Who Are Ya‘ll Voting For?

You are on page out of 3 | Reverse Order
Profile picture of Emhendo
E. M. Henderson
@Emhendo
8 Years1,000+ PostsCancer

Comments: 6961 · Posts: 3640 · Topics: 152
Posted by AcutelyUnaware
Voting for Trump even though he'll lose. Looking forward to the civil war that will follow.


These cowards won’t even fight for what’s going on I their household.. Ain’t gon be no damn civil war. Anybody walk outside with their pussy little pistols and sub machine guns, and watch how bad they get laughed back into the house…
Profile picture of Emhendo
E. M. Henderson
@Emhendo
8 Years1,000+ PostsCancer

Comments: 6961 · Posts: 3640 · Topics: 152
Posted by AcutelyUnaware
Posted by Emhendo
Posted by AcutelyUnaware
Voting for Trump even though he'll lose. Looking forward to the civil war that will follow.
These cowards won’t even fight for what’s going on I their household.. Ain’t gon be no damn civil war. Anybody walk outside with their pussy little pistols and sub machine guns, and watch how bad they get laughed back into the house…
click to expand

We've got more guns than you guys do....
click to expand



What guys?
Profile picture of Solo
100% ILLEGAL
@Solo
2 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 4658 · Posts: 1567 · Topics: 2
Could never support someone who tried to overturn shit. Each small incident like the haitian lies just adds onto it. He couldn't even disavow the threats.. and then again said that they were illegal immigrants (they're not illegal). They claim to care about the kids but don't care about school shootings, feeding children that need it, educating them. He gets shot at and everyone is supposed to feel sympathetic. It's backwards. He was doing okay in this little segment and then completely obliterates it by saying "we have to get over it, we have to move forward." Praying to god always sounds great because then you don't have to put any work in yourself. Well I asked God for it and they didn't change anything so it must be god's will. Fucking stupid.





Yes, the government has its issues, that doesn't mean someone gets to usurp head of state. Which is highly documented that he tried. Dumbasses and bots will say "if they really wanted to, they could've taken overthrown the government," which completely ignores the facts that failing at doing so is still an attempt. It ignores the facts of all of Trumps backchanneling and trying to figure out ways to bend the outcome to his will. His own administration denied his claims of widespread voter fraud. FOX settled their suit with Dominion because it was proven that FOX knew they were pushing unsubstantiated claims.

https://apnews.com/article/fox-news-dominion-lawsuit-trial-trump-2020-0ac71f75acfacc52ea80b3e747fb0afe

Here's the John Eastman memo.

https://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2021/images/09/20/eastman.memo.pdf

You can read the whole J6 report right here and see their supporting materials

https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 206th% 20Committee% 20Final% 20Report% 20and% 20Supporting% 20Materials% 20Collection/Final% 20Report/% 7B% 22pageSize% 22% 3A% 2250% 22% 2C% 22offset% 22% 3A% 220% 22% 7D

You have the option of downloading a neater PDF or reading plain text. It's under "Final Report" at the top.

At one point during the December 27th call in which Donoghue refuted President Trump’s fraud allegations, Donoghue recorded in handwritten notes a request President Trump made specifically to him and Acting Attorney General Rosen: “Just say the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Republican Congressmen.” 274 Donoghue explained: “[T]he Department had zero involvement in anyone’s political strategy,” and “he wanted us to say that it was corrupt.” 275 “We told him we were not going to do that.” 276 At the time, neither Rosen nor Donoghue knew the full extent to which Republican Congressmen, including Representative Scott Perry, were attempting to assist President Trump to overturn the election results.

This is just one small part that stands out to me.

There's insane amounts of fuckery.
Profile picture of Solo
100% ILLEGAL
@Solo
2 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 4658 · Posts: 1567 · Topics: 2
Posted by AcutelyUnaware
Posted by Solo
Could never support someone who tried to overturn shit. Each small incident like the haitian lies just adds onto it. He couldn't even disavow the threats.. and then again said that they were illegal immigrants (they're not illegal). They claim to care about the kids but don't care about school shootings, feeding children that need it, educating them. He gets shot at and everyone is supposed to feel sympathetic. It's backwards. He was doing okay in this little segment and then completely obliterates it by saying "we have to get over it, we have to move forward." Praying to god always sounds great because then you don't have to put any work in yourself. Well I asked God for it and they didn't change anything so it must be god's will. Fucking stupid.


Yes, the government has its issues, that doesn't mean someone gets to usurp head of state. Which is highly documented that he tried. Dumbasses and bots will say "if they really wanted to, they could've taken overthrown the government," which completely ignores the facts that failing at doing so is still an attempt. It ignores the facts of all of Trumps backchanneling and trying to figure out ways to bend the outcome to his will. His own administration denied his claims of widespread voter fraud. FOX settled their suit with Dominion because it was proven that FOX knew they were pushing unsubstantiated claims.
https://apnews.com/article/fox-news-dominion-lawsuit-trial-trump-2020-0ac71f75acfacc52ea80b3e747fb0afe
Here's the John Eastman memo.
https://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2021/images/09/20/eastman.memo.pdf
You can read the whole J6 report right here and see their supporting materials
https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 206th% 20Committee% 20Final% 20Report% 20and% 20Supporting% 20Materials% 20Collection/Final% 20Report/% 7B% 22pageSize% 22% 3A% 2250% 22% 2C% 22offset% 22% 3A% 220% 22% 7D
You have the option of downloading a neater PDF or reading plain text. It's under "Final Report" at the top.
At one point during the December 27th call in which Donoghue refuted President Trump’s fraud allegations, Donoghue recorded in handwritten notes a request President Trump made specifically to him and Acting Attorney General Rosen: “Just say the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Republican Congressmen.” 274 Donoghue explained: “[T]he Department had zero involvement in anyone’s political strategy,” and “he wanted us to say that it was corrupt.” 275 “We told him we were not going to do that.” 276 At the time, neither Rosen nor Donoghue knew the full extent to which Republican Congressmen, including Representative Scott Perry, were attempting to assist President Trump to overturn the election results.
This is just one small part that stands out to me.
There's insane amounts of fuckery.

