
Pandora101
@Pandora101
10 Years1,000+ Posts
Comments: 826 · Posts: 2348 · Topics: 15


Posted by ArilovesAqu
I’m a bit confused by the details but strippers and strip clubs are not designed for sex.

Posted by MrsElleCappysnatch
Rape is rape.
There are not different levels or one more traumatic than the other.
It is all a violation to your body.
Please stop trying to justify it in your head.


Posted by MrsElleCappysnatch
Rape is rape.
There are not different levels or one more traumatic than the other.
It is all a violation to your body.
Please stop trying to justify it in your head.


Posted by MrsElleCappysnatchPosted by Pandora101Posted by MrsElleCappysnatch
Rape is rape.
There are not different levels or one more traumatic than the other.
It is all a violation to your body.
Please stop trying to justify it in your head.
and I agree that it is all a violation to your body
the difference is (imho) that if you were a participant of this violation of your body or not
if you offer yourself and/or know this person and then cry rape - you could control it, you could expect the violence, it was somehow at least in your control to stay away
if its a stranger in a dark alley, a brutal assault from a total stranger - you can not control it, you cant stay away
I dont think one is less or more traumatic than the other
I just say, there really are different levels of how to invite offenders into your lives.
If you have a victim mentality, you stay and endure abuse until you cry "rape" (your choice - sorry)
If you get brutalized by a total stranger randomly - you didnt have a choice
It's very simple.....
If you say no before the act, it is rape.
If you don't say no and regret it later, it is not rape.
It doesnt matter if you get all the way naked and seconds beforehand you say no. It is your right to say no and the other person is responsible for their self control.....not you.click to expand

Posted by Pandora101Posted by MrsElleCappysnatchPosted by Pandora101Posted by MrsElleCappysnatch
Rape is rape.
There are not different levels or one more traumatic than the other.
It is all a violation to your body.
Please stop trying to justify it in your head.
and I agree that it is all a violation to your body
the difference is (imho) that if you were a participant of this violation of your body or not
if you offer yourself and/or know this person and then cry rape - you could control it, you could expect the violence, it was somehow at least in your control to stay away
if its a stranger in a dark alley, a brutal assault from a total stranger - you can not control it, you cant stay away
I dont think one is less or more traumatic than the other
I just say, there really are different levels of how to invite offenders into your lives.
If you have a victim mentality, you stay and endure abuse until you cry "rape" (your choice - sorry)
If you get brutalized by a total stranger randomly - you didnt have a choice
It's very simple.....
If you say no before the act, it is rape.
If you don't say no and regret it later, it is not rape.
It doesnt matter if you get all the way naked and seconds beforehand you say no. It is your right to say no and the other person is responsible for their self control.....not you.
"It doesnt matter if you get all the way naked and seconds beforehand you say no."
this will do a great service to our girls, thank you
and to our boys as well, great messege
sarcasm
it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say its rape
see, thats why I am saying, rape and claiming rape is not equal
would be better to tell girls, dont get naked and into sex, if you dont want to have sex, because otherwise boys will think you want sex (you got naked voluntarily)
and lots of boys are getting into trouble by "drunk as ass and getting naked and inviting" type of girls, who then cry rape because of their parents force them to claim
but, my initial question was, if this is the same type of attack what you endure if you are not naked at the party and dont say you go with them somewhere for money
as the same type of rape when you are not voluntarily naked at some party and got brutalized just the same?
case 1: girls getting voluntary naked and inviting, sex workers taking money, strippers voluntarily going into some rooms with the "customer"
case 2: you go home from work and get attacked by some random perv and raped
same case?
click to expand

Posted by dilettantePosted by Pandora101Posted by MrsElleCappysnatch
Rape is rape.
There are not different levels or one more traumatic than the other.
It is all a violation to your body.
Please stop trying to justify it in your head.
and I agree that it is all a violation to your body
the difference is (imho) that if you were a participant of this violation of your body or not
if you offer yourself and/or know this person and then cry rape - you could control it, you could expect the violence, it was somehow at least in your control to stay away
if its a stranger in a dark alley, a brutal assault from a total stranger - you can not control it, you cant stay away
I dont think one is less or more traumatic than the other
I just say, there really are different levels of how to invite offenders into your lives.
If you have a victim mentality, you stay and endure abuse until you cry "rape" (your choice - sorry)
If you get brutalized by a total stranger randomly - you didnt have a choice
you are an incredibly fucked person.
does this also go for people who are date raped? or drugged by a person they know at the bar?
not everyone goes around exuding rapist vibes. rapists often take advantage of a situation.
RAPE IS ABOUT POWER. not sex.
if you believe being a dancer is consenting to rape, YOU ARE FUCKING SCUM.click to expand

