Posted by aquarius09You have whined about name calling. Scroll up and see it for yourself. You always whine about it when you encounter me which is why you brought up the attentionwhore comment I made previously. You have some serious self awareness issues, buddy. Assumptions were made that it has something to do with Islam and all. Do I need to copy paste?i said you resort to name calling when an argument fails you and that you have a history of calling me names instead of debating the topic at hand. the attention whore phrase (incorrectly used) was an example.click to expand
no assumptions were made that it had to do with islam. a supposition was made that perhaps it was cultural based on my own experience.
copy and paste if you want to.
Posted by jeaneYes, you did say culture. I'll stay with that for you. Lemme ask you: when did I say that my opinion was objective truth and that men are polygamous?Posted by aquarius09i raised the issue of culture. now either you don't know the difference between religion and culture or you are being dishonest.
@tauruslovesscorpio, as for the percentage, that was my personal opinion too. Please show me where I said I got that percentage from some research. You taking people and their opinions so literally is your problem. Whereas people talking about subject matter where there is objective truths without knowing much about it is straight ignorant and jackass move.
Islam = religion. There is objective truths about that religion. If you're going to bring it up, then present objective truths about the religion. Don't give some dude's opinion as if what he says is the objective truth or how the media portrayed it for you is what it actually is.
if your opinion really is a valid as you say, stay on topic.click to expand
Posted by aquarius09is a man saying he believes that women are 90% responsible of men cheating? that is an objective and verifiable fact. is me saying that i, too, have heard that said in my upbringing? also a verifiable fact. is that related to culture? i think we can agree on that given other cultures do not share that view, we can say it is a valid conclusion.Posted by jeaneThat's perfect. I'm gonna agree with that. Going off that, we have reached objective truths on the religion you brought up. So if you're going to use a subject matter to back up your point, you're going to bring knowledge right? Not someone's opinion, are you?Posted by aquarius09knowledge starts from an idea or an opinion or hypothesis. an experiment or study takes place, data is gathered and the opinion (idea) is either refuted, confirmed or requires further study. if it is accepted (and peer reviewed) then it is thought to be a fact.Posted by jeaneYeah, there is a religions couse that studies facts on religion. Philosophy, I did a minor in it, doesn't study one religion nor is philosophy centered on religion. Knowledge starts from dissecting FaCTs. Not people's grapevine opinionsPosted by aquarius09you better tell universities to close down their sociology, theology, philosophy, most of the art departments then.
is not knowledge based. It's not something you study. There is no objective truth on gender roles and all. Knowledge based subjects like religion, science don't work on opinions.
where does knowledge start? it starts from an opinion. come on, keep up.
click to expand
Posted by jeanePosted by aquarius09That's called whining, Jeane. Why else would you bring that up? Attentionwhore was the accurate term for you based on what you were promoting on there.You have whined about name calling. Scroll up and see it for yourself. You always whine about it when you encounter me which is why you brought up the attentionwhore comment I made previously. You have some serious self awareness issues, buddy. Assumptions were made that it has something to do with Islam and all. Do I need to copy paste?i said you resort to name calling when an argument fails you and that you have a history of calling me names instead of debating the topic at hand. the attention whore phrase (incorrectly used) was an example.
no assumptions were made that it had to do with islam. a supposition was made that perhaps it was cultural based on my own experience.
copy and paste if you want to.click to expand
Posted by aquarius09you didn't say that and at no point did i say you said that.Posted by jeaneYes, you did say culture. I'll stay with that for you. Lemme ask you: when did I say that my opinion was objective truth and that men are polygamous?Posted by aquarius09i raised the issue of culture. now either you don't know the difference between religion and culture or you are being dishonest.
@tauruslovesscorpio, as for the percentage, that was my personal opinion too. Please show me where I said I got that percentage from some research. You taking people and their opinions so literally is your problem. Whereas people talking about subject matter where there is objective truths without knowing much about it is straight ignorant and jackass move.
