Buy your boo some boots with a lift and start sitting in all photos together lol
"Uncompromising standards is the #2 culprit of why women are single." (Page 2)
You are on page out of 3 | Reverse Order
Posted by LadyPootsAlotPosted by CapTennYou tell yourself that all men are this way to make yourself feel better about it, because deep-down eitherPosted by LadyPootsAlotPosted by CapTennI'm not triggered. His predictable, boring misogyny pisses me off. But then he says something funny like that he enjoys the idea of sniffing the period panties, and I chill. *shrugs*Posted by LadyPootsAlotPosted by DonJohnOh, go sniff your wife's period-stained panties, douche.Posted by LadyPootsAlotPosted by DonJohn
The women saying men also have standards mile long etc etc. this social experiment disproves all of that bullchit notion.
this is a photoshopped female with a pig nose and chest hair. In other words, it's humanly impossible to be this ugly.
she has a full inbox from men. She doesn't have to be FA if she doesn't want to be. Women are in the best place in history.
Yes you do have to learn how to not put out right away and chit. but at least this woman is still wanted. you have a good starting point.
you can choose...... but you have to choose at your level in order it to work out in the long term.
So, which is it, Don? Do men have no standards as you say in this post or are women doomed to be alone when they reach 30?
Nice skin hat on that one dude.
you make no sense.
what i'm saying is women have the choice. men don't need this talk because they are the suitors. the woman is in the driver's seat. you have the choice.
however, you have to choose at your level to sustain longevity. if you are choosing levels above you. the men will just use you as a cum dumpster
He is right, though. Despite him triggering you.
And no, he's wrong.
No, I'm a guy. And, he's right.
If I meet a woman of equal or greater status as compared to myself, she gets treated differently and I weigh longer term options.
If I meet a lower status female than myself, I use her for sex.....probably only once. (cum dumpster)
I also can make this distinction in under 10 minutes, usually less, on who is who.
I can understand you disliked the coarseness of the language, but the message is fact.
a) you know it's wrong to treat people this way
or
b) you don't see women as people. And if that's the case, you have a deep wound in your soul, because you came from a woman, and as a straight man, you can only find love with a woman.
So, it's your problem, dude. And Don's. And the 4Chan crowd. It's way too many dudes, but absolutely is not all of them.click to expand
Yeah, pretty sure that's not it.
Just trying to give you some insight into the male mind.
Posted by DonJohnThey fear the daughter would end up alone and be a drain on their finances. Also because of the ascribed gender roles, women were expected to marry and have kids, this was the only job allowed for them. So society looks down on your family as a whole if you have unmarried children, could make marriages for your other children harder as well.Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by DonJohnDisagree.Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by xXxQueenliciaXxXCause women have a shorter biological clock then men. Funny thing is that people who have these opinions seem stuck in the 1950s. Like has no one told you we are not in the 'Little House in the Prairie' days and no longer need to populate the earth?
I'm trying to understand why the spotlight is always on women when they're single as opposed to a man.
Moreover, why does a strangers relationship status matter that much to other people?
We need more childless people in the world.
stuck in the 50's is a popular liberal media narrative.
you see from the 50's back to thousands of years of tradition. families rushed their daughters to get married.... do you know why?
because there's a scientific biological reason for it. your chances of having a healthy baby plummets. or if your entire lineage ends.
Families rushed their daughters into marriage because if they weren't married they became a drain on the households funds. Because women were not allowed to work and support themselves they were dependents.
Your lineage argument is bull as the name and wealth passes through the male line, not the female in such patriarchal societies.
you can't say disagree when it is a biological fact that women's fertility health and likelihood decreases with age. this is the case before the invention of money.
you are saying it's entirely monetary? that's a false narrative. it could be a combination of both but most importantly it's the fact that they fear the daughter would end up alone.
click to expand
Its also fact that childbirth was the number one killer of women before modern medicine. The oldest living women were in fact unmarried or widowed and did not have to subject their bodies to constant pregnancies. This was one of the reasons women breast fed for so long as a natural form of birth control.