Jan 6 was beautiful. I pissed a lot of people off because I sat on front of the TV and laughed my ass off watching the capital get stormed. I've been rooting the People to overthrow the government since I was a crybaby Democrat.
click to expand



Yeah, I agree it was beautiful when Ashli Babbitt got smoked. It's a shame she could only take 1 bullet. What a weakling.
Profile picture of Solo
100% ILLEGAL
@Solo
2 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 4658 · Posts: 1567 · Topics: 2
Posted by AcutelyUnaware
Posted by Solo
Posted by AcutelyUnaware
Posted by Solo
Could never support someone who tried to overturn shit. Each small incident like the haitian lies just adds onto it. He couldn't even disavow the threats.. and then again said that they were illegal immigrants (they're not illegal). They claim to care about the kids but don't care about school shootings, feeding children that need it, educating them. He gets shot at and everyone is supposed to feel sympathetic. It's backwards. He was doing okay in this little segment and then completely obliterates it by saying "we have to get over it, we have to move forward." Praying to god always sounds great because then you don't have to put any work in yourself. Well I asked God for it and they didn't change anything so it must be god's will. Fucking stupid.


Yes, the government has its issues, that doesn't mean someone gets to usurp head of state. Which is highly documented that he tried. Dumbasses and bots will say "if they really wanted to, they could've taken overthrown the government," which completely ignores the facts that failing at doing so is still an attempt. It ignores the facts of all of Trumps backchanneling and trying to figure out ways to bend the outcome to his will. His own administration denied his claims of widespread voter fraud. FOX settled their suit with Dominion because it was proven that FOX knew they were pushing unsubstantiated claims.
https://apnews.com/article/fox-news-dominion-lawsuit-trial-trump-2020-0ac71f75acfacc52ea80b3e747fb0afe
Here's the John Eastman memo.
https://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2021/images/09/20/eastman.memo.pdf
You can read the whole J6 report right here and see their supporting materials
https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 206th% 20Committee% 20Final% 20Report% 20and% 20Supporting% 20Materials% 20Collection/Final% 20Report/% 7B% 22pageSize% 22% 3A% 2250% 22% 2C% 22offset% 22% 3A% 220% 22% 7D
You have the option of downloading a neater PDF or reading plain text. It's under "Final Report" at the top.
At one point during the December 27th call in which Donoghue refuted President Trump’s fraud allegations, Donoghue recorded in handwritten notes a request President Trump made specifically to him and Acting Attorney General Rosen: “Just say the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Republican Congressmen.” 274 Donoghue explained: “[T]he Department had zero involvement in anyone’s political strategy,” and “he wanted us to say that it was corrupt.” 275 “We told him we were not going to do that.” 276 At the time, neither Rosen nor Donoghue knew the full extent to which Republican Congressmen, including Representative Scott Perry, were attempting to assist President Trump to overturn the election results.
This is just one small part that stands out to me.
There's insane amounts of fuckery.
Jan 6 was beautiful. I pissed a lot of people off because I sat on front of the TV and laughed my ass off watching the capital get stormed. I've been rooting the People to overthrow the government since I was a crybaby Democrat.
click to expand
Yeah, I agree it was beautiful when Ashli Babbitt got smoked. It's a shame she could only take 1 bullet. What a weakling.
click to expand

I give zero fucks about ashli babbit. Try harder libtard
click to expand



You don't care about anything and have no real opinions. That's why you're not worth listening to. You literally want a civil war. You don't care about the US at all. Nor anyone in it.



This is how you wanna end up? Dying while wearing a Trump flag? You realize this would be tons of people, right? Dead? On any "side."
Profile picture of Solo
100% ILLEGAL
@Solo
2 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 4658 · Posts: 1567 · Topics: 2
Posted by AcutelyUnaware
Posted by Emhendo
Posted by AcutelyUnaware
Posted by Emhendo
Posted by AcutelyUnaware
Voting for Trump even though he'll lose. Looking forward to the civil war that will follow.
These cowards won’t even fight for what’s going on I their household.. Ain’t gon be no damn civil war. Anybody walk outside with their pussy little pistols and sub machine guns, and watch how bad they get laughed back into the house…
click to expand
We've got more guns than you guys do....
click to expand
What guys?
click to expand

Republicans
click to expand



How many guns can you actually shoot at once? Two handguns? And do you think that they stopped making guns after yours? And do you think that just because "dems" tend to not make their weaponry their whole identity, that they don't have any or don't know how to use them? Such insanely ignorant statements all the time from you.
Profile picture of Solo
100% ILLEGAL
@Solo
2 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 4658 · Posts: 1567 · Topics: 2
Posted by AcutelyUnaware
Posted by Solo
Posted by AcutelyUnaware
Posted by Emhendo
Posted by AcutelyUnaware
Posted by Emhendo
Posted by AcutelyUnaware
Voting for Trump even though he'll lose. Looking forward to the civil war that will follow.
These cowards won’t even fight for what’s going on I their household.. Ain’t gon be no damn civil war. Anybody walk outside with their pussy little pistols and sub machine guns, and watch how bad they get laughed back into the house…
click to expand
We've got more guns than you guys do....
click to expand
What guys?
click to expand
Republicans
click to expand
How many guns can you actually shoot at once? Two handguns? And do you think that they stopped making guns after yours? And do you think that just because "dems" tend to not make their weaponry their whole identity, that they don't have any or don't know how to use them? Such insanely ignorant statements all the time from you.
click to expand

Tldr
click to expand



I know you can't handle 5 sentences. It's a lot for you.
Profile picture of Solo
100% ILLEGAL
@Solo
2 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 4658 · Posts: 1567 · Topics: 2
Posted by Argus


Myself! 🙌

Facetious aside, the degree of ppls commitment to work/vote against their own interests by propagating uniparties narrative never cease to astound me!


