
jeane
@jeane
11 Years5,000+ Posts
Comments: 22 · Posts: 8048 · Topics: 36


Posted by Infinite8Oh, and I never had a point. Whatever gave you the idea that I had one or to even back it up. I had an opinion which I shared and y'all got butthurt over it.Posted by aquarius09Butthurt?!?! You can believe what you wish.
@infinite8That's not promoting dumb behaviour. That's my personal Opinion. You don't have to believe it. LOL and you most certainly don't need to get butthurt over it. I didn't say your man will cheat on you. Lol
I'm just saying that you are not making your point and you are contradicting yourself. You are also taking everything personal. Jeane is debating pretty strongly, but your rebuttals are coming off as immature and they are lacking real substance. Just a whole lot of name calling. It's numbing really... Snoozeclick to expand

Posted by frostey91
Omg the OP actually exists...
The thread has doubled in size.
Plus Jeane and Aqua09 are duking it out yeah.
![]()


Posted by jeaneI stopped reading at your promotion of critical analysis. When did you make one? All you did was assume. Anyways, this conversation is over.Posted by aquarius09it's an opinion and yes, we've all got one. opinions just also need careful examination from time to time. sorry, your opinion is a poor one.
It's an opinion and if you can't shallow it then you need a thicker skin or get off dxp. You took that comment pretty badly and started to ASSUme that it must be because of culture or religion. Which is where I got allergic to you and your response. You already know I'm intolerant of idiotic responses and people. If you still so butthurt over my calling you attentionwhore then keep your ignorance to yourself and don't irritate me by responding to my posts. Because then I rightfully call you over the dumb shit you say and you whine about how I'm resorting to name calling. Whereas if u just kept your dumb comments to yourself, you wouldn't have irritated me. I don't like my comments being taken out of context or people assuming nonsense.
i'm not butthurt.
i'm not allergic to you.
i'm not intolerant to different beliefs but it doesn't mean they should be without critical analysis. i know that's how religions operate but not so much on an internet forum.
i'm not an attention whore (again, i would encourage you to read the definition because using it incorrectly really does damage your point.)
you can call me over what you deem to be dumb shit but i've yet to see a coherent argument from you but you know, there is time.
i'm sorry i've irritated you. that's just what a forum is there for. it's a sharing of views. maybe you should stay away from differing opinions if it upsets you so.
where has your comment been taken out of context?click to expand


Posted by NevermoreIf someone is gonna bring up religion/culture or my personal choice of remaining a virgin into my opinion, you bet I will attack that person. Where did you get unnecessary attacking from? People wanna sit there and analyze my opinion (because they couldn't swallow it) based of my religion/culture meanwhile possessing no knowledge of it will invoke attack so don't call it unnecessary.Posted by aquarius09
@infinite8That's not promoting dumb behaviour. That's my personal Opinion. You don't have to believe it. LOL and you most certainly don't need to get butthurt over it. I didn't say your man will cheat on you. Lol
To be fair, you were promoting dumb behavior, especially unnecessary attacking someone as if you were taken offended already or attacking someone of their view like OP when your opinions matters more. No matter of your denial, you do have huge ego problem.click to expand

Posted by aquarius09OK, you are right, we made assumptions, and I was the one who connected it with your virginity. Sorry for this, you were very clear on your posts about this. You know, I respected this, until you made this "all man cant resists an open leg" comment, which truthfully was very offensive...... so that is why I personally started to assume you are from a certain community or culture....... sorry, if I was wrong....Posted by Infinite8Oh, and I never had a point. Whatever gave you the idea that I had one or to even back it up. I had an opinion which I shared and y'all got butthurt over it.Posted by aquarius09Butthurt?!?! You can believe what you wish.
@infinite8That's not promoting dumb behaviour. That's my personal Opinion. You don't have to believe it. LOL and you most certainly don't need to get butthurt over it. I didn't say your man will cheat on you. Lol
I'm just saying that you are not making your point and you are contradicting yourself. You are also taking everything personal. Jeane is debating pretty strongly, but your rebuttals are coming off as immature and they are lacking real substance. Just a whole lot of name calling. It's numbing really... Snooze
Jeane came with her assumptions that my opinion must have something to do with my religion/culture. Fail.
Jeane came up with a ridiculous example to back up her claim on Islam. Epic fail there too.
Pandora came with her assumption on my keeping my virginity having to do with my race/culture. Assumption and fail
^that sums up the idiocy encountered so far.
You thinking these people or rather Jeane made strong arguments with all their assumptions is another idiocy. Pardon me if I got agitated by the stupidity of all the assumptions madeclick to expand

Posted by frostey91i agree with you. it was a leap on my part but it echoed something that i heard many times in my own upbringing. i pointed out the source of it for me.
Yeah but really we assume way too much about people on here Aqua has a legitimate point there.
That is looking trough communication---jumping to conclusions based on small facts.
Not enough hard evidence to bring up the cultural religious stuff.