Men are always talking about what’s “natural” but in nature it’s always the males of the species that have to be pretty or work really hard to get the females.
I want to see more men dressing up and wearing makeup. Dance for me. Build me a fucking house. Impress me, you mediocre fucks.
I want to see more men dressing up and wearing makeup. Dance for me. Build me a fucking house. Impress me, you mediocre fucks.
Posted by DonJohnYou could also compromise your standards and get married and dedicate the next 20 years of your life to some man only to have him leave you for someone younger and hotter and not a penny to your name. You'd still be standing in the same exact place..."looking in the mirror and the face looking back at you is all wrinkled and saggy. the men no longer come knocking and your eggs have dried up"
listen....... you can say whatever you want now. you can lie to yourself all day long. you can spray the liberal media narrative till you are blue in the face.
One day you will wake up looking in the mirror and the face looking back at you is all wrinkled and saggy. the men no longer come knocking and your eggs have dried up.
when that day comes...... just remember what I wrote.
Point is to make decisions that you can live with. Because you'll have too.
As for the height thing something is funny:
In Northern Europe countries most women wanted or still want to date men who are at least 1.80m (5'11) which is still way taller than the american/canadian average male height, yet american women want to date men around 6ft, which is like 1.83m. lol No woman in Europe says "I want him to be 1.83m". So I guess 6ft just like 1.80m just sound better because those are full numerals. And I also guess since the average height in Europe has gone up in recent years european women go for 1.85m nowadays which is almost 6'1 ( again almost no european woman says I want him to be 1.86m). The good thing for shorter men though is that a lot of women, especially shorter women can't even tell the difference between 5'10, 5'11 or 6ft.
And with that being said, I figured out a long time ago that I haven't had a crush/fling with a girl that I really liked who was older than 27 since 2010. The last girl that I really liked was like 23 when I met her. I feel sooooooooo shallow now and I can't do anything about it... 😢
In Northern Europe countries most women wanted or still want to date men who are at least 1.80m (5'11) which is still way taller than the american/canadian average male height, yet american women want to date men around 6ft, which is like 1.83m. lol No woman in Europe says "I want him to be 1.83m". So I guess 6ft just like 1.80m just sound better because those are full numerals. And I also guess since the average height in Europe has gone up in recent years european women go for 1.85m nowadays which is almost 6'1 ( again almost no european woman says I want him to be 1.86m). The good thing for shorter men though is that a lot of women, especially shorter women can't even tell the difference between 5'10, 5'11 or 6ft.
Posted by LadyNeptuneYou know, from my experience every woman who claimed her man fullfilled all her needs and lists were actually lowering them in hindsight. He might have been 6'2 and a manger, yet he was balding, let alone being "dark and handsome". Or he might have been an Alpha male with a good body, yet he wasn't quite the career type of guy she had dreamt about, but so what, he could cook pancakes once a month, right? lol
And speaking as someone who has dated men that fulfilled my list and STILL found them wanting, life works better when you are open to all possibilities.
And with that being said, I figured out a long time ago that I haven't had a crush/fling with a girl that I really liked who was older than 27 since 2010. The last girl that I really liked was like 23 when I met her. I feel sooooooooo shallow now and I can't do anything about it... 😢
Posted by TheSagNo I'm serious. 100% fulfilled my ENTIRE list. But that's why I also said your standards change. Life experience teaches you what you truly need to be happy and that list of what your looking for evolves.
As for the height thing something is funny:
In Northern Europe countries most women wanted or still want to date men who are at least 1.80m (5'11) which is still way taller than the american/canadian average male height, yet american women want to date men around 6ft, which is like 1.83m. lol No woman in Europe says "I want him to be 1.83m". So I guess 6ft just like 1.80m just sound better because those are full numerals. And I also guess since the average height in Europe has gone up in recent years european women go for 1.85m nowadays which is almost 6'1 ( again almost no european woman says I want him to be 1.86m). The good thing for shorter men though is that a lot of women, especially shorter women can't even tell the difference between 5'10, 5'11 or 6ft.