Islam = religion. There is objective truths about that religion. If you're going to bring it up, then present objective truths about the religion. Don't give some dude's opinion as if what he says is the objective truth or how the media portrayed it for you is what it actually is.
if your opinion really is a valid as you say, stay on topic.click to expand
Posted by aquarius09Its pretty clear that you're retreating to the old "everything is an opinion", as you can't justify your ignorant sexist comments. Some opinions have a basis in fact. Some clearly don't. And therein lies the real difference between our opinions. My opinion regarding your sexism is based on the fact that you've made unsubstantiated negative generalizations about the male gender, that your personal experience (in addition to your aunt's), no matter how vast, could not possibly vindicate. Do you disagree with me that your statement is ignorant and sexist? To do so, you'd really have to think that you had adequate justification to make such a generalization. If you do (other than anecdotes about the unfaithful men in your own family), please share it with the rest of us.
Me calling you naive was my opinion just like you calling me a sexist is your opinion. Difference of opinion. Neither of us have objective knowledge on the subject matter because there is no 100% on whether men are polygamous.
Posted by jeaneWhat culture are you from? I keep using religion and culture together because one of you brought religion and the other brought culture. You being the other. I'm tackling both issues together. As for you hearing that growing up, that was an opinion promoted to you in your surrounding. It wasn't fact!Posted by aquarius09is a man saying he believes that women are 90% responsible of men cheating? that is an objective and verifiable fact. is me saying that i, too, have heard that said in my upbringing? also a verifiable fact. is that related to culture? i think we can agree on that given other cultures do not share that view, we can say it is a valid conclusion.Posted by jeaneThat's perfect. I'm gonna agree with that. Going off that, we have reached objective truths on the religion you brought up. So if you're going to use a subject matter to back up your point, you're going to bring knowledge right? Not someone's opinion, are you?Posted by aquarius09knowledge starts from an idea or an opinion or hypothesis. an experiment or study takes place, data is gathered and the opinion (idea) is either refuted, confirmed or requires further study. if it is accepted (and peer reviewed) then it is thought to be a fact.Posted by jeaneYeah, there is a religions couse that studies facts on religion. Philosophy, I did a minor in it, doesn't study one religion nor is philosophy centered on religion. Knowledge starts from dissecting FaCTs. Not people's grapevine opinionsPosted by aquarius09you better tell universities to close down their sociology, theology, philosophy, most of the art departments then.
is not knowledge based. It's not something you study. There is no objective truth on gender roles and all. Knowledge based subjects like religion, science don't work on opinions.
where does knowledge start? it starts from an opinion. come on, keep up.
again, you are talking about religion and i am talking about culture. you're not this dim. you just cannot fathom that you might be wrong here.click to expand
Posted by aquarius09I think you are 99.74% full of shit. Just my opinion there.
@tauruslovesscorpio, as for the percentage, that was my personal opinion too. Please show me where I said I got that percentage from some research. You taking people and their opinions so literally is your problem. Whereas people talking about subject matter where there is objective truths without knowing much about it is straight ignorant and jackass move.
Islam = religion. There is objective truths about that religion. If you're going to bring it up, then present objective truths about the religion. Don't give some dude's opinion as if what he says is the objective truth or how the media portrayed it for you is what it actually is.
Posted by jeaneAbsolutely! You can criticize based on what is said and being pertinent. To bring in assumptions and your own judgement or projections is unwarranted.Posted by aquarius09you didn't say that and at no point did i say you said that.Posted by jeaneYes, you did say culture. I'll stay with that for you. Lemme ask you: when did I say that my opinion was objective truth and that men are polygamous?Posted by aquarius09i raised the issue of culture. now either you don't know the difference between religion and culture or you are being dishonest.
@tauruslovesscorpio, as for the percentage, that was my personal opinion too. Please show me where I said I got that percentage from some research. You taking people and their opinions so literally is your problem. Whereas people talking about subject matter where there is objective truths without knowing much about it is straight ignorant and jackass move.