Posted by NevermorePlenty of people thought that so go take it up with everyone who thought that. Once again, my opinion on her oP given how there is no purpose to this thread.Posted by frostey91
Yeah but really we assume way too much about people on here Aqua has a legitimate point there.
That is looking trough communication---jumping to conclusions based on small facts.
Not enough hard evidence to bring up the cultural religious stuff.
Well, she was attacking OP of her jumping to conclusion that she finds her "slut" where there's no sex statement on OP parts.click to expand

Posted by NevermoreYou don't have to have sex to be a slut.Posted by frostey91
Yeah but really we assume way too much about people on here Aqua has a legitimate point there.
That is looking trough communication---jumping to conclusions based on small facts.
Not enough hard evidence to bring up the cultural religious stuff.
Well, she was attacking OP of her jumping to conclusion that she finds her "slut" where there's no sex statement on OP parts.click to expand

Posted by jeaneDon't make this about me. You started it with your own issues with your ipbringing which you projected mightily on my opinion on the leg comment.Posted by frostey91i agree with you. it was a leap on my part but it echoed something that i heard many times in my own upbringing. i pointed out the source of it for me.
Yeah but really we assume way too much about people on here Aqua has a legitimate point there.
That is looking trough communication---jumping to conclusions based on small facts.
Not enough hard evidence to bring up the cultural religious stuff.
all she had to say was "nah, it's not that. my aunt had a husband who was a dog." and that would have been the end. instead we get shit about isis, name calling, nonsense about being allergic to hugs...whatevs.click to expand


Posted by aquarius09hang on, i thought the conversation was over. have you deemed it to start again?Posted by jeaneDon't make this about me. You started it with your own issues with your ipbringing which you projected mightily on my opinion on the leg comment.Posted by frostey91i agree with you. it was a leap on my part but it echoed something that i heard many times in my own upbringing. i pointed out the source of it for me.
Yeah but really we assume way too much about people on here Aqua has a legitimate point there.
That is looking trough communication---jumping to conclusions based on small facts.
Not enough hard evidence to bring up the cultural religious stuff.
all she had to say was "nah, it's not that. my aunt had a husband who was a dog." and that would have been the end. instead we get shit about isis, name calling, nonsense about being allergic to hugs...whatevs.click to expand

Posted by frostey91Thank you!!! Exactly, being called a thirsty whore can have various meanings. Not just someone who's sexually depraved or licentious.Posted by NevermoreYou don't have to have sex to be a slut.Posted by frostey91
Yeah but really we assume way too much about people on here Aqua has a legitimate point there.
That is looking trough communication---jumping to conclusions based on small facts.
Not enough hard evidence to bring up the cultural religious stuff.
Well, she was attacking OP of her jumping to conclusion that she finds her "slut" where there's no sex statement on OP parts.
If you kiss anybody and everybody that's slutty to.
I see the fun factor, the only problem is the guy had a girlfriend, which OP didn't know.
What she does after knowing could justify her being called a slut as well.click to expand

Posted by aquarius09Exactly some people's views are more conservative then other's and should have the same respect.Posted by NevermorePlenty of people thought that so go take it up with everyone who thought that. Once again, my opinion on her oP given how there is no purpose to this thread.Posted by frostey91
Yeah but really we assume way too much about people on here Aqua has a legitimate point there.
That is looking trough communication---jumping to conclusions based on small facts.
Not enough hard evidence to bring up the cultural religious stuff.
Well, she was attacking OP of her jumping to conclusion that she finds her "slut" where there's no sex statement on OP parts.click to expand

Posted by jeaneWhen you take responsibility properly then it's over. Don't tell me how I should carry my commentary on dxp. "all she had to say was "nah, it's not that. my aunt had a husband who was a dog." I don't need to watch how I comment on here. And that comment you made about "instead we get comments about Isis, name calling", this was all a result of what you said. Don't make it sound like I came out you pointlessly. I don't even like talking to you let alone came at you pointlessly.Posted by aquarius09hang on, i thought the conversation was over. have you deemed it to start again?Posted by jeaneDon't make this about me. You started it with your own issues with your ipbringing which you projected mightily on my opinion on the leg comment.Posted by frostey91i agree with you. it was a leap on my part but it echoed something that i heard many times in my own upbringing. i pointed out the source of it for me.
Yeah but really we assume way too much about people on here Aqua has a legitimate point there.
That is looking trough communication---jumping to conclusions based on small facts.
Not enough hard evidence to bring up the cultural religious stuff.
all she had to say was "nah, it's not that. my aunt had a husband who was a dog." and that would have been the end. instead we get shit about isis, name calling, nonsense about being allergic to hugs...whatevs.click to expand


