
LetltB
@LetltB
12 Years5,000+ Posts
Comments: 1 · Posts: 9186 · Topics: 179





Posted by LetltB
My opinion, I really could care less about the guy. He could've stayed and rotted in prison. He was kept from society. I also believe survivors of victims/immediate family should be able to make the decision after all facts are brought to trial and the defendent is found guilty as to whether or not an eye for eye should be the proper punishment.
On a side note, this IS the second time this botched execution happened in this state. Why is this new drug being introduced for execution when other executions and the drug they've always used has gone forward without incident?


Posted by LetltB
I provided a link earlier on the legal findings which include his mental state by doctors a couple of pages back.

Posted by LIb4Life
I could care less about about a MONSTER that would inflict this kinda torture on another human being, and I'm sure his parents would feel the same as me or any other parent that looses a child to tragedy ...
.





Posted by jeannegrey
Speaking as a an economomist:
The death penalty is not cost effective. It costs more to execute someone than it does to incarcerate for life...
Abortion... now that is cost effective--if you really wanna get technical about it. Unwanted child: aborted--the original cost: is around $ 500- $ 1,000. A unwanted child forced onto a parent that DOES NOt want the child? *COULD* end up abused or in the foster system---costing tax payers MUCH more than $ 500.
NOW obviously---this is all horrible ways of seeing these two issues. But in terms of what is "best for society" in terms of COST ONLY, that is the straight facts.
(just FYI: these are not MY personal views on these subjects...) please don't go insane on me ...from a political or moral stance...





Posted by DonAmanMarat
I oppose the death penalty.
Not because its cruel, unusual or sadistic, politics, economy ...non of this bullshit!
Its just too goddamn lenient!
For example...
When you were a child and did something wrong, your dad gave you a spanking!
Spanking was never too bad (you got used to it, forgot about it )and continued on with your mischievious ways.
It was the when he'd lock you in a bathroom for an hour or so, you'd truly think about what you did.
From my experience it was much more worst than corporal punishment.
He died a slow death, system did him favor!
I SEE HIM AS AN ESCAPEE. HE'S A COWARD ASS FUGITIVE!
They shoulda locked him in a cell for ENTIRE life with limited access to food, water, and human contact so he's a living dead with very little to think, except for "WHAT I DONE?" "WHAT WOULD I HAVE DONE DIFFERENT?"
Running the picture about the last moments of his free life....
OVER AND OVER til the levee finally breaks.
These thoughts can run you mad in 2 minutes.
Imagine em for 25+ years!

Posted by munchkinPosted by DonAmanMarat
I oppose the death penalty.
Not because its cruel, unusual or sadistic, politics, economy ...non of this bullshit!
Its just too goddamn lenient!
For example...
When you were a child and did something wrong, your dad gave you a spanking!
Spanking was never too bad (you got used to it, forgot about it )and continued on with your mischievious ways.
It was the when he'd lock you in a bathroom for an hour or so, you'd truly think about what you did.
From my experience it was much more worst than corporal punishment.
He died a slow death, system did him favor!
I SEE HIM AS AN ESCAPEE. HE'S A COWARD ASS FUGITIVE!
They shoulda locked him in a cell for ENTIRE life with limited access to food, water, and human contact so he's a living dead with very little to think, except for "WHAT I DONE?" "WHAT WOULD I HAVE DONE DIFFERENT?"
Running the picture about the last moments of his free life....
OVER AND OVER til the levee finally breaks.
These thoughts can run you mad in 2 minutes.
Imagine em for 25+ years!
Yea, except it's more like having taxpayers pay your room and board while you jerk off to Jerry Springer in the rec room.click to expand

Posted by P-AngelPosted by LIb4Life
I could care less about about a MONSTER that would inflict this kinda torture on another human being, and I'm sure his parents would feel the same as me or any other parent that looses a child to tragedy ...
.
how could any person possibly agree or not with you .... when you no clue what I was saying.
I am talking about the case in point, and NOT about whatever it is you have in your mind.
the man in this case has a parent, so your same theory of how a parent feels applies. It's not rocket science. How is it possible that you can't grasp such an elemtary concept.
unless of course, you can't figure out how to pry your panties out of your ass ..... and them being wedged prevents you from rationalizing.click to expand

Posted by WaterCupPosted by LetltB
I provided a link earlier on the legal findings which include his mental state by doctors a couple of pages back.
People get misdiagnosed all the time. It proves nothing. Murderers get away with their crimes all the time by faking some sort of disorder, which gets approved by some professional. Remember the guy who murdered his whole family & claimed he was sleep walking during the murders? He got acquitted because some quack showed the courts the "proof". But others in the field disagreed. My point is, no 3 or 4 doctors are going to return with the same results in proving someone's mental health.
Oscar Pistorius is also going to get away with murder with his fake GAD diagnosis.click to expand



Posted by Nala13
Believe it or not life in prison is cheaper than execution. The burden will be ours no matter what we do.

