
E. M. Henderson
@Emhendo
8 Years1,000+ PostsCancer
Comments: 6961 · Posts: 3640 · Topics: 152




Posted by hydorah
I'm not american but I'm gonna slide into california as a refugee, just so they can give me a voting card, and I'm going to vote for trump. I don't like this moron, but I want to do it just to piss off the drama queens. Then I'm going back home, thanks but no thanks

Posted by AcutelyUnaware
Voting for Trump even though he'll lose. Looking forward to the civil war that will follow.

Posted by AcutelyUnawarePosted by EmhendoPosted by AcutelyUnawareThese cowards won’t even fight for what’s going on I their household.. Ain’t gon be no damn civil war. Anybody walk outside with their pussy little pistols and sub machine guns, and watch how bad they get laughed back into the house…
Voting for Trump even though he'll lose. Looking forward to the civil war that will follow.
click to expand
We've got more guns than you guys do....click to expand




Posted by AcutelyUnawarePosted by Solo
Could never support someone who tried to overturn shit. Each small incident like the haitian lies just adds onto it. He couldn't even disavow the threats.. and then again said that they were illegal immigrants (they're not illegal). They claim to care about the kids but don't care about school shootings, feeding children that need it, educating them. He gets shot at and everyone is supposed to feel sympathetic. It's backwards. He was doing okay in this little segment and then completely obliterates it by saying "we have to get over it, we have to move forward." Praying to god always sounds great because then you don't have to put any work in yourself. Well I asked God for it and they didn't change anything so it must be god's will. Fucking stupid.
Yes, the government has its issues, that doesn't mean someone gets to usurp head of state. Which is highly documented that he tried. Dumbasses and bots will say "if they really wanted to, they could've taken overthrown the government," which completely ignores the facts that failing at doing so is still an attempt. It ignores the facts of all of Trumps backchanneling and trying to figure out ways to bend the outcome to his will. His own administration denied his claims of widespread voter fraud. FOX settled their suit with Dominion because it was proven that FOX knew they were pushing unsubstantiated claims.
https://apnews.com/article/fox-news-dominion-lawsuit-trial-trump-2020-0ac71f75acfacc52ea80b3e747fb0afe
Here's the John Eastman memo.
https://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2021/images/09/20/eastman.memo.pdf
You can read the whole J6 report right here and see their supporting materials
https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 206th% 20Committee% 20Final% 20Report% 20and% 20Supporting% 20Materials% 20Collection/Final% 20Report/% 7B% 22pageSize% 22% 3A% 2250% 22% 2C% 22offset% 22% 3A% 220% 22% 7D
You have the option of downloading a neater PDF or reading plain text. It's under "Final Report" at the top.
At one point during the December 27th call in which Donoghue refuted President Trump’s fraud allegations, Donoghue recorded in handwritten notes a request President Trump made specifically to him and Acting Attorney General Rosen: “Just say the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Republican Congressmen.” 274 Donoghue explained: “[T]he Department had zero involvement in anyone’s political strategy,” and “he wanted us to say that it was corrupt.” 275 “We told him we were not going to do that.” 276 At the time, neither Rosen nor Donoghue knew the full extent to which Republican Congressmen, including Representative Scott Perry, were attempting to assist President Trump to overturn the election results.
This is just one small part that stands out to me.
There's insane amounts of fuckery.
Jan 6 was beautiful. I pissed a lot of people off because I sat on front of the TV and laughed my ass off watching the capital get stormed. I've been rooting the People to overthrow the government since I was a crybaby Democrat.click to expand