Posted by jeaneJeane, it was me, who started this angle....... but, I read lots of threads and comments and I connect people to their previous replays...... there are so many topics, where people contradicts themselfs, so I just remember, what people said (wrote) and then make assumptions.... sometimes wrongly, as I can feel differently sometimes and accordingly write my opinions....... I never go back on my opinions, but I feel sometimes, that I should have written it differently...... less agressively myself?Posted by frostey91i agree with you. it was a leap on my part but it echoed something that i heard many times in my own upbringing. i pointed out the source of it for me.
Yeah but really we assume way too much about people on here Aqua has a legitimate point there.
That is looking trough communication---jumping to conclusions based on small facts.
Not enough hard evidence to bring up the cultural religious stuff.
all she had to say was "nah, it's not that. my aunt had a husband who was a dog." and that would have been the end. instead we get shit about isis, name calling, nonsense about being allergic to hugs...whatevs.click to expand

Posted by frostey91I'm done now! Thanks for bringing some sanity in. BTW, I got my Boxing Day stat holiday here.
Oh shit it will not end. Is everybody off work or something? Damn.

Posted by aquarius09ok. it is still going.Posted by jeaneWhen you take responsibility properly then it's over. Don't tell me how I should carry my commentary on dxp. "all she had to say was "nah, it's not that. my aunt had a husband who was a dog." I don't need to watch how I comment on here. And that comment you made about "instead we get comments about Isis, name calling", this was all a result of what you said. Don't make it sound like I came out you pointlessly. I don't even like talking to you let alone came at you pointlessly.Posted by aquarius09hang on, i thought the conversation was over. have you deemed it to start again?Posted by jeaneDon't make this about me. You started it with your own issues with your ipbringing which you projected mightily on my opinion on the leg comment.Posted by frostey91i agree with you. it was a leap on my part but it echoed something that i heard many times in my own upbringing. i pointed out the source of it for me.
Yeah but really we assume way too much about people on here Aqua has a legitimate point there.
That is looking trough communication---jumping to conclusions based on small facts.
Not enough hard evidence to bring up the cultural religious stuff.
all she had to say was "nah, it's not that. my aunt had a husband who was a dog." and that would have been the end. instead we get shit about isis, name calling, nonsense about being allergic to hugs...whatevs.click to expand

Posted by aquarius09The Capricorn comes into break up the Aqua and Libra... Sounds about right.Posted by frostey91I'm done now! Thanks for bringing some sanity in. BTW, I got my Boxing Day stat holiday here.
Oh shit it will not end. Is everybody off work or something? Damn.click to expand

Posted by NevermoreI have said it several times, I don't take well to assumptions and judging based on something that was NEVER said by me. Like you said, they judged me and my aunt based on my religion, culture or my choices, which were never voiced by me in this thread. That warrants an attack on them so it's not unnecessary. As for me calling the Op a thirsty whore, it's based on the OP which is relevant. I didn't rehash anything she wrote previously in some other thread or come at her and said "you mentioned somewhere that you dot have a mom. This is why you're like this". When people get judged or things are assumed about them because people wanna fly with their projections and imagination, it's really irksome.Posted by aquarius09Posted by NevermoreIf someone is gonna bring up religion/culture or my personal choice of remaining a virgin into my opinion, you bet I will attack that person. Where did you get unnecessary attacking from? People wanna sit there and analyze my opinion (because they couldn't swallow it) based of my religion/culture meanwhile possessing no knowledge of it will invoke attack so don't call it unnecessary.Posted by aquarius09
@infinite8That's not promoting dumb behaviour. That's my personal Opinion. You don't have to believe it. LOL and you most certainly don't need to get butthurt over it. I didn't say your man will cheat on you. Lol
To be fair, you were promoting dumb behavior, especially unnecessary attacking someone as if you were taken offended already or attacking someone of their view like OP when your opinions matters more. No matter of your denial, you do have huge ego problem.
You were attacking OP in which that's really unnecessary to do that because she didn't had sex with that guy. Plus she didn't knew that he had gf. You were really like having an urge wrath towards her.
Plus, once you were exposed of your religious/culture on this public site and especially about your aunt where we all assumed your though are like her, they will remember that. But they are not attacking you, they are assuming/judging you.
.click to expand

