
Angeleyes17
@Angeleyes17
13 Years500+ Posts
Comments: 2 · Posts: 689 · Topics: 53





Posted by Angeleyes17
How do you loose trust or interest in a friend or partner? Or even respect? How do you react that?
do you cut them off out of your life? give them a chance to earn it back? Ignore it? etc...





Posted by lisabethur8
wow so many requirements.....
with this many requirements, it's hard to even COMMIT.
Posted by lisabethur8
i'm sorry but that's wayyyyyy tooo many requirements. It's IDEALIZING for a human being that doesn't exist. Might as well be single for the rest of your life because people are always gonna disappoint you in small or big ways.
commitment is hard work and it isn't gonna be a bed of roses all through your years.
and i'm sure your poop stinks too, (metaphorically)
if you're looking for perfection, there's NONE. NONE. NONE NONE.
but yeah don't be cruel to children and animals...that's already a huge red flag for anyone. it doesn't even have to be romantic.
You get bad vibes from those types of people, because they have no respect for innocents.
anyway, no wonder Aquarius sign is the top three for Commitment PHOBICS. always having this looonnnng list of dos and don'ts.
sagittarius and virgo are similar in a way, one too choosy nitpicky (similar) and sagittarius (idealization of the perfect Mister Darcy -- Jane Austen is a Sag) lmao!!
Posted by IrresistableScorp
Exactly right, lisburth. Do not under any circumstance ever point out a deficiency in your Aqua. Because that will be turned into YOUR flaw and you will be cut off. I think Aquas rank up there with an inability to see themselves realistically. Its all: oh I'm not judgmental--bullshit because as soon as someone does the smallest thing that you PERCEIVE to go against whatever your morality dictates they are cut off; I'm open-minded: sure until someone challenges your hard core beliefs; I'm not possessive or jealous: can you be anymore wrong? Believe me a scorned Aqua can do some manipulative shit that would make a biggest psychopath envious. Mind fucks extroardinaires!
Don't believe me? Cut one off and then watch the mindfucks begin??_ lord have mercy! And then when you are called on your bullshit you pretend that you haven't done it like a little innocent rainbow hugging unicorn??_smh.
/rant
Posted by mz
lisa, my darling...
unlike you, i have never fancied about mr. Darcy...my cancer man is just great.
you have to accept the fact that some women are Cleopatra/victoria beckham/kate middleton type , while others are Jane Austen/hillary clinton/lady di type. it's not about a LIST, it's about VALUES...
but when you settle for the best you can do, is hard to understand settling for the best you deserve
Posted by IrresistableScorp
Lady Di was not a poor little ole me. She had numerous affairs while she was married. Charles had one woman. Okay not good but Lady Di was actually known as quite the Ho in some circles. Don't believe everything you read in the Rag Mags.
How do I know this? I have sources deep in the Royal circle--true story.
Posted by IrresistableScorp
Charles was forced to marry Lady Di because she was a virgin. She was 19 yrs old when they met and were betrothed. Charles wanted to marry Camilla but it was his duty to marry a virgin because that's how it works. Although I wouldn't doubt if that has to change. I'm pretty sure Kate was a virgin as well so she would pass if the crown gets handed down to her husband.
Posted by mz
cleopatra didn't poison her men.
jane austen...never been very fond of victorian family style ...to hypocritical for my taste.
lady di...poor——!!!!!!!!! no way...she knew what camilla and charles shared...she just stupidly hoped things would turn in her favour. she got into this without being the cleopatra type
hillary... a public scandle about her husband's cheating...sorryyyyy...what's that marriage about, actually? HE SLEPT WITH ANOTHER WOMAN FOR GOD'S SAKE. PERIOD.
anyway, this is not the topic of the thread, so...we'd better stop here, don't you think?
Posted by IrresistableScorp
I believe Jane Austen fell in love with a man who then ended up marrying someone else and chose to live a single life after that. Her problem was that she was an independent woman with financial means of her own during a time when women were meant to be subservient. She found the one man who loved her in spite of this, but he was "promised" to someone else and for the sake of not bringing his family into disrepute he chose duty. Bloody bastard. 🙂
Posted by lisabethur8Posted by mz
cleopatra didn't poison her men.
jane austen...never been very fond of victorian family style ...to hypocritical for my taste.
lady di...poor——!!!!!!!!! no way...she knew what camilla and charles shared...she just stupidly hoped things would turn in her favour. she got into this without being the cleopatra type
hillary... a public scandle about her husband's cheating...sorryyyyy...what's that marriage about, actually? HE SLEPT WITH ANOTHER WOMAN FOR GOD'S SAKE. PERIOD.
anyway, this is not the topic of the thread, so...we'd better stop here, don't you think?
awww leave Bill Clinton alone. 😛
blame Monica Lewinsky!! the she-devil.
he did not have "sexual relations" with that woman.
and yes, from what i read of cleopatra, she did poison her men and women!!click to expand
Posted by IrresistableScorpPosted by lisabethur8Posted by mz
cleopatra didn't poison her men.
jane austen...never been very fond of victorian family style ...to hypocritical for my taste.
lady di...poor——!!!!!!!!! no way...she knew what camilla and charles shared...she just stupidly hoped things would turn in her favour. she got into this without being the cleopatra type
hillary... a public scandle about her husband's cheating...sorryyyyy...what's that marriage about, actually? HE SLEPT WITH ANOTHER WOMAN FOR GOD'S SAKE. PERIOD.
anyway, this is not the topic of the thread, so...we'd better stop here, don't you think?
awww leave Bill Clinton alone. 😛
blame Monica Lewinsky!! the she-devil.
he did not have "sexual relations" with that woman.
and yes, from what i read of cleopatra, she did poison her men and women!!
Hilary is just being a typical Scorp and hooking onto the POWA (or creating the power) of Bill. She probably could care less about his affairs as long as she gets to cling to his coattails??_ Then again, she is getting older and maybe might actually want happiness. I am sure power gets old after awhile...click to expand
Posted by mzPosted by lisabethur8Posted by mz
cleopatra didn't poison her men.
jane austen...never been very fond of victorian family style ...to hypocritical for my taste.
lady di...poor——!!!!!!!!! no way...she knew what camilla and charles shared...she just stupidly hoped things would turn in her favour. she got into this without being the cleopatra type
hillary... a public scandle about her husband's cheating...sorryyyyy...what's that marriage about, actually? HE SLEPT WITH ANOTHER WOMAN FOR GOD'S SAKE. PERIOD.
anyway, this is not the topic of the thread, so...we'd better stop here, don't you think?
awww leave Bill Clinton alone. 😛
blame Monica Lewinsky!! the she-devil.
he did not have "sexual relations" with that woman.
and yes, from what i read of cleopatra, she did poison her men and women!!
no, cleopatra DIDN'T poison HER men.
oh...poor bill clinton....such an innocent man....raped by the manipulative monica...
i have no understanding for cheaters...i thought it so self-understood that i didn't even added on my list 🙂
NICE TALKING TO YOU LADIES...BUT I'LL STOP HEREclick to expand

Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
do you cut them off out of your life? give them a chance to earn it back? Ignore it? etc...