Islam = religion. There is objective truths about that religion. If you're going to bring it up, then present objective truths about the religion. Don't give some dude's opinion as if what he says is the objective truth or how the media portrayed it for you is what it actually is.
if your opinion really is a valid as you say, stay on topic.
saying it is an opinion is not a get out of jail free card. opinions are subject to criticism. mine is. yours is as well. if you don't like being questioned, then talk only to people who share your views.click to expand
Posted by aquarius09it is not whining, it is creating an argument based on evidence. whining implies there is an emotion attached. there is no emotion. i'm plainly repeating a fact.
That's called whining, Jeane. Why else would you bring that up? Attentionwhore was the accurate term for you based on what you were promoting on there.
Posted by TaurusLovesScorpioIt's an opinion based on my surrounding and my experiences. I never once said that it was based on some study and a proven fact. Why are you taking my opinion as that? That's on you. My opinion is sexist to someone who doesn't believe that. Ignorant it is not because it is not a matter of ignorance. Ignorance can only be attributed to something that is proven. Men, whether they are polygamous or not, is not proven and nor is it disproven.Posted by aquarius09Its pretty clear that you're retreating to the old "everything is an opinion", as you can't justify your ignorant sexist comments. Some opinions have a basis in fact. Some clearly don't. And therein lies the real difference between our opinions. My opinion regarding your sexism is based on the fact that you've made unsubstantiated negative generalizations about the male gender, that your personal experience (in addition to your aunt's), no matter how vast, could not possibly vindicate. Do you disagree with me that your statement is ignorant and sexist? To do so, you'd really have to think that you had adequate justification to make such a generalization. If you do (other than anecdotes about the unfaithful men in your own family), please share it with the rest of us.
Me calling you naive was my opinion just like you calling me a sexist is your opinion. Difference of opinion. Neither of us have objective knowledge on the subject matter because there is no 100% on whether men are polygamous.click to expand
Posted by jeaneWhat I considere to be a lewd comment? Yeah, no.Posted by aquarius09it is not whining, it is creating an argument based on evidence. whining implies there is an emotion attached. there is no emotion. i'm plainly repeating a fact.
That's called whining, Jeane. Why else would you bring that up? Attentionwhore was the accurate term for you based on what you were promoting on there.
let's get this straight once and for all. you complained to the board that a man at work was making what you considered to be lewd comments. he is generally disregarded at work as a bit of a buffoon but you came here on your high horse outraged that this man would make a comment like that to you (of all people!). you then proceeded to talk about how you engaged is childish sparring with him. (i think at one point you said he farts out of his mouth?). if i remember correctly, you were riled up saying you were going to let him have it and possibly report him to hr.
my response was to not engage with him. he was clearly an idiot and one who should be disregarded.
from this you called me an attention whore.
since you are so fond of urban dictionary, let's turn to it shall we?
attention whore
Label given to any person who craves attention to such an extent that they will do anything to receive it. The type of attention (negative or positive) does not matter.
now you came to the board to tell how all taurus men are pigs and how they say crude sexual things to you.
i am saying you should ignore it. you are said he needs to be put in his place. based on the definition, who is the attention whore?click to expand
Posted by aquarius09but you are not accusing the both of us. you are accusing me. it is a fact that it was something i was told to believe to be true. i suggested that it might be the same situation again. you sad it wasn't and that was the end of it. as you can see, i've not brought it up since.
What culture are you from? I keep using religion and culture together because one of you brought religion and the other brought culture. You being the other. I'm tackling both issues together. As for you hearing that growing up, that was an opinion promoted to you in your surrounding. It wasn't fact!
Posted by aquarius09you didn't want him suggestiing you were participating in bondage the night before. ok so not lewd, insulting? inappropriate? it really doesn't matter. you've ignored my main point to play semantics.Posted by jeaneWhat I considere to be a lewd comment? Yeah, no.Posted by aquarius09it is not whining, it is creating an argument based on evidence. whining implies there is an emotion attached. there is no emotion. i'm plainly repeating a fact.