Green Party can't even win a congress seat. IIIIIIIFFFFFF this info on wiki is correct (it's not sourced), they've only won 3 State positions. They're most successful at local. Why don't they try hard for Congress positions where they can have more of a hand in things? Do you expect a Green to win when there's basically no National representation?
Profile picture of Solo
100% ILLEGAL
@Solo
2 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 4658 · Posts: 1567 · Topics: 2
Posted by AcutelyUnaware
Posted by Solo
Posted by AcutelyUnaware
Posted by Solo
Posted by AcutelyUnaware
Posted by Emhendo
Posted by AcutelyUnaware
Posted by Emhendo
Posted by AcutelyUnaware
Voting for Trump even though he'll lose. Looking forward to the civil war that will follow.
These cowards won’t even fight for what’s going on I their household.. Ain’t gon be no damn civil war. Anybody walk outside with their pussy little pistols and sub machine guns, and watch how bad they get laughed back into the house…
click to expand
We've got more guns than you guys do....
click to expand
What guys?
click to expand
Republicans
click to expand
How many guns can you actually shoot at once? Two handguns? And do you think that they stopped making guns after yours? And do you think that just because "dems" tend to not make their weaponry their whole identity, that they don't have any or don't know how to use them? Such insanely ignorant statements all the time from you.
click to expand
Tldr
click to expand
I know you can't handle 5 sentences. It's a lot for you.
click to expand

You handle about 2 inches. I've seen you play with yourself.
click to expand



😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Profile picture of Argus
TheGlitchWitch
@Argus
6 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 2714 · Posts: 2790 · Topics: 5
Posted by Solo
Posted by Argus

Myself! 🙌
Facetious aside, the degree of ppls commitment to work/vote against their own interests by propagating uniparties narrative never cease to astound me!

Green Party can't even win a congress seat. IIIIIIIFFFFFF this info on wiki is correct (it's not sourced), they've only won 3 State positions. They're most successful at local. Why don't they try hard for Congress positions where they can have more of a hand in things? Do you expect a Green to win when there's basically no National representation?
click to expand



Like I suggested many times before, instead of regurgitating same ol' bs (by now you genuinely sound like their foot soilder), how about, for once, you look into trully indipendant media outlets & see for yourself as to WHY it may be that they were allegedly not sooo successful! Could it possibly be that the pillar of democratic process, the shining beacon on the hill, our trusted democratic party has deployed every single, dirty trick (including but no limited to frivolous lawsuits in tageted attempts to drain thir funds) in the playbook to keep the green party off of the ballot. Several election cycles now!

Oh but look... https://www.jillstein2024ballotaccess.com/

simple search will show you current status in how many states green party did qualify for the ballot access. Seems pretty successful to me. But you want hear corporate media report on that, including your trusted APN!

Funny thing, though... i never said anything about the Green Party in my previous posts....



Profile picture of Solo
100% ILLEGAL
@Solo
2 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 4658 · Posts: 1567 · Topics: 2
Posted by Argus
Posted by Solo
Posted by Argus

Myself! 🙌
Facetious aside, the degree of ppls commitment to work/vote against their own interests by propagating uniparties narrative never cease to astound me!
Green Party can't even win a congress seat. IIIIIIIFFFFFF this info on wiki is correct (it's not sourced), they've only won 3 State positions. They're most successful at local. Why don't they try hard for Congress positions where they can have more of a hand in things? Do you expect a Green to win when there's basically no National representation?
click to expand

Like I suggested many times before, instead of regurgitating same ol' bs (by now you genuinely sound like their foot soilder), how about, for once, you look into trully indipendant media outlets & see for yourself as to WHY it may be that they were allegedly not sooo successful! Could it possibly be that the pillar of democratic process, the shining beacon on the hill, our trusted democratic party has deployed every single, dirty trick (including but no limited to frivolous lawsuits in tageted attempts to drain thir funds) in the playbook to keep the green party off of the ballot. Several election cycles now!

Oh but look... https://www.jillstein2024ballotaccess.com/

simple search will show you current status in how many states green party did qualify for the ballot access. Seems pretty successful to me. But you want hear corporate media report on that, including your trusted APN!

Funny thing, though... i never said anything about the Green Party in my previous posts....



click to expand



I'm a foot soldier of keeping the country out of someone like trumps hands mostly because of Jan 6th. Yeah, go figure. Lol. Do you realize that almost everything you say lines up with republican talking points? You're as much of a foot soldier as me. Uniparty, russia is a victim, and idk exactly what your opinion is on J6 but you obviously don't think Trump did anything wrong with his authoritarian attempt at a power grab. Or am I wrong? Because you say that there are other things to look into with it. Russia invaded Ukraine in this most recent thing so it's not defending itself.

Iirc and correct me if I'm wrong, you were a Stein supporter. Or are. You didnt say green party but you did say uniparty so basically proposing why hasn't a third party gained significant steam? Not gonna act like there's no political warfare but do you think theyre so successful that they can't manage 1? They can do it locally, sometimes at the state level but never for congress? I don't think I've ever seen third party stuff besides like high school. There's not 1 compelling candidate that could get a lot of grassroots steam? I'm not really buying that.
Profile picture of Soul
Soul
@Soul
10 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 2280 · Posts: 17009 · Topics: 110
Posted by Solo
Posted by Argus
Posted by Solo
Posted by Argus