Posted by NevermoreYour opinion is DIFFERENT.Posted by frostey91Even though kissing has full of saliva and dangerous bacterial that should be aware of, but that does not considered to be slut.Posted by NevermoreYou don't have to have sex to be a slut.Posted by frostey91
Yeah but really we assume way too much about people on here Aqua has a legitimate point there.
That is looking trough communication---jumping to conclusions based on small facts.
Not enough hard evidence to bring up the cultural religious stuff.
Well, she was attacking OP of her jumping to conclusion that she finds her "slut" where there's no sex statement on OP parts.
If you kiss anybody and everybody that's slutty too.
I see the fun factor, the only problem is the guy had a girlfriend, which OP didn't know.
What she does after knowing could justify her being called a slut as well.
Once they went full sexual on each others and having sex with everyone of their promiscuous way, now that's slut.click to expand

Posted by NevermoreSlut, slurry behaviour are all loose terms used subjectively. There is no one right answer like "a slut is someone who sleeps with multiple men"Posted by frostey91Even though kissing has full of saliva and dangerous bacterial that should be aware of, but that does not considered to be slut.Posted by NevermoreYou don't have to have sex to be a slut.Posted by frostey91
Yeah but really we assume way too much about people on here Aqua has a legitimate point there.
That is looking trough communication---jumping to conclusions based on small facts.
Not enough hard evidence to bring up the cultural religious stuff.
Well, she was attacking OP of her jumping to conclusion that she finds her "slut" where there's no sex statement on OP parts.
If you kiss anybody and everybody that's slutty too.
I see the fun factor, the only problem is the guy had a girlfriend, which OP didn't know.
What she does after knowing could justify her being called a slut as well.
Once they went full sexual on each others and having sex with everyone of their promiscuous way, now that's slut.click to expand

Posted by frostey91It may not be slutty, but it's definitely trashy. Both are often used interchangeably by whoever uses these terms.Posted by NevermoreYour opinion is DIFFERENT.Posted by frostey91Even though kissing has full of saliva and dangerous bacterial that should be aware of, but that does not considered to be slut.Posted by NevermoreYou don't have to have sex to be a slut.Posted by frostey91
Yeah but really we assume way too much about people on here Aqua has a legitimate point there.
That is looking trough communication---jumping to conclusions based on small facts.
Not enough hard evidence to bring up the cultural religious stuff.
Well, she was attacking OP of her jumping to conclusion that she finds her "slut" where there's no sex statement on OP parts.
If you kiss anybody and everybody that's slutty too.
I see the fun factor, the only problem is the guy had a girlfriend, which OP didn't know.
What she does after knowing could justify her being called a slut as well.
Once they went full sexual on each others and having sex with everyone of their promiscuous way, now that's slut.
I'm not saying she is a slut yet.
Key word yet.
However I can see why some think she is
Kissing a random in the bathroom is sketch and for 3 hours. She might as well collect money for it at that point.click to expand

Posted by jeaneI'm not telling you anything and as for religion or culture, if you're gonna talk about it, then speak knowledge because that subject isn't opinion based. There is no room for comments like "umm I think Islam oppresses women." Did you ever pick up a Quran or read hadiths where prophet talks about women? No? Then why are you talking. These conversations are knowledge based or you'll look like an idiot. Whereas perception on men or womenPosted by aquarius09ok. it is still going.Posted by jeaneWhen you take responsibility properly then it's over. Don't tell me how I should carry my commentary on dxp. "all she had to say was "nah, it's not that. my aunt had a husband who was a dog." I don't need to watch how I comment on here. And that comment you made about "instead we get comments about Isis, name calling", this was all a result of what you said. Don't make it sound like I came out you pointlessly. I don't even like talking to you let alone came at you pointlessly.Posted by aquarius09hang on, i thought the conversation was over. have you deemed it to start again?Posted by jeaneDon't make this about me. You started it with your own issues with your ipbringing which you projected mightily on my opinion on the leg comment.Posted by frostey91i agree with you. it was a leap on my part but it echoed something that i heard many times in my own upbringing. i pointed out the source of it for me.
Yeah but really we assume way too much about people on here Aqua has a legitimate point there.
That is looking trough communication---jumping to conclusions based on small facts.
Not enough hard evidence to bring up the cultural religious stuff.
all she had to say was "nah, it's not that. my aunt had a husband who was a dog." and that would have been the end. instead we get shit about isis, name calling, nonsense about being allergic to hugs...whatevs.
so i can;t tell you how to respond but in the same breath you can tell me. how does that work? you determine when things stop and start. you determine how to insult both men and women on this board. you judge those whose behaviour is different to your own. seems like you like being judgemental but unwilling to receive judgement in return.
gosh, that does again remind me of how religions work....funny that isn't it?click to expand