That's called whining, Jeane. Why else would you bring that up? Attentionwhore was the accurate term for you based on what you were promoting on there.
let's get this straight once and for all. you complained to the board that a man at work was making what you considered to be lewd comments. he is generally disregarded at work as a bit of a buffoon but you came here on your high horse outraged that this man would make a comment like that to you (of all people!). you then proceeded to talk about how you engaged is childish sparring with him. (i think at one point you said he farts out of his mouth?). if i remember correctly, you were riled up saying you were going to let him have it and possibly report him to hr.
my response was to not engage with him. he was clearly an idiot and one who should be disregarded.
from this you called me an attention whore.
since you are so fond of urban dictionary, let's turn to it shall we?
attention whore
Label given to any person who craves attention to such an extent that they will do anything to receive it. The type of attention (negative or positive) does not matter.
now you came to the board to tell how all taurus men are pigs and how they say crude sexual things to you.
i am saying you should ignore it. you are said he needs to be put in his place. based on the definition, who is the attention whore?click to expand
Posted by aquarius09Its quite relevant as it shows that you have a tendency to generalize in your language, and that you are inconsistent in when, and from what basis, you think it is ok to generalize. You think it inappropriate to generalize about the behavior of Taurus men based on your limited experience. But most of the men in your family and social circle are cheaters, so its ok to say that 95% of all men are cheaters.
And as for that thread about the Taurus dude, I generalized in my OP but that is not what I meant. Sorry, you took it so literally that I had to retract and explain myself. Nice try there trying to use that particular thread to back up your stance here on my opinion about men. Irrelevant, isn't it? As for you doubting I have any justification based on that thread, it's upto u.
Posted by aquarius09i said it didn't warrant an over the top (attention whoring?) response and it certainly didn't require a thread so everyone could look at you and your battles to beat off (!) taurus men.
@jeane and you got it all wrong. You had a memory loss I see. You clearly said to laugh it off and not pay any heed to it. Moreover, you saw nothing wrong with the comment, which was the part where I called you an attentionwhore.
I got that situation rectified with my own method.
Posted by jeaneYeah, I'm baffled at the paet where you assumed that it's probably the same case with me what was with you and your upbringing. That's the part of dxp that makes me upset. People should stay on point and not assume and project.Posted by aquarius09but you are not accusing the both of us. you are accusing me. it is a fact that it was something i was told to believe to be true. i suggested that it might be the same situation again. you sad it wasn't and that was the end of it. as you can see, i've not brought it up since.
What culture are you from? I keep using religion and culture together because one of you brought religion and the other brought culture. You being the other. I'm tackling both issues together. As for you hearing that growing up, that was an opinion promoted to you in your surrounding. It wasn't fact!click to expand
Posted by NevermoreThere was more to it. I didn't just call her that out of nowhere. She mentioned something about me overreacting and thinking that the guy wants to sleep with me or something or that I have that complex etc. which I believe she mentioned in this thread as well.Posted by aquarius09She saw it nothing wrong with the comment and you called her an attentionwhore for that? Wow, what a nice method you got there..
@jeane and you got it all wrong. You had a memory loss I see. You clearly said to laugh it off and not pay any heed to it. Moreover, you saw nothing wrong with the comment, which was the part where I called you an attentionwhore.
I got that situation rectified with my own method.click to expand
Posted by aquarius09i didn't assume. i said it might be the reason for your aunt's ridiculous statement. give me some credit i was trying to excuse her ignorance. to make an assumption is to say culture was the reason.Posted by jeaneYeah, I'm baffled at the paet where you assumed that it's probably the same case with me what was with you and your upbringing. That's the part of dxp that makes me upset. People should stay on point and not assume and project.Posted by aquarius09but you are not accusing the both of us. you are accusing me. it is a fact that it was something i was told to believe to be true. i suggested that it might be the same situation again. you sad it wasn't and that was the end of it. as you can see, i've not brought it up since.
What culture are you from? I keep using religion and culture together because one of you brought religion and the other brought culture. You being the other. I'm tackling both issues together. As for you hearing that growing up, that was an opinion promoted to you in your surrounding. It wasn't fact!
