
R1g0rM0rT1s
@R1g0rM0rT1s
13 Years1,000+ Posts
Comments: 0 · Posts: 3039 · Topics: 111



Posted by ellessque
I think that's your leo 🙂
I heard cancers don't wait 😛


Posted by HouseCleaning
what i meant there was 2 groups, 1 group of ladies prefer casual sex on equal terms and another group of ladies against the idea and some undecided. its the liberals and the conservatives versus off and then i didn't care any more. i use the word prefer because people are entitled to their opinions. i also didn't mean sexual animals
i don't think so about that whole crab thing. there is some significance coming from some where and the sex seems like it was the tipping point

Posted by AreTwoFour
I also want to go ahead and have sex and feel if there is a connection or not before I waste my time.

Posted by capgirl69Posted by AreTwoFour
I also want to go ahead and have sex and feel if there is a connection or not before I waste my time.
This is how I feel too, most of the time.
Let's see what you got. lol. I spent many years in a miserable sexual situation and I won't be repeating that any time soon.
That being said, not ever done it on the first date.
Never hooked up with a stranger, or randomly hooked up, either
Had a few FWB, a few relationships. I slept with my ex-husband on the second date. He still married me.
I was wondering where the original comment came from. Can you link it?
The way I read it, I think it is more about the guy than the girl. In fact, whenever I do "wait" with a guy it is more about how he will perceive it than how I feel about it. I generally dgaf one way or the other but I know how important it can be to be perceived as a "nice girl".click to expand


Posted by DazedScorpPosted by IntriguedScorp
Well in my case as it so happens, if I end up in bed with someone we end up having a relationship. Just how it has generally worked in my case and that includes first date sex. However. First date is like months after I have spent time observing and know he'll be able to handle me.
This is me.
I generally know if I want to presue a relationship well before we have sex. It's either a NO, or a GO. And if it's a go, and we have sex (even if it's the first date), I'll likely give you a key to my place when you wake up... maybe breakfast too.click to expand

Posted by R1g0rM0rT1sPosted by tiki33
Hopefully you haven't had sex with him (sorry for implying that you did). Cut your losses if he's not responding to you in a positive consistent way then there is no reason to continue.
this kind of comment pisses me off....no offence tiki cos you're just saying what is a popular theory...that women who give it up too soon are gonna get disrespected as a result....but i beg to differ.
IF a woman uses sex as some kind of tool to seal a relationship deal then yeah, it's gonna backfire but if a woman finds a man attractive and wants him to fuck her for the same selfish reasons HE wants to fuck her...then what's the problem?
it's just that this 'theory' implies that women can't enjoy sex on a purely carnal level. am i really in the minority of women who can?
it's varied for me personally but i don't have a 'rule' as to when i'll sleep with someone, i let my body tell me...I decide. i can honestly say i've never been disrespected for it either.click to expand

Posted by QUlETstormPosted by R1g0rM0rT1sPosted by tiki33
Hopefully you haven't had sex with him (sorry for implying that you did). Cut your losses if he's not responding to you in a positive consistent way then there is no reason to continue.
this kind of comment pisses me off....no offence tiki cos you're just saying what is a popular theory...that women who give it up too soon are gonna get disrespected as a result....
Is that what she was implying or is that just your perception of what she was implying?
The way I read it, I took it as "hopefully you haven't had sex with him" because it would only deepen the ties & feelings for him.
I admit I did not read the other thread, but from that sentence alone ^ that's how I took it.click to expand

Posted by tiki33Posted by QUlETstormPosted by R1g0rM0rT1sPosted by tiki33
Hopefully you haven't had sex with him (sorry for implying that you did). Cut your losses if he's not responding to you in a positive consistent way then there is no reason to continue.
this kind of comment pisses me off....no offence tiki cos you're just saying what is a popular theory...that women who give it up too soon are gonna get disrespected as a result....
Is that what she was implying or is that just your perception of what she was implying?
The way I read it, I took it as "hopefully you haven't had sex with him" because it would only deepen the ties & feelings for him.
I admit I did not read the other thread, but from that sentence alone ^ that's how I took it.
This^^ That's exactly what I meant QS.click to expand



Posted by tiki33
"he's had plenty of involvement with women but all of his long term relationships have been either as the third party in adultery (not his) or has come about after the woman left the man she was cheating on with him. "
That would have been my queue to move on. I just can't. He's too fucked up to start. Him revealing his toxic relationship patterns is a big intimacy red flag.

