Wizardzzz
@Wizardzzz
Comments: 415 · Posts: 368 · Topics: 11
Astrology doesn’t seem to be helping me (Page 4)
You are on page out of 4 | Reverse Order
Posted by WizardzzzPosted by bricklemarkPosted by WizardzzzWhere did you read that?Posted by bricklemarkOh right, so you know that Leos have the least medals won at the Olympics then? How does that fit into your pattern?Posted by WizardzzzThe best all-round athletes, with a genius IQ. Tom Brady is a 4-time Leo. That’s powerful too. Ali was a Capricorn which is common among boxes because it’s a lot of hard work. And he was a Leo rising which matches his giganticself promotion.Posted by bricklemarkYour list is biased. What about Muhammed Ali instead of Mayweather. Tom Brady? Roger Federer. You took a few examples of top sportspeople who are Aquarius and then made the leap to "the best athletes in the world are Aquarius".. that's a studied psychological process where we take a few bits of information, form a pattern from them and fix it in our minds and then reject information that contradicts it with vague excuses, until the evidence is strong and clear enough that we can't ignore it and have to change our belief. I read a book on it. It's like a time saving process, jumping to conclusionsPosted by WizardzzzWell, running is about power and speed, not talent like those other sports.Posted by bricklemarkHuh what about Usain Bolt? Or Kipchoge? or 1000s of other top athletes?Posted by WizardzzzI’m an Aries and I’m a typical pioneer type, I never shy away from confrontation. I actually thrive on it. My mom was a libra she was extremely social and welcoming and couldn’t stand rudeness or profanity. You think those are just coincidences.?Posted by bricklemarkHumans are pre-wired to see patterns, so you can relate to the characteristics of your sign but anything that doesn't ring true then you just make up another reason like oh it's because of my Aries rising etc etc. The only true use for astrology is like a placebo effect whereby you can gain insight simply because something is true about you or another person and that could apply to whatever your placements where. Regardless of what day and time you were born astrology is going to say something true about you.. that's the trick of itPosted by WizardzzzYou think the signs don’t actually apply to us?
It's amazing the convoluted excuses people will make to avoid the simple explanation. Astrology is just psychological and has no actual value in reality
click to expand
click to expand
The best athletes in the world have been Aquarius, Babe Ruth Wayne Gretzky Michael Jordan Kelly Slater Floyd Mayweather… all perfect athletes and by far the best of their sport. You think that’s just a coincidence.?
click to expand
I bet if you took the zodiac signs of the top 1000 sportspeople then the split would be fairly even across all zodiac signs. One sign would have the most but that's random standard deviation. Like I said, people like to see patterns and assign importance to them, they're not good at accepting randomness , we're just not wired that way
click to expand
click to expand
I think you were literally complaining about people doing that about you earlier on in the thread 🤣
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
Same place anyone reads anything these days 😅click to expand
That’s a generality. You have to look at the specifics. You have a confirmation bias against astrology. You have this preconceived idea that astrology doesn’t work, and you look at examples that can confirm this.
I look at astrology and I say : could it be true? And I study it and study it and it always turns out yes that’s definitely consistent.
Like the Aquarius athletes, I’m not saying they’re successful therefore they’re Aquarius. I’m saying they all fit the same profile: the perfect athlete. They’re not the tallest not the fastest not the strongest, they just have an amazing sport IQ and talent. Babe Ruth Kelly Slater Wayne Gretzky Michael Jordan.
Posted by bricklemarkPosted by WizardzzzPosted by bricklemarkSame place anyone reads anything these days 😅Posted by WizardzzzWhere did you read that?Posted by bricklemarkOh right, so you know that Leos have the least medals won at the Olympics then? How does that fit into your pattern?Posted by WizardzzzThe best all-round athletes, with a genius IQ. Tom Brady is a 4-time Leo. That’s powerful too. Ali was a Capricorn which is common among boxes because it’s a lot of hard work. And he was a Leo rising which matches his giganticself promotion.Posted by bricklemarkYour list is biased. What about Muhammed Ali instead of Mayweather. Tom Brady? Roger Federer. You took a few examples of top sportspeople who are Aquarius and then made the leap to "the best athletes in the world are Aquarius".. that's a studied psychological process where we take a few bits of information, form a pattern from them and fix it in our minds and then reject information that contradicts it with vague excuses, until the evidence is strong and clear enough that we can't ignore it and have to change our belief. I read a book on it. It's like a time saving process, jumping to conclusionsPosted by WizardzzzWell, running is about power and speed, not talent like those other sports.Posted by bricklemarkHuh what about Usain Bolt? Or Kipchoge? or 1000s of other top athletes?Posted by WizardzzzI’m an Aries and I’m a typical pioneer type, I never shy away from confrontation. I actually thrive on it. My mom was a libra she was extremely social and welcoming and couldn’t stand rudeness or profanity. You think those are just coincidences.?Posted by bricklemarkHumans are pre-wired to see patterns, so you can relate to the characteristics of your sign but anything that doesn't ring true then you just make up another reason like oh it's because of my Aries rising etc etc. The only true use for astrology is like a placebo effect whereby you can gain insight simply because something is true about you or another person and that could apply to whatever your placements where. Regardless of what day and time you were born astrology is going to say something true about you.. that's the trick of itPosted by WizardzzzYou think the signs don’t actually apply to us?
It's amazing the convoluted excuses people will make to avoid the simple explanation. Astrology is just psychological and has no actual value in reality
click to expand
click to expand
The best athletes in the world have been Aquarius, Babe Ruth Wayne Gretzky Michael Jordan Kelly Slater Floyd Mayweather… all perfect athletes and by far the best of their sport. You think that’s just a coincidence.?
click to expand
I bet if you took the zodiac signs of the top 1000 sportspeople then the split would be fairly even across all zodiac signs. One sign would have the most but that's random standard deviation. Like I said, people like to see patterns and assign importance to them, they're not good at accepting randomness , we're just not wired that way
click to expand
click to expand
I think you were literally complaining about people doing that about you earlier on in the thread 🤣
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
That’s a generality. You have to look at the specifics. You have a confirmation bias against astrology. You have this preconceived idea that astrology doesn’t work, and you look at examples that can confirm this.
I look at astrology and I say : could it be true? And I study it and study it and it always turns out yes that’s definitely consistent.