Posted by LittleStarPosted by DevilPosted by Phantum
I don't really understand the question, but consent can be revoked at any point and time. A blanket statement of "I'll do whatever you want" out of context is not a life-time pass to rape the person.
See that shit is confusing. Are we supposed to be mind readers and understand they didn't want in the first place after they already had sex or even during sex?
After they said let's do it. Now if they said only I'll do whatever you want the guy should of asked what exactly. Buy seriously how did it even get to the point of having sex without her saying NO i didn't mean that.
I'm just really confused by the whole premise.
If girls just aren’t overly enthusiastic and happy to be having sex with you, you can always ask them: Do you want this? Are you okay with this?click to expand

Posted by MrsElleCappysnatchPosted by Pandora101Posted by MrsElleCappysnatchPosted by Pandora101Posted by MrsElleCappysnatch
Rape is rape.
There are not different levels or one more traumatic than the other.
It is all a violation to your body.
Please stop trying to justify it in your head.
and I agree that it is all a violation to your body
the difference is (imho) that if you were a participant of this violation of your body or not
if you offer yourself and/or know this person and then cry rape - you could control it, you could expect the violence, it was somehow at least in your control to stay away
if its a stranger in a dark alley, a brutal assault from a total stranger - you can not control it, you cant stay away
I dont think one is less or more traumatic than the other
I just say, there really are different levels of how to invite offenders into your lives.
If you have a victim mentality, you stay and endure abuse until you cry "rape" (your choice - sorry)
If you get brutalized by a total stranger randomly - you didnt have a choice
It's very simple.....
If you say no before the act, it is rape.
If you don't say no and regret it later, it is not rape.
It doesnt matter if you get all the way naked and seconds beforehand you say no. It is your right to say no and the other person is responsible for their self control.....not you.
"It doesnt matter if you get all the way naked and seconds beforehand you say no."
this will do a great service to our girls, thank you
and to our boys as well, great messege
sarcasm
it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say its rape
see, thats why I am saying, rape and claiming rape is not equal
would be better to tell girls, dont get naked and into sex, if you dont want to have sex, because otherwise boys will think you want sex (you got naked voluntarily)
and lots of boys are getting into trouble by "drunk as ass and getting naked and inviting" type of girls, who then cry rape because of their parents force them to claim
but, my initial question was, if this is the same type of attack what you endure if you are not naked at the party and dont say you go with them somewhere for money
You are not trying to understand my perspective.
"it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say its rape"
^^ This is not what I said.
it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say NO. If you proceed after being told NO. It is Rape.
^^ This is what I said.
There is a very clear line. No means no.click to expand

Posted by MrsElleCappysnatchPosted by Pandora101Posted by MrsElleCappysnatchPosted by Pandora101Posted by MrsElleCappysnatch
Rape is rape.
There are not different levels or one more traumatic than the other.
It is all a violation to your body.
Please stop trying to justify it in your head.
and I agree that it is all a violation to your body
the difference is (imho) that if you were a participant of this violation of your body or not
if you offer yourself and/or know this person and then cry rape - you could control it, you could expect the violence, it was somehow at least in your control to stay away
if its a stranger in a dark alley, a brutal assault from a total stranger - you can not control it, you cant stay away
I dont think one is less or more traumatic than the other
I just say, there really are different levels of how to invite offenders into your lives.
If you have a victim mentality, you stay and endure abuse until you cry "rape" (your choice - sorry)
If you get brutalized by a total stranger randomly - you didnt have a choice
It's very simple.....
If you say no before the act, it is rape.
If you don't say no and regret it later, it is not rape.
It doesnt matter if you get all the way naked and seconds beforehand you say no. It is your right to say no and the other person is responsible for their self control.....not you.
"It doesnt matter if you get all the way naked and seconds beforehand you say no."
this will do a great service to our girls, thank you
and to our boys as well, great messege
sarcasm
it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say its rape
see, thats why I am saying, rape and claiming rape is not equal
would be better to tell girls, dont get naked and into sex, if you dont want to have sex, because otherwise boys will think you want sex (you got naked voluntarily)
and lots of boys are getting into trouble by "drunk as ass and getting naked and inviting" type of girls, who then cry rape because of their parents force them to claim
but, my initial question was, if this is the same type of attack what you endure if you are not naked at the party and dont say you go with them somewhere for money
You are not trying to understand my perspective.
"it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say its rape"
^^ This is not what I said.
it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say NO. If you proceed after being told NO. It is Rape.
^^ This is what I said.
There is a very clear line. No means no.click to expand