Posted by AcutelyUnawarePosted by SoloPosted by AcutelyUnawareYeah, I agree it was beautiful when Ashli Babbitt got smoked. It's a shame she could only take 1 bullet. What a weakling.Posted by SoloJan 6 was beautiful. I pissed a lot of people off because I sat on front of the TV and laughed my ass off watching the capital get stormed. I've been rooting the People to overthrow the government since I was a crybaby Democrat.
Could never support someone who tried to overturn shit. Each small incident like the haitian lies just adds onto it. He couldn't even disavow the threats.. and then again said that they were illegal immigrants (they're not illegal). They claim to care about the kids but don't care about school shootings, feeding children that need it, educating them. He gets shot at and everyone is supposed to feel sympathetic. It's backwards. He was doing okay in this little segment and then completely obliterates it by saying "we have to get over it, we have to move forward." Praying to god always sounds great because then you don't have to put any work in yourself. Well I asked God for it and they didn't change anything so it must be god's will. Fucking stupid.
Yes, the government has its issues, that doesn't mean someone gets to usurp head of state. Which is highly documented that he tried. Dumbasses and bots will say "if they really wanted to, they could've taken overthrown the government," which completely ignores the facts that failing at doing so is still an attempt. It ignores the facts of all of Trumps backchanneling and trying to figure out ways to bend the outcome to his will. His own administration denied his claims of widespread voter fraud. FOX settled their suit with Dominion because it was proven that FOX knew they were pushing unsubstantiated claims.
https://apnews.com/article/fox-news-dominion-lawsuit-trial-trump-2020-0ac71f75acfacc52ea80b3e747fb0afe
Here's the John Eastman memo.
https://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2021/images/09/20/eastman.memo.pdf
You can read the whole J6 report right here and see their supporting materials
https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25" data-url="https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 25">https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report?path=/gpo/January% 206th% 20Committee% 20Final% 20Report% 20and% 20Supporting% 20Materials% 20Collection/Final% 20Report/% 7B% 22pageSize% 22% 3A% 2250% 22% 2C% 22offset% 22% 3A% 220% 22% 7D
You have the option of downloading a neater PDF or reading plain text. It's under "Final Report" at the top.
At one point during the December 27th call in which Donoghue refuted President Trump’s fraud allegations, Donoghue recorded in handwritten notes a request President Trump made specifically to him and Acting Attorney General Rosen: “Just say the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Republican Congressmen.” 274 Donoghue explained: “[T]he Department had zero involvement in anyone’s political strategy,” and “he wanted us to say that it was corrupt.” 275 “We told him we were not going to do that.” 276 At the time, neither Rosen nor Donoghue knew the full extent to which Republican Congressmen, including Representative Scott Perry, were attempting to assist President Trump to overturn the election results.
This is just one small part that stands out to me.
There's insane amounts of fuckery.
click to expand
click to expand
I give zero fucks about ashli babbit. Try harder libtardclick to expand

Posted by AcutelyUnawarePosted by EmhendoPosted by AcutelyUnawareWhat guys?Posted by EmhendoWe've got more guns than you guys do....Posted by AcutelyUnawareThese cowards won’t even fight for what’s going on I their household.. Ain’t gon be no damn civil war. Anybody walk outside with their pussy little pistols and sub machine guns, and watch how bad they get laughed back into the house…
Voting for Trump even though he'll lose. Looking forward to the civil war that will follow.
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
Republicansclick to expand


Posted by AcutelyUnawarePosted by SoloPosted by AcutelyUnawareHow many guns can you actually shoot at once? Two handguns? And do you think that they stopped making guns after yours? And do you think that just because "dems" tend to not make their weaponry their whole identity, that they don't have any or don't know how to use them? Such insanely ignorant statements all the time from you.Posted by EmhendoRepublicansPosted by AcutelyUnawareWhat guys?Posted by EmhendoWe've got more guns than you guys do....Posted by AcutelyUnawareThese cowards won’t even fight for what’s going on I their household.. Ain’t gon be no damn civil war. Anybody walk outside with their pussy little pistols and sub machine guns, and watch how bad they get laughed back into the house…
Voting for Trump even though he'll lose. Looking forward to the civil war that will follow.
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
Tldrclick to expand

Posted by Argus
Myself! 🙌
Facetious aside, the degree of ppls commitment to work/vote against their own interests by propagating uniparties narrative never cease to astound me!