Like the Aquarius athletes, I’m not saying they’re successful therefore they’re Aquarius. I’m saying they all fit the same profile: the perfect athlete. They’re not the tallest not the fastest not the strongest, they just have an amazing sport IQ and talent. Babe Ruth Kelly Slater Wayne Gretzky Michael Jordan.click to expand
The title of the thread is literally "Astrology doesn't seem to be helping me" 🤣 Well umm sorry to tell you this but it's about as likely to help you find a compatible partner as picking a name out of a hat
But anyway, even IF it was true about Aquarians being the sign with the best athletes (and one sign has to have the most) then why Aquarius? Thought they were supposed to be humanitarians
Posted by WizardzzzPosted by bricklemarkPosted by WizardzzzThat’s a generality. You have to look at the specifics. You have a confirmation bias against astrology. You have this preconceived idea that astrology doesn’t work, and you look at examples that can confirm this.Posted by bricklemarkSame place anyone reads anything these days 😅Posted by WizardzzzWhere did you read that?Posted by bricklemarkOh right, so you know that Leos have the least medals won at the Olympics then? How does that fit into your pattern?Posted by WizardzzzThe best all-round athletes, with a genius IQ. Tom Brady is a 4-time Leo. That’s powerful too. Ali was a Capricorn which is common among boxes because it’s a lot of hard work. And he was a Leo rising which matches his giganticself promotion.Posted by bricklemarkYour list is biased. What about Muhammed Ali instead of Mayweather. Tom Brady? Roger Federer. You took a few examples of top sportspeople who are Aquarius and then made the leap to "the best athletes in the world are Aquarius".. that's a studied psychological process where we take a few bits of information, form a pattern from them and fix it in our minds and then reject information that contradicts it with vague excuses, until the evidence is strong and clear enough that we can't ignore it and have to change our belief. I read a book on it. It's like a time saving process, jumping to conclusionsPosted by WizardzzzWell, running is about power and speed, not talent like those other sports.Posted by bricklemarkHuh what about Usain Bolt? Or Kipchoge? or 1000s of other top athletes?Posted by WizardzzzI’m an Aries and I’m a typical pioneer type, I never shy away from confrontation. I actually thrive on it. My mom was a libra she was extremely social and welcoming and couldn’t stand rudeness or profanity. You think those are just coincidences.?Posted by bricklemarkHumans are pre-wired to see patterns, so you can relate to the characteristics of your sign but anything that doesn't ring true then you just make up another reason like oh it's because of my Aries rising etc etc. The only true use for astrology is like a placebo effect whereby you can gain insight simply because something is true about you or another person and that could apply to whatever your placements where. Regardless of what day and time you were born astrology is going to say something true about you.. that's the trick of itPosted by WizardzzzYou think the signs don’t actually apply to us?
It's amazing the convoluted excuses people will make to avoid the simple explanation. Astrology is just psychological and has no actual value in reality
click to expand
click to expand
The best athletes in the world have been Aquarius, Babe Ruth Wayne Gretzky Michael Jordan Kelly Slater Floyd Mayweather… all perfect athletes and by far the best of their sport. You think that’s just a coincidence.?
click to expand
I bet if you took the zodiac signs of the top 1000 sportspeople then the split would be fairly even across all zodiac signs. One sign would have the most but that's random standard deviation. Like I said, people like to see patterns and assign importance to them, they're not good at accepting randomness , we're just not wired that way
click to expand
click to expand
I think you were literally complaining about people doing that about you earlier on in the thread 🤣
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
I look at astrology and I say : could it be true? And I study it and study it and it always turns out yes that’s definitely consistent.
Like the Aquarius athletes, I’m not saying they’re successful therefore they’re Aquarius. I’m saying they all fit the same profile: the perfect athlete. They’re not the tallest not the fastest not the strongest, they just have an amazing sport IQ and talent. Babe Ruth Kelly Slater Wayne Gretzky Michael Jordan.
click to expand
The title of the thread is literally "Astrology doesn't seem to be helping me" 🤣 Well umm sorry to tell you this but it's about as likely to help you find a compatible partner as picking a name out of a hat
But anyway, even IF it was true about Aquarians being the sign with the best athletes (and one sign has to have the most) then why Aquarius? Thought they were supposed to be humanitarians
click to expand
I don’t know. I just noticed this in Aquarius. The best player on my hockey team was also an Aquarius, and he was also the perfect athlete.
Mayweather is a Pisces, but Aquarius mercury, that’s why he had the perfect ring IQ, but he was a defensive fighter and very slippery, which is consistent with Pisces. He didn’t wanna hurt anyone. He just wanted to show a good fight and everybody gets paid. That’s typical Pisces compassion.
And about using astrology to find a partner, it’s a very difficult because there are too many parameters. Synastry is a full chart multiplied by another full chart. There are way too many parameters. I’m not saying synastry doesn’t exist, but it’s too complicated to even bother using it. Just try and hope for the best, and look at the astrology afterwards and see why it works or why it doesn’t work.
Posted by bricklemarkPosted by WizardzzzPosted by bricklemarkThe title of the thread is literally "Astrology doesn't seem to be helping me" 🤣 Well umm sorry to tell you this but it's about as likely to help you find a compatible partner as picking a name out of a hatPosted by WizardzzzThat’s a generality. You have to look at the specifics. You have a confirmation bias against astrology. You have this preconceived idea that astrology doesn’t work, and you look at examples that can confirm this.Posted by bricklemarkSame place anyone reads anything these days 😅Posted by WizardzzzWhere did you read that?Posted by bricklemarkOh right, so you know that Leos have the least medals won at the Olympics then? How does that fit into your pattern?Posted by WizardzzzThe best all-round athletes, with a genius IQ. Tom Brady is a 4-time Leo. That’s powerful too. Ali was a Capricorn which is common among boxes because it’s a lot of hard work. And he was a Leo rising which matches his giganticself promotion.Posted by bricklemarkYour list is biased. What about Muhammed Ali instead of Mayweather. Tom Brady? Roger Federer. You took a few examples of top sportspeople who are Aquarius and then made the leap to "the best athletes in the world are Aquarius".. that's a studied psychological process where we take a few bits of information, form a pattern from them and fix it in our minds and then reject information that contradicts it with vague excuses, until the evidence is strong and clear enough that we can't ignore it and have to change our belief. I read a book on it. It's like a time saving process, jumping to conclusionsPosted by WizardzzzWell, running is about power and speed, not talent like those other sports.Posted by bricklemarkHuh what about Usain Bolt? Or Kipchoge? or 1000s of other top athletes?Posted by WizardzzzI’m an Aries and I’m a typical pioneer type, I never shy away from confrontation. I actually thrive on it. My mom was a libra she was extremely social and welcoming and couldn’t stand rudeness or profanity. You think those are just coincidences.?Posted by bricklemarkHumans are pre-wired to see patterns, so you can relate to the characteristics of your sign but anything that doesn't ring true then you just make up another reason like oh it's because of my Aries rising etc etc. The only true use for astrology is like a placebo effect whereby you can gain insight simply because something is true about you or another person and that could apply to whatever your placements where. Regardless of what day and time you were born astrology is going to say something true about you.. that's the trick of itPosted by WizardzzzYou think the signs don’t actually apply to us?
It's amazing the convoluted excuses people will make to avoid the simple explanation. Astrology is just psychological and has no actual value in reality
click to expand
click to expand
The best athletes in the world have been Aquarius, Babe Ruth Wayne Gretzky Michael Jordan Kelly Slater Floyd Mayweather… all perfect athletes and by far the best of their sport. You think that’s just a coincidence.?
click to expand
I bet if you took the zodiac signs of the top 1000 sportspeople then the split would be fairly even across all zodiac signs. One sign would have the most but that's random standard deviation. Like I said, people like to see patterns and assign importance to them, they're not good at accepting randomness , we're just not wired that way
click to expand
click to expand
I think you were literally complaining about people doing that about you earlier on in the thread 🤣
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
I look at astrology and I say : could it be true? And I study it and study it and it always turns out yes that’s definitely consistent.
Like the Aquarius athletes, I’m not saying they’re successful therefore they’re Aquarius. I’m saying they all fit the same profile: the perfect athlete. They’re not the tallest not the fastest not the strongest, they just have an amazing sport IQ and talent. Babe Ruth Kelly Slater Wayne Gretzky Michael Jordan.
click to expand
But anyway, even IF it was true about Aquarians being the sign with the best athletes (and one sign has to have the most) then why Aquarius? Thought they were supposed to be humanitarians
click to expand
I don’t know. I just noticed this in Aquarius. The best player on my hockey team was also an Aquarius, and he was also the perfect athlete.