Posted by DevilPosted by STILLPosted by DevilPosted by STILL
What is the point of this thread?
If you’re touching on common sense or poor decision making, doesn’t matter if the victim is as dumb as bricks and so called put themselves in an unfavorable situation, if the victim says NO, then that’s what it is. Doesn’t matter the situation.
This makes sense. Both sides should understand the boundaries that exist and respect them and each other enough not to play with these things.
Im guessing that’s what her intention is with this thread, but it comes off as something else.
I wont use the term because I don’t want to accuse her of anything when I don’t know whats going on in her mind
Hey I had no clue this was posted by a she untill now. I'm leave this conversation to everyone else. It's getting to hot for me.click to expand

Posted by STILLPosted by Pandora101Posted by MrsElleCappysnatchPosted by Pandora101Posted by MrsElleCappysnatchPosted by Pandora101Posted by MrsElleCappysnatch
Rape is rape.
There are not different levels or one more traumatic than the other.
It is all a violation to your body.
Please stop trying to justify it in your head.
and I agree that it is all a violation to your body
the difference is (imho) that if you were a participant of this violation of your body or not
if you offer yourself and/or know this person and then cry rape - you could control it, you could expect the violence, it was somehow at least in your control to stay away
if its a stranger in a dark alley, a brutal assault from a total stranger - you can not control it, you cant stay away
I dont think one is less or more traumatic than the other
I just say, there really are different levels of how to invite offenders into your lives.
If you have a victim mentality, you stay and endure abuse until you cry "rape" (your choice - sorry)
If you get brutalized by a total stranger randomly - you didnt have a choice
It's very simple.....
If you say no before the act, it is rape.
If you don't say no and regret it later, it is not rape.
It doesnt matter if you get all the way naked and seconds beforehand you say no. It is your right to say no and the other person is responsible for their self control.....not you.
"It doesnt matter if you get all the way naked and seconds beforehand you say no."
this will do a great service to our girls, thank you
and to our boys as well, great messege
sarcasm
it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say its rape
see, thats why I am saying, rape and claiming rape is not equal
would be better to tell girls, dont get naked and into sex, if you dont want to have sex, because otherwise boys will think you want sex (you got naked voluntarily)
and lots of boys are getting into trouble by "drunk as ass and getting naked and inviting" type of girls, who then cry rape because of their parents force them to claim
but, my initial question was, if this is the same type of attack what you endure if you are not naked at the party and dont say you go with them somewhere for money
You are not trying to understand my perspective.
"it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say its rape"
^^ This is not what I said.
it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say NO. If you proceed after being told NO. It is Rape.
^^ This is what I said.
There is a very clear line. No means no.
You are not trying to understand my perspective.
"it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say its rape"
^^ This is not what I said.
it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say NO. If you proceed after being told NO. It is Rape.
^^ This is what I said.
There is a very clear line. No means no."
I see your perspective, I just dont agree with it fully. If you get naked and inviting, its a consensual sex. If our girls would hear that (instead of the: any time you say no its a rape), it would be more beneficial, imho
How do you think it would be more beneficial?click to expand

Posted by Pandora101Posted by STILLPosted by Pandora101Posted by MrsElleCappysnatchPosted by Pandora101Posted by MrsElleCappysnatchPosted by Pandora101Posted by MrsElleCappysnatch
Rape is rape.
There are not different levels or one more traumatic than the other.
It is all a violation to your body.
Please stop trying to justify it in your head.
and I agree that it is all a violation to your body
the difference is (imho) that if you were a participant of this violation of your body or not
if you offer yourself and/or know this person and then cry rape - you could control it, you could expect the violence, it was somehow at least in your control to stay away
if its a stranger in a dark alley, a brutal assault from a total stranger - you can not control it, you cant stay away
I dont think one is less or more traumatic than the other
I just say, there really are different levels of how to invite offenders into your lives.
If you have a victim mentality, you stay and endure abuse until you cry "rape" (your choice - sorry)
If you get brutalized by a total stranger randomly - you didnt have a choice
It's very simple.....
If you say no before the act, it is rape.
If you don't say no and regret it later, it is not rape.
It doesnt matter if you get all the way naked and seconds beforehand you say no. It is your right to say no and the other person is responsible for their self control.....not you.
"It doesnt matter if you get all the way naked and seconds beforehand you say no."
this will do a great service to our girls, thank you
and to our boys as well, great messege
sarcasm
it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say its rape
see, thats why I am saying, rape and claiming rape is not equal
would be better to tell girls, dont get naked and into sex, if you dont want to have sex, because otherwise boys will think you want sex (you got naked voluntarily)
and lots of boys are getting into trouble by "drunk as ass and getting naked and inviting" type of girls, who then cry rape because of their parents force them to claim
but, my initial question was, if this is the same type of attack what you endure if you are not naked at the party and dont say you go with them somewhere for money
You are not trying to understand my perspective.
"it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say its rape"
^^ This is not what I said.
it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say NO. If you proceed after being told NO. It is Rape.
^^ This is what I said.
There is a very clear line. No means no.
You are not trying to understand my perspective.
"it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say its rape"
^^ This is not what I said.
it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say NO. If you proceed after being told NO. It is Rape.
^^ This is what I said.
There is a very clear line. No means no."
I see your perspective, I just dont agree with it fully. If you get naked and inviting, its a consensual sex. If our girls would hear that (instead of the: any time you say no its a rape), it would be more beneficial, imho
How do you think it would be more beneficial?
"How do you think it would be more beneficial?click to expand