Posted by R1g0rM0rT1sPosted by capgirl69Posted by AreTwoFour
I also want to go ahead and have sex and feel if there is a connection or not before I waste my time.
This is how I feel too, most of the time.
Let's see what you got. lol. I spent many years in a miserable sexual situation and I won't be repeating that any time soon.
That being said, not ever done it on the first date.
Never hooked up with a stranger, or randomly hooked up, either
Had a few FWB, a few relationships. I slept with my ex-husband on the second date. He still married me.
I was wondering where the original comment came from. Can you link it?
The way I read it, I think it is more about the guy than the girl. In fact, whenever I do "wait" with a guy it is more about how he will perceive it than how I feel about it. I generally dgaf one way or the other but I know how important it can be to be perceived as a "nice girl".click to expand
i just think that it shouldn't matter about anyone's perception of you other than your own. what is a 'nice girl' anyway? and why does being up tight make you nice?
i know this is an extreme attitude but in somalia they still have the practice of female circumcision which basically entails the removal of the labia and the clitoris with the vagina being stitched back together to leave the smallest hole only to be penetrated by the woman's husband. this practice is aimed at preventing women from experiencing the pleasure of sex that according to the culture could lead to promiscuity.
so basically these women are being deprived of the joy of celebrating their own sexuality. they are made to feel dirty for even having sexual urges and it's obvious to most in the western world that this is a barbaric and outrageous tradition.
nevertheless, i think society's attitudes to women and their sexuality still emanate from this extreme. women are made to feel LESS if they are overtly sexual and a moral standard is applied to them that isn't applied equally to men.
so as far as i'm concerned this overall view of women being cheap if they have multiple sexual partners is not a REAL perception but a cumulative generational attitude to women which belongs in the trash can with the attitude that women should be in the kit



Posted by R1g0rM0rT1s
i've been seeing crabman for a few weeks. he's great fun to hang out with but he's just too intense sometimes. i told him i don't like 'defining' things too soon as people tend to cos it all smacks of staking a claim and personally, i want to be sure there's a long term prospect before any 'announcements' are made.
anyway, i felt i had to talk to him about someone who hurt me really badly and who was still fucking with my head not only because this man is a good friend of the crab but cos it's directly affecting my ability to trust anyone.
so we had a heart to heart about it all. it wasn't pleasant cos the crab got upset at the prospect that he was second best or that i was just hanging around until this other guy jerked my chain and i'd be off. he got so pissed off with the conclusion that he asked me to leave and he meant it. i refused to budge however as he'd totally misunderstood me. i wasn't telling him i had feelings for the other man but i was trying to tell him that i hadn't entirely dealt with what he had DONE to me. i told him that after a long marriage full of mis-communication and zero trust, i wanted to be with someone i can be completely honest with but i got the feeling in last night's discussion that i would've been better off editing what i said so that he didn't get hold of the wrong stick and run with it.
he said i offered him no assurance that i wanted to be with him and that all i'd said was that i didn't want to see the other dude. i dunno, it felt like everything i said made him feel more insecure but i've only known him 4 weeks!! to me that's no time at all, particularly as i've just moved and have had some business problems distracting me.
how do i slow things down without him misinterpreting that for no interest? it's for his benefit as well cos as i said to him i don't want to rush into anything when i'm still a little fucked up about what went on before cos that's when you're in danger of rebounding and i really do like him.
i'm worried that if he doesn't slow down the pace i'll end up really hurting him cos i feel suffocated already and i barely know him!!