I'm not exActly just accusing you. I'm trying to simultaneously tackle both issues.click to expand
Posted by aquarius09You aren't really getting it. I'm not arguing that it isn't an opinion that you've formed based on what you've experienced. I'm sure many racist, sexist, homophobic, etc. opinions are formed by a person, based on what they've experienced. I'm also not asking for *proof* - empirical evidence, deductive argument, polls, etc. I'm asking if you have any justification at all, to generalize from your limited experience within your family and your social circle (which might be the problem in itself) to the majority of the male gender. What is your justification for that? That is where you step into the realm of ignorance and sexism. You understood how that worked with generalizing about a zodiac sign, but you just don't get it when it comes to the male gender. Why the double-standard?
It's an opinion based on my surrounding and my experiences. I never once said that it was based on some study and a proven fact. Why are you taking my opinion as that? That's on you. My opinion is sexist to someone who doesn't believe that. Ignorant it is not because it is not a matter of ignorance. Ignorance can only be attributed to something that is proven. Men, whether they are polygamous or not, is not proven and nor is it disproven.
Posted by TaurusLovesScorpioLike I said that's my opinion. You don't have to agree with it. I will believe what I want to. As for knowledge of things that studies are done on, I'll take knowledge by reading up on it.Posted by aquarius09Its quite relevant as it shows that you have a tendency to generalize in your language, and that you are inconsistent in when, and from what basis, you think it is ok to generalize. You think it inappropriate to generalize about the behavior of Taurus men based on your limited experience. But most of the men in your family and social circle are cheaters, so its ok to say that 95% of all men are cheaters.
And as for that thread about the Taurus dude, I generalized in my OP but that is not what I meant. Sorry, you took it so literally that I had to retract and explain myself. Nice try there trying to use that particular thread to back up your stance here on my opinion about men. Irrelevant, isn't it? As for you doubting I have any justification based on that thread, it's upto u.click to expand
Posted by jeaneThis is how you started your garbage. An underhanded comment which you also made in the Taurus man thread of mine where I called you an attentionwhore.
i wouldn't take anything aqua09 says in this department seriously. she thinks every man secretly wants to fuck her.
Posted by aquarius09you said "In case you haven't noticed, I'm not trying to be clever because that would turn him on." in response to me saying just make a smart comment.Posted by NevermoreThere was more to it. I didn't just call her that out of nowhere. She mentioned something about me overreacting and thinking that the guy wants to sleep with me or something or that I have that complex etc. which I believe she mentioned in this thread as well.Posted by aquarius09She saw it nothing wrong with the comment and you called her an attentionwhore for that? Wow, what a nice method you got there..
@jeane and you got it all wrong. You had a memory loss I see. You clearly said to laugh it off and not pay any heed to it. Moreover, you saw nothing wrong with the comment, which was the part where I called you an attentionwhore.
I got that situation rectified with my own method.click to expand
Posted by TaurusLovesScorpioNow I get your point. It's because men say this about themselves (men of all races that I encounter). Science is saying that about men as well. Let's bring science in this, shall we?Posted by aquarius09You aren't really getting it. I'm not arguing that it isn't an opinion that you've formed based on what you've experienced. I'm sure many racist, sexist, homophobic, etc. opinions are formed by a person, based on what they've experienced. I'm also not asking for *proof* - empirical evidence, deductive argument, polls, etc. I'm asking if you have any justification at all, to generalize from your limited experience within your family and your social circle (which might be the problem in itself) to the majority of the male gender. What is your justification for that? That is where you step into the realm of ignorance and sexism. You understood how that worked with generalizing about a zodiac sign, but you just don't get it when it comes to the male gender. Why the double-standard?