Posted by MrsElleCappysnatchPosted by Pandora101Posted by MrsElleCappysnatchPosted by Pandora101Posted by MrsElleCappysnatchPosted by Pandora101Posted by MrsElleCappysnatch
Rape is rape.
There are not different levels or one more traumatic than the other.
It is all a violation to your body.
Please stop trying to justify it in your head.
and I agree that it is all a violation to your body
the difference is (imho) that if you were a participant of this violation of your body or not
if you offer yourself and/or know this person and then cry rape - you could control it, you could expect the violence, it was somehow at least in your control to stay away
if its a stranger in a dark alley, a brutal assault from a total stranger - you can not control it, you cant stay away
I dont think one is less or more traumatic than the other
I just say, there really are different levels of how to invite offenders into your lives.
If you have a victim mentality, you stay and endure abuse until you cry "rape" (your choice - sorry)
If you get brutalized by a total stranger randomly - you didnt have a choice
It's very simple.....
If you say no before the act, it is rape.
If you don't say no and regret it later, it is not rape.
It doesnt matter if you get all the way naked and seconds beforehand you say no. It is your right to say no and the other person is responsible for their self control.....not you.
"It doesnt matter if you get all the way naked and seconds beforehand you say no."
this will do a great service to our girls, thank you
and to our boys as well, great messege
sarcasm
it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say its rape
see, thats why I am saying, rape and claiming rape is not equal
would be better to tell girls, dont get naked and into sex, if you dont want to have sex, because otherwise boys will think you want sex (you got naked voluntarily)
and lots of boys are getting into trouble by "drunk as ass and getting naked and inviting" type of girls, who then cry rape because of their parents force them to claim
but, my initial question was, if this is the same type of attack what you endure if you are not naked at the party and dont say you go with them somewhere for money
You are not trying to understand my perspective.
"it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say its rape"
^^ This is not what I said.
it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say NO. If you proceed after being told NO. It is Rape.
^^ This is what I said.
There is a very clear line. No means no.
You are not trying to understand my perspective.
"it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say its rape"
^^ This is not what I said.
it DOES MATTER if you get all the way naked and inviting, and then you say NO. If you proceed after being told NO. It is Rape.
^^ This is what I said.
There is a very clear line. No means no."
I see your perspective, I just dont agree with it fully. If you get naked and inviting, its a consensual sex. If our girls would hear that (instead of the: any time you say no its a rape), it would be more beneficial, imho
I'm not saying it is okay for women to do that.
However, everyon we....man oroman, has the individual right to say no anytime before the act takes place and the other person is always responsible for having self control.click to expand




Posted by MrsElleCappysnatchPosted by nikkistar
Playing devil's advocate here, just because this thread reminded me of a story I just read.
This woman filed a police report against a man she was seeing for a short period of time. Over an extended weekend she and him had spent roughly 4 days straight having sex. On the first or second day, he "titty fucked" her in the middle of having sex. She didn't like it, and told him to stop. So he did and they finished having intercourse naturally and continued for the next several days.
However after leaving his house, she went to the police station and reported him for rape and sexual assault for titty fucking her, because she didn't give him consent to do so and didn't like it. Just this portion of their sexual exploits during the 4 days.
Is this rape still in this scenario? Because if it is, this would open up a whole new can of worms that gets REAL scary to me for men.
Not rape.click to expand