Posted by NevermoreUntidy dirty woman (used loosley)Posted by aquarius09slutPosted by NevermoreSlut, slurry behaviour are all loose terms used subjectively. There is no one right answer like "a slut is someone who sleeps with multiple men"Posted by frostey91Even though kissing has full of saliva and dangerous bacterial that should be aware of, but that does not considered to be slut.Posted by NevermoreYou don't have to have sex to be a slut.Posted by frostey91
Yeah but really we assume way too much about people on here Aqua has a legitimate point there.
That is looking trough communication---jumping to conclusions based on small facts.
Not enough hard evidence to bring up the cultural religious stuff.
Well, she was attacking OP of her jumping to conclusion that she finds her "slut" where there's no sex statement on OP parts.
If you kiss anybody and everybody that's slutty too.
I see the fun factor, the only problem is the guy had a girlfriend, which OP didn't know.
What she does after knowing could justify her being called a slut as well.
Once they went full sexual on each others and having sex with everyone of their promiscuous way, now that's slut.
Also found in: Thesaurus, Medical, Legal, Acronyms, Idioms, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
slut (slÅt)
n.
1. Often Offensive A person considered to be sexually promiscuous.
2. Archaic:
a. A woman prostitute.
b. An untidy, dirty woman; a slattern.click to expand

Posted by NevermoreIf you go exactly by the dictionary on how that term is used, you're in for a disappointment in real life as to how that word is used by people. Good luck sending this memo to everyone in real life.Posted by aquarius09slutPosted by NevermoreSlut, slurry behaviour are all loose terms used subjectively. There is no one right answer like "a slut is someone who sleeps with multiple men"Posted by frostey91Even though kissing has full of saliva and dangerous bacterial that should be aware of, but that does not considered to be slut.Posted by NevermoreYou don't have to have sex to be a slut.Posted by frostey91
Yeah but really we assume way too much about people on here Aqua has a legitimate point there.
That is looking trough communication---jumping to conclusions based on small facts.
Not enough hard evidence to bring up the cultural religious stuff.
Well, she was attacking OP of her jumping to conclusion that she finds her "slut" where there's no sex statement on OP parts.
If you kiss anybody and everybody that's slutty too.
I see the fun factor, the only problem is the guy had a girlfriend, which OP didn't know.
What she does after knowing could justify her being called a slut as well.
Once they went full sexual on each others and having sex with everyone of their promiscuous way, now that's slut.
Also found in: Thesaurus, Medical, Legal, Acronyms, Idioms, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
slut (slÅt)
n.
1. Often Offensive A person considered to be sexually promiscuous.
2. Archaic:
a. A woman prostitute.
b. An untidy, dirty woman; a slattern.click to expand

Posted by aquarius09i'm not telling you anything and then you go on to say "if you're gonna talk about it, then..." surely you see the contradiction here?
I'm not telling you anything and as for religion or culture, if you're gonna talk about it, then speak knowledge because that subject isn't opinion based. There is no room for comments like "umm I think Islam oppresses women." Did you ever pick up a Quran or read hadiths where prophet talks about women? No? Then why are you talking. These conversations are knowledge based or you'll look like an idiot. Whereas perception on men or women

Posted by SassyKiwiOk ... You can still preach on Monday too.
Urbandictionary considers passionate kissing as a slutty behavior. Idk who the heck wouldn't be upset at their significant other of 2 years having a make out session for 3 hours with some random bimbo.
Urbandictionary is more legit as it reflects societal standards !!

Posted by aquarius09you better tell universities to close down their sociology, theology, philosophy, most of the art departments then.
is not knowledge based. It's not something you study. There is no objective truth on gender roles and all. Knowledge based subjects like religion, science don't work on opinions.
Posted by aquarius09You claimed that I was naive, as I don't hold to your sexist viewpoint. If I'm naive in that I don't share you're same view, it sort of implies that there's some information that is objectively accessible, that I would be aware of, had my experience or knowledge not been so limited.
@infinite8That's not promoting dumb behaviour. That's my personal Opinion. You don't have to believe it.
Posted by aquarius09I love fake statistics...lol. And though you retreat to subjective opinion/experience in this thread, there you're implying that other women ought to acknowledge these things as well. I already brought up the fact of your hasty generalizations when you were on this board a month earlier, referring to Taurus men, without qualification, as lacking tact, being unprofessional, etc. - because of your own experience with merely two men of this sign. You apologized and said you "didn't mean for a second that all Taurus men are like that." But here you are now generalizing to 95% of the male population. No justification whatsoever for this kind of ignorant extrapolation. Your opinion is probably ignorant and inaccurate, even if you don't generalize, and base it just the men within your own circle. I doubt that you have any justification whatsoever for believing that 9 out of 10 men you know are cheaters or have cheated. These are simply unfounded sexist comments. You decry racism in other threads, but your sexism is really just as bad.
Yeah, the sooner women understand that 95% of men cheat at some point in their lives, the easier it will be for them. No more stressing and stalking and crying and whining and most definitely no more broken families as a result of infidelity. The 5% that don't cheat are usually those shy guys that take forever to make a move on a woman. These 5% normally get friendzoned or women get tired of hoping they'd man up and just walk away.
click to expand

Posted by elllesque😆
You all need Jesus.