Posted by LadyNeptuneYou know, from my experience every woman who claimed her man fullfilled all her needs and lists were actually lowering them in hindsight. He might have been 6'2 and a manger, yet he was balding, let alone being "dark and handsome". Or he might have been an Alpha male with a good body, yet he wasn't quite the career type of guy she had dreamt about, but so what, he could cook pancakes once a month, right? lol
And speaking as someone who has dated men that fulfilled my list and STILL found them wanting, life works better when you are open to all possibilities.
And with that being said, I figured out a long time ago that I haven't had a crush/fling with a girl that I really liked who was older than 27 since 2010. The last girl that I really liked was like 23 when I met her. I feel sooooooooo shallow now and I can't do anything about it... 😢
click to expand
Posted by LadyNeptuneI agree that standards change, especially for women who get older but then again, let me tell you something about my AWESOME experiences with women:Posted by TheSagNo I'm serious. 100% fulfilled my ENTIRE list. But that's why I also said your standards change. Life experience teaches you what you truly need to be happy and that list of what your looking for evolves.
As for the height thing something is funny:
In Northern Europe countries most women wanted or still want to date men who are at least 1.80m (5'11) which is still way taller than the american/canadian average male height, yet american women want to date men around 6ft, which is like 1.83m. lol No woman in Europe says "I want him to be 1.83m". So I guess 6ft just like 1.80m just sound better because those are full numerals. And I also guess since the average height in Europe has gone up in recent years european women go for 1.85m nowadays which is almost 6'1 ( again almost no european woman says I want him to be 1.86m). The good thing for shorter men though is that a lot of women, especially shorter women can't even tell the difference between 5'10, 5'11 or 6ft.
Posted by LadyNeptuneYou know, from my experience every woman who claimed her man fullfilled all her needs and lists were actually lowering them in hindsight. He might have been 6'2 and a manger, yet he was balding, let alone being "dark and handsome". Or he might have been an Alpha male with a good body, yet he wasn't quite the career type of guy she had dreamt about, but so what, he could cook pancakes once a month, right? lol
And speaking as someone who has dated men that fulfilled my list and STILL found them wanting, life works better when you are open to all possibilities.
And with that being said, I figured out a long time ago that I haven't had a crush/fling with a girl that I really liked who was older than 27 since 2010. The last girl that I really liked was like 23 when I met her. I feel sooooooooo shallow now and I can't do anything about it... 😢
click to expand
most of women's standards are conflicting when you pay attention to them apart from the looks department. A man can't be a good looking macho, strong yet sensitive, who loves kids, animals, money, the environment and spends money for charity projects. They just don't exist in real life.
And IF there actually was a perfect guy outhere who fullfills everything that a woman dreams about, then one thing is for sure: he will never commit to any woman, at least not on a long term. Why would he? He gets all the pussy for free and he is not going to change his life style s. If Mick Jagger and Keith Richards can sleep with thousands of women then Mr. Perfect is going triple that. ^^
Posted by TheSag"Especially for women." So your saying women experience change more deeply than men...Posted by LadyNeptuneI agree that standards change, especially for women who get older but then again, let me tell you something about my AWESOME experiences with women:Posted by TheSagNo I'm serious. 100% fulfilled my ENTIRE list. But that's why I also said your standards change. Life experience teaches you what you truly need to be happy and that list of what your looking for evolves.
As for the height thing something is funny:
In Northern Europe countries most women wanted or still want to date men who are at least 1.80m (5'11) which is still way taller than the american/canadian average male height, yet american women want to date men around 6ft, which is like 1.83m. lol No woman in Europe says "I want him to be 1.83m". So I guess 6ft just like 1.80m just sound better because those are full numerals. And I also guess since the average height in Europe has gone up in recent years european women go for 1.85m nowadays which is almost 6'1 ( again almost no european woman says I want him to be 1.86m). The good thing for shorter men though is that a lot of women, especially shorter women can't even tell the difference between 5'10, 5'11 or 6ft.