Posted by PhantumPosted by nikkistarPosted by MrsElleCappysnatchPosted by nikkistar
Playing devil's advocate here, just because this thread reminded me of a story I just read.
This woman filed a police report against a man she was seeing for a short period of time. Over an extended weekend she and him had spent roughly 4 days straight having sex. On the first or second day, he "titty fucked" her in the middle of having sex. She didn't like it, and told him to stop. So he did and they finished having intercourse naturally and continued for the next several days.
However after leaving his house, she went to the police station and reported him for rape and sexual assault for titty fucking her, because she didn't give him consent to do so and didn't like it. Just this portion of their sexual exploits during the 4 days.
Is this rape still in this scenario? Because if it is, this would open up a whole new can of worms that gets REAL scary to me for men.
Not rape.
I don't feel it is either. But if SHE feels its rape, can she?
That's the dilemma I see here, because their are women that will say that the woman is entitled to feel as if she was raped. That YOU can't tell her how to feel. And that's where it all starts getting messy af to me.
But that's such an insane outlier. Why do conversations about this topic always end up discussing these crazy hypotheticals that almost never happen? The situation the OP is mad about happened on a TV show.click to expand

Posted by MrsElleCappysnatchPosted by Pandora101
"However, everyone we....man or woman, has the individual right to say no anytime before the act takes place and the other person is always responsible for having self control."
I dont think the other person is is always responsible for having self control. Why would they have self control, if the participant doesnt have any self-control? how much we are responsible for any unresponsible person´s action?
I cant with you anymore.
Did you see the example of the locked versus unlocked car?
Whether to car is locked or not doesnt give you permission to take its contents.
I really don't understand why you don't get that.
I realise women have been conditioned for centuries that men have the final say in everything women but I am sad that it is so engrained in the brains of women that they actually dont feel they have rights over their decisions and somehow men are still not expected to respect those decisions.click to expand

Posted by PhantumPosted by nikkistarPosted by PhantumPosted by nikkistarPosted by MrsElleCappysnatchPosted by nikkistar
Playing devil's advocate here, just because this thread reminded me of a story I just read.
This woman filed a police report against a man she was seeing for a short period of time. Over an extended weekend she and him had spent roughly 4 days straight having sex. On the first or second day, he "titty fucked" her in the middle of having sex. She didn't like it, and told him to stop. So he did and they finished having intercourse naturally and continued for the next several days.
However after leaving his house, she went to the police station and reported him for rape and sexual assault for titty fucking her, because she didn't give him consent to do so and didn't like it. Just this portion of their sexual exploits during the 4 days.
Is this rape still in this scenario? Because if it is, this would open up a whole new can of worms that gets REAL scary to me for men.
Not rape.
I don't feel it is either. But if SHE feels its rape, can she?
That's the dilemma I see here, because their are women that will say that the woman is entitled to feel as if she was raped. That YOU can't tell her how to feel. And that's where it all starts getting messy af to me.
But that's such an insane outlier. Why do conversations about this topic always end up discussing these crazy hypotheticals that almost never happen? The situation the OP is mad about happened on a TV show.
I'm just asking about mine, not the OP's tbh.
I just read that story like a week ago and went WTF? This thread just reminded me of it and was convenient to bring it up.
I didn't mean to pick on you. It just seems to always happen. "Rape is wrong..." "But what if...(insane situation)?" Are people expecting to get into these 1 in a million situations or it just for the mental exercise?
Anyway, that story is nuts.click to expand

Posted by PhantumPosted by nikkistarPosted by PhantumPosted by nikkistarPosted by PhantumPosted by nikkistarPosted by MrsElleCappysnatchPosted by nikkistar
Playing devil's advocate here, just because this thread reminded me of a story I just read.
This woman filed a police report against a man she was seeing for a short period of time. Over an extended weekend she and him had spent roughly 4 days straight having sex. On the first or second day, he "titty fucked" her in the middle of having sex. She didn't like it, and told him to stop. So he did and they finished having intercourse naturally and continued for the next several days.
However after leaving his house, she went to the police station and reported him for rape and sexual assault for titty fucking her, because she didn't give him consent to do so and didn't like it. Just this portion of their sexual exploits during the 4 days.
Is this rape still in this scenario? Because if it is, this would open up a whole new can of worms that gets REAL scary to me for men.
Not rape.
I don't feel it is either. But if SHE feels its rape, can she?
That's the dilemma I see here, because their are women that will say that the woman is entitled to feel as if she was raped. That YOU can't tell her how to feel. And that's where it all starts getting messy af to me.
But that's such an insane outlier. Why do conversations about this topic always end up discussing these crazy hypotheticals that almost never happen? The situation the OP is mad about happened on a TV show.
I'm just asking about mine, not the OP's tbh.
I just read that story like a week ago and went WTF? This thread just reminded me of it and was convenient to bring it up.
I didn't mean to pick on you. It just seems to always happen. "Rape is wrong..." "But what if...(insane situation)?" Are people expecting to get into these 1 in a million situations or it just for the mental exercise?
Anyway, that story is nuts.
I agree rape is rape. Trust me. With my past, I 100% agree it is.
But I also just trying to understand weird outliers. This story was one of them. The woman in it wasn't taken seriously. And I don't either, but I sit there and can only come up with the conclusion she was probably pissed off at him for something to report him for that, because IF she actually believes she is a victim, that would be nuts. Ya know?
You and I are mostly sane and rational, though. It is really hard to understand the thought process of a person who would make such a claim.click to expand