Mayweather is a Pisces, but Aquarius mercury, that’s why he had the perfect ring IQ, but he was a defensive fighter and very slippery, which is consistent with Pisces. He didn’t wanna hurt anyone. He just wanted to show a good fight and everybody gets paid. That’s typical Pisces compassion.
And about using astrology to find a partner, it’s a very difficult because there are too many parameters. Synastry is a full chart multiplied by another full chart. There are way too many parameters. I’m not saying synastry doesn’t exist, but it’s too complicated to even bother using it. Just try and hope for the best, and look at the astrology afterwards and see why it works or why it doesn’t work.click to expand
Ofc there are too many parameters, that's the point. You can use astrology to explain why the same thing did or didn't happen, why it did or didn't work , you always can find something that fits. Mayweather isn't even an Aquarius but you still manage to fit him into your pattern that you "noticed". That's the trick of astrology.
Spotting patterns afterwards is even more easy. That's like being a financial trader from the future
Posted by WizardzzzPosted by bricklemarkPosted by WizardzzzI don’t know. I just noticed this in Aquarius. The best player on my hockey team was also an Aquarius, and he was also the perfect athlete.Posted by bricklemarkPosted by WizardzzzThat’s a generality. You have to look at the specifics. You have a confirmation bias against astrology. You have this preconceived idea that astrology doesn’t work, and you look at examples that can confirm this.Posted by bricklemarkSame place anyone reads anything these days 😅Posted by WizardzzzWhere did you read that?Posted by bricklemarkOh right, so you know that Leos have the least medals won at the Olympics then? How does that fit into your pattern?Posted by WizardzzzThe best all-round athletes, with a genius IQ. Tom Brady is a 4-time Leo. That’s powerful too. Ali was a Capricorn which is common among boxes because it’s a lot of hard work. And he was a Leo rising which matches his giganticself promotion.Posted by bricklemarkYour list is biased. What about Muhammed Ali instead of Mayweather. Tom Brady? Roger Federer. You took a few examples of top sportspeople who are Aquarius and then made the leap to "the best athletes in the world are Aquarius".. that's a studied psychological process where we take a few bits of information, form a pattern from them and fix it in our minds and then reject information that contradicts it with vague excuses, until the evidence is strong and clear enough that we can't ignore it and have to change our belief. I read a book on it. It's like a time saving process, jumping to conclusionsPosted by WizardzzzWell, running is about power and speed, not talent like those other sports.Posted by bricklemarkHuh what about Usain Bolt? Or Kipchoge? or 1000s of other top athletes?Posted by WizardzzzI’m an Aries and I’m a typical pioneer type, I never shy away from confrontation. I actually thrive on it. My mom was a libra she was extremely social and welcoming and couldn’t stand rudeness or profanity. You think those are just coincidences.?Posted by bricklemarkHumans are pre-wired to see patterns, so you can relate to the characteristics of your sign but anything that doesn't ring true then you just make up another reason like oh it's because of my Aries rising etc etc. The only true use for astrology is like a placebo effect whereby you can gain insight simply because something is true about you or another person and that could apply to whatever your placements where. Regardless of what day and time you were born astrology is going to say something true about you.. that's the trick of itPosted by WizardzzzYou think the signs don’t actually apply to us?
It's amazing the convoluted excuses people will make to avoid the simple explanation. Astrology is just psychological and has no actual value in reality
click to expand
click to expand
The best athletes in the world have been Aquarius, Babe Ruth Wayne Gretzky Michael Jordan Kelly Slater Floyd Mayweather… all perfect athletes and by far the best of their sport. You think that’s just a coincidence.?
click to expand
I bet if you took the zodiac signs of the top 1000 sportspeople then the split would be fairly even across all zodiac signs. One sign would have the most but that's random standard deviation. Like I said, people like to see patterns and assign importance to them, they're not good at accepting randomness , we're just not wired that way
click to expand
click to expand
I think you were literally complaining about people doing that about you earlier on in the thread 🤣
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
I look at astrology and I say : could it be true? And I study it and study it and it always turns out yes that’s definitely consistent.
Like the Aquarius athletes, I’m not saying they’re successful therefore they’re Aquarius. I’m saying they all fit the same profile: the perfect athlete. They’re not the tallest not the fastest not the strongest, they just have an amazing sport IQ and talent. Babe Ruth Kelly Slater Wayne Gretzky Michael Jordan.
click to expand
The title of the thread is literally "Astrology doesn't seem to be helping me" 🤣 Well umm sorry to tell you this but it's about as likely to help you find a compatible partner as picking a name out of a hat
But anyway, even IF it was true about Aquarians being the sign with the best athletes (and one sign has to have the most) then why Aquarius? Thought they were supposed to be humanitarians
click to expand
Mayweather is a Pisces, but Aquarius mercury, that’s why he had the perfect ring IQ, but he was a defensive fighter and very slippery, which is consistent with Pisces. He didn’t wanna hurt anyone. He just wanted to show a good fight and everybody gets paid. That’s typical Pisces compassion.
And about using astrology to find a partner, it’s a very difficult because there are too many parameters. Synastry is a full chart multiplied by another full chart. There are way too many parameters. I’m not saying synastry doesn’t exist, but it’s too complicated to even bother using it. Just try and hope for the best, and look at the astrology afterwards and see why it works or why it doesn’t work.
click to expand
Ofc there are too many parameters, that's the point. You can use astrology to explain why the same thing did or didn't happen, why it did or didn't work , you always can find something that fits. Mayweather isn't even an Aquarius but you still manage to fit him into your pattern that you "noticed". That's the trick of astrology.
Spotting patterns afterwards is even more easy. That's like being a financial trader from the futureclick to expand
Doesn’t mean it doesn’t work.
Also, I include Mayweather because he has the Aquarius quality, the ring IQ, and he’s considered the best. It’s no coincidence. Also, you ignored the stuff I said about Pisces. You just use confirmation bias.
Posted by bricklemarkPosted by WizardzzzPosted by bricklemarkOfc there are too many parameters, that's the point. You can use astrology to explain why the same thing did or didn't happen, why it did or didn't work , you always can find something that fits. Mayweather isn't even an Aquarius but you still manage to fit him into your pattern that you "noticed". That's the trick of astrology.Posted by WizardzzzI don’t know. I just noticed this in Aquarius. The best player on my hockey team was also an Aquarius, and he was also the perfect athlete.Posted by bricklemarkPosted by WizardzzzThat’s a generality. You have to look at the specifics. You have a confirmation bias against astrology. You have this preconceived idea that astrology doesn’t work, and you look at examples that can confirm this.Posted by bricklemarkSame place anyone reads anything these days 😅Posted by WizardzzzWhere did you read that?Posted by bricklemarkOh right, so you know that Leos have the least medals won at the Olympics then? How does that fit into your pattern?Posted by WizardzzzThe best all-round athletes, with a genius IQ. Tom Brady is a 4-time Leo. That’s powerful too. Ali was a Capricorn which is common among boxes because it’s a lot of hard work. And he was a Leo rising which matches his giganticself promotion.Posted by bricklemarkYour list is biased. What about Muhammed Ali instead of Mayweather. Tom Brady? Roger Federer. You took a few examples of top sportspeople who are Aquarius and then made the leap to "the best athletes in the world are Aquarius".. that's a studied psychological process where we take a few bits of information, form a pattern from them and fix it in our minds and then reject information that contradicts it with vague excuses, until the evidence is strong and clear enough that we can't ignore it and have to change our belief. I read a book on it. It's like a time saving process, jumping to conclusionsPosted by WizardzzzWell, running is about power and speed, not talent like those other sports.Posted by bricklemarkHuh what about Usain Bolt? Or Kipchoge? or 1000s of other top athletes?Posted by WizardzzzI’m an Aries and I’m a typical pioneer type, I never shy away from confrontation. I actually thrive on it. My mom was a libra she was extremely social and welcoming and couldn’t stand rudeness or profanity. You think those are just coincidences.?Posted by bricklemarkHumans are pre-wired to see patterns, so you can relate to the characteristics of your sign but anything that doesn't ring true then you just make up another reason like oh it's because of my Aries rising etc etc. The only true use for astrology is like a placebo effect whereby you can gain insight simply because something is true about you or another person and that could apply to whatever your placements where. Regardless of what day and time you were born astrology is going to say something true about you.. that's the trick of itPosted by WizardzzzYou think the signs don’t actually apply to us?