Posted by AcutelyUnawarePosted by SoloPosted by AcutelyUnawareI know you can't handle 5 sentences. It's a lot for you.Posted by SoloTldrPosted by AcutelyUnawareHow many guns can you actually shoot at once? Two handguns? And do you think that they stopped making guns after yours? And do you think that just because "dems" tend to not make their weaponry their whole identity, that they don't have any or don't know how to use them? Such insanely ignorant statements all the time from you.Posted by EmhendoRepublicansPosted by AcutelyUnawareWhat guys?Posted by EmhendoWe've got more guns than you guys do....Posted by AcutelyUnawareThese cowards won’t even fight for what’s going on I their household.. Ain’t gon be no damn civil war. Anybody walk outside with their pussy little pistols and sub machine guns, and watch how bad they get laughed back into the house…
Voting for Trump even though he'll lose. Looking forward to the civil war that will follow.
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
You handle about 2 inches. I've seen you play with yourself.click to expand


Posted by SoloPosted by Argus
Myself! 🙌
Facetious aside, the degree of ppls commitment to work/vote against their own interests by propagating uniparties narrative never cease to astound me!
Green Party can't even win a congress seat. IIIIIIIFFFFFF this info on wiki is correct (it's not sourced), they've only won 3 State positions. They're most successful at local. Why don't they try hard for Congress positions where they can have more of a hand in things? Do you expect a Green to win when there's basically no National representation?click to expand



Posted by ArgusPosted by SoloPosted by ArgusGreen Party can't even win a congress seat. IIIIIIIFFFFFF this info on wiki is correct (it's not sourced), they've only won 3 State positions. They're most successful at local. Why don't they try hard for Congress positions where they can have more of a hand in things? Do you expect a Green to win when there's basically no National representation?
Myself! 🙌
Facetious aside, the degree of ppls commitment to work/vote against their own interests by propagating uniparties narrative never cease to astound me!
click to expand
Like I suggested many times before, instead of regurgitating same ol' bs (by now you genuinely sound like their foot soilder), how about, for once, you look into trully indipendant media outlets & see for yourself as to WHY it may be that they were allegedly not sooo successful! Could it possibly be that the pillar of democratic process, the shining beacon on the hill, our trusted democratic party has deployed every single, dirty trick (including but no limited to frivolous lawsuits in tageted attempts to drain thir funds) in the playbook to keep the green party off of the ballot. Several election cycles now!
Oh but look... https://www.jillstein2024ballotaccess.com/
simple search will show you current status in how many states green party did qualify for the ballot access. Seems pretty successful to me. But you want hear corporate media report on that, including your trusted APN!
Funny thing, though... i never said anything about the Green Party in my previous posts....
click to expand

Posted by SoloPosted by ArgusPosted by SoloLike I suggested many times before, instead of regurgitating same ol' bs (by now you genuinely sound like their foot soilder), how about, for once, you look into trully indipendant media outlets & see for yourself as to WHY it may be that they were allegedly not sooo successful! Could it possibly be that the pillar of democratic process, the shining beacon on the hill, our trusted democratic party has deployed every single, dirty trick (including but no limited to frivolous lawsuits in tageted attempts to drain thir funds) in the playbook to keep the green party off of the ballot. Several election cycles now!Posted by ArgusGreen Party can't even win a congress seat. IIIIIIIFFFFFF this info on wiki is correct (it's not sourced), they've only won 3 State positions. They're most successful at local. Why don't they try hard for Congress positions where they can have more of a hand in things? Do you expect a Green to win when there's basically no National representation?
Myself! 🙌
Facetious aside, the degree of ppls commitment to work/vote against their own interests by propagating uniparties narrative never cease to astound me!
click to expand
Oh but look... https://www.jillstein2024ballotaccess.com/
simple search will show you current status in how many states green party did qualify for the ballot access. Seems pretty successful to me. But you want hear corporate media report on that, including your trusted APN!
Funny thing, though... i never said anything about the Green Party in my previous posts....
click to expand
I'm a foot soldier of keeping the country out of someone like trumps hands mostly because of Jan 6th. Yeah, go figure. Lol. Do you realize that almost everything you say lines up with republican talking points? You're as much of a foot soldier as me. Uniparty, russia is a victim, and idk exactly what your opinion is on J6 but you obviously don't think Trump did anything wrong with his authoritarian attempt at a power grab. Or am I wrong? Because you say that there are other things to look into with it. Russia invaded Ukraine in this most recent thing so it's not defending itself.
Iirc and correct me if I'm wrong, you were a Stein supporter. Or are. You didnt say green party but you did say uniparty so basically proposing why hasn't a third party gained significant steam? Not gonna act like there's no political warfare but do you think theyre so successful that they can't manage 1? They can do it locally, sometimes at the state level but never for congress? I don't think I've ever seen third party stuff besides like high school. There's not 1 compelling candidate that could get a lot of grassroots steam? I'm not really buying that.click to expand

