ein_da_piscas
@ein_da_piscas
1 Year
Comments: 21 · Posts: 54 · Topics: 0

Posted by ein_da_piscasPosted by Bluemoon86Fight back against what? Fight the BS? Are they 'taking back their home'? The Canaanites—ancestors of modern Palestinians—were the owners of the land long before the Jewish people established Israel. They were eventually displaced from their land, and it became Israel.Posted by PilatesBod
I also have no idea who Hasan Piker is. He has 1.7 million followers on IG. Erika Kirk has 6.6 million.
Right wing is much more susceptible to propaganda and political misinformation of ‘influencers’. Even Dean Withers who I do know of only has 3 million. And Destiny has 300k. Charlie Kirk had 13.8 million on IG alone.
I do not think the Right wing is more susceptible. However, I do believe in the Horseshoe theory.
click to expand
Based on that history, it looks more like this: after the Greeks removed the Israelites, the original owners took the land back from the Greeks. Then, the 'second owners' returned to take it from the original owners again. This cycle suggests a pattern of 'steal, then defend what was stolen.' The Arab nations are simply helping the original owners reclaim what is theirs.
What is Palestine? Palestine has existed since at least 800 BCE, referred to as 'Palashtu' and later 'Palaistinē' by the Ancient Greeks, eventually becoming 'Syria Palaestina.'
On November 15, 1988, many countries across Asia, Africa, and the Middle East recognized Palestine immediately. Furthermore, on November 29, 2012, the United Nations General Assembly passed Resolution 67/19. This upgraded Palestine’s status from a 'Non-member observer entity' to a 'Non-member observer state.' This is a crucial distinction: while not yet a 'Full Member' (which requires Security Council approval), the resolution effectively recognized Palestine as a sovereign state under international law, allowing it to join the International Criminal Court (ICC) and sign international treaties.
What other arguments can you bring? The past shows the land was taken from the ancient Palestinians/Canaanites, so the current occupants aren't the original owners. The present confirms they aren't the rightful owners either. So, what’s next—the future? From its origins, this is wrong. From the way it was taken—using foreign-controlled such as US populations and false flags—it is wrong. What justification is left to try and make this wrong look right?
And stop talking about 'Muslim domination.' Just because people convert to Islam in various countries, does that mean Muslims 'dominate' the world? That’s an absurd logic. By that standard, you would have to say Christians dominate the world because they are in every country. It's a double standard. Enough already; I can’t stand this level of ignorance."click to expand





Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
Fight back against what? Fight the BS? Are they 'taking back their home'? The Canaanites—ancestors of modern Palestinians—were the owners of the land long before the Jewish people established Israel. They were eventually displaced from their land, and it became Israel.
Based on that history, it looks more like this: after the Greeks removed the Israelites, the original owners took the land back from the Greeks. Then, the 'second owners' returned to take it from the original owners again. This cycle suggests a pattern of 'steal, then defend what was stolen.' The Arab nations are simply helping the original owners reclaim what is theirs.
What is Palestine? Palestine has existed since at least 800 BCE, referred to as 'Palashtu' and later 'Palaistinē' by the Ancient Greeks, eventually becoming 'Syria Palaestina.'
On November 15, 1988, many countries across Asia, Africa, and the Middle East recognized Palestine immediately. Furthermore, on November 29, 2012, the United Nations General Assembly passed Resolution 67/19. This upgraded Palestine’s status from a 'Non-member observer entity' to a 'Non-member observer state.' This is a crucial distinction: while not yet a 'Full Member' (which requires Security Council approval), the resolution effectively recognized Palestine as a sovereign state under international law, allowing it to join the International Criminal Court (ICC) and sign international treaties.
What other arguments can you bring? The past shows the land was taken from the ancient Palestinians/Canaanites, so the current occupants aren't the original owners. The present confirms they aren't the rightful owners either. So, what’s next—the future? From its origins, this is wrong. From the way it was taken—using foreign-controlled such as US populations and false flags—it is wrong. What justification is left to try and make this wrong look right?
And stop talking about 'Muslim domination.' Just because people convert to Islam in various countries, does that mean Muslims 'dominate' the world? That’s an absurd logic. By that standard, you would have to say Christians dominate the world because they are in every country. It's a double standard. Enough already; I can’t stand this level of ignorance."