It's amazing the convoluted excuses people will make to avoid the simple explanation. Astrology is just psychological and has no actual value in reality
click to expand
click to expand
The best athletes in the world have been Aquarius, Babe Ruth Wayne Gretzky Michael Jordan Kelly Slater Floyd Mayweather… all perfect athletes and by far the best of their sport. You think that’s just a coincidence.?
click to expand
I bet if you took the zodiac signs of the top 1000 sportspeople then the split would be fairly even across all zodiac signs. One sign would have the most but that's random standard deviation. Like I said, people like to see patterns and assign importance to them, they're not good at accepting randomness , we're just not wired that way
click to expand
click to expand
I think you were literally complaining about people doing that about you earlier on in the thread 🤣
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
I look at astrology and I say : could it be true? And I study it and study it and it always turns out yes that’s definitely consistent.
Like the Aquarius athletes, I’m not saying they’re successful therefore they’re Aquarius. I’m saying they all fit the same profile: the perfect athlete. They’re not the tallest not the fastest not the strongest, they just have an amazing sport IQ and talent. Babe Ruth Kelly Slater Wayne Gretzky Michael Jordan.
click to expand
The title of the thread is literally "Astrology doesn't seem to be helping me" 🤣 Well umm sorry to tell you this but it's about as likely to help you find a compatible partner as picking a name out of a hat
But anyway, even IF it was true about Aquarians being the sign with the best athletes (and one sign has to have the most) then why Aquarius? Thought they were supposed to be humanitarians
click to expand
Mayweather is a Pisces, but Aquarius mercury, that’s why he had the perfect ring IQ, but he was a defensive fighter and very slippery, which is consistent with Pisces. He didn’t wanna hurt anyone. He just wanted to show a good fight and everybody gets paid. That’s typical Pisces compassion.
And about using astrology to find a partner, it’s a very difficult because there are too many parameters. Synastry is a full chart multiplied by another full chart. There are way too many parameters. I’m not saying synastry doesn’t exist, but it’s too complicated to even bother using it. Just try and hope for the best, and look at the astrology afterwards and see why it works or why it doesn’t work.
click to expand
Spotting patterns afterwards is even more easy. That's like being a financial trader from the future
click to expand
Doesn’t mean it doesn’t work.
Also, I include Mayweather because he has the Aquarius quality, the ring IQ, and he’s considered the best. It’s no coincidence. Also, you ignored the stuff I said about Pisces. You just use confirmation bias.click to expand
Ahh Pisces, the fighters of the zodiac 😅
If you said Michael Phelps then I could agree. Those fishes live to swim
Posted by WizardzzzPosted by bricklemarkPosted by WizardzzzDoesn’t mean it doesn’t work.Posted by bricklemarkOfc there are too many parameters, that's the point. You can use astrology to explain why the same thing did or didn't happen, why it did or didn't work , you always can find something that fits. Mayweather isn't even an Aquarius but you still manage to fit him into your pattern that you "noticed". That's the trick of astrology.Posted by WizardzzzI don’t know. I just noticed this in Aquarius. The best player on my hockey team was also an Aquarius, and he was also the perfect athlete.Posted by bricklemarkPosted by WizardzzzThat’s a generality. You have to look at the specifics. You have a confirmation bias against astrology. You have this preconceived idea that astrology doesn’t work, and you look at examples that can confirm this.Posted by bricklemarkSame place anyone reads anything these days 😅Posted by WizardzzzWhere did you read that?Posted by bricklemarkOh right, so you know that Leos have the least medals won at the Olympics then? How does that fit into your pattern?Posted by WizardzzzThe best all-round athletes, with a genius IQ. Tom Brady is a 4-time Leo. That’s powerful too. Ali was a Capricorn which is common among boxes because it’s a lot of hard work. And he was a Leo rising which matches his giganticself promotion.Posted by bricklemarkYour list is biased. What about Muhammed Ali instead of Mayweather. Tom Brady? Roger Federer. You took a few examples of top sportspeople who are Aquarius and then made the leap to "the best athletes in the world are Aquarius".. that's a studied psychological process where we take a few bits of information, form a pattern from them and fix it in our minds and then reject information that contradicts it with vague excuses, until the evidence is strong and clear enough that we can't ignore it and have to change our belief. I read a book on it. It's like a time saving process, jumping to conclusionsPosted by WizardzzzWell, running is about power and speed, not talent like those other sports.Posted by bricklemarkHuh what about Usain Bolt? Or Kipchoge? or 1000s of other top athletes?Posted by WizardzzzI’m an Aries and I’m a typical pioneer type, I never shy away from confrontation. I actually thrive on it. My mom was a libra she was extremely social and welcoming and couldn’t stand rudeness or profanity. You think those are just coincidences.?Posted by bricklemarkHumans are pre-wired to see patterns, so you can relate to the characteristics of your sign but anything that doesn't ring true then you just make up another reason like oh it's because of my Aries rising etc etc. The only true use for astrology is like a placebo effect whereby you can gain insight simply because something is true about you or another person and that could apply to whatever your placements where. Regardless of what day and time you were born astrology is going to say something true about you.. that's the trick of itPosted by WizardzzzYou think the signs don’t actually apply to us?
It's amazing the convoluted excuses people will make to avoid the simple explanation. Astrology is just psychological and has no actual value in reality
click to expand
click to expand
The best athletes in the world have been Aquarius, Babe Ruth Wayne Gretzky Michael Jordan Kelly Slater Floyd Mayweather… all perfect athletes and by far the best of their sport. You think that’s just a coincidence.?
click to expand
I bet if you took the zodiac signs of the top 1000 sportspeople then the split would be fairly even across all zodiac signs. One sign would have the most but that's random standard deviation. Like I said, people like to see patterns and assign importance to them, they're not good at accepting randomness , we're just not wired that way
click to expand
click to expand
I think you were literally complaining about people doing that about you earlier on in the thread 🤣
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
I look at astrology and I say : could it be true? And I study it and study it and it always turns out yes that’s definitely consistent.