Myself! 🙌
Facetious aside, the degree of ppls commitment to work/vote against their own interests by propagating uniparties narrative never cease to astound me!
Green Party can't even win a congress seat. IIIIIIIFFFFFF this info on wiki is correct (it's not sourced), they've only won 3 State positions. They're most successful at local. Why don't they try hard for Congress positions where they can have more of a hand in things? Do you expect a Green to win when there's basically no National representation?
click to expand
Like I suggested many times before, instead of regurgitating same ol' bs (by now you genuinely sound like their foot soilder), how about, for once, you look into trully indipendant media outlets & see for yourself as to WHY it may be that they were allegedly not sooo successful! Could it possibly be that the pillar of democratic process, the shining beacon on the hill, our trusted democratic party has deployed every single, dirty trick (including but no limited to frivolous lawsuits in tageted attempts to drain thir funds) in the playbook to keep the green party off of the ballot. Several election cycles now!
Oh but look... https://www.jillstein2024ballotaccess.com/
simple search will show you current status in how many states green party did qualify for the ballot access. Seems pretty successful to me. But you want hear corporate media report on that, including your trusted APN!
Funny thing, though... i never said anything about the Green Party in my previous posts....


click to expand

I'm a foot soldier of keeping the country out of someone like trumps hands mostly because of Jan 6th. Yeah, go figure. Lol. Do you realize that almost everything you say lines up with republican talking points? You're as much of a foot soldier as me. Uniparty, russia is a victim, and idk exactly what your opinion is on J6 but you obviously don't think Trump did anything wrong with his authoritarian attempt at a power grab. Or am I wrong? Because you say that there are other things to look into with it. Russia invaded Ukraine in this most recent thing so it's not defending itself.

Iirc and correct me if I'm wrong, you were a Stein supporter. Or are. You didnt say green party but you did say uniparty so basically proposing why hasn't a third party gained significant steam? Not gonna act like there's no political warfare but do you think theyre so successful that they can't manage 1? They can do it locally, sometimes at the state level but never for congress? I don't think I've ever seen third party stuff besides like high school. There's not 1 compelling candidate that could get a lot of grassroots steam? I'm not really buying that.
click to expand



Maybe Trump is the type of daddy you never had required to whip your white ass into shape. I mean have you ever thought of that? You hate him so bad, and why is that? Does he remind you of a daddy figure you never had that could actually whip your privilege white ass into shape?

These are questions the entire world needs to hear.
Profile picture of Solo
100% ILLEGAL
@Solo
2 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 4658 · Posts: 1567 · Topics: 2
Posted by Soul
Posted by Solo
Posted by Argus
Posted by Solo
Posted by Argus

Myself! 🙌
Facetious aside, the degree of ppls commitment to work/vote against their own interests by propagating uniparties narrative never cease to astound me!
Green Party can't even win a congress seat. IIIIIIIFFFFFF this info on wiki is correct (it's not sourced), they've only won 3 State positions. They're most successful at local. Why don't they try hard for Congress positions where they can have more of a hand in things? Do you expect a Green to win when there's basically no National representation?
click to expand
Like I suggested many times before, instead of regurgitating same ol' bs (by now you genuinely sound like their foot soilder), how about, for once, you look into trully indipendant media outlets & see for yourself as to WHY it may be that they were allegedly not sooo successful! Could it possibly be that the pillar of democratic process, the shining beacon on the hill, our trusted democratic party has deployed every single, dirty trick (including but no limited to frivolous lawsuits in tageted attempts to drain thir funds) in the playbook to keep the green party off of the ballot. Several election cycles now!
Oh but look... https://www.jillstein2024ballotaccess.com/
simple search will show you current status in how many states green party did qualify for the ballot access. Seems pretty successful to me. But you want hear corporate media report on that, including your trusted APN!
Funny thing, though... i never said anything about the Green Party in my previous posts....

click to expand
I'm a foot soldier of keeping the country out of someone like trumps hands mostly because of Jan 6th. Yeah, go figure. Lol. Do you realize that almost everything you say lines up with republican talking points? You're as much of a foot soldier as me. Uniparty, russia is a victim, and idk exactly what your opinion is on J6 but you obviously don't think Trump did anything wrong with his authoritarian attempt at a power grab. Or am I wrong? Because you say that there are other things to look into with it. Russia invaded Ukraine in this most recent thing so it's not defending itself.
Iirc and correct me if I'm wrong, you were a Stein supporter. Or are. You didnt say green party but you did say uniparty so basically proposing why hasn't a third party gained significant steam? Not gonna act like there's no political warfare but do you think theyre so successful that they can't manage 1? They can do it locally, sometimes at the state level but never for congress? I don't think I've ever seen third party stuff besides like high school. There's not 1 compelling candidate that could get a lot of grassroots steam? I'm not really buying that.
click to expand

Maybe Trump is the type of daddy you never had required to whip your white ass into shape. I mean have you ever thought of that? You hate him so bad, and why is that? Does he remind you of a daddy figure you never had that could actually whip your privilege white ass into shape?

These are questions the entire world needs to hear.
click to expand



L bait, brotha
Profile picture of Soul
Soul
@Soul
10 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 2280 · Posts: 17009 · Topics: 110
Posted by Solo
Posted by Soul
Posted by Solo
Posted by Argus
Posted by Solo
Posted by Argus

Myself! 🙌
Facetious aside, the degree of ppls commitment to work/vote against their own interests by propagating uniparties narrative never cease to astound me!
Green Party can't even win a congress seat. IIIIIIIFFFFFF this info on wiki is correct (it's not sourced), they've only won 3 State positions. They're most successful at local. Why don't they try hard for Congress positions where they can have more of a hand in things? Do you expect a Green to win when there's basically no National representation?
click to expand
Like I suggested many times before, instead of regurgitating same ol' bs (by now you genuinely sound like their foot soilder), how about, for once, you look into trully indipendant media outlets & see for yourself as to WHY it may be that they were allegedly not sooo successful! Could it possibly be that the pillar of democratic process, the shining beacon on the hill, our trusted democratic party has deployed every single, dirty trick (including but no limited to frivolous lawsuits in tageted attempts to drain thir funds) in the playbook to keep the green party off of the ballot. Several election cycles now!
Oh but look... https://www.jillstein2024ballotaccess.com/
simple search will show you current status in how many states green party did qualify for the ballot access. Seems pretty successful to me. But you want hear corporate media report on that, including your trusted APN!
Funny thing, though... i never said anything about the Green Party in my previous posts....