Posted by HouseCleaning
The warning signs were at the beginning
Posted by R1g0rM0rT1s
i've been seeing crabman for a few weeks. he's great fun to hang out with but he's just too intense sometimes. i told him i don't like 'defining' things too soon as people tend to cos it all smacks of staking a claim and personally, i want to be sure there's a long term prospect before any 'announcements' are made.
anyway, i felt i had to talk to him about someone who hurt me really badly and who was still fucking with my head not only because this man is a good friend of the crab but cos it's directly affecting my ability to trust anyone.
so we had a heart to heart about it all. it wasn't pleasant cos the crab got upset at the prospect that he was second best or that i was just hanging around until this other guy jerked my chain and i'd be off. he got so pissed off with the conclusion that he asked me to leave and he meant it. i refused to budge however as he'd totally misunderstood me. i wasn't telling him i had feelings for the other man but i was trying to tell him that i hadn't entirely dealt with what he had DONE to me. i told him that after a long marriage full of mis-communication and zero trust, i wanted to be with someone i can be completely honest with but i got the feeling in last night's discussion that i would've been better off editing what i said so that he didn't get hold of the wrong stick and run with it.
he said i offered him no assurance that i wanted to be with him and that all i'd said was that i didn't want to see the other dude. i dunno, it felt like everything i said made him feel more insecure but i've only known him 4 weeks!! to me that's no time at all, particularly as i've just moved and have had some business problems distracting me.
how do i slow things down without him misinterpreting that for no interest? it's for his benefit as well cos as i said to him i don't want to rush into anything when i'm still a little fucked up about what went on before cos that's when you're in danger of rebounding and i really do like him.
i'm worried that if he doesn't slow down the pace i'll end up really hurting him cos i feel suffocated already and i barely know him!!click to expand

Posted by NicroblizPosted by tiki33Cancer... toxic... notice a correlation?
"he's had plenty of involvement with women but all of his long term relationships have been either as the third party in adultery (not his) or has come about after the woman left the man she was cheating on with him. "
That would have been my queue to move on. I just can't. He's too fucked up to start. Him revealing his toxic relationship patterns is a big intimacy red flag.
click to expand



Posted by HouseCleaning
I would think yes and it would be coming from the same women who want these men to bang their brains out. So you're all hypocrites and I don't like any of you



Posted by tiziani
With all due respect Rigormortis, it doesn't seem likely you're going to be part of any breaking of stereotypes with the amount of times you have contradicted yourself in this thread alone. And I mean that light-heartedly, but if anything you're reinforcing several stereotypes. You would have been better off just saying you're happy and leaving it at that.
I do agree, however, that every individual deserves to be respected. But you even contradicted that by listing a number of things that you feel others should or should not do, and what needs to be done as a society. Can't have it every single which way. Either you're happy or you're not.

Posted by HouseCleaning
you don't take humor too well? ok expect for R1g0rM0rT1s, the rest of yous are hypocrites and I don't like any of yous

Posted by R1g0rM0rT1sPosted by tiziani
With all due respect Rigormortis, it doesn't seem likely you're going to be part of any breaking of stereotypes with the amount of times you have contradicted yourself in this thread alone. And I mean that light-heartedly, but if anything you're reinforcing several stereotypes. You would have been better off just saying you're happy and leaving it at that.
I do agree, however, that every individual deserves to be respected. But you even contradicted that by listing a number of things that you feel others should or should not do, and what needs to be done as a society. Can't have it every single which way. Either you're happy or you're not.
can you be more specific about these contradictions?
having an opinion doesn't mean you disrespect a different one.click to expand

Posted by tiziani
Not just the fact of telling others what they should do, but also the event of actually caring about what others are doing (just another form of caring what people think) whilst living her life style as she chooses.
And then there was the very first contradiction where she admitting she would never go back to having sex with an ex.
Even before DeeGee's intervention, I was not even tempting to list all the contradictions because there are too many to name and I'm not even tempted to debate them.
I guess my roundabout point is you've unwittingly proven people can't have unemotional sex, since there are a core of emotions, thoughts and experiences behind why we do what we do. And you've shared all your inner conflicts in this thread alone.
But like I said, sincerely whatever makes you happy. I'm not trying to tell anyone to change their life. I just think when you're happy doing what you're doing, you wouldn't need to elaborate on it towards anyone much less would it even be a debate lingering on your mind.