Like the Aquarius athletes, I’m not saying they’re successful therefore they’re Aquarius. I’m saying they all fit the same profile: the perfect athlete. They’re not the tallest not the fastest not the strongest, they just have an amazing sport IQ and talent. Babe Ruth Kelly Slater Wayne Gretzky Michael Jordan.
click to expand
The title of the thread is literally "Astrology doesn't seem to be helping me" 🤣 Well umm sorry to tell you this but it's about as likely to help you find a compatible partner as picking a name out of a hat
But anyway, even IF it was true about Aquarians being the sign with the best athletes (and one sign has to have the most) then why Aquarius? Thought they were supposed to be humanitarians
click to expand
Mayweather is a Pisces, but Aquarius mercury, that’s why he had the perfect ring IQ, but he was a defensive fighter and very slippery, which is consistent with Pisces. He didn’t wanna hurt anyone. He just wanted to show a good fight and everybody gets paid. That’s typical Pisces compassion.
And about using astrology to find a partner, it’s a very difficult because there are too many parameters. Synastry is a full chart multiplied by another full chart. There are way too many parameters. I’m not saying synastry doesn’t exist, but it’s too complicated to even bother using it. Just try and hope for the best, and look at the astrology afterwards and see why it works or why it doesn’t work.
click to expand
Spotting patterns afterwards is even more easy. That's like being a financial trader from the future
click to expand
Also, I include Mayweather because he has the Aquarius quality, the ring IQ, and he’s considered the best. It’s no coincidence. Also, you ignored the stuff I said about Pisces. You just use confirmation bias.
click to expand
Ahh Pisces, the fighters of the zodiac 😅
If you said Michael Phelps then I could agree. Those fishes live to swimclick to expand
He has the slippery quality, punches literally slip off his moist body, and he has the compassionate quality, his pure defence he does nothing but avoid punches. Some boxes don’t even know why they fight. Because he doesn’t want to hurt anyone that’s the Pisces compassion.
I can’t keep chasing you around showing you the specifics while you just dismiss them and stick to your theory. That astrology doesn’t work. You have to look at the specifics at some point. You have to STUDY it.
Posted by bricklemarkPosted by WizardzzzPosted by bricklemarkAhh Pisces, the fighters of the zodiac 😅Posted by WizardzzzDoesn’t mean it doesn’t work.Posted by bricklemarkOfc there are too many parameters, that's the point. You can use astrology to explain why the same thing did or didn't happen, why it did or didn't work , you always can find something that fits. Mayweather isn't even an Aquarius but you still manage to fit him into your pattern that you "noticed". That's the trick of astrology.Posted by WizardzzzI don’t know. I just noticed this in Aquarius. The best player on my hockey team was also an Aquarius, and he was also the perfect athlete.Posted by bricklemarkPosted by WizardzzzThat’s a generality. You have to look at the specifics. You have a confirmation bias against astrology. You have this preconceived idea that astrology doesn’t work, and you look at examples that can confirm this.Posted by bricklemarkSame place anyone reads anything these days 😅Posted by WizardzzzWhere did you read that?Posted by bricklemarkOh right, so you know that Leos have the least medals won at the Olympics then? How does that fit into your pattern?Posted by WizardzzzThe best all-round athletes, with a genius IQ. Tom Brady is a 4-time Leo. That’s powerful too. Ali was a Capricorn which is common among boxes because it’s a lot of hard work. And he was a Leo rising which matches his giganticself promotion.Posted by bricklemarkYour list is biased. What about Muhammed Ali instead of Mayweather. Tom Brady? Roger Federer. You took a few examples of top sportspeople who are Aquarius and then made the leap to "the best athletes in the world are Aquarius".. that's a studied psychological process where we take a few bits of information, form a pattern from them and fix it in our minds and then reject information that contradicts it with vague excuses, until the evidence is strong and clear enough that we can't ignore it and have to change our belief. I read a book on it. It's like a time saving process, jumping to conclusionsPosted by WizardzzzWell, running is about power and speed, not talent like those other sports.Posted by bricklemarkHuh what about Usain Bolt? Or Kipchoge? or 1000s of other top athletes?Posted by WizardzzzI’m an Aries and I’m a typical pioneer type, I never shy away from confrontation. I actually thrive on it. My mom was a libra she was extremely social and welcoming and couldn’t stand rudeness or profanity. You think those are just coincidences.?Posted by bricklemarkHumans are pre-wired to see patterns, so you can relate to the characteristics of your sign but anything that doesn't ring true then you just make up another reason like oh it's because of my Aries rising etc etc. The only true use for astrology is like a placebo effect whereby you can gain insight simply because something is true about you or another person and that could apply to whatever your placements where. Regardless of what day and time you were born astrology is going to say something true about you.. that's the trick of itPosted by WizardzzzYou think the signs don’t actually apply to us?
It's amazing the convoluted excuses people will make to avoid the simple explanation. Astrology is just psychological and has no actual value in reality
click to expand
click to expand
The best athletes in the world have been Aquarius, Babe Ruth Wayne Gretzky Michael Jordan Kelly Slater Floyd Mayweather… all perfect athletes and by far the best of their sport. You think that’s just a coincidence.?
click to expand
I bet if you took the zodiac signs of the top 1000 sportspeople then the split would be fairly even across all zodiac signs. One sign would have the most but that's random standard deviation. Like I said, people like to see patterns and assign importance to them, they're not good at accepting randomness , we're just not wired that way
click to expand
click to expand
I think you were literally complaining about people doing that about you earlier on in the thread 🤣
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
I look at astrology and I say : could it be true? And I study it and study it and it always turns out yes that’s definitely consistent.
Like the Aquarius athletes, I’m not saying they’re successful therefore they’re Aquarius. I’m saying they all fit the same profile: the perfect athlete. They’re not the tallest not the fastest not the strongest, they just have an amazing sport IQ and talent. Babe Ruth Kelly Slater Wayne Gretzky Michael Jordan.
click to expand
The title of the thread is literally "Astrology doesn't seem to be helping me" 🤣 Well umm sorry to tell you this but it's about as likely to help you find a compatible partner as picking a name out of a hat
But anyway, even IF it was true about Aquarians being the sign with the best athletes (and one sign has to have the most) then why Aquarius? Thought they were supposed to be humanitarians
click to expand
Mayweather is a Pisces, but Aquarius mercury, that’s why he had the perfect ring IQ, but he was a defensive fighter and very slippery, which is consistent with Pisces. He didn’t wanna hurt anyone. He just wanted to show a good fight and everybody gets paid. That’s typical Pisces compassion.
And about using astrology to find a partner, it’s a very difficult because there are too many parameters. Synastry is a full chart multiplied by another full chart. There are way too many parameters. I’m not saying synastry doesn’t exist, but it’s too complicated to even bother using it. Just try and hope for the best, and look at the astrology afterwards and see why it works or why it doesn’t work.
click to expand
Spotting patterns afterwards is even more easy. That's like being a financial trader from the future
click to expand
Also, I include Mayweather because he has the Aquarius quality, the ring IQ, and he’s considered the best. It’s no coincidence. Also, you ignored the stuff I said about Pisces. You just use confirmation bias.
click to expand
If you said Michael Phelps then I could agree. Those fishes live to swim
click to expand
He has the slippery quality, punches literally slip off his moist body, and he has the compassionate quality, his pure defence he does nothing but avoid punches. Some boxes don’t even know why they fight. Because he doesn’t want to hurt anyone that’s the Pisces compassion.