It's an opinion based on my surrounding and my experiences. I never once said that it was based on some study and a proven fact. Why are you taking my opinion as that? That's on you. My opinion is sexist to someone who doesn't believe that. Ignorant it is not because it is not a matter of ignorance. Ignorance can only be attributed to something that is proven. Men, whether they are polygamous or not, is not proven and nor is it disproven.
click to expand
Posted by aquarius09there is nothing underhand about it. its in plain sight for all to see.Posted by jeaneThis is how you started your garbage. An underhanded comment which you also made in the Taurus man thread of mine where I called you an attentionwhore.
i wouldn't take anything aqua09 says in this department seriously. she thinks every man secretly wants to fuck her.
click to expand
Posted by jeanePosted by aquarius09you said "In case you haven't noticed, I'm not trying to be clever because that would turn him on." in response to me saying just make a smart comment.Posted by NevermoreThere was more to it. I didn't just call her that out of nowhere. She mentioned something about me overreacting and thinking that the guy wants to sleep with me or something or that I have that complex etc. which I believe she mentioned in this thread as well.Posted by aquarius09She saw it nothing wrong with the comment and you called her an attentionwhore for that? Wow, what a nice method you got there..
@jeane and you got it all wrong. You had a memory loss I see. You clearly said to laugh it off and not pay any heed to it. Moreover, you saw nothing wrong with the comment, which was the part where I called you an attentionwhore.
I got that situation rectified with my own method.click to expand
you called me an attention whore ebfore that comment anyway...
the conversation went
me: i still can't work out why for something so juvenile you are even giving it a second thought. by continually engaging him, prancing around like some self entitled diva, you are only making things more difficult for yourself.
if you ignored it, gave a light hearted laugh, and thought no more of it, i would bet that that is the last you heard about it. he would lose interest. you wouldn't have to cuss or be rude, you'd take the high road and let it wash off you like water off a duck's back.
it's like you have no real problems in your life that you are spending time worrying about an idiotic, unfunny remark.
you: Something tells me that you're an attentionwhore who doesn't know how to read. I never once said that I continually engaged him. I repeatedly said that he comes in my office or follows me around and nor am I prancing around in his line of vision. I stay in my office or use the normal walkway to exit the office. LOL. Silent treatment/ignoring when someone is talking to you is ridiculous and childish. Your libra passive approach to conflict and attentionwhore tendencies is quite apparent from what you've written. Your attentionwhore self would probably laugh at comments like that. I'm not a pussy ass libra that's going to IGNORE really inappropriate comments or even laugh at them because you seem to find them funny. I bet you love comments like that. This is obviously minor to you given your approach with conflicts. I don't ignore shit. I confront them myself or via channels tha
Posted by jeaneBased on what? Assumption and catty ones at that.Posted by aquarius09there is nothing underhand about it. its in plain sight for all to see.Posted by jeaneThis is how you started your garbage. An underhanded comment which you also made in the Taurus man thread of mine where I called you an attentionwhore.
i wouldn't take anything aqua09 says in this department seriously. she thinks every man secretly wants to fuck her.
click to expand
Posted by aquarius09Right, and here I'm arguing that you have a double-standard with regards to your opinions. LOL, your response "well, that's my opinion". If that's your only defense, please don't bother repeating it. We know - its all your opinion. No one is saying it isn't.Posted by TaurusLovesScorpioLike I said that's my opinion. You don't have to agree with it. I will believe what I want to. As for knowledge of things that studies are done on, I'll take knowledge by reading up on it.Posted by aquarius09Its quite relevant as it shows that you have a tendency to generalize in your language, and that you are inconsistent in when, and from what basis, you think it is ok to generalize. You think it inappropriate to generalize about the behavior of Taurus men based on your limited experience. But most of the men in your family and social circle are cheaters, so its ok to say that 95% of all men are cheaters.
