
Astrobyn
@Astrobyn
11 Years1,000+ Posts
Comments: 593 · Posts: 4512 · Topics: 128




Posted by elllesquelmao youre on a roll this week
I was wondering what happened to kittenlarouge.

Posted by elllesqueHow can you have 'real life' sex with someone you've never actually seen IRL?! I swear that can only happen to a Brit..
how can you have sex ten times and not know it was a dildo?
I have to touch. how can you not touch?






Posted by Astrobyn"I'm here for you.."
“You were so convincing in your cruel deception of [the victim] she thought she had finally found a man she could love and be with,” Mirror Online reported

Posted by Rambunctious76Like I said I don't buy it.Posted by DamnataMaybe not all along, but at least after they met in person.
I really thnk she knew all along.
I am gullible myself but..uhm..yeah.
She was in denial to the point of stupidity.click to expand




Posted by elllesqueLmao!
I was wondering what happened to kittenlarouge.




Posted by Rambunctious76what about prosthethic balls. do they jingle?Posted by truecapThe lack of an Adam's apple wouldn't have been obvious to the victim?
For my own sanity, I'm going to assume the victim was really, really naive and inexperienced.
OMG! Just had a thought. What if she was a virgin and didn't know any better?
How sad to lose virginity that way.
click to expand


Posted by Rambunctious76I know, I know. I'm reaching for straws here to find some of justification why she didn't know. lol!Posted by truecapThe lack of an Adam's apple wouldn't have been obvious to the victim?
For my own sanity, I'm going to assume the victim was really, really naive and inexperienced.
OMG! Just had a thought. What if she was a virgin and didn't know any better?
How sad to lose virginity that way.
click to expand


Posted by truecapfixed.
I just can't get over how the prosthethic penis got pulled over her eyes.
*Pun intended*

Posted by VanishLike I said, we just needed this case to truly understand the cliche. It's quite profound lol.
I just love how "its not what you think" always means "its exactly what you think"

Posted by DamnataLol!Posted by truecapfixed.
I just can't get over how the prosthethic penis got pulled over her eyes.
*Pun intended*click to expand


Posted by MlleFiskIt's not what you think.
Gifting a DXP catfish a $ 500 vitamix blender doesnt seem so bad anymore.


Posted by SassyKiwiAre you sure your friend is female?
Omg I can't get over how much that woman looks like an older version of one of my close friends in that picture. I need to send this to her innocent, virgin butt.

Posted by DamnataI... I... she.., I really wanna share a picture of her with you guys but I don't want to exploit her 😢Posted by SassyKiwiAre you sure your friend is female?
Omg I can't get over how much that woman looks like an older version of one of my close friends in that picture. I need to send this to her innocent, virgin butt.click to expand

Posted by SassyKiwiI can think of a good pick up line now to get things frisky with someone, based on this article. lolPosted by DamnataI... I... she.., I really wanna share a picture of her with you guys but I don't want to exploit her 😢Posted by SassyKiwiAre you sure your friend is female?
Omg I can't get over how much that woman looks like an older version of one of my close friends in that picture. I need to send this to her innocent, virgin butt.click to expand

Posted by Rambunctious76*side eye* so lame as f*ck (pun intended).Posted by PhoenixRisingStarfish position. She probably just lay there throughout most of their sessions.
What the many f*cks? That must have been one delux "I can't believe it's not penis" type of dildo that she could not tell it wasn't real.
And how exactly is this "highly elaborate" deceptive woman built? I see (although fairly small) breast in that pic, so how did she mask those without detection. I understand the use of chest binders, but you would feel the material.
No seriously what kind of "just lay there and take it" sex were they having that she never touched, embraced, grabbed, caressed this woman? GTFOH.
click to expand


Posted by MlleFiskIt would explain the fullwaterpisces threads....
Can we start guessing signs—
Pisces-Cancer unrequited love....



Posted by Rambunctious76It is speculation because the judge's rulling was super emotional, which pretty much proves my point about women turning the tearducts on for men. I would have understood the fraud part, it seemed rational.Posted by tizianiKnowing the British justice system (actually all legal systems), they probably just referenced cases of fraud, acting under false pretenses etc.etc. Cases where the perpetrator would groom a victim using emotional leverage in return for monetary gain. But that's just speculation on my part.
I'd be interested to see what they referred to in the sentence, it's either a brand new ruling or there's legal precedent for the 8 year thing I'm guessing.
Plus false advertisement isn't a crime is it? It's a civil infraction. She was sentenced under criminal law, different domain entirely.click to expand




Posted by Rambunctious76Do you think the court would've had mercy on a 'victim'Posted by tizianiKnowing the British justice system (actually all legal systems), they probably just referenced cases of fraud, acting under false pretenses etc.etc. Cases where the perpetrator would groom a victim using emotional leverage in return for monetary gain. But that's just speculation on my part.
I'd be interested to see what they referred to in the sentence, it's either a brand new ruling or there's legal precedent for the 8 year thing I'm guessing.
Plus false advertisement isn't a crime is it? It's a civil infraction. She was sentenced under criminal law, different domain entirely.click to expand

Posted by ImpulsvThe problem isn't the deception, it's the judge ruling this as sexual assault.Posted by DamnataSo any act followed by deception = criminal
(cont)
“The deception conduct was part and parcel of Gayle Newland maintaining the male persona she had adopted,” she said. “The sexual activity was only criminal as a result of this deception and it should not be used exacerbate her culpability. To use sexual and gender confusion as a basis for criminal liability was – in my opinion – a step too far; to use it to further justify a lengthy sentence is cruel.”
Wtf
Why isolate sex
How about a marriage " he deceived me" give him
10 years.
Why is sex or gender make it special. This judges argument does not stand.click to expand

Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
You read that right.
The 25-year-old British woman, pictured above, slept with an unnamed woman 10 times before she became suspicious.
Described as “scheming,” “deceitful” and “highly manipulative” by Judge Roger Dutton, Newland was convicted on three charges of sexual assault.
“You were so convincing in your cruel deception of [the victim] she thought she had finally found a man she could love and be with,” Mirror Online reported.
Apparently, Newland and the victim’s relationship began as a two-year online romance.
The first time the two met was in February 2013, but, according to Mail Online, “the complainant told the jury that Kye had asked her to wear a blindfold because he was insecure about his looks following supposed life-saving brain surgery.”
The case was described by Cheshire Police Detective Inspector Clare Coleman as a “highly elaborate deception.”
“This was a highly elaborate deception where Newland abused the trust that the victim had in her,” she said. “She has been extremely upset by what has happened and there is no doubt that there will be a lasting psychological impact on her.”
“I would like to thank the victim for her bravery and co-operation throughout the investigation,” she added.
Read more at http://rare.us/story/the-way-a-british-woman-tricked-a-friend-into-having-sex-with-her-is-beyond-creepy/#Aeu75KwoGFvGsaY2.99