupt and cruel.
i like that type of society because i like protection. Good, strong men can protect.
while women nurture and care-giving.
i like that type of society because i like protection. Good, strong men can protect.
while women nurture and care-giving.
Posted by tizianiWell okay then, shoot and compare the two lol. I'd like to see.Posted by RamOfPeaceLolPosted by tizianiIt used to be. With every passing year that I live here, it gets more and more matriarchal. And I mean I have something to compare it with, being raised in both soceities for approx 50% of my lifetime in each, at this point in time.Posted by RamOfPeaceAgain, no... that is a patriarchal society.Posted by tizianiActually no, most hung up people like that are predominantly feminist women in modern matriarchal USA.Posted by GreyWizThose people are hung up, in a patriarchal society.......
I can accept some women rulers who possess that great leadership ability or society can accept a women with great yang energy. However my default positions would still be patriarchy. it is much more natural and has lot more power behind it from multiple places. social acceptance of that woman will be tough though even from women. most people are so hung up on complete equality.
you're comparing patriarchy vs patriarchy.
There's no logic in looking at years/centuries of patriarchy, identifying a few things about it that you don't like and saying "well this must be what matriarchy tastes like."
You'd have to actual look at the evidence of what a matriarchal society actually is like from the ground up. Like in regions of India or China that have been that way for millenia.click to expand
Posted by cuteboyI haven't met a more pretentious, feather-ruffling beta in my life tbh.
Matriarchal probably i dunno. whatever those two words mean.
you could have suspect DonJohnson to derail this topic if not for him being banned.
Posted by ScenicPosted by Sn1p3r187On my phone. If you want to learn you can do it yourself. I didn't make this post for you.Posted by ScenicPosted by Sn1p3r187Proof? It's history. Just look it upPosted by Scenic
Way back when we started off as a matriarchal society. Once cattle started to be used as property and for trade, it turned patriarchal since men wanted all the goods and property they were getting from this trade to be passed down. If they didn't do that, they wouldnt be able to pass their property down to their kin. After that, the roles switched and females couldn't pass down property. Just a little history.
Personally, an egalitarian society sounds better than either.
Uh huh. What proof do you have?
Uh no. You either provide proof in the form of link or video or point is invalid.click to expand
and your points been rendered. Thank you for registering but your validity of your statement balance is 0.
Posted by tiziani
Yeah, well I was also thinking about the Chinese Mosuo tribe where women take a different man to bed every night. Like a big swingers club. It's amazing. No more jealous manlets and no bitter women. Both of the excuses and resentment you're highlighting from either gender in a system that still sees only bi-gender relations is a product of patriarchy as we've experienced it. Let's face it, when any section of society is made out to be helpless and passive then they are absolved of responsiblity and make excuses. The best example was that thread in relationships lately over Germany and legal sex workers. The hypocrisy was comical.
a bunch a swingers? Jesus I bet herpes and sysphilis were running rampant among their tribe.
Posted by Sn1p3r187good for you?Posted by ScenicPosted by Sn1p3r187On my phone. If you want to learn you can do it yourself. I didn't make this post for you.Posted by ScenicPosted by Sn1p3r187Proof? It's history. Just look it upPosted by Scenic
Way back when we started off as a matriarchal society. Once cattle started to be used as property and for trade, it turned patriarchal since men wanted all the goods and property they were getting from this trade to be passed down. If they didn't do that, they wouldnt be able to pass their property down to their kin. After that, the roles switched and females couldn't pass down property. Just a little history.
Personally, an egalitarian society sounds better than either.
Uh huh. What proof do you have?
Uh no. You either provide proof in the form of link or video or point is invalid.
and your points been rendered. Thank you for registering but your validity of your statement balance is 0.click to expand
Posted by tizianiPosted by Sn1p3r187I really doubt it.Posted by tiziani
Yeah, well I was also thinking about the Chinese Mosuo tribe where women take a different man to bed every night. Like a big swingers club. It's amazing. No more jealous manlets and no bitter women. Both of the excuses and resentment you're highlighting from either gender in a system that still sees only bi-gender relations is a product of patriarchy as we've experienced it. Let's face it, when any section of society is made out to be helpless and passive then they are absolved of responsiblity and make excuses. The best example was that thread in relationships lately over Germany and legal sex workers. The hypocrisy was comical.
a bunch a swingers? Jesus I bet herpes and sysphilis were running rampant among their tribe.click to expand
Why? Jesus when you swing with that many people you're increasing the probability of catching an STD. Id really think there were some people with STDs and they just made it worse.
Posted by GreyWiz
aww cap guy and pisces girl fight. cute.
Hardly a fight. More of someone not wanting present evidence because theyre trying really hard to back up their idea by making someone go in loopholes instead obliging a simple request- show me a link or video and I will consider your point.