And as for that thread about the Taurus dude, I generalized in my OP but that is not what I meant. Sorry, you took it so literally that I had to retract and explain myself. Nice try there trying to use that particular thread to back up your stance here on my opinion about men. Irrelevant, isn't it? As for you doubting I have any justification based on that thread, it's upto u.click to expand
Posted by jeaneWhich thread of mine indicated that every man secretly wants to bang me? Please enlighten me. And if you can't then you really are a catty woman as I see you for what you are.Posted by aquarius09there is nothing underhand about it. its in plain sight for all to see.Posted by jeaneThis is how you started your garbage. An underhanded comment which you also made in the Taurus man thread of mine where I called you an attentionwhore.
i wouldn't take anything aqua09 says in this department seriously. she thinks every man secretly wants to fuck her.
click to expand
Posted by TaurusLovesScorpioI have double standards, so be it. I never said I didn't.Posted by aquarius09Right, and here I'm arguing that you have a double-standard with regards to your opinions. LOL, your response "well, that's my opinion". If that's your only defense, please don't bother repeating it. We know - its all your opinion. No one is saying it isn't.Posted by TaurusLovesScorpioLike I said that's my opinion. You don't have to agree with it. I will believe what I want to. As for knowledge of things that studies are done on, I'll take knowledge by reading up on it.Posted by aquarius09Its quite relevant as it shows that you have a tendency to generalize in your language, and that you are inconsistent in when, and from what basis, you think it is ok to generalize. You think it inappropriate to generalize about the behavior of Taurus men based on your limited experience. But most of the men in your family and social circle are cheaters, so its ok to say that 95% of all men are cheaters.
And as for that thread about the Taurus dude, I generalized in my OP but that is not what I meant. Sorry, you took it so literally that I had to retract and explain myself. Nice try there trying to use that particular thread to back up your stance here on my opinion about men. Irrelevant, isn't it? As for you doubting I have any justification based on that thread, it's upto u.click to expand
Posted by aquarius09it doesn't have to based on anything. you said it was underhand, i say there was nothing underhand about it. it was not done in a secret or dishonest way.Posted by jeaneBased on what? Assumption and catty ones at that.Posted by aquarius09there is nothing underhand about it. its in plain sight for all to see.Posted by jeaneThis is how you started your garbage. An underhanded comment which you also made in the Taurus man thread of mine where I called you an attentionwhore.
i wouldn't take anything aqua09 says in this department seriously. she thinks every man secretly wants to fuck her.
click to expand
Posted by jeaneYou were being catty in your response as you were in here. In fact you started your responses with a catty comment as I've proven.
my comment was that you were over reacting. like you are over reacting now.
Posted by aquarius09you said you didn't want to be clever because that would turn him on. is that like an intellectual way of spreading your legs? the implication is that all you need for men to want to sleep with you is to be clever. don't worry, i think you are safe on that count.Posted by jeaneWhich thread of mine indicated that every man secretly wants to bang me? Please enlighten me. And if you can't then you really are a catty woman as I see you for what you are.Posted by aquarius09there is nothing underhand about it. its in plain sight for all to see.Posted by jeaneThis is how you started your garbage. An underhanded comment which you also made in the Taurus man thread of mine where I called you an attentionwhore.
i wouldn't take anything aqua09 says in this department seriously. she thinks every man secretly wants to fuck her.
click to expand
Posted by jeaneUnderhanded as an unfair comment. Where did you get off starting the response with cattiness and expected kindness from me?Posted by aquarius09it doesn't have to based on anything. you said it was underhand, i say there was nothing underhand about it. it was not done in a secret or dishonest way.Posted by jeaneBased on what? Assumption and catty ones at that.Posted by aquarius09there is nothing underhand about it. its in plain sight for all to see.Posted by jeaneThis is how you started your garbage. An underhanded comment which you also made in the Taurus man thread of mine where I called you an attentionwhore.
i wouldn't take anything aqua09 says in this department seriously. she thinks every man secretly wants to fuck her.
click to expand
Posted by aquarius09i thought you weren't going to tell me how to respond?Posted by jeaneYou were being catty in your response as you were in here. In fact you started your responses with a catty comment as I've proven.
my comment was that you were over reacting. like you are over reacting now.click to expand
Posted by jeaneI'm not telling you how to respond. I'm pointing something out 😉Posted by aquarius09i thought you weren't going to tell me how to respond?Posted by jeaneYou were being catty in your response as you were in here. In fact you started your responses with a catty comment as I've proven.
my comment was that you were over reacting. like you are over reacting now.click to expand
Posted by aquarius09from the dictionary:
Underhanded as an unfair comment. Where did you get off starting the response with cattiness and expected kindness from me?