Posted by Nala13
Believe it or not life in prison is cheaper than execution. The burden will be ours no matter what we do.


Posted by munchkinPosted by Nala13
Believe it or not life in prison is cheaper than execution. The burden will be ours no matter what we do.
This is true right now, because of how expensive and tedious the lethal injection is. But if the US can get over its French Revolution hangups, the guillotine will make it much much cheaper than lifelong keeping of an inmate.click to expand

Posted by Nala13Posted by munchkinPosted by Nala13
Believe it or not life in prison is cheaper than execution. The burden will be ours no matter what we do.
This is true right now, because of how expensive and tedious the lethal injection is. But if the US can get over its French Revolution hangups, the guillotine will make it much much cheaper than lifelong keeping of an inmate.
I think that would be a bit much. Heads falling off and rolling around. Blood squirting everywhere. I would maybe support a firing squad but not the guillotine. That's too much.click to expand


Posted by LetltB
I'd like to add guillotine not only for pedophiles, but the use of it for dismembering rapists as well. Especially 20 year old punks who get off on raping 80 year old women etc..






Posted by HeartOfALioN
WWJD?

Posted by MayDay31
I agree with don, death is definitely the easy way out. Solitary confinement for the rest of their days. But true that taxpayers would be the one their burden falls on.
I don't really care too much if their death is humane or not. I don't think the death penalty, slow and cruel or not, is the worst way they could go. Rotting away for 50 years alone in a cell is way worse. And fuck em. That's what they get.
I like p angels thing about making them donate organs. That is a really good idea.
And I didn't know ohio is so big on botched executions. Interesting to know.

Posted by LIb4LifePosted by HeartOfALioN
WWJD?
Well..in the old testament, it was an eye for an eye, but then man re-wrote the bible, so it became a little softer, and the LORD saith, vengeance is mine, but that's a hard pill to swallow when your child is brutally and inhumanly slaughtered, so I dunno.click to expand

Posted by HeartOfALioNPosted by LIb4LifePosted by HeartOfALioN
WWJD?
Well..in the old testament, it was an eye for an eye, but then man re-wrote the bible, so it became a little softer, and the LORD saith, vengeance is mine, but that's a hard pill to swallow when your child is brutally and inhumanly slaughtered, so I dunno.
Indeed. Makes one wonder which one is the truth.click to expand


Posted by CapTennPosted by HeartOfALioNPosted by LIb4LifePosted by HeartOfALioN
WWJD?
Well..in the old testament, it was an eye for an eye, but then man re-wrote the bible, so it became a little softer, and the LORD saith, vengeance is mine, but that's a hard pill to swallow when your child is brutally and inhumanly slaughtered, so I dunno.
Indeed. Makes one wonder which one is the truth.
*sigh*
Man didn't rewrite anything. God, in the flesh, known as Jesus of Nazareth defined the new covenant, or New Testament, if you prefer.
C'mon folks....click to expand


Posted by Wynter
Would have been cheaper and quicker to just shoot him in the fucking head.

Posted by HeartOfALioN
Posted by CapTennPosted by HeartOfALioNPosted by LIb4LifePosted by HeartOfALioN
WWJD?
Well..in the old testament, it was an eye for an eye, but then man re-wrote the bible, so it became a little softer, and the LORD saith, vengeance is mine, but that's a hard pill to swallow when your child is brutally and inhumanly slaughtered, so I dunno.
Indeed. Makes one wonder which one is the truth.
*sigh*
Man didn't rewrite anything. God, in the flesh, known as Jesus of Nazareth defined the new covenant, or New Testament, if you prefer.
C'mon folks....
That wouldn't be my argument whether or not Jesus wrote the first documents but rather if it has been changed to fit todays bill.
So much disinformation in the present.click to expand