I can’t keep chasing you around showing you the specifics while you just dismiss them and stick to your theory. That astrology doesn’t work. You have to look at the specifics at some point. You have to STUDY it.click to expand
Yeh professional boxer sounds like the ideal career for someone who doesn't want to hurt people 🙄
Posted by WizardzzzPosted by bricklemarkPosted by WizardzzzHe has the slippery quality, punches literally slip off his moist body, and he has the compassionate quality, his pure defence he does nothing but avoid punches. Some boxes don’t even know why they fight. Because he doesn’t want to hurt anyone that’s the Pisces compassion.Posted by bricklemarkAhh Pisces, the fighters of the zodiac 😅Posted by WizardzzzDoesn’t mean it doesn’t work.Posted by bricklemarkOfc there are too many parameters, that's the point. You can use astrology to explain why the same thing did or didn't happen, why it did or didn't work , you always can find something that fits. Mayweather isn't even an Aquarius but you still manage to fit him into your pattern that you "noticed". That's the trick of astrology.Posted by WizardzzzI don’t know. I just noticed this in Aquarius. The best player on my hockey team was also an Aquarius, and he was also the perfect athlete.Posted by bricklemarkPosted by WizardzzzThat’s a generality. You have to look at the specifics. You have a confirmation bias against astrology. You have this preconceived idea that astrology doesn’t work, and you look at examples that can confirm this.Posted by bricklemarkSame place anyone reads anything these days 😅Posted by WizardzzzWhere did you read that?Posted by bricklemarkOh right, so you know that Leos have the least medals won at the Olympics then? How does that fit into your pattern?Posted by WizardzzzThe best all-round athletes, with a genius IQ. Tom Brady is a 4-time Leo. That’s powerful too. Ali was a Capricorn which is common among boxes because it’s a lot of hard work. And he was a Leo rising which matches his giganticself promotion.Posted by bricklemarkYour list is biased. What about Muhammed Ali instead of Mayweather. Tom Brady? Roger Federer. You took a few examples of top sportspeople who are Aquarius and then made the leap to "the best athletes in the world are Aquarius".. that's a studied psychological process where we take a few bits of information, form a pattern from them and fix it in our minds and then reject information that contradicts it with vague excuses, until the evidence is strong and clear enough that we can't ignore it and have to change our belief. I read a book on it. It's like a time saving process, jumping to conclusionsPosted by WizardzzzWell, running is about power and speed, not talent like those other sports.Posted by bricklemarkHuh what about Usain Bolt? Or Kipchoge? or 1000s of other top athletes?Posted by WizardzzzI’m an Aries and I’m a typical pioneer type, I never shy away from confrontation. I actually thrive on it. My mom was a libra she was extremely social and welcoming and couldn’t stand rudeness or profanity. You think those are just coincidences.?Posted by bricklemarkHumans are pre-wired to see patterns, so you can relate to the characteristics of your sign but anything that doesn't ring true then you just make up another reason like oh it's because of my Aries rising etc etc. The only true use for astrology is like a placebo effect whereby you can gain insight simply because something is true about you or another person and that could apply to whatever your placements where. Regardless of what day and time you were born astrology is going to say something true about you.. that's the trick of itPosted by WizardzzzYou think the signs don’t actually apply to us?
It's amazing the convoluted excuses people will make to avoid the simple explanation. Astrology is just psychological and has no actual value in reality
click to expand
click to expand
The best athletes in the world have been Aquarius, Babe Ruth Wayne Gretzky Michael Jordan Kelly Slater Floyd Mayweather… all perfect athletes and by far the best of their sport. You think that’s just a coincidence.?
click to expand
I bet if you took the zodiac signs of the top 1000 sportspeople then the split would be fairly even across all zodiac signs. One sign would have the most but that's random standard deviation. Like I said, people like to see patterns and assign importance to them, they're not good at accepting randomness , we're just not wired that way
click to expand
click to expand
I think you were literally complaining about people doing that about you earlier on in the thread 🤣
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
click to expand
I look at astrology and I say : could it be true? And I study it and study it and it always turns out yes that’s definitely consistent.
Like the Aquarius athletes, I’m not saying they’re successful therefore they’re Aquarius. I’m saying they all fit the same profile: the perfect athlete. They’re not the tallest not the fastest not the strongest, they just have an amazing sport IQ and talent. Babe Ruth Kelly Slater Wayne Gretzky Michael Jordan.
click to expand
The title of the thread is literally "Astrology doesn't seem to be helping me" 🤣 Well umm sorry to tell you this but it's about as likely to help you find a compatible partner as picking a name out of a hat
But anyway, even IF it was true about Aquarians being the sign with the best athletes (and one sign has to have the most) then why Aquarius? Thought they were supposed to be humanitarians
click to expand
Mayweather is a Pisces, but Aquarius mercury, that’s why he had the perfect ring IQ, but he was a defensive fighter and very slippery, which is consistent with Pisces. He didn’t wanna hurt anyone. He just wanted to show a good fight and everybody gets paid. That’s typical Pisces compassion.
And about using astrology to find a partner, it’s a very difficult because there are too many parameters. Synastry is a full chart multiplied by another full chart. There are way too many parameters. I’m not saying synastry doesn’t exist, but it’s too complicated to even bother using it. Just try and hope for the best, and look at the astrology afterwards and see why it works or why it doesn’t work.
click to expand
Spotting patterns afterwards is even more easy. That's like being a financial trader from the future
click to expand
Also, I include Mayweather because he has the Aquarius quality, the ring IQ, and he’s considered the best. It’s no coincidence. Also, you ignored the stuff I said about Pisces. You just use confirmation bias.
click to expand
If you said Michael Phelps then I could agree. Those fishes live to swim
click to expand
I can’t keep chasing you around showing you the specifics while you just dismiss them and stick to your theory. That astrology doesn’t work. You have to look at the specifics at some point. You have to STUDY it.
click to expand
Yeh professional boxer sounds like the ideal career for someone who doesn't want to hurt people 🙄click to expand
His dad was a professional boxer
Again you’re just thinking of things that could disprove astrology and not actually studying things. This is a one-sided conversation. I’m carrying you and it’s tiring.
The truth is
Astrology isn't helping you find a partner.
So then you decide you need to look at different placements or whatever.
Eventually you find a partner
Then you say "AHH that's why it wasn't working, because I wasn't looking at Venus conjunct Jupiter" or whatever the fuck random shit coincides with you finding someone. Then you make up some pattern with hindsight which like I said is worthless since we'd all be Billionaire traders if we could do that
Astrology isn't helping you find a partner.
So then you decide you need to look at different placements or whatever.
Eventually you find a partner
Then you say "AHH that's why it wasn't working, because I wasn't looking at Venus conjunct Jupiter" or whatever the fuck random shit coincides with you finding someone. Then you make up some pattern with hindsight which like I said is worthless since we'd all be Billionaire traders if we could do that
Posted by Wizardzzz
The truth is
Astrology isn't helping you find a partner.
So then you decide you need to look at different placements or whatever.
Eventually you find a partner
Then you say "AHH that's why it wasn't working, because I wasn't looking at Venus conjunct Jupiter" or whatever the fuck random shit coincides with you finding someone. Then you make up some pattern with hindsight which like I said is worthless since we'd all be Billionaire traders if we could do that
Synastry is way too complex to use it as a predictive tool. It does work sometimes. But there are also other factors, like this girl was from a big city and I’m from a small town. So for a big city girl she was very compassionate and kind, but she was way too cunning for me.