Posted by jeaneWow! Just wow. You projected your own stupid thinking on me. Now I see where the problem is.Posted by aquarius09you said you didn't want to be clever because that would turn him on. is that like an intellectual way of spreading your legs? the implication is that all you need for men to want to sleep with you is to be clever. don't worry, i think you are safe on that count.Posted by jeaneWhich thread of mine indicated that every man secretly wants to bang me? Please enlighten me. And if you can't then you really are a catty woman as I see you for what you are.Posted by aquarius09there is nothing underhand about it. its in plain sight for all to see.Posted by jeaneThis is how you started your garbage. An underhanded comment which you also made in the Taurus man thread of mine where I called you an attentionwhore.
i wouldn't take anything aqua09 says in this department seriously. she thinks every man secretly wants to fuck her.
click to expand
Posted by aquarius09is that an opinion or an objective truth?Posted by jeaneI'm not telling you how to respond. I'm pointing something out 😉Posted by aquarius09i thought you weren't going to tell me how to respond?Posted by jeaneYou were being catty in your response as you were in here. In fact you started your responses with a catty comment as I've proven.
my comment was that you were over reacting. like you are over reacting now.click to expand
Posted by Nevermorehaha, you're quite right! but i have to admit, i quite enjoy the sparring...Posted by aquarius09Posted by jeaneYou were being catty in your response as you were in here. In fact you started your responses with a catty comment as I've proven.
my comment was that you were over reacting. like you are over reacting now.
You could've ignored her you know. That's another option to do instead of creating 15 pages of your irrelevant arguments.click to expand
Posted by jeaneGo to thesaurus and see all the synonyms for it, little buddy 😉Posted by aquarius09from the dictionary:
Underhanded as an unfair comment. Where did you get off starting the response with cattiness and expected kindness from me?
underhand
adjective UK /ˌʌn.dəˈhænd/ US /-dɚ-/ mainly UK (US usually underhanded) disapproving
”º done ”‹secretly, and sometimes ”‹dishonestly, in ”‹order to ”‹achieve an ”‹advantage:
click to expand
Posted by aquarius09anyway, i didn't expect kindness. i expected your usual aggressive and unreasonable self. you delivered. thank you.Posted by jeaneUnderhanded as an unfair comment. Where did you get off starting the response with cattiness and expected kindness from me?Posted by aquarius09it doesn't have to based on anything. you said it was underhand, i say there was nothing underhand about it. it was not done in a secret or dishonest way.Posted by jeaneBased on what? Assumption and catty ones at that.Posted by aquarius09there is nothing underhand about it. its in plain sight for all to see.Posted by jeaneThis is how you started your garbage. An underhanded comment which you also made in the Taurus man thread of mine where I called you an attentionwhore.
i wouldn't take anything aqua09 says in this department seriously. she thinks every man secretly wants to fuck her.
click to expand
Posted by aquarius09i don't need to find a word that is similar, i just gave you the definition.Posted by jeaneGo to thesaurus and see all the synonyms for it, little buddy 😉Posted by aquarius09from the dictionary:
Underhanded as an unfair comment. Where did you get off starting the response with cattiness and expected kindness from me?
underhand
adjective UK /ˌʌn.dəˈhænd/ US /-dɚ-/ mainly UK (US usually underhanded) disapproving
”º done ”‹secretly, and sometimes ”‹dishonestly, in ”‹order to ”‹achieve an ”‹advantage:
click to expand
Posted by jeaneYou tell me 😉 this way I'llPosted by aquarius09is that an opinion or an objective truth?Posted by jeaneI'm not telling you how to respond. I'm pointing something out 😉Posted by aquarius09i thought you weren't going to tell me how to respond?Posted by jeaneYou were being catty in your response as you were in here. In fact you started your responses with a catty comment as I've proven.
my comment was that you were over reacting. like you are over reacting now.click to expand
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