Posted by Sn1p3r187I haven't tried to back up my claim at all and I don't intend to. I didn't post it to argue over it. if you don't agree with it then I don't care. I didn't post it for you to agree withPosted by GreyWiz
aww cap guy and pisces girl fight. cute.
Hardly a fight. More of someone not wanting present evidence because theyre trying really hard to back up their idea by making someone go in loopholes instead obliging a simple request- show me a link or video and I will consider your point.click to expand
Posted by Sn1p3r187Since I am all in favor of old school patriarchy, I'd have to support the Cap's message 😄Posted by GreyWiz
aww cap guy and pisces girl fight. cute.
Hardly a fight. More of someone not wanting present evidence because theyre trying really hard to back up their idea by making someone go in loopholes instead obliging a simple request- show me a link or video and I will consider your point.click to expand
In reality tho, he's correct in a logical sense. If you have no personal experience or the main source to back up your words, you'd just better remain silent and observe.
Posted by RamOfPeaceno thanksPosted by Sn1p3r187Since I am all in favor of old school patriarchy, I'd have to support the Cap's message 😄Posted by GreyWiz
aww cap guy and pisces girl fight. cute.
Hardly a fight. More of someone not wanting present evidence because theyre trying really hard to back up their idea by making someone go in loopholes instead obliging a simple request- show me a link or video and I will consider your point.
In reality tho, he's correct in a logical sense. If you have no personal experience or the main source to back up your words, you'd just better remain silent and observe.click to expand
Posted by GreyWizThanks, I will gladly accept your hugs
*hugs scenic*
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →Related Topics
I don't know what to think about this or what to feel. Thoughts anyone?
Spent eve with immediate family.. I have no friends left because I isolated myself due to money issues and ignored them. So I sent happy new year text and received no response.
For washing your dishes before they used them? To a lesser extent, would you be upset? :(
They keep telling me what to do!!! :(
I'm relatively new and I want to get to know you all better. Name: Age: Country & timezone: And if you want you can tell me a little about yourself, what you're interested in, anything you wanna share, your signs, fav food, anything!
For the curious, top article off google search: http://www.alternet.org/story/154970/5_countries_that_do_it_better%3A_how_sexual_prudery_makes_america_a_less_healthy_and_happy_place
He wants to see yours and you ask to see his and he refuses. He guards his phone like a hawk, takes.it into the bathroom when he goes. Turns it off when im over. Claims we are in a relationship? Im peeping game here. Is this guy yanking my chain
Especially, RumiLove, Elllesque, FrenchKapricorn, LadyNeptune, Gobshite, BlackMamba (cheer up girl, he sin't wort it), GreenTea, SirHorns, YourfavoriteDXPguy, Incandescent, and the rest of you! ♥♥♥♥
I got yellow limecrime lip stick and libran zodiac glitter and some singlets from Bae, mum got me a makeup bag with shimmers (though the label says that they're flammable) babes little brother got me a ps4 game final fantasy bless his cotton socks, I also
has led to bs like this. Right after San Bernardino, I was seeing a slew of scary, redneck thinking throughout article comment sections and my own Facebook newsfeed. People insisting on taking matters into their own hands since they felt that we didn't re
Share your fun holiday memories! :) I was just remembering me and my husband's first Christmas together. We bought eachother not only the same thing, a dayplanner for the coming year.. it was the *exact* same one in the exact same color! We each opened
What should I do whenever I see their names on FB? It's bothering me sometimes. @_@
I just don't care about them. I occasionally watch tv but don't know people's names. I didn't even know Kim Kardashian had her baby until 2 days ago. I didn't watch miss whatever the heck it was where they announced the name wrong. I don't even know s
Mine is "Cheerleader" by Omi. I love it! What's yours? :)
These articles got me thinking about it- http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/sep/04/why-are-the-baby-boomers-desperate-to-make-us-millennials-hate-ourselves http://www.salon.com/2014/10/20/baby_boomers_ruined_america_why_blaming_millennials_
Burn... They were together 6 years. Married 6 months and went to basic at Ft. Jackson and Ft. Benning. I knew her husband and was there with him at Ft. Benning. He is very peaceful and calm even now not too angry about the situation but is filing for
do you judge his house, car, the way he dresses, if it looks like he has money? if he is messy or neat? what if he is a great and fun guy? how important are the material things etc? i've dated some great guys that were a mess and some perfectionists with
go on a date. guy is 35 and he has his own place with tupac biggie posters thumbtacked to his wall and shoes everywhere. looks like a man cave or college dorm. a guy i work with is 45, lives down by the university with a bunch of guys, doesn't own a car,
Also, let's pretend we are not going to be talking about Muslim extremism of patriarchy.
So, which one would you prefer to live in?
Which type of household would you rather accept?