Posted by ellessquePosted by R1g0rM0rT1sPosted by HouseCleaning
I would think yes and it would be coming from the same women who want these men to bang their brains out. So you're all hypocrites and I don't like any of you
allow me to answer the question before you decide i'm a hypocrite.
i don't want men to supress their carnal instincts just as i don't think women should. i simply think it's about time that sex is acknowledged as something that is shared between two individuals for pretty much the same reasons but usually with completely different expectations. women should stop thinking they're heading for a relationship if they fuck someone and men should stop assuming it's the be all and end all to the women they're fucking or that they've somehow 'conquered' them. sex isn't a game, a treat or a reward.....it's a basic human instinctive activity. if men OR women like sex with multiple partners (not at the same time, lol...that's greedy) it doesn't mean they're 'bad', it just means they are HUMAN!
there are a whole bunch of stereotype values which need blowing out of the water and we should be more concerned that whatever our sexual appetite or preferences, we respect ourselves and our partners.
OMFG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
+1 GAZILLION EIGHT HUNDRED AND EIGHTY EIGHT
FFS! I CANNOT +1 THIS ENOUGH (and might get it tattooed on my forehead!)click to expand

Posted by tiziani
Not just the fact of telling others what they should do, but also the event of actually caring about what others are doing (just another form of caring what people think) whilst living her life style as she chooses.
And then there was the very first contradiction where she admitting she would never go back to having sex with an ex.
Even before DeeGee's intervention, I was not even tempting to list all the contradictions because there are too many to name and I'm not even tempted to debate them.
I guess my roundabout point is you've unwittingly proven people can't have unemotional sex, since there are a core of emotions, thoughts and experiences behind why we do what we do. And you've shared all your inner conflicts in this thread alone.
But like I said, sincerely whatever makes you happy. I'm not trying to tell anyone to change their life. I just think when you're happy doing what you're doing, you wouldn't need to elaborate on it towards anyone much less would it even be a debate lingering on your mind.

Posted by ellessquePosted by R1g0rM0rT1sPosted by HouseCleaning
I would think yes and it would be coming from the same women who want these men to bang their brains out. So you're all hypocrites and I don't like any of you
allow me to answer the question before you decide i'm a hypocrite.
i don't want men to supress their carnal instincts just as i don't think women should. i simply think it's about time that sex is acknowledged as something that is shared between two individuals for pretty much the same reasons but usually with completely different expectations. women should stop thinking they're heading for a relationship if they fuck someone and men should stop assuming it's the be all and end all to the women they're fucking or that they've somehow 'conquered' them. sex isn't a game, a treat or a reward.....it's a basic human instinctive activity. if men OR women like sex with multiple partners (not at the same time, lol...that's greedy) it doesn't mean they're 'bad', it just means they are HUMAN!
there are a whole bunch of stereotype values which need blowing out of the water and we should be more concerned that whatever our sexual appetite or preferences, we respect ourselves and our partners.
OMFG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
+1 GAZILLION EIGHT HUNDRED AND EIGHTY EIGHT
FFS! I CANNOT +1 THIS ENOUGH (and might get it tattooed on my forehead!)click to expand

Posted by tiziani
Not just the fact of telling others what they should do, but also the event of actually caring about what others are doing (just another form of caring what people think) whilst living her life style as she chooses.
And then there was the very first contradiction where she admitting she would never go back to having sex with an ex.
Even before DeeGee's intervention, I was not even tempting to list all the contradictions because there are too many to name and I'm not even tempted to debate them.
I guess my roundabout point is you've unwittingly proven people can't have unemotional sex, since there are a core of emotions, thoughts and experiences behind why we do what we do. And you've shared all your inner conflicts in this thread alone.
But like I said, sincerely whatever makes you happy. I'm not trying to tell anyone to change their life. I just think when you're happy doing what you're doing, you wouldn't need to elaborate on it towards anyone much less would it even be a debate lingering on your mind.