Posted by LadyNeptuneYou know, from my experience every woman who claimed her man fullfilled all her needs and lists were actually lowering them in hindsight. He might have been 6'2 and a manger, yet he was balding, let alone being "dark and handsome". Or he might have been an Alpha male with a good body, yet he wasn't quite the career type of guy she had dreamt about, but so what, he could cook pancakes once a month, right? lol
And speaking as someone who has dated men that fulfilled my list and STILL found them wanting, life works better when you are open to all possibilities.
And with that being said, I figured out a long time ago that I haven't had a crush/fling with a girl that I really liked who was older than 27 since 2010. The last girl that I really liked was like 23 when I met her. I feel sooooooooo shallow now and I can't do anything about it... 😢
most of women's standards are conflicting when you pay attention to them apart from the looks department. A man can't be a good looking macho, strong yet sensitive, who loves kids, animals, money, the environment and spends money for charity projects. They just don't exist in real life.
And IF there actually was a perfect guy outhere who fullfills everything that a woman dreams about, then one thing is for sure: he will never commit to any woman, at least not on a long term. Why would he? He gets all the pussy for free and he is not going to change his life style s. If Mick Jagger and Keith Richards can sleep with thousands of women then Mr. Perfect is going triple that. ^^click to expand
Posted by LadyNeptuneIn my view women, not all of them, lower their standards, throgh the yearsPosted by TheSag"Especially for women." So your saying women experience change more deeply than men...Posted by LadyNeptuneI agree that standards change, especially for women who get older but then again, let me tell you something about my AWESOME experiences with women:Posted by TheSagNo I'm serious. 100% fulfilled my ENTIRE list. But that's why I also said your standards change. Life experience teaches you what you truly need to be happy and that list of what your looking for evolves.
As for the height thing something is funny:
In Northern Europe countries most women wanted or still want to date men who are at least 1.80m (5'11) which is still way taller than the american/canadian average male height, yet american women want to date men around 6ft, which is like 1.83m. lol No woman in Europe says "I want him to be 1.83m". So I guess 6ft just like 1.80m just sound better because those are full numerals. And I also guess since the average height in Europe has gone up in recent years european women go for 1.85m nowadays which is almost 6'1 ( again almost no european woman says I want him to be 1.86m). The good thing for shorter men though is that a lot of women, especially shorter women can't even tell the difference between 5'10, 5'11 or 6ft.
Posted by LadyNeptuneYou know, from my experience every woman who claimed her man fullfilled all her needs and lists were actually lowering them in hindsight. He might have been 6'2 and a manger, yet he was balding, let alone being "dark and handsome". Or he might have been an Alpha male with a good body, yet he wasn't quite the career type of guy she had dreamt about, but so what, he could cook pancakes once a month, right? lol
And speaking as someone who has dated men that fulfilled my list and STILL found them wanting, life works better when you are open to all possibilities.
And with that being said, I figured out a long time ago that I haven't had a crush/fling with a girl that I really liked who was older than 27 since 2010. The last girl that I really liked was like 23 when I met her. I feel sooooooooo shallow now and I can't do anything about it... 😢
most of women's standards are conflicting when you pay attention to them apart from the looks department. A man can't be a good looking macho, strong yet sensitive, who loves kids, animals, money, the environment and spends money for charity projects. They just don't exist in real life.
And IF there actually was a perfect guy outhere who fullfills everything that a woman dreams about, then one thing is for sure: he will never commit to any woman, at least not on a long term. Why would he? He gets all the pussy for free and he is not going to change his life style s. If Mick Jagger and Keith Richards can sleep with thousands of women then Mr. Perfect is going triple that. ^^click to expand
Posted by CaramelizedCoffeePeace be with you during this trying time
being single is an unfortunate endeavor
Posted by LadyPootsAlotI think you do, YOU DO! 🙂Posted by TheSagDo we? DO WE? Or do we begin to understand that a funny, kind man who is good in the sack and makes us feel good about ourselves is actually BETTER than, not inferior to, an objectively hotter or more successful man?Posted by LadyNeptuneIn my view women, not all of them, lower their standards, throgh the yearsPosted by TheSag"Especially for women." So your saying women experience change more deeply than men...Posted by LadyNeptuneI agree that standards change, especially for women who get older but then again, let me tell you something about my AWESOME experiences with women:Posted by TheSagNo I'm serious. 100% fulfilled my ENTIRE list. But that's why I also said your standards change. Life experience teaches you what you truly need to be happy and that list of what your looking for evolves.