Posted by SoulPosted by SoloPosted by ArgusI'm a foot soldier of keeping the country out of someone like trumps hands mostly because of Jan 6th. Yeah, go figure. Lol. Do you realize that almost everything you say lines up with republican talking points? You're as much of a foot soldier as me. Uniparty, russia is a victim, and idk exactly what your opinion is on J6 but you obviously don't think Trump did anything wrong with his authoritarian attempt at a power grab. Or am I wrong? Because you say that there are other things to look into with it. Russia invaded Ukraine in this most recent thing so it's not defending itself.Posted by SoloLike I suggested many times before, instead of regurgitating same ol' bs (by now you genuinely sound like their foot soilder), how about, for once, you look into trully indipendant media outlets & see for yourself as to WHY it may be that they were allegedly not sooo successful! Could it possibly be that the pillar of democratic process, the shining beacon on the hill, our trusted democratic party has deployed every single, dirty trick (including but no limited to frivolous lawsuits in tageted attempts to drain thir funds) in the playbook to keep the green party off of the ballot. Several election cycles now!Posted by ArgusGreen Party can't even win a congress seat. IIIIIIIFFFFFF this info on wiki is correct (it's not sourced), they've only won 3 State positions. They're most successful at local. Why don't they try hard for Congress positions where they can have more of a hand in things? Do you expect a Green to win when there's basically no National representation?
Myself! 🙌
Facetious aside, the degree of ppls commitment to work/vote against their own interests by propagating uniparties narrative never cease to astound me!
click to expand
Oh but look... https://www.jillstein2024ballotaccess.com/
simple search will show you current status in how many states green party did qualify for the ballot access. Seems pretty successful to me. But you want hear corporate media report on that, including your trusted APN!
Funny thing, though... i never said anything about the Green Party in my previous posts....
click to expand
Iirc and correct me if I'm wrong, you were a Stein supporter. Or are. You didnt say green party but you did say uniparty so basically proposing why hasn't a third party gained significant steam? Not gonna act like there's no political warfare but do you think theyre so successful that they can't manage 1? They can do it locally, sometimes at the state level but never for congress? I don't think I've ever seen third party stuff besides like high school. There's not 1 compelling candidate that could get a lot of grassroots steam? I'm not really buying that.
click to expand
Maybe Trump is the type of daddy you never had required to whip your white ass into shape. I mean have you ever thought of that? You hate him so bad, and why is that? Does he remind you of a daddy figure you never had that could actually whip your privilege white ass into shape?
These are questions the entire world needs to hear.click to expand