click to expand
I'm a foot soldier of keeping the country out of someone like trumps hands mostly because of Jan 6th. Yeah, go figure. Lol. Do you realize that almost everything you say lines up with republican talking points? You're as much of a foot soldier as me. Uniparty, russia is a victim, and idk exactly what your opinion is on J6 but you obviously don't think Trump did anything wrong with his authoritarian attempt at a power grab. Or am I wrong? Because you say that there are other things to look into with it. Russia invaded Ukraine in this most recent thing so it's not defending itself.
Iirc and correct me if I'm wrong, you were a Stein supporter. Or are. You didnt say green party but you did say uniparty so basically proposing why hasn't a third party gained significant steam? Not gonna act like there's no political warfare but do you think theyre so successful that they can't manage 1? They can do it locally, sometimes at the state level but never for congress? I don't think I've ever seen third party stuff besides like high school. There's not 1 compelling candidate that could get a lot of grassroots steam? I'm not really buying that.
click to expand
Maybe Trump is the type of daddy you never had required to whip your white ass into shape. I mean have you ever thought of that? You hate him so bad, and why is that? Does he remind you of a daddy figure you never had that could actually whip your privilege white ass into shape?
These are questions the entire world needs to hear.
click to expand

L bait, brotha
click to expand



You can say bait all you want. You won't deny it though. Simply because you can't. You are boxed in, and any answer you give will be the wrong answer. Politics 101. As much as you hate it, Trump is that daddy you never had. Tell me I'm wrong.
Profile picture of Argus
TheGlitchWitch
@Argus
6 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 2714 · Posts: 2790 · Topics: 5
Posted by Solo
Posted by Argus
Posted by Solo
Posted by Argus

Myself! 🙌
Facetious aside, the degree of ppls commitment to work/vote against their own interests by propagating uniparties narrative never cease to astound me!
Green Party can't even win a congress seat. IIIIIIIFFFFFF this info on wiki is correct (it's not sourced), they've only won 3 State positions. They're most successful at local. Why don't they try hard for Congress positions where they can have more of a hand in things? Do you expect a Green to win when there's basically no National representation?
click to expand
Like I suggested many times before, instead of regurgitating same ol' bs (by now you genuinely sound like their foot soilder), how about, for once, you look into trully indipendant media outlets & see for yourself as to WHY it may be that they were allegedly not sooo successful! Could it possibly be that the pillar of democratic process, the shining beacon on the hill, our trusted democratic party has deployed every single, dirty trick (including but no limited to frivolous lawsuits in tageted attempts to drain thir funds) in the playbook to keep the green party off of the ballot. Several election cycles now!
Oh but look... https://www.jillstein2024ballotaccess.com/
simple search will show you current status in how many states green party did qualify for the ballot access. Seems pretty successful to me. But you want hear corporate media report on that, including your trusted APN!
Funny thing, though... i never said anything about the Green Party in my previous posts....


click to expand

I'm a foot soldier of keeping the country out of someone like trumps hands mostly because of Jan 6th. Yeah, go figure. Lol. Do you realize that almost everything you say lines up with republican talking points? You're as much of a foot soldier as me. Uniparty, russia is a victim, and idk exactly what your opinion is on J6 but you obviously don't think Trump did anything wrong with his authoritarian attempt at a power grab. Or am I wrong? Because you say that there are other things to look into with it. Russia invaded Ukraine in this most recent thing so it's not defending itself.

Iirc and correct me if I'm wrong, you were a Stein supporter. Or are. You didnt say green party but you did say uniparty so basically proposing why hasn't a third party gained significant steam? Not gonna act like there's no political warfare but do you think theyre so successful that they can't manage 1? They can do it locally, sometimes at the state level but never for congress? I don't think I've ever seen third party stuff besides like high school. There's not 1 compelling candidate that could get a lot of grassroots steam? I'm not really buying that.
click to expand





”…. Trump did anything wrong with his authoritarian attempt at a power grab. Or am I wrong?”

I see you now became a psychic, too! You bet your ass you are wrong (more levels than one) but explaining myself to you is exercise in futility so I shan’t even attempt because calling out the truth wether on the local, national or global level is not what you want to hear!

What you want to hear is confirmation biases & in a bit of irony -friendly advise here- at this rate you are slowly becoming that which you claim to stand against!

Begs the question though as to why you act so defensive when alternatives to the establishment are presented? Why is it that am I yet see you cite any independent sources? Are you afraid that you may be proven wrong or experience potential cognitive dissonance? Rhetorical questions, of course so you needn’t waste energy on answering any of it!
Profile picture of Argus
TheGlitchWitch
@Argus
6 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 2714 · Posts: 2790 · Topics: 5
Also, @Solo, you can cut your hyperbolic bs out when asserting I said something I never did! Never did I argue, suggest or imply Russia was a victim! What I did do, however, is highlight our government's hypocrisy & dissemination of blatant lies in which our media is havily complicit. Sooo, you can take that statement and shove it where sun don’t shine!

This is not the first time you used that tactic but I guess it goes back to what I’ve observed earlier, that even unadulterated facts are now considered propaganda if it does not align with someone’s narrative!

How far we’ve come! 👍🏼



P.S.

While you cry about Trump, current VP is endorsed by THE biggest criminal of all Dick morherfucking Cheney! Lmao! Can’t make this shit up! Just lmao

But I’m the bad guy for proposing alternatives! Sure Jen!
Profile picture of Solo
100% ILLEGAL
@Solo
2 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 4658 · Posts: 1567 · Topics: 2
Posted by Argus
Also, @Solo, you can cut your hyperbolic bs out when asserting I said something I never did! Never did I argue, suggest or imply Russia was a victim! So you can take that statement and shove it where sun don’t shine!