Posted by elllesqueWell timed
You all need Jesus.

Posted by Nevermore?Posted by frostey91Or better off to see you next Tuesday.Posted by SassyKiwiOk ... You can still preach on Monday too.
Urbandictionary considers passionate kissing as a slutty behavior. Idk who the heck wouldn't be upset at their significant other of 2 years having a make out session for 3 hours with some random bimbo.
Urbandictionary is more legit as it reflects societal standards !!click to expand

Posted by NevermoreEver heard of connotations? It's what gives words life.Posted by aquarius09Posted by NevermoreIf you go exactly by the dictionary on how that term is used, you're in for a disappointment in real life as to how that word is used by people. Good luck sending this memo to everyone in real life.Posted by aquarius09slutPosted by NevermoreSlut, slurry behaviour are all loose terms used subjectively. There is no one right answer like "a slut is someone who sleeps with multiple men"Posted by frostey91Even though kissing has full of saliva and dangerous bacterial that should be aware of, but that does not considered to be slut.Posted by NevermoreYou don't have to have sex to be a slut.Posted by frostey91
Yeah but really we assume way too much about people on here Aqua has a legitimate point there.
That is looking trough communication---jumping to conclusions based on small facts.
Not enough hard evidence to bring up the cultural religious stuff.
Well, she was attacking OP of her jumping to conclusion that she finds her "slut" where there's no sex statement on OP parts.
If you kiss anybody and everybody that's slutty too.
I see the fun factor, the only problem is the guy had a girlfriend, which OP didn't know.
What she does after knowing could justify her being called a slut as well.
Once they went full sexual on each others and having sex with everyone of their promiscuous way, now that's slut.
Also found in: Thesaurus, Medical, Legal, Acronyms, Idioms, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
slut (slÅt)
n.
1. Often Offensive A person considered to be sexually promiscuous.
2. Archaic:
a. A woman prostitute.
b. An untidy, dirty woman; a slattern.
Unlike everyone using urban dictionary with different meaning of their views (& easy to add your definitions with the meaning of this words). Now that's disappointing.click to expand

Posted by phoenixrisesThe above was said to him after you found out about his woman. You didn't use the word, "want" in past tense, you used it in current tense.
I told him I just want to kiss
Posted by phoenixrisesSo, when he calls you, you don't handle yourself with honor and dignity to tell him that you won't participate in cheating. No - you merely make a suggestion to him about how he should view your worth to him as a snogger.
When he called the last time i told him I'm not worth it all thedrama andpain. He will just remain my sweet snogger who happened to be a Taurus
click to expand

Posted by jeaneI'm not saying you said that about Islam. I was using that as an example. Never mind. I give up with you. I will introduce an opinion however I want to. Keyword being an opinion. If you don't like it, you can say well I disagree with yada yada but I don't wanna tell you how you should word it or say or whatever. Nobody should be telling anybody what to say or do, but don't assume and take things out of context and bring in things which are irrelevant. You can do whatever you want but if you're gonna come at me with little to no knowledge of a subject matter where there is objective truth and then I call you an idiot for bringing it up without knowing much of it, don't whine about name calling. That's all I'm saying.Posted by aquarius09i'm not telling you anything and then you go on to say "if you're gonna talk about it, then..." surely you see the contradiction here?
I'm not telling you anything and as for religion or culture, if you're gonna talk about it, then speak knowledge because that subject isn't opinion based. There is no room for comments like "umm I think Islam oppresses women." Did you ever pick up a Quran or read hadiths where prophet talks about women? No? Then why are you talking. These conversations are knowledge based or you'll look like an idiot. Whereas perception on men or women
i said never islam oppresses women. you are making this about that. you're being intellectually dishonest.
perceptions, opinions are all subject to discussion. if you don't want me to describe you aunt as ignorant when she says that every man will cheat if a woman opens her legs wide enough (which is vulgar and contemptible in of itself) then don't introduce her into the discussion. doing so is the implicit agreement that her words will be subject to comment.click to expand

Posted by jeaneYeah, there is a religions couse that studies facts on religion. Philosophy, I did a minor in it, doesn't study one religion nor is philosophy centered on religion. Knowledge starts from dissecting FaCTs. Not people's grapevine opinionsPosted by aquarius09you better tell universities to close down their sociology, theology, philosophy, most of the art departments then.
is not knowledge based. It's not something you study. There is no objective truth on gender roles and all. Knowledge based subjects like religion, science don't work on opinions.
where does knowledge start? it starts from an opinion. come on, keep up.
click to expand