Posted by HeartOfALioNPosted by CapTennPosted by HeartOfALioNPosted by LIb4LifePosted by HeartOfALioN
WWJD?
Well..in the old testament, it was an eye for an eye, but then man re-wrote the bible, so it became a little softer, and the LORD saith, vengeance is mine, but that's a hard pill to swallow when your child is brutally and inhumanly slaughtered, so I dunno.
Indeed. Makes one wonder which one is the truth.
*sigh*
Man didn't rewrite anything. God, in the flesh, known as Jesus of Nazareth defined the new covenant, or New Testament, if you prefer.
C'mon folks....
That wouldn't be my argument whether or not Jesus wrote the first documents but rather if it has been changed to fit todays bill.
So much disinformation in the present.click to expand




Posted by LIb4LifePosted by HeartOfALioNPosted by CapTennPosted by HeartOfALioNPosted by LIb4LifePosted by HeartOfALioN
WWJD?
Well..in the old testament, it was an eye for an eye, but then man re-wrote the bible, so it became a little softer, and the LORD saith, vengeance is mine, but that's a hard pill to swallow when your child is brutally and inhumanly slaughtered, so I dunno.
Indeed. Makes one wonder which one is the truth.
*sigh*
Man didn't rewrite anything. God, in the flesh, known as Jesus of Nazareth defined the new covenant, or New Testament, if you prefer.
C'mon folks....
That wouldn't be my argument whether or not Jesus wrote the first documents but rather if it has been changed to fit todays bill.
So much disinformation in the present.
True True..the whole bible can be contradictory, that's why you have to use your own common sense, if you were blessed with it, to come to your own understanding of the bible, but at the same time, I guess it's a good thing because we all fall short of God's glory, so technically if he didn't forgive us for our current and pass transgressions, what would the state of humanity be. That's why I use the disclaimer: I have mixed emotions about certain things, because I am still learning and trying to understand certain things in the bible. As far as GOD defining the new testament, I don't know about that either. I wasn't there and since he used Man as a tool to re-write his word, we all know how man can twist things around to fit his ideals and beliefs, so I will leave that alone.I'll just wait until I have my meeting with GOD and personally ask him that question.
🙂click to expand

Posted by MontgomeryPosted by HeartOfALioN
Posted by CapTennPosted by HeartOfALioNPosted by LIb4LifePosted by HeartOfALioN
WWJD?
Well..in the old testament, it was an eye for an eye, but then man re-wrote the bible, so it became a little softer, and the LORD saith, vengeance is mine, but that's a hard pill to swallow when your child is brutally and inhumanly slaughtered, so I dunno.
Indeed. Makes one wonder which one is the truth.
*sigh*
Man didn't rewrite anything. God, in the flesh, known as Jesus of Nazareth defined the new covenant, or New Testament, if you prefer.
C'mon folks....
That wouldn't be my argument whether or not Jesus wrote the first documents but rather if it has been changed to fit todays bill.
So much disinformation in the present.
Defined.
And there is a lot of disinfo, but there are countless versions against which to compare, including
Young's literal translated from the original Hebrew and Greek texts.
🙂
click to expand
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
Execution: 13 December 2006
State: Florida
Drug protocol: Lethal injection
What happened: Executioners —pushed [the needles] all the way through the blood vessels into surrounding soft tissue??, rather than into his veins, leaving him with chemical burns on both arms. According to the Associated Press, —witnesses reported Diaz was moving as long as 24 minutes after the first injection, including grimacing, blinking, licking his lips, blowing and attempting to mouth words.?? The execution took about 34 minutes. The duration of three-drug lethal injections vary depending on state protocol and the drugs involved, but the AP reports that this method would typically take 15 minutes, with the inmate unconscious after 3-5 minutes.
Brian Steckel, 36
Execution: 4 November 2005
State: Delaware
Drug protocol: Triple injection
What happened: The machine meant to deliver the lethal drugs did not function correctly, forcing the execution team to switch to a backup device. They did not re-administer the sedative, however, leaving Steckel lucid throughout the 12 minutes it took for the drugs to take effect. He spoke throughout, and at one point looked to the warden and said, —I didn't think it would take this long.??
Pedro Medina, 39
Execution: 25 March 1997
State: Florida
Method: Electric chair
What happened: Medina's head caught fire from inside its mask after officials delivered electricity to the chair. A witness testified that Medina kept breathing for several seconds, saw smoke and smelled burning.
Jesse Tafero, 43
Execution: 4 May 1990
State: Florida
Method: Electric chair
What happened: On the electric chair Tafero??s head —burst into flame??, which officials blamed on the synthetic, —water-filled sponge attached to his head [to] conduct electricity from the electrode.?? Prison officials then decided that —only sea sponges could enter the death chamber.??