This is not the first time you used that tactic but I guess it goes back to what I’ve observed earlier, that even unadulterated facts are now considered propaganda if it does not align with someone’s narrative!

How far we’ve come! 👍🏼


P.S.

While you cry about Trump, current VP is endorsed by THE biggest criminal of all Dick morherfucking Cheney! Lmao! Can’t make this shit up! Just lmao

But I’m the bad guy for proposing alternatives! Sure Jen!


"Thinking you are genuinely interested in a conversation, I then proceed to go a bit deeper into the topic of Russia as an additional example of how our government & its greatest ally media are heavily distorting our reality/perception. ----- this kinda looks like "Never did I argue, suggest or imply Russia was a victim!"

I then proceed to use North Stream pipeline explosion as evidence of how said event has been used to fear monger & portray Putin intentions as bloodthirsty imperialist who wants to conquer all of Europe and so we ( the US) must act or else while pumping billions into wars that have been artificially manufactured only to be accused of veering off the subject! What gives, son!?"

Nordstream Pipeline explosion was in September of 2022. 7 months after the Russian invasion started. Blaming it on him doens't matter after he already invaded. Well, nevermind, I won't say it doesn't matter but it's inconsequential at that point, no?

I see you now became a psychic, too! You bet your ass you are wrong (more levels than one) but explaining myself to you is exercise in futility so I shan’t even attempt because calling out the truth wether on the local, national or global level is not what you want to hear! ----- No, I didn't, that's why I asked if I was wrong. You refuse to engage with the J6 stuff and say what he did is up for debate? And it's not lol. Why do I have the feeling that you're thinking about "fed gave 'em the plan" or something of the like? Lemme know if I'm wrong.

What you want to hear is confirmation biases & in a bit of irony -friendly advise here- at this rate you are slowly becoming that which you claim to stand against!

Begs the question though as to why you act so defensive when alternatives to the establishment are presented? Why is it that am I yet see you cite any independent sources? Are you afraid that you may be proven wrong or experience potential cognitive dissonance? Rhetorical questions, of course so you needn’t waste energy on answering any of it!

You realize that I come from a military family, right? And that as much as I hate shit that goes on here, I will NEVER. EVER. EVER. pass over what Trump did by trying to take the presidency through cheating. You'd flip the fuck out tho if Biden/Harris tried that. I HIGHLY doubt you'd be so generous as to say "oh you need to look into it more." Have you even GLANCED through the J6 report? Or do you just think the entire thing and his fake electors being convicted and all that is all fake or false information?

This is not the first time you used that tactic but I guess it goes back to what I’ve observed earlier, that even unadulterated facts are now considered propaganda if it does not align with someone’s narrative! ----- you're literally claiming this with J6 and shit. Lol.

While you cry about Trump, current VP is endorsed by THE biggest criminal of all Dick morherfucking Cheney! Lmao! ----- Lmao first time around he supported the Republican nominee, who ended up being Trump. Then probably after J6, decided that's a no-go this time.

I've gotta laugh at you being disrespectful.

You wanna gamble with the Presidency against someone who tried cheating to win it. Completely wrong time to propose alternatives.

If you come at me like that again, I'm going to start being a lot less respectful.
Profile picture of Argus
TheGlitchWitch
@Argus
6 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 2714 · Posts: 2790 · Topics: 5
Posted by Solo
Posted by Argus
Also, @Solo, you can cut your hyperbolic bs out when asserting I said something I never did! Never did I argue, suggest or imply Russia was a victim! So you can take that statement and shove it where sun don’t shine!
This is not the first time you used that tactic but I guess it goes back to what I’ve observed earlier, that even unadulterated facts are now considered propaganda if it does not align with someone’s narrative!
How far we’ve come! 👍🏼

P.S.
While you cry about Trump, current VP is endorsed by THE biggest criminal of all Dick morherfucking Cheney! Lmao! Can’t make this shit up! Just lmao
But I’m the bad guy for proposing alternatives! Sure Jen!

"Thinking you are genuinely interested in a conversation, I then proceed to go a bit deeper into the topic of Russia as an additional example of how our government & its greatest ally media are heavily distorting our reality/perception. ----- this kinda looks like "Never did I argue, suggest or imply Russia was a victim!"

I then proceed to use North Stream pipeline explosion as evidence of how said event has been used to fear monger & portray Putin intentions as bloodthirsty imperialist who wants to conquer all of Europe and so we ( the US) must act or else while pumping billions into wars that have been artificially manufactured only to be accused of veering off the subject! What gives, son!?"

Nordstream Pipeline explosion was in September of 2022. 7 months after the Russian invasion started. Blaming it on him doens't matter after he already invaded. Well, nevermind, I won't say it doesn't matter but it's inconsequential at that point, no?

I see you now became a psychic, too! You bet your ass you are wrong (more levels than one) but explaining myself to you is exercise in futility so I shan’t even attempt because calling out the truth wether on the local, national or global level is not what you want to hear! ----- No, I didn't, that's why I asked if I was wrong. You refuse to engage with the J6 stuff and say what he did is up for debate? And it's not lol. Why do I have the feeling that you're thinking about "fed gave 'em the plan" or something of the like? Lemme know if I'm wrong.

What you want to hear is confirmation biases & in a bit of irony -friendly advise here- at this rate you are slowly becoming that which you claim to stand against!

Begs the question though as to why you act so defensive when alternatives to the establishment are presented? Why is it that am I yet see you cite any independent sources? Are you afraid that you may be proven wrong or experience potential cognitive dissonance? Rhetorical questions, of course so you needn’t waste energy on answering any of it!

You realize that I come from a military family, right? And that as much as I hate shit that goes on here, I will NEVER. EVER. EVER. pass over what Trump did by trying to take the presidency through cheating. You'd flip the fuck out tho if Biden/Harris tried that. I HIGHLY doubt you'd be so generous as to say "oh you need to look into it more." Have you even GLANCED through the J6 report? Or do you just think the entire thing and his fake electors being convicted and all that is all fake or false information?