Posted by SoloPosted by SoulPosted by SoloMaybe Trump is the type of daddy you never had required to whip your white ass into shape. I mean have you ever thought of that? You hate him so bad, and why is that? Does he remind you of a daddy figure you never had that could actually whip your privilege white ass into shape?Posted by ArgusI'm a foot soldier of keeping the country out of someone like trumps hands mostly because of Jan 6th. Yeah, go figure. Lol. Do you realize that almost everything you say lines up with republican talking points? You're as much of a foot soldier as me. Uniparty, russia is a victim, and idk exactly what your opinion is on J6 but you obviously don't think Trump did anything wrong with his authoritarian attempt at a power grab. Or am I wrong? Because you say that there are other things to look into with it. Russia invaded Ukraine in this most recent thing so it's not defending itself.Posted by SoloLike I suggested many times before, instead of regurgitating same ol' bs (by now you genuinely sound like their foot soilder), how about, for once, you look into trully indipendant media outlets & see for yourself as to WHY it may be that they were allegedly not sooo successful! Could it possibly be that the pillar of democratic process, the shining beacon on the hill, our trusted democratic party has deployed every single, dirty trick (including but no limited to frivolous lawsuits in tageted attempts to drain thir funds) in the playbook to keep the green party off of the ballot. Several election cycles now!Posted by ArgusGreen Party can't even win a congress seat. IIIIIIIFFFFFF this info on wiki is correct (it's not sourced), they've only won 3 State positions. They're most successful at local. Why don't they try hard for Congress positions where they can have more of a hand in things? Do you expect a Green to win when there's basically no National representation?
Myself! 🙌
Facetious aside, the degree of ppls commitment to work/vote against their own interests by propagating uniparties narrative never cease to astound me!
click to expand
Oh but look... https://www.jillstein2024ballotaccess.com/
simple search will show you current status in how many states green party did qualify for the ballot access. Seems pretty successful to me. But you want hear corporate media report on that, including your trusted APN!
Funny thing, though... i never said anything about the Green Party in my previous posts....
click to expand
Iirc and correct me if I'm wrong, you were a Stein supporter. Or are. You didnt say green party but you did say uniparty so basically proposing why hasn't a third party gained significant steam? Not gonna act like there's no political warfare but do you think theyre so successful that they can't manage 1? They can do it locally, sometimes at the state level but never for congress? I don't think I've ever seen third party stuff besides like high school. There's not 1 compelling candidate that could get a lot of grassroots steam? I'm not really buying that.
click to expand
These are questions the entire world needs to hear.
click to expand
L bait, brothaclick to expand

Posted by SoloPosted by ArgusPosted by SoloLike I suggested many times before, instead of regurgitating same ol' bs (by now you genuinely sound like their foot soilder), how about, for once, you look into trully indipendant media outlets & see for yourself as to WHY it may be that they were allegedly not sooo successful! Could it possibly be that the pillar of democratic process, the shining beacon on the hill, our trusted democratic party has deployed every single, dirty trick (including but no limited to frivolous lawsuits in tageted attempts to drain thir funds) in the playbook to keep the green party off of the ballot. Several election cycles now!Posted by ArgusGreen Party can't even win a congress seat. IIIIIIIFFFFFF this info on wiki is correct (it's not sourced), they've only won 3 State positions. They're most successful at local. Why don't they try hard for Congress positions where they can have more of a hand in things? Do you expect a Green to win when there's basically no National representation?
Myself! 🙌
Facetious aside, the degree of ppls commitment to work/vote against their own interests by propagating uniparties narrative never cease to astound me!
click to expand
Oh but look... https://www.jillstein2024ballotaccess.com/
simple search will show you current status in how many states green party did qualify for the ballot access. Seems pretty successful to me. But you want hear corporate media report on that, including your trusted APN!
Funny thing, though... i never said anything about the Green Party in my previous posts....
click to expand
I'm a foot soldier of keeping the country out of someone like trumps hands mostly because of Jan 6th. Yeah, go figure. Lol. Do you realize that almost everything you say lines up with republican talking points? You're as much of a foot soldier as me. Uniparty, russia is a victim, and idk exactly what your opinion is on J6 but you obviously don't think Trump did anything wrong with his authoritarian attempt at a power grab. Or am I wrong? Because you say that there are other things to look into with it. Russia invaded Ukraine in this most recent thing so it's not defending itself.
Iirc and correct me if I'm wrong, you were a Stein supporter. Or are. You didnt say green party but you did say uniparty so basically proposing why hasn't a third party gained significant steam? Not gonna act like there's no political warfare but do you think theyre so successful that they can't manage 1? They can do it locally, sometimes at the state level but never for congress? I don't think I've ever seen third party stuff besides like high school. There's not 1 compelling candidate that could get a lot of grassroots steam? I'm not really buying that.click to expand



Posted by Argus
Also, @Solo, you can cut your hyperbolic bs out when asserting I said something I never did! Never did I argue, suggest or imply Russia was a victim! So you can take that statement and shove it where sun don’t shine!
This is not the first time you used that tactic but I guess it goes back to what I’ve observed earlier, that even unadulterated facts are now considered propaganda if it does not align with someone’s narrative!
How far we’ve come! 👍🏼
P.S.
While you cry about Trump, current VP is endorsed by THE biggest criminal of all Dick morherfucking Cheney! Lmao! Can’t make this shit up! Just lmao
But I’m the bad guy for proposing alternatives! Sure Jen!