Posted by TaurusLovesScorpioMe calling you naive was my opinion just like you calling me a sexist is your opinion. Difference of opinion. Neither of us have objective knowledge on the subject matter because there is no 100% on whether men are polygamous.Posted by aquarius09You claimed that I was naive, as I don't hold to your sexist viewpoint. If I'm naive in that I don't share you're same view, it sort of implies that there's some information that is objectively accessible, that I would be aware of, had my experience or knowledge not been so limited.
@infinite8That's not promoting dumb behaviour. That's my personal Opinion. You don't have to believe it.
You and your aunt are quite ignorant, but not because of your mere opinion based on your private experience, but because, though you both have extremely limited experience, you generalize to the population of men at large. Here's your statement to this effect from another thread:
Posted by aquarius09I love fake statistics...lol. And though you retreat to subjective opinion/experience in this thread, there you're implying that other women ought to acknowledge these things as well. I already brought up the fact of your hasty generalizations when you were on this board a month earlier, referring to Taurus men, without qualification, as lacking tact, being unprofessional, etc. - because of your own experience with merely two men of this sign. You apologized and said you "didn't mean for a second that all Taurus men are like that." But here you are now generalizing to 95% of the male population. No justification whatsoever for this kind of ignorant extrapolation. Your opinion is probably ignorant and inaccurate, even if you don't generalize, and base it just the men within your own circle. I doubt that you have any justification whatsoever for believing that 9 out of 10 men you know are cheaters or have cheated. These are simply unfounded sexist comments. You decry racism in other threads, but your sexism is really just as bad.
Yeah, the sooner women understand that 95% of men cheat at some point in their lives, the easier it will be for them. No more stressing and stalking and crying and whining and most definitely no more broken families as a result of infidelity. The 5% that don't cheat are usually those shy guys that take forever to make a move on a woman. These 5% normally get friendzoned or women get tired of hoping they'd man up and just walk away.
click to expand


Posted by frostey91Hilarious!Posted by NevermoreUntidy dirty woman (used loosley)Posted by aquarius09slutPosted by NevermoreSlut, slurry behaviour are all loose terms used subjectively. There is no one right answer like "a slut is someone who sleeps with multiple men"Posted by frostey91Even though kissing has full of saliva and dangerous bacterial that should be aware of, but that does not considered to be slut.Posted by NevermoreYou don't have to have sex to be a slut.Posted by frostey91
Yeah but really we assume way too much about people on here Aqua has a legitimate point there.
That is looking trough communication---jumping to conclusions based on small facts.
Not enough hard evidence to bring up the cultural religious stuff.
Well, she was attacking OP of her jumping to conclusion that she finds her "slut" where there's no sex statement on OP parts.
If you kiss anybody and everybody that's slutty too.
I see the fun factor, the only problem is the guy had a girlfriend, which OP didn't know.
What she does after knowing could justify her being called a slut as well.
Once they went full sexual on each others and having sex with everyone of their promiscuous way, now that's slut.
Also found in: Thesaurus, Medical, Legal, Acronyms, Idioms, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
slut (slÅt)
n.
1. Often Offensive A person considered to be sexually promiscuous.
2. Archaic:
a. A woman prostitute.
b. An untidy, dirty woman; a slattern.
Oh I forgot men's restrooms are the cleanest sanctuaries on the fucking planet.click to expand

Posted by TaurusLovesScorpioAnd as for that thread about the Taurus dude, I generalized in my OP but that is not what I meant. Sorry, you took it so literally that I had to retract and explain myself. Nice try there trying to use that particular thread to back up your stance here on my opinion about men. Irrelevant, isn't it? As for you doubting I have any justification based on that thread, it's upto u.Posted by aquarius09You claimed that I was naive, as I don't hold to your sexist viewpoint. If I'm naive in that I don't share you're same view, it sort of implies that there's some information that is objectively accessible, that I would be aware of, had my experience or knowledge not been so limited.
@infinite8That's not promoting dumb behaviour. That's my personal Opinion. You don't have to believe it.
You and your aunt are quite ignorant, but not because of your mere opinion based on your private experience, but because, though you both have extremely limited experience, you generalize to the population of men at large. Here's your statement to this effect from another thread:
Posted by aquarius09I love fake statistics...lol. And though you retreat to subjective opinion/experience in this thread, there you're implying that other women ought to acknowledge these things as well. I already brought up the fact of your hasty generalizations when you were on this board a month earlier, referring to Taurus men, without qualification, as lacking tact, being unprofessional, etc. - because of your own experience with merely two men of this sign. You apologized and said you "didn't mean for a second that all Taurus men are like that." But here you are now generalizing to 95% of the male population. No justification whatsoever for this kind of ignorant extrapolation. Your opinion is probably ignorant and inaccurate, even if you don't generalize, and base it just the men within your own circle. I doubt that you have any justification whatsoever for believing that 9 out of 10 men you know are cheaters or have cheated. These are simply unfounded sexist comments. You decry racism in other threads, but your sexism is really just as bad.
Yeah, the sooner women understand that 95% of men cheat at some point in their lives, the easier it will be for them. No more stressing and stalking and crying and whining and most definitely no more broken families as a result of infidelity. The 5% that don't cheat are usually those shy guys that take forever to make a move on a woman. These 5% normally get friendzoned or women get tired of hoping they'd man up and just walk away.
click to expand