Posted by tiziani
I can't see anywhere where I've tried to correct anything Rigomortis was saying. I pretty much just wanted to point out I find it hard to believe there aren't emotions involved because her reasoning is riddled with contradictions.
And the idea of there being no emotion behind sex was my only real interest in this discussion (as it always is in my real life) and that's where my interests ends.




Posted by tiziani
Even though I wouldn't necessarily agree with calling it "emotionless"

Posted by HouseCleaning
this is what happens when you give the women the right to vote, now they want more


Posted by R1g0rM0rT1sPosted by tiki33
Hopefully you haven't had sex with him (sorry for implying that you did). Cut your losses if he's not responding to you in a positive consistent way then there is no reason to continue.
this kind of comment pisses me off....no offence tiki cos you're just saying what is a popular theory...that women who give it up too soon are gonna get disrespected as a result....but i beg to differ.
IF a woman uses sex as some kind of tool to seal a relationship deal then yeah, it's gonna backfire but if a woman finds a man attractive and wants him to fuck her for the same selfish reasons HE wants to fuck her...then what's the problem?
it's just that this 'theory' implies that women can't enjoy sex on a purely carnal level. am i really in the minority of women who can?
it's varied for me personally but i don't have a 'rule' as to when i'll sleep with someone, i let my body tell me...I decide. i can honestly say i've never been disrespected for it either.click to expand

Posted by P-AngelPosted by R1g0rM0rT1sPosted by tiki33
Hopefully you haven't had sex with him (sorry for implying that you did). Cut your losses if he's not responding to you in a positive consistent way then there is no reason to continue.
this kind of comment pisses me off....no offence tiki cos you're just saying what is a popular theory...that women who give it up too soon are gonna get disrespected as a result....but i beg to differ.
IF a woman uses sex as some kind of tool to seal a relationship deal then yeah, it's gonna backfire but if a woman finds a man attractive and wants him to fuck her for the same selfish reasons HE wants to fuck her...then what's the problem?
it's just that this 'theory' implies that women can't enjoy sex on a purely carnal level. am i really in the minority of women who can?
it's varied for me personally but i don't have a 'rule' as to when i'll sleep with someone, i let my body tell me...I decide. i can honestly say i've never been disrespected for it either.click to expand
Ro, you know damn well that most women cannot fuck a bloke for pleasure .. it's always for emotional gain. In theory, I would agree with you, but, in actuality, a woman is too desperate to be loved to be able to do as you proposed.
blockquote>
well i agree that the majority of women aren't able to fuck a bloke purely for pleasure. i'm not even sure why god made it possible for women to orgasm seeing as most of them can take it or leave it unless it comes with a commitment.

Posted by AreTwoFour
HouseCleaning you need to grudge fuck a scorp woman and put her in her place 😛





Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
you didn't summarise things very well at all. i'm not talking about PREFERING casual sex....i'm just saying that women are just as capable of it as men are and they shouldn't feel ashamed of that as society would like them to.
sex with full emotional participation is in a league of it's own imo....it would take a long time for me to reach that level of intimacy.
also, just cos casual sex doesn't involve emotions doesn't mean it can't be an uber sensual experience. while rutting like animals has its place in a relationship, i don't like it so animal even when it's meaningless. my libra need for smooching needs feeding but it can cause confusion to my partner cos it implies i'm feeling things i'm not.