Posted by nikkistar
Playing devil's advocate here, just because this thread reminded me of a story I just read.
This woman filed a police report against a man she was seeing for a short period of time. Over an extended weekend she and him had spent roughly 4 days straight having sex. On the first or second day, he "titty fucked" her in the middle of having sex. She didn't like it, and told him to stop. So he did and they finished having intercourse naturally and continued for the next several days.
However after leaving his house, she went to the police station and reported him for rape and sexual assault for titty fucking her, because she didn't give him consent to do so and didn't like it. Just this portion of their sexual exploits during the 4 days.
Is this rape still in this scenario? Because if it is, this would open up a whole new can of worms that gets REAL scary to me for men.

Posted by MrsElleCappysnatchPosted by Pandora101Posted by MrsElleCappysnatchPosted by Pandora101
"However, everyone we....man or woman, has the individual right to say no anytime before the act takes place and the other person is always responsible for having self control."
I dont think the other person is is always responsible for having self control. Why would they have self control, if the participant doesnt have any self-control? how much we are responsible for any unresponsible person´s action?
I cant with you anymore.
Did you see the example of the locked versus unlocked car?
Whether to car is locked or not doesnt give you permission to take its contents.
I really don't understand why you don't get that.
I realise women have been conditioned for centuries that men have the final say in everything women but I am sad that it is so engrained in the brains of women that they actually dont feel they have rights over their decisions and somehow men are still not expected to respect those decisions.
SOME women will never take responsibility for their actions. Willingly.
"I really don't understand why you don't get that."
my word 🙂
It doesnt matter what "Some" women or men do. Personal accountability is yours and you own it.click to expand

Posted by Devil
What is weird for me is I thought pandora was a dude. Holy shit it's a female. Too hard to believe.

Posted by VenusAquariusPosted by nikkistar
Playing devil's advocate here, just because this thread reminded me of a story I just read.
This woman filed a police report against a man she was seeing for a short period of time. Over an extended weekend she and him had spent roughly 4 days straight having sex. On the first or second day, he "titty fucked" her in the middle of having sex. She didn't like it, and told him to stop. So he did and they finished having intercourse naturally and continued for the next several days.
However after leaving his house, she went to the police station and reported him for rape and sexual assault for titty fucking her, because she didn't give him consent to do so and didn't like it. Just this portion of their sexual exploits during the 4 days.
Is this rape still in this scenario? Because if it is, this would open up a whole new can of worms that gets REAL scary to me for men.
No because he stopped."She didn't like it, and told him to stop. So he did and they finished having intercourse naturally and continued for the next several days."click to expand

Posted by Devil
What is weird for me is I thought pandora was a dude. Holy shit it's a female. Too hard to believe.

Posted by Nadiakalidescope
At any point consent is taken away it can be rape because sex is not a contract where once you sign up that's it.

Posted by Pandora101Posted by Devil
What is weird for me is I thought pandora was a dude. Holy shit it's a female. Too hard to believe.
Pandora is a female and very much angered by false rape accusations, because it takes away the focus from the real rape victims. I dont count voluntarily naked girls on parties or strippers who invite you into the "Whatever you want" rooms, as rape. Girls have to take responsibility for their actions. You like to get naked or you like to get paid for sex? Its ok, enjoy it, but Its not rape. Enjoy it, but why to accuse the other of rape?
Some women get raped even if its not invited and agreed (like in these cases above), bear this in mind.click to expand