Astrology is undisprovable? anecdotally
You're making up stuff about 1 person and giving anecdotal evidence (my mum was a Libra and she was like this)
Scientifically, it has been disproven many times where possible and inversely not proven to be anymore accurate than randomness in the situations where it can't be directly disproved (since a lot of it is subjective and vague)
You're making up stuff about 1 person and giving anecdotal evidence (my mum was a Libra and she was like this)
Scientifically, it has been disproven many times where possible and inversely not proven to be anymore accurate than randomness in the situations where it can't be directly disproved (since a lot of it is subjective and vague)
Posted by Wizardzzz
Astrology is undisprovable? anecdotally
You're making up stuff about 1 person and giving anecdotal evidence (my mum was a Libra and she was like this)
Scientifically, it has been disproven many times where possible and inversely not proven to be anymore accurate than randomness in the situations where it can't be directly disproved (since a lot of it is subjective and vague)
No, it’s a very coherent and consistent. It’s not a gigantic influence, but it’s there. I saw the way scientists analyse astrology, they don’t look into it at all. They don’t listen. They don’t study it. Just like you don’t.
Also, why are you on an astrology site if you don’t believe in it?
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-IIPosted by bricklemark
Recently, I got the full chart, she was very nice and nurturing, a triple cancer with moon on the rising. I thought perfect. This is the kind of nurturing person I’m looking for.
Are you a big baby?
click to expand
Oh I should’ve told you, the reason I look for a nurturing woman is because I’m a cancer rising and Jupiter and moon in the seventh.
What day were you guys born on ? the numbers matter as well
You can successfully use astrology to predict though
See: my synastry thread
My methods never fail
See: my synastry thread
My methods never fail
Posted by bricklemark
@Lulufer
How am I dense and defensive? Especially extremely.😂😂😂 where did you get that from?
You ask too many questions
Posted by bricklemarkPosted by Wizardzzz
Astrology is undisprovable? anecdotally
You're making up stuff about 1 person and giving anecdotal evidence (my mum was a Libra and she was like this)
Scientifically, it has been disproven many times where possible and inversely not proven to be anymore accurate than randomness in the situations where it can't be directly disproved (since a lot of it is subjective and vague)
No, it’s a very coherent and consistent. It’s not a gigantic influence, but it’s there. I saw the way scientists analyse astrology, they don’t look into it at all. They don’t listen. They don’t study it. Just like you don’t.
Also, why are you on an astrology site if you don’t believe in it?click to expand
I don't believe in it but sometimes it's fun. Also, like I said we can't help but find patterns in things so I 'm not immune to thinking of people as Virgos etc but I don't think it causes any harm
Why would I spend time studying something I'm not interested in studying and has no evidence except anecdotal that it has any worth?
Posted by MidAtBestPosted by bricklemark
@Lulufer
How am I dense and defensive? Especially extremely.😂😂😂 where did you get that from?
You ask too many questionsclick to expand
Why do you say that? What do you mean by that? Huh?
Posted by WizardzzzPosted by bricklemarkPosted by WizardzzzNo, it’s a very coherent and consistent. It’s not a gigantic influence, but it’s there. I saw the way scientists analyse astrology, they don’t look into it at all. They don’t listen. They don’t study it. Just like you don’t.
Astrology is undisprovable? anecdotally
You're making up stuff about 1 person and giving anecdotal evidence (my mum was a Libra and she was like this)
Scientifically, it has been disproven many times where possible and inversely not proven to be anymore accurate than randomness in the situations where it can't be directly disproved (since a lot of it is subjective and vague)
Also, why are you on an astrology site if you don’t believe in it?
click to expand
I don't believe in it but sometimes it's fun. Also, like I said we can't help but find patterns in things so I 'm not immune to thinking of people as Virgos etc but I don't think it causes any harm
Why would I spend time studying something I'm not interested in studying and has no evidence except anecdotal that it has any worth?click to expand
Because that’s the normal thing to do, astrology is a science, and you should study it. You spend this much time talking about it but you never actually study it? You’re mentally challenged, aren’t you?
Posted by WizardzzzPosted by MidAtBestPosted by bricklemarkYou ask too many questions
@Lulufer
How am I dense and defensive? Especially extremely.😂😂😂 where did you get that from?
click to expand
Why do you say that? What do you mean by that? Huh?click to expand
Fuck you, arsehole
Posted by Overthinker
Good on paper doesn't mean always good, especially if you're only partly reading it (which I'm pretty sure you are). You need to get a full reading on someone to really understand how they are. And just placements alone don't give as nearly as good picture. I find aspects to be much more telling about the person, than placements themselves are. Poorly aspected vs well aspected same placement will have way different outcome. A person who's Moon makes squares compared to the one who's makes trines to their Sun or Venus are going to be very different, even if Moon is in same sign, even house.
And also, use astrology as a tool to better understand someone, not to create an image of them without getting to know them.
Also, looks like that woman did you both a favor by not entertaining something that leads nowhere. And while I do agree, not all loves start with attraction at first glance (I've experienced this just now for the first time, at 38 yo) and they can develop over time, it's less likely to happen if neither side is interested in further entertaining of that kind of relationship. Imo such loves can only happen if two people are brought together by other circumstances - either they are part of the same social group, work place etc. if you don't have shared daily activities it's not likely to develop over time and just going out to see if it will, seems like forcing it too much
I did look at all of it. Why would you assume the contrary why do you assume the worst of people? Better understand./create an image are the same thing! You want to give a lesson but you have nothing to teach😂
She didn’t do us both a favour, that’s such an American way of thinking, you invent millions of reasons why people shouldn’t be in a relationship, and you loooooove telling other people that. It’s like your favourite thing.
Internet dating is a big thing nowadays, a loooot of people meet that way. Again, you’re trying to teach that you have nothing to teach.
Posted by OverthinkerPosted by bricklemarkPosted by OverthinkerI did look at all of it. Why would you assume the contrary why do you assume the worst of people? Better understand./create an image are the same thing! You want to give a lesson but you have nothing to teach😂
Good on paper doesn't mean always good, especially if you're only partly reading it (which I'm pretty sure you are). You need to get a full reading on someone to really understand how they are. And just placements alone don't give as nearly as good picture. I find aspects to be much more telling about the person, than placements themselves are. Poorly aspected vs well aspected same placement will have way different outcome. A person who's Moon makes squares compared to the one who's makes trines to their Sun or Venus are going to be very different, even if Moon is in same sign, even house.
And also, use astrology as a tool to better understand someone, not to create an image of them without getting to know them.
Also, looks like that woman did you both a favor by not entertaining something that leads nowhere. And while I do agree, not all loves start with attraction at first glance (I've experienced this just now for the first time, at 38 yo) and they can develop over time, it's less likely to happen if neither side is interested in further entertaining of that kind of relationship. Imo such loves can only happen if two people are brought together by other circumstances - either they are part of the same social group, work place etc. if you don't have shared daily activities it's not likely to develop over time and just going out to see if it will, seems like forcing it too much
She didn’t do us both a favour, that’s such an American way of thinking, you invent millions of reasons why people shouldn’t be in a relationship, and you loooooove telling other people that. It’s like your favourite thing.
Internet dating is a big thing nowadays, a loooot of people meet that way. Again, you’re trying to teach that you have nothing to teach.
click to expand
1. Because you need a quality understanding of astrology and you literally just named a few placements - so my comment is based on what you wrote. I don't assume anything, I read what is written and comment on that.