Posted by SoloPosted by Argus
Also, @Solo, you can cut your hyperbolic bs out when asserting I said something I never did! Never did I argue, suggest or imply Russia was a victim! So you can take that statement and shove it where sun don’t shine!
This is not the first time you used that tactic but I guess it goes back to what I’ve observed earlier, that even unadulterated facts are now considered propaganda if it does not align with someone’s narrative!
How far we’ve come! 👍🏼
P.S.
While you cry about Trump, current VP is endorsed by THE biggest criminal of all Dick morherfucking Cheney! Lmao! Can’t make this shit up! Just lmao
But I’m the bad guy for proposing alternatives! Sure Jen!
"Thinking you are genuinely interested in a conversation, I then proceed to go a bit deeper into the topic of Russia as an additional example of how our government & its greatest ally media are heavily distorting our reality/perception. ----- this kinda looks like "Never did I argue, suggest or imply Russia was a victim!"
I then proceed to use North Stream pipeline explosion as evidence of how said event has been used to fear monger & portray Putin intentions as bloodthirsty imperialist who wants to conquer all of Europe and so we ( the US) must act or else while pumping billions into wars that have been artificially manufactured only to be accused of veering off the subject! What gives, son!?"
Nordstream Pipeline explosion was in September of 2022. 7 months after the Russian invasion started. Blaming it on him doens't matter after he already invaded. Well, nevermind, I won't say it doesn't matter but it's inconsequential at that point, no?
I see you now became a psychic, too! You bet your ass you are wrong (more levels than one) but explaining myself to you is exercise in futility so I shan’t even attempt because calling out the truth wether on the local, national or global level is not what you want to hear! ----- No, I didn't, that's why I asked if I was wrong. You refuse to engage with the J6 stuff and say what he did is up for debate? And it's not lol. Why do I have the feeling that you're thinking about "fed gave 'em the plan" or something of the like? Lemme know if I'm wrong.
What you want to hear is confirmation biases & in a bit of irony -friendly advise here- at this rate you are slowly becoming that which you claim to stand against!
Begs the question though as to why you act so defensive when alternatives to the establishment are presented? Why is it that am I yet see you cite any independent sources? Are you afraid that you may be proven wrong or experience potential cognitive dissonance? Rhetorical questions, of course so you needn’t waste energy on answering any of it!
You realize that I come from a military family, right? And that as much as I hate shit that goes on here, I will NEVER. EVER. EVER. pass over what Trump did by trying to take the presidency through cheating. You'd flip the fuck out tho if Biden/Harris tried that. I HIGHLY doubt you'd be so generous as to say "oh you need to look into it more." Have you even GLANCED through the J6 report? Or do you just think the entire thing and his fake electors being convicted and all that is all fake or false information?
This is not the first time you used that tactic but I guess it goes back to what I’ve observed earlier, that even unadulterated facts are now considered propaganda if it does not align with someone’s narrative! ----- you're literally claiming this with J6 and shit. Lol.
While you cry about Trump, current VP is endorsed by THE biggest criminal of all Dick morherfucking Cheney! Lmao! ----- Lmao first time around he supported the Republican nominee, who ended up being Trump. Then probably after J6, decided that's a no-go this time.
I've gotta laugh at you being disrespectful.
You wanna gamble with the Presidency against someone who tried cheating to win it. Completely wrong time to propose alternatives.
If you come at me like that again, I'm going to start being a lot less respectful.click to expand