Posted by PhantumPosted by Pandora101Posted by Nadiakalidescope
At any point consent is taken away it can be rape because sex is not a contract where once you sign up that's it.
if you are not putting yourself into situations which can be considered as a consensual sex (getting naked or offering "room service") is consensual in my book
I really want to make sure everyone understands what rape is. If you offer yourself, its not rape, even if you not feel good afterwards and feel rejected. Because you are not total stupid and dumb to get into this situation, right? or are you? and you teach your girls and boys this same stupidity? That you get naked and during the intercourse you say no, and then accuse the other party of rape? (if they dont "love you anymore")
If you just go home from work and get attacked, thats rape. Unexpected. Horrible.
Lots of women and girls are shamed into the accusations
our girls are really not that imbecile, why force them to act like ones? Rape is rape, sexual liberation is sexual liberation
dont accuse others for YOUR actions.
(ps. not you, but generally)
You are the one who does not understand what rape is.click to expand



Posted by PhantumPosted by Pandora101Posted by PhantumPosted by Pandora101Posted by Nadiakalidescope
At any point consent is taken away it can be rape because sex is not a contract where once you sign up that's it.
if you are not putting yourself into situations which can be considered as a consensual sex (getting naked or offering "room service") is consensual in my book
I really want to make sure everyone understands what rape is. If you offer yourself, its not rape, even if you not feel good afterwards and feel rejected. Because you are not total stupid and dumb to get into this situation, right? or are you? and you teach your girls and boys this same stupidity? That you get naked and during the intercourse you say no, and then accuse the other party of rape? (if they dont "love you anymore")
If you just go home from work and get attacked, thats rape. Unexpected. Horrible.
Lots of women and girls are shamed into the accusations
our girls are really not that imbecile, why force them to act like ones? Rape is rape, sexual liberation is sexual liberation
dont accuse others for YOUR actions.
(ps. not you, but generally)
You are the one who does not understand what rape is.
"You are the one who does not understand what rape is"
I am not the one parroting the useless "if you say no, its no" mantra. Reality proved this wrong. What is the goal, to protect our girls or to let them know AFTERWARDS, that it was "rape"? Then it happens because the girl empowered by this bs is getting naked in a party, feeded by no is no AT ANY TIME. Is this really the way how to protect our girls?
Times are changing. Can't stop progress toward more democratic freedoms for people once they get a taste of it. And that means women should be able to be where they want to be without getting raped.click to expand

Posted by MrsElleCappysnatchPosted by Pandora101Posted by Nadiakalidescope
At any point consent is taken away it can be rape because sex is not a contract where once you sign up that's it.
if you are not putting yourself into situations which can be considered as a consensual sex (getting naked or offering "room service") is consensual in my book
I really want to make sure everyone understands what rape is. If you offer yourself, its not rape, even if you not feel good afterwards and feel rejected. Because you are not total stupid and dumb to get into this situation, right? or are you? and you teach your girls and boys this same stupidity? That you get naked and during the intercourse you say no, and then accuse the other party of rape? (if they dont "love you anymore")
If you just go home from work and get attacked, thats rape. Unexpected. Horrible.
Lots of women and girls are shamed into the accusations
our girls are really not that imbecile, why force them to act like ones? Rape is rape, sexual liberation is sexual liberation
dont accuse others for YOUR actions.
(ps. not you, but generally)
This is where I have a problem.
We are giving men and women the wrong message.
Instead of taking personal responsibility we try to place blame.
You shouldn't have been naked.
You shouldn't have been a stripper
You shouldn't have worn that
You shouldn't have been there
You shouldn't have drank alcohol
When in fact, the message should be....
You should say no if you don't want to have sex. Full stop.click to expand

Posted by PhantumPosted by Pandora101Posted by PhantumPosted by Pandora101Posted by PhantumPosted by Pandora101Posted by Nadiakalidescope
At any point consent is taken away it can be rape because sex is not a contract where once you sign up that's it.
if you are not putting yourself into situations which can be considered as a consensual sex (getting naked or offering "room service") is consensual in my book
I really want to make sure everyone understands what rape is. If you offer yourself, its not rape, even if you not feel good afterwards and feel rejected. Because you are not total stupid and dumb to get into this situation, right? or are you? and you teach your girls and boys this same stupidity? That you get naked and during the intercourse you say no, and then accuse the other party of rape? (if they dont "love you anymore")
If you just go home from work and get attacked, thats rape. Unexpected. Horrible.
Lots of women and girls are shamed into the accusations
our girls are really not that imbecile, why force them to act like ones? Rape is rape, sexual liberation is sexual liberation
dont accuse others for YOUR actions.
(ps. not you, but generally)
You are the one who does not understand what rape is.
"You are the one who does not understand what rape is"
I am not the one parroting the useless "if you say no, its no" mantra. Reality proved this wrong. What is the goal, to protect our girls or to let them know AFTERWARDS, that it was "rape"? Then it happens because the girl empowered by this bs is getting naked in a party, feeded by no is no AT ANY TIME. Is this really the way how to protect our girls?
Times are changing. Can't stop progress toward more democratic freedoms for people once they get a taste of it. And that means women should be able to be where they want to be without getting raped.
"Times are changing. Can't stop progress toward more democratic freedoms for people once they get a taste of it. And that means women should be able to be where they want to be without getting raped."
Absolutely.
But not naked, imho
So, what if a woman is having sex in her own bed naked with her own husband, and she wants to stop for some reason? (Any reason would do, but let me tell you the ones that have happened to me... it started to hurt or I had to pee.) If her husband refuses to stop, did he just rape his wife? According to US law, and every other law I know, he sure as hell did.
Edit: Just to be clear. I've never been raped, and my husband has never raped me or anyone. I feel I need to say that since people misread all the time.click to expand