2. I'm not american / have no idea what american way of thinking is
3. Clearly you're hurt from rejection and you're frustrated at anyone who tries to explain to you why it was in fact good for you both
4. I'm not teaching you anything, I'm explaining things in more clear way that clearly lands on deaf ears and wastes my time so I'm not going to waste a second of it any more.
Good luck.click to expand
I mentioned the really good points we had. Doesn’t mean I didn’t look at the rest.
You probably spend a lot of time on social media and so you met a lot of Americans and so you started an American way of thinking. It’s really primitive.
I’m not hurt at all. I’m just saying there’s no reason it shouldn’t have worked.
And like I demonstrated your advice is garbage. I understand why you’re running with your tail between your legs. I shoved your bullshit back at you. I don’t suffer fools and I don’t take any shit from them. Run forest run!!😂
Posted by bricklemark
@Lulufer
How am I dense and defensive? Especially extremely.😂😂😂 where did you get that from?
Shut up unc 🥲
Posted by LuluferPosted by bricklemark
@Lulufer
How am I dense and defensive? Especially extremely.😂😂😂 where did you get that from?
Shut up unc 🥲click to expand
No you shut the fuck up you 5-year-old
It's good you made a thread and were so receptive to responses 🤣
So many revelations
What an ad out means
Impotence
Funny responses
Thread of the year contender fr fr
What an ad out means
Impotence
Funny responses
Thread of the year contender fr fr
Couple things:
1. Kudos to you for trying to find love despite that you’re unable to have penetrative sex and self-aware that your pool will be diminutive.
2. There are chat rooms / Reddit pages where asexual/sapiosexual folks get together. These people seek to establish mental or emotional connection first before jumping in bed. Sex isn’t everything to these people, so long as the personality matches and you can offer other means of pleasuring your partner like oral sex.
3. Most importantly, stop playing penpals. Virtual connection doesn’t necessarily lead to nor translate to physical attraction. I met my share of insecure dudes who used dilatory tactics to avoid meeting me right away, so I didn’t reject them if there was no chemistry in real life. They wanted to tie me emotionally to them. Utter waste of time for everyone involved because I still rejected them when I met them in real life and found no chemistry with them or they lied about various things. Talk for 3-4 days and then meet the person.
1. Kudos to you for trying to find love despite that you’re unable to have penetrative sex and self-aware that your pool will be diminutive.
2. There are chat rooms / Reddit pages where asexual/sapiosexual folks get together. These people seek to establish mental or emotional connection first before jumping in bed. Sex isn’t everything to these people, so long as the personality matches and you can offer other means of pleasuring your partner like oral sex.
3. Most importantly, stop playing penpals. Virtual connection doesn’t necessarily lead to nor translate to physical attraction. I met my share of insecure dudes who used dilatory tactics to avoid meeting me right away, so I didn’t reject them if there was no chemistry in real life. They wanted to tie me emotionally to them. Utter waste of time for everyone involved because I still rejected them when I met them in real life and found no chemistry with them or they lied about various things. Talk for 3-4 days and then meet the person.
Astrology is very deep my moon mercury and mars are in water but I hardly ever get along with water signs or earth signs with the exception of Virgos. I normally click with fire signs, geminis and Aquarius.
However my venus is in Aries even tho it’s retrograde I also pay attention to the day a person is born for example even tho I’m compatible with a Gemini if that person is born on 2nd 4th 8th 11th 13th or 17th then it won’t matter their sign because those numbers aren’t compatible with mine, Aspects also play a part but they have to be attracted to you first.
I don’t know how much you’re into it but if you need more info then l can be happy to elaborate or if you wanna know which sign you’ll attract just based on ya bday let me know.
However my venus is in Aries even tho it’s retrograde I also pay attention to the day a person is born for example even tho I’m compatible with a Gemini if that person is born on 2nd 4th 8th 11th 13th or 17th then it won’t matter their sign because those numbers aren’t compatible with mine, Aspects also play a part but they have to be attracted to you first.
I don’t know how much you’re into it but if you need more info then l can be happy to elaborate or if you wanna know which sign you’ll attract just based on ya bday let me know.
Real Conversations Since 2000
dxpnet has been home to open discussions and shared experiences for over 25 years. If you value independent communities, you can support the site below.
Every contribution helps keep dxpnet independent and ad-light.
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →Related Topics
It’s a comedy about prison rape🥴 then I realised he’s a Scorpio… pretty fucking dark😂
⚝Pluto in the 1st house⚝
When Pluto is located in your first house, it suggests that you possess a commanding aura and possess a fervent and fervid personality. This planetary position indicates that your body is robust and can endure considerable st
Which placement do you always feel the proudest having?
Like you can't stop name dropping it oh btw Virgo merc here 🤸🤸🤸
What is your favoured sign/placement of late and why?
Mine is Virgos (Pisces and Aqua moons) who have been incredibly kind to me when I’ve needed it, also Scorpio who always has my back and Capricorn (Pisces moon) who is always there, is empathic, and
And it turns out moon is transiting my Mars
I have this friend (Virgo) who bumped into her colleague (Scorpio) at a bank. Once they're done with their business, they were about to go their separate ways when the Scorpio asked curiously where she's going and my friend says she's just going to gra
ChatGPT is so bad with western astrology—don’t even bother. I don’t know how accurate Vedic astrology & Bazi is on there but I used it to rectify my birth time by providing dates of significant life events (it ended up being close to what I’ve
I thought they were all nice and nurturing, but apparently not I learned the hard way
~ as created by AI
This thread is inspired by @Overthinker.
Create an account with ChatGPT, log in and ask for an image of your life partner based on your astro chart. I gave Sun, Moon, Venus, Mars and ascendant with houses
Here’s mine 😅. Looks l
I do. My sister has mercury conjunct Jupiter, sun and another one in the 10th house. And she has so much success, her life is just so easy and she does so many things. She easily got back in the workforce after 15 years looking after three children. Meanw
Should be electric
I would say Sagittarius moon as it seems that motivated people really can thrive with this moon. i believe it's more powerful to have this as a moon over having it as a sun. I would say barn none it's the best to be gifted with.
I would say the tricky mo
Anyone looked into this ?
My Jupiter line (runs right through where I’m
living). Luck, fortune and expansion which i totally relate to as I love my home place💚
Go to Astro.com
Extended chart selection > special > Astro maps to see where woul
Aries - like charcoal
Taurus - like skim milk
Gemini - like jet propel engine
Cancer - like raindrops (teardrops)
Leo - like smoke
Virgo - odorless
Libra - like chocolate
Scorpio - like sex
Sagittarius - like burnt firewood
Capricorn - like goat cheese
Aq
From most masculine to most feminine! (its only fair)
1. Sagittarius
2. Aries
3. Gemini
4. Scorpio
5. Aqua
6. Pisces
7. Taurus
8. Leo
9. Libra
10. Capricorn
11. Cancer
12. Virgo
When it comes to zodiac compatibility, certain signs naturally complement each other based on their elements (Fire, Earth, Air, and Water) and shared personality traits. Here’s a general breakdown of the most compatible zodiac pairings:
@astroera
Joined: Mar 25, 2025 · Topics: 1 · Posts: 1
Astrology always a good convo starter I've noticed . Do you ever use it in daily conversation or with friends.
Some friends I refer to simply as Aquarius Woman or Taurus Man. Some I refer to their celebrity sun and moon match. The possibilities are real
Do you know any? Are you one? Do you have emotions lol
Same place anyone reads anything these days 😅