Posted by ArgusPosted by SoloPosted by Argus"Thinking you are genuinely interested in a conversation, I then proceed to go a bit deeper into the topic of Russia as an additional example of how our government & its greatest ally media are heavily distorting our reality/perception. ----- this kinda looks like "Never did I argue, suggest or imply Russia was a victim!"
Also, @Solo, you can cut your hyperbolic bs out when asserting I said something I never did! Never did I argue, suggest or imply Russia was a victim! So you can take that statement and shove it where sun don’t shine!
This is not the first time you used that tactic but I guess it goes back to what I’ve observed earlier, that even unadulterated facts are now considered propaganda if it does not align with someone’s narrative!
How far we’ve come! 👍🏼
P.S.
While you cry about Trump, current VP is endorsed by THE biggest criminal of all Dick morherfucking Cheney! Lmao! Can’t make this shit up! Just lmao
But I’m the bad guy for proposing alternatives! Sure Jen!
I then proceed to use North Stream pipeline explosion as evidence of how said event has been used to fear monger & portray Putin intentions as bloodthirsty imperialist who wants to conquer all of Europe and so we ( the US) must act or else while pumping billions into wars that have been artificially manufactured only to be accused of veering off the subject! What gives, son!?"
Nordstream Pipeline explosion was in September of 2022. 7 months after the Russian invasion started. Blaming it on him doens't matter after he already invaded. Well, nevermind, I won't say it doesn't matter but it's inconsequential at that point, no?
I see you now became a psychic, too! You bet your ass you are wrong (more levels than one) but explaining myself to you is exercise in futility so I shan’t even attempt because calling out the truth wether on the local, national or global level is not what you want to hear! ----- No, I didn't, that's why I asked if I was wrong. You refuse to engage with the J6 stuff and say what he did is up for debate? And it's not lol. Why do I have the feeling that you're thinking about "fed gave 'em the plan" or something of the like? Lemme know if I'm wrong.
What you want to hear is confirmation biases & in a bit of irony -friendly advise here- at this rate you are slowly becoming that which you claim to stand against!
Begs the question though as to why you act so defensive when alternatives to the establishment are presented? Why is it that am I yet see you cite any independent sources? Are you afraid that you may be proven wrong or experience potential cognitive dissonance? Rhetorical questions, of course so you needn’t waste energy on answering any of it!
You realize that I come from a military family, right? And that as much as I hate shit that goes on here, I will NEVER. EVER. EVER. pass over what Trump did by trying to take the presidency through cheating. You'd flip the fuck out tho if Biden/Harris tried that. I HIGHLY doubt you'd be so generous as to say "oh you need to look into it more." Have you even GLANCED through the J6 report? Or do you just think the entire thing and his fake electors being convicted and all that is all fake or false information?
This is not the first time you used that tactic but I guess it goes back to what I’ve observed earlier, that even unadulterated facts are now considered propaganda if it does not align with someone’s narrative! ----- you're literally claiming this with J6 and shit. Lol.
While you cry about Trump, current VP is endorsed by THE biggest criminal of all Dick morherfucking Cheney! Lmao! ----- Lmao first time around he supported the Republican nominee, who ended up being Trump. Then probably after J6, decided that's a no-go this time.
I've gotta laugh at you being disrespectful.
You wanna gamble with the Presidency against someone who tried cheating to win it. Completely wrong time to propose alternatives.
If you come at me like that again, I'm going to start being a lot less respectful.
click to expand
I'm not even gonna go into it beyond addressing the 1st paragraph in which you clearly demonstrate inability to hear beyond of that what you want to hear! I expressly stated I used Russia's case as an axample & by that account one could easily argue that, at least, 3/4 of the world is a victim to & of our foreign policies! I'm not gonna get galist into being so-called "russias apologist" by those who can't cope with facts. Tough tities!click to expand







Posted by borednbeautiful
I could vote in absentee (or whatever it is called) but I chose not to.
If I had to pick a candidate, it would be really tough.

Posted by Stardustmopped
Honestly I think we’re fucked either way. We’re just treading water so we can pass the burden to future generations. Neither of their tax plans benefit me. I wish I saw what other people saw who claim to care about the economy.