Posted by Antiphates
Finding a working defintiojn of what is and entails rape and what isn't is indeed actually a lot harder than it might intuitively seem to be.
For both of the cases you stated I'd say it's rape as long as a refusal was articulated. In that sense the circumstances are irrelevant to the matter. On the other hand we could argue that the circumstances are in fact relevant because the women might be too frightened to voice her protest.
Per defintion it will be hard to be seen as rape while our intution clearly would say it is.
Another case would be one where the intital sex was consensual and already 95% with the men about to ejaculate and the women withdraws her consent seconds before the ejaculation. Per defintion it might be seen as rape because the women was harmed in the sense of having to endure something she didn't want.
And those cases aren't even about the legal nightmare that the whole thing is. The last case could easily be seen as a legal rape case with evidence.
Then there is the general issue of how you prove the protest if the two people were alone when protest and rape happended. It's practically impossible to determine it from a legal perspective.

Posted by Phantum
In my opinion the question should not be "what can men or people in general get away with?" It should be, "what constitutes being a normal, healthy, sexual person and how do I not violate other people?"


Posted by PhantumPosted by Pandora101Posted by Phantum
In my opinion the question should not be "what can men or people in general get away with?" It should be, "what constitutes being a normal, healthy, sexual person and how do I not violate other people?"
actually, the original question was something like: it is the same rape, if someone offers themselves or the person get raped accidentally
You're wanting to redefine rape so that some women's rapes don't count and are instead blamed on them. Why?
I suspect that you don't approve of the way certain women behave, and so you want to keep this stone age form of vigilantism alive, where men teach women "a lesson" via rape.click to expand

Posted by AntiphatesPosted by Pandora101Posted by Antiphates
Finding a working defintiojn of what is and entails rape and what isn't is indeed actually a lot harder than it might intuitively seem to be.
For both of the cases you stated I'd say it's rape as long as a refusal was articulated. In that sense the circumstances are irrelevant to the matter. On the other hand we could argue that the circumstances are in fact relevant because the women might be too frightened to voice her protest.
Per defintion it will be hard to be seen as rape while our intution clearly would say it is.
Another case would be one where the intital sex was consensual and already 95% with the men about to ejaculate and the women withdraws her consent seconds before the ejaculation. Per defintion it might be seen as rape because the women was harmed in the sense of having to endure something she didn't want.
And those cases aren't even about the legal nightmare that the whole thing is. The last case could easily be seen as a legal rape case with evidence.
Then there is the general issue of how you prove the protest if the two people were alone when protest and rape happended. It's practically impossible to determine it from a legal perspective.
I just want to say to our girls, you take responsibility. If you want sex, go for it, but dont make a scene about rape, if you didnt get, what you wanted
tell your daughters this, it will be more beneficial than the "no is no at any time, even during the intercourse" nonsense. Sign your girls up to self-defense classes, so they can parade naked in parties unattached, if that is what you want (not you, generally)
how many of your girls are attending self-defence classes? if you say them its okey to say no during the intercourse and then cry rape, it would be more beneficial for their mental health to fight the "pig" off, if they REALLY didnt want it
That might be fitting reaction to an enviroment where rape is an almost daily occurance but it's something that can severly impact your enjoyment of life.
The real goal, I think, is to end up having a society were the number of rapes is very low or, at best, isn't even a thing outside of the occasional odd cases of misunderstanding.click to expand
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
My question is, is there a difference between people who get raped just going home at a dark alley by random predators and between people who offered the: "I am here for you honey, I do whatever you like" type of rape?
If you offer sex, you are not raped. If you not invite this in your life by saying you do anything, you are raped.
Or?
I mean, you can wear sexy outfit, it doesnt mean you want sexual intercourse.
If you say: I will do anything (in a place designed for it), it invites a very possible intercourse, so why cry rape? more money?
thoughts?