As for the height thing something is funny:
In Northern Europe countries most women wanted or still want to date men who are at least 1.80m (5'11) which is still way taller than the american/canadian average male height, yet american women want to date men around 6ft, which is like 1.83m. lol No woman in Europe says "I want him to be 1.83m". So I guess 6ft just like 1.80m just sound better because those are full numerals. And I also guess since the average height in Europe has gone up in recent years european women go for 1.85m nowadays which is almost 6'1 ( again almost no european woman says I want him to be 1.86m). The good thing for shorter men though is that a lot of women, especially shorter women can't even tell the difference between 5'10, 5'11 or 6ft.
Posted by LadyNeptuneYou know, from my experience every woman who claimed her man fullfilled all her needs and lists were actually lowering them in hindsight. He might have been 6'2 and a manger, yet he was balding, let alone being "dark and handsome". Or he might have been an Alpha male with a good body, yet he wasn't quite the career type of guy she had dreamt about, but so what, he could cook pancakes once a month, right? lol
And speaking as someone who has dated men that fulfilled my list and STILL found them wanting, life works better when you are open to all possibilities.
And with that being said, I figured out a long time ago that I haven't had a crush/fling with a girl that I really liked who was older than 27 since 2010. The last girl that I really liked was like 23 when I met her. I feel sooooooooo shallow now and I can't do anything about it... 😢
most of women's standards are conflicting when you pay attention to them apart from the looks department. A man can't be a good looking macho, strong yet sensitive, who loves kids, animals, money, the environment and spends money for charity projects. They just don't exist in real life.
And IF there actually was a perfect guy outhere who fullfills everything that a woman dreams about, then one thing is for sure: he will never commit to any woman, at least not on a long term. Why would he? He gets all the pussy for free and he is not going to change his life style s. If Mick Jagger and Keith Richards can sleep with thousands of women then Mr. Perfect is going triple that. ^^click to expand
What's the difference in both of our comments? Sure, women mature once they reach their 30s and "begin to understand" like you said, that other things might make them feel better, but let's face it: if you could, you would go for a funny, kind man who is good in the sack and makes you feel good about yourselves AND who is objectively hot and successful.
Posted by TheSagNot me, I raise it!Posted by LadyNeptuneIn my view women, not all of them, lower their standards, throgh the yearsPosted by TheSag"Especially for women." So your saying women experience change more deeply than men...Posted by LadyNeptuneI agree that standards change, especially for women who get older but then again, let me tell you something about my AWESOME experiences with women:Posted by TheSagNo I'm serious. 100% fulfilled my ENTIRE list. But that's why I also said your standards change. Life experience teaches you what you truly need to be happy and that list of what your looking for evolves.
As for the height thing something is funny:
In Northern Europe countries most women wanted or still want to date men who are at least 1.80m (5'11) which is still way taller than the american/canadian average male height, yet american women want to date men around 6ft, which is like 1.83m. lol No woman in Europe says "I want him to be 1.83m". So I guess 6ft just like 1.80m just sound better because those are full numerals. And I also guess since the average height in Europe has gone up in recent years european women go for 1.85m nowadays which is almost 6'1 ( again almost no european woman says I want him to be 1.86m). The good thing for shorter men though is that a lot of women, especially shorter women can't even tell the difference between 5'10, 5'11 or 6ft.
Posted by LadyNeptuneYou know, from my experience every woman who claimed her man fullfilled all her needs and lists were actually lowering them in hindsight. He might have been 6'2 and a manger, yet he was balding, let alone being "dark and handsome". Or he might have been an Alpha male with a good body, yet he wasn't quite the career type of guy she had dreamt about, but so what, he could cook pancakes once a month, right? lol
And speaking as someone who has dated men that fulfilled my list and STILL found them wanting, life works better when you are open to all possