" Come on, do you think someone actually "revel" in his'/her's sun sign reputation? That's a tad bit laughable. "
Thatz not the image quite. I think itz viewed as a fundamentally strong sign but not "dangerous". I think itz like extrapolating that if one is powerful than one can potentially be dangerous if annoyed.
That's not quite the point I was getting at-I doubt anyone actually wakes up in the morning and goes "Ohh, I was born between october 24 and november 22, KICKASS!"
I think itz like extrapolating that if one is powerful than one can potentially be dangerous if annoyed.
Well put.
But maybe it's just me but I'd prefer signs to be known more for positive qualities. For instance, Cancer females are sometimes known to be 'flaky' & 'emotional' but I'd rather they to be known as "nurturers".
That's often been the case with me. Often times, it's been Cancer females who have been generous to me with their emotional support.
Likewise, many scorps seem to revell in their reputation for being dangerous. But I'd rather they take pride in their ability to fulfil their visions.
Yes, I know we ALL have our good and bad points but some signs actually seem to take pride in their bad points. And wanting to hurt others/revenge is ALWAYS a bad point.
Yama was that statement wrong as it was framed ?..OR U feel that the meaning/intent was off mark ?