Posted by aquarius09 I'm not saying you said that about Islam. I was using that as an example. Never mind. I give up with you. I will introduce an opinion however I want to. Keyword being an opinion. If you don't like it, you can say well I disagree with yada yada but I don't wanna tell you how you should word it or say or whatever. Nobody should be telling anybody what to say or do, but don't assume and take things out of context and bring in things which are irrelevant. You can do whatever you want but if you're gonna come at me with little to no knowledge of a subject matter where there is objective truth and then I call you an idiot for bringing it up without knowing much of it, don't whine about name calling. That's all I'm saying."no one should be telling anybody what to say or do" and then "don't assume and take things out of context" lol. you just can't help yourself, can you?

Posted by aquarius09knowledge starts from an idea or an opinion or hypothesis. an experiment or study takes place, data is gathered and the opinion (idea) is either refuted, confirmed or requires further study. if it is accepted (and peer reviewed) then it is thought to be a fact.Posted by jeaneYeah, there is a religions couse that studies facts on religion. Philosophy, I did a minor in it, doesn't study one religion nor is philosophy centered on religion. Knowledge starts from dissecting FaCTs. Not people's grapevine opinionsPosted by aquarius09you better tell universities to close down their sociology, theology, philosophy, most of the art departments then.
is not knowledge based. It's not something you study. There is no objective truth on gender roles and all. Knowledge based subjects like religion, science don't work on opinions.
where does knowledge start? it starts from an opinion. come on, keep up.
click to expand

Posted by jeaneYou have whined about name calling. Scroll up and see it for yourself. You always whine about it when you encounter me which is why you brought up the attentionwhore comment I made previously. You have some serious self awareness issues, buddy. Assumptions were made that it has something to do with Islam and all. Do I need to copy paste?Posted by aquarius09 I'm not saying you said that about Islam. I was using that as an example. Never mind. I give up with you. I will introduce an opinion however I want to. Keyword being an opinion. If you don't like it, you can say well I disagree with yada yada but I don't wanna tell you how you should word it or say or whatever. Nobody should be telling anybody what to say or do, but don't assume and take things out of context and bring in things which are irrelevant. You can do whatever you want but if you're gonna come at me with little to no knowledge of a subject matter where there is objective truth and then I call you an idiot for bringing it up without knowing much of it, don't whine about name calling. That's all I'm saying."no one should be telling anybody what to say or do" and then "don't assume and take things out of context" lol. you just can't help yourself, can you?
what's the objective truth again? "it doesn't take a lot to make a man cheat on his wife/gf. As my aunt says, if a woman opens her legs wide in front of a man face, why won't he take it?" is that an objective truth? i believe you said it was a subjective perception.
i have knowledge of my own upbringing. i have knowledge of what i was told to believe. my words were "i'm not sure if it is a cultural thing..." so no assumptions were made. the fact that you insist on this argument again, makes you intellectually dishonest.
i'm not whining about the name calling. again (is reading comprehension an issue for you?) i was remarking on your tactic to make personal attacks before even attempt to formulate a valid and logical response. honey you can call me all the names you can think of. i can guarantee i have been called much worse by much better people.click to expand

Posted by aquarius09i raised the issue of culture. now either you don't know the difference between religion and culture or you are being dishonest.
@tauruslovesscorpio, as for the percentage, that was my personal opinion too. Please show me where I said I got that percentage from some research. You taking people and their opinions so literally is your problem. Whereas people talking about subject matter where there is objective truths without knowing much about it is straight ignorant and jackass move.
Islam = religion. There is objective truths about that religion. If you're going to bring it up, then present objective truths about the religion. Don't give some dude's opinion as if what he says is the objective truth or how the media portrayed it for you is what it actually is.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
i'm not butthurt.
i'm not allergic to you.
i'm not intolerant to different beliefs but it doesn't mean they should be without critical analysis. i know that's how religions operate but not so much on an internet forum.
i'm not an attention whore (again, i would encourage you to read the definition because using it incorrectly really does damage your point.)
you can call me over what you deem to be dumb shit but i've yet to see a coherent argument from you but you know, there is time.
i'm sorry i've irritated you. that's just what a forum is there for. it's a sharing of views. maybe you should stay away from differing opinions if it upsets you so.
where has your comment been taken out of context?