This is not the first time you used that tactic but I guess it goes back to what I’ve observed earlier, that even unadulterated facts are now considered propaganda if it does not align with someone’s narrative! ----- you're literally claiming this with J6 and shit. Lol.

While you cry about Trump, current VP is endorsed by THE biggest criminal of all Dick morherfucking Cheney! Lmao! ----- Lmao first time around he supported the Republican nominee, who ended up being Trump. Then probably after J6, decided that's a no-go this time.

I've gotta laugh at you being disrespectful.

You wanna gamble with the Presidency against someone who tried cheating to win it. Completely wrong time to propose alternatives.

If you come at me like that again, I'm going to start being a lot less respectful.
click to expand



I'm not even gonna go into it beyond addressing the 1st paragraph in which you clearly demonstrate inability to hear beyond of that what you want to hear! I expressly stated I used Russia's case as an axample & by that account one could easily argue that, at least, 3/4 of the world is a victim to & of our foreign policies! I'm not gonna get galist into being so-called "russias apologist" by those who can't cope with facts. Tough tities!
Profile picture of Solo
100% ILLEGAL
@Solo
2 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 4658 · Posts: 1567 · Topics: 2
Posted by Argus
Posted by Solo
Posted by Argus
Also, @Solo, you can cut your hyperbolic bs out when asserting I said something I never did! Never did I argue, suggest or imply Russia was a victim! So you can take that statement and shove it where sun don’t shine!
This is not the first time you used that tactic but I guess it goes back to what I’ve observed earlier, that even unadulterated facts are now considered propaganda if it does not align with someone’s narrative!
How far we’ve come! 👍🏼

P.S.
While you cry about Trump, current VP is endorsed by THE biggest criminal of all Dick morherfucking Cheney! Lmao! Can’t make this shit up! Just lmao
But I’m the bad guy for proposing alternatives! Sure Jen!
"Thinking you are genuinely interested in a conversation, I then proceed to go a bit deeper into the topic of Russia as an additional example of how our government & its greatest ally media are heavily distorting our reality/perception. ----- this kinda looks like "Never did I argue, suggest or imply Russia was a victim!"
I then proceed to use North Stream pipeline explosion as evidence of how said event has been used to fear monger & portray Putin intentions as bloodthirsty imperialist who wants to conquer all of Europe and so we ( the US) must act or else while pumping billions into wars that have been artificially manufactured only to be accused of veering off the subject! What gives, son!?"
Nordstream Pipeline explosion was in September of 2022. 7 months after the Russian invasion started. Blaming it on him doens't matter after he already invaded. Well, nevermind, I won't say it doesn't matter but it's inconsequential at that point, no?
I see you now became a psychic, too! You bet your ass you are wrong (more levels than one) but explaining myself to you is exercise in futility so I shan’t even attempt because calling out the truth wether on the local, national or global level is not what you want to hear! ----- No, I didn't, that's why I asked if I was wrong. You refuse to engage with the J6 stuff and say what he did is up for debate? And it's not lol. Why do I have the feeling that you're thinking about "fed gave 'em the plan" or something of the like? Lemme know if I'm wrong.
What you want to hear is confirmation biases & in a bit of irony -friendly advise here- at this rate you are slowly becoming that which you claim to stand against!
Begs the question though as to why you act so defensive when alternatives to the establishment are presented? Why is it that am I yet see you cite any independent sources? Are you afraid that you may be proven wrong or experience potential cognitive dissonance? Rhetorical questions, of course so you needn’t waste energy on answering any of it!
You realize that I come from a military family, right? And that as much as I hate shit that goes on here, I will NEVER. EVER. EVER. pass over what Trump did by trying to take the presidency through cheating. You'd flip the fuck out tho if Biden/Harris tried that. I HIGHLY doubt you'd be so generous as to say "oh you need to look into it more." Have you even GLANCED through the J6 report? Or do you just think the entire thing and his fake electors being convicted and all that is all fake or false information?
This is not the first time you used that tactic but I guess it goes back to what I’ve observed earlier, that even unadulterated facts are now considered propaganda if it does not align with someone’s narrative! ----- you're literally claiming this with J6 and shit. Lol.
While you cry about Trump, current VP is endorsed by THE biggest criminal of all Dick morherfucking Cheney! Lmao! ----- Lmao first time around he supported the Republican nominee, who ended up being Trump. Then probably after J6, decided that's a no-go this time.
I've gotta laugh at you being disrespectful.
You wanna gamble with the Presidency against someone who tried cheating to win it. Completely wrong time to propose alternatives.
If you come at me like that again, I'm going to start being a lot less respectful.
click to expand

I'm not even gonna go into it beyond addressing the 1st paragraph in which you clearly demonstrate inability to hear beyond of that what you want to hear! I expressly stated I used Russia's case as an axample & by that account one could easily argue that, at least, 3/4 of the world is a victim to & of our foreign policies! I'm not gonna get galist into being so-called "russias apologist" by those who can't cope with facts. Tough tities!
click to expand



I think it's more that you can't.
Profile picture of Solo
100% ILLEGAL
@Solo
2 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 4658 · Posts: 1567 · Topics: 2
Posted by Stardustmopped
Honestly I think we’re fucked either way. We’re just treading water so we can pass the burden to future generations. Neither of their tax plans benefit me. I wish I saw what other people saw who claim to care about the economy.