Posted by StardustmoppedPosted by SoloPosted by StardustmoppedWhen you say economy, what do you mean? Because for most people I feel like they just mean "I'm not getting paid enough"
Honestly I think we’re fucked either way. We’re just treading water so we can pass the burden to future generations. Neither of their tax plans benefit me. I wish I saw what other people saw who claim to care about the economy.
click to expand
https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2024-09-13/trump-vs-harris-on-tax-policy-what-to-knowclick to expand

Posted by Saturn_Returns
The US economy is fucked either way.
Neither presidential candidate is preferable.
However, anyone who votes for the Democrats - a party that has spent the last four years worsening the state of the nation, and has resorted to so many dirty tricks and lies that goes AGAINST the spirit of democracy - is a fucking imbecile.
Oh, and anyone who's been swayed by a celebrity's opinion should have their right to vote fucking revoked. Immediately.

Posted by Saturn_ReturnsPosted by SoloAs I said before, neither candidates are ideal choices.Posted by Saturn_ReturnsAt one point during the December 27th call in which Donoghue refuted President Trump’s fraud allegations, Donoghue recorded in handwritten notes a request President Trump made specifically to him and Acting Attorney General Rosen: “Just say the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Republican Congressmen.”
The US economy is fucked either way.
Neither presidential candidate is preferable.
However, anyone who votes for the Democrats - a party that has spent the last four years worsening the state of the nation, and has resorted to so many dirty tricks and lies that goes AGAINST the spirit of democracy - is a fucking imbecile.
Oh, and anyone who's been swayed by a celebrity's opinion should have their right to vote fucking revoked. Immediately.
Yes, it's the Democratic party that tried this. You can say those stupid talking points about the democratic party but we have the FEC so anyone can make a Party if they meet requirements and Harris got the delegates at the DNC which is where the actual nominee pick happens.
Trump is a blatant liar. So is Vance. Do you believe that Haitian immigrants are eating cats and dogs in Springfield, OH? Do you think a good president is one who can't even disavow the bomb and shooting threats?
click to expand
However, if you're prepared to reinstate for a party that allowed a shady, senile old man to act as POTUS, you need your head checked.
Anyway, I have no desire to be drawn further into this 'discussion', as it's very clear that, just like in the UK, many voters are nothing but impressionable fools.
click to expand

Posted by Saturn_ReturnsPosted by SoloAs I said before, neither candidates are ideal choices.Posted by Saturn_ReturnsAt one point during the December 27th call in which Donoghue refuted President Trump’s fraud allegations, Donoghue recorded in handwritten notes a request President Trump made specifically to him and Acting Attorney General Rosen: “Just say the election was corrupt and leave the rest to me and the Republican Congressmen.”
The US economy is fucked either way.
Neither presidential candidate is preferable.
However, anyone who votes for the Democrats - a party that has spent the last four years worsening the state of the nation, and has resorted to so many dirty tricks and lies that goes AGAINST the spirit of democracy - is a fucking imbecile.
Oh, and anyone who's been swayed by a celebrity's opinion should have their right to vote fucking revoked. Immediately.
Yes, it's the Democratic party that tried this. You can say those stupid talking points about the democratic party but we have the FEC so anyone can make a Party if they meet requirements and Harris got the delegates at the DNC which is where the actual nominee pick happens.
Trump is a blatant liar. So is Vance. Do you believe that Haitian immigrants are eating cats and dogs in Springfield, OH? Do you think a good president is one who can't even disavow the bomb and shooting threats?
click to expand
However, if you're prepared to reinstate for a party that allowed a shady, senile old man to act as POTUS, you need your head checked.
Anyway, I have no desire to be drawn further into this 'discussion', as it's very clear that, just like in the UK, many voters are nothing but impressionable fools.
click to expand





Posted by StardustmoppedPosted by MyStarsShine
I saw a page on FB asking if anyone would vote for Harris and 80/90% said no
Most reputable news sources are reporting the polls as closely tiedclick to expand


Posted by Soul
I'd rather swallow liquid glass then vote. That shits a fucking joke. I'd rather go down as the Capitan of my ship then spend a second with their dick down my throat. Anyone with a stump or that dumb bitch sign outside their house is a sad excuse for human. I'd rather be armend to the T for a better movement.

Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
We don’t have to get into the politics and why and why not…
I don’t hate you if you vote for Trump
I don’t hate you if you vote for Kamala
Judgement free. Simply state who’d you’d like to be in office and move on .. Or if any other opinion and further statements made will be considered and appreciated.