When you say economy, what do you mean? Because for most people I feel like they just mean "I'm not getting paid enough"
Profile picture of Solo
100% ILLEGAL
@Solo
2 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 4658 · Posts: 1567 · Topics: 2
Posted by Stardustmopped
Posted by Solo
Posted by Stardustmopped
Honestly I think we’re fucked either way. We’re just treading water so we can pass the burden to future generations. Neither of their tax plans benefit me. I wish I saw what other people saw who claim to care about the economy.
When you say economy, what do you mean? Because for most people I feel like they just mean "I'm not getting paid enough"
click to expand

https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2024-09-13/trump-vs-harris-on-tax-policy-what-to-know
click to expand



Just want you to know that I've seen your reply. I'm gonna try to address everything that's running through my mind but I'm doing a lotta learning and shit so, y'know, bear with me.

Am I correct in that what you're actually saying when you say "the economy" - is that your purchasing power isn't the same as it used to be? That's the core of your thought?
Profile picture of Solo
100% ILLEGAL
@Solo
2 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 4658 · Posts: 1567 · Topics: 2
Posted by Saturn_Returns
The US economy is fucked either way.

Neither presidential candidate is preferable.

However, anyone who votes for the Democrats - a party that has spent the last four years worsening the state of the nation, and has resorted to so many dirty tricks and lies that goes AGAINST the spirit of democracy - is a fucking imbecile.

Oh, and anyone who's been swayed by a celebrity's opinion should have their right to vote fucking revoked. Immediately.


At one point during the December 27th call in which Donoghue refuted President Trump’s fraud allegations, Donoghue recorded in handwritten notes a request President Trump made specifically to him and Acting Attorney General Rosen: “Just say the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Republican Congressmen.”

Yes, it's the Democratic party that tried this. You can say those stupid talking points about the democratic party but we have the FEC so anyone can make a Party if they meet requirements and Harris got the delegates at the DNC which is where the actual nominee pick happens.

Trump is a blatant liar. So is Vance. Do you believe that Haitian immigrants are eating cats and dogs in Springfield, OH? Do you think a good president is one who can't even disavow the bomb and shooting threats?
Profile picture of Solo
100% ILLEGAL
@Solo
2 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 4658 · Posts: 1567 · Topics: 2
Posted by Saturn_Returns
Posted by Solo
Posted by Saturn_Returns
The US economy is fucked either way.
Neither presidential candidate is preferable.
However, anyone who votes for the Democrats - a party that has spent the last four years worsening the state of the nation, and has resorted to so many dirty tricks and lies that goes AGAINST the spirit of democracy - is a fucking imbecile.
Oh, and anyone who's been swayed by a celebrity's opinion should have their right to vote fucking revoked. Immediately.
At one point during the December 27th call in which Donoghue refuted President Trump’s fraud allegations, Donoghue recorded in handwritten notes a request President Trump made specifically to him and Acting Attorney General Rosen: “Just say the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Republican Congressmen.”
Yes, it's the Democratic party that tried this. You can say those stupid talking points about the democratic party but we have the FEC so anyone can make a Party if they meet requirements and Harris got the delegates at the DNC which is where the actual nominee pick happens.
Trump is a blatant liar. So is Vance. Do you believe that Haitian immigrants are eating cats and dogs in Springfield, OH? Do you think a good president is one who can't even disavow the bomb and shooting threats?
click to expand
As I said before, neither candidates are ideal choices.

However, if you're prepared to reinstate for a party that allowed a shady, senile old man to act as POTUS, you need your head checked.

Anyway, I have no desire to be drawn further into this 'discussion', as it's very clear that, just like in the UK, many voters are nothing but impressionable fools.

click to expand



Do you live in the UK or US because it's funny that you'd have such a strong opinion if you live in the UK? shady, senile old man to act as POTUS is literally Trump. Biden wouldn't be president this time around, it'd be Harris. You don't think you're one of those impressionable fools? Giving the presidency to a man that tried to overturn the election is a smart move? Lmao. Y'all would never give Biden or Harris or literally anyone else the same grace.
Profile picture of Solo
100% ILLEGAL
@Solo
2 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 4658 · Posts: 1567 · Topics: 2
Posted by Saturn_Returns
Posted by Solo
Posted by Saturn_Returns
The US economy is fucked either way.
Neither presidential candidate is preferable.
However, anyone who votes for the Democrats - a party that has spent the last four years worsening the state of the nation, and has resorted to so many dirty tricks and lies that goes AGAINST the spirit of democracy - is a fucking imbecile.
Oh, and anyone who's been swayed by a celebrity's opinion should have their right to vote fucking revoked. Immediately.
At one point during the December 27th call in which Donoghue refuted President Trump’s fraud allegations, Donoghue recorded in handwritten notes a request President Trump made specifically to him and Acting Attorney General Rosen: “Just say the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Republican Congressmen.”
Yes, it's the Democratic party that tried this. You can say those stupid talking points about the democratic party but we have the FEC so anyone can make a Party if they meet requirements and Harris got the delegates at the DNC which is where the actual nominee pick happens.
Trump is a blatant liar. So is Vance. Do you believe that Haitian immigrants are eating cats and dogs in Springfield, OH? Do you think a good president is one who can't even disavow the bomb and shooting threats?
click to expand
As I said before, neither candidates are ideal choices.

However, if you're prepared to reinstate for a party that allowed a shady, senile old man to act as POTUS, you need your head checked.

Anyway, I have no desire to be drawn further into this 'discussion', as it's very clear that, just like in the UK, many voters are nothing but impressionable fools.

click to expand



and you answered a resounding ZERO of my questions lol
Profile picture of Emhendo
E. M. Henderson
@Emhendo
8 Years1,000+ PostsCancer

Comments: 6961 · Posts: 3640 · Topics: 152
Posted by Soul
I'd rather swallow liquid glass then vote. That shits a fucking joke. I'd rather go down as the Capitan of my ship then spend a second with their dick down my throat. Anyone with a stump or that dumb bitch sign outside their house is a sad excuse for human. I'd rather be armend to the T for a better movement.


This stuck out the most to me…

Agh, Soul

You never fail to disappoint with your indifferent attitude and off the wall perspectives of the things
First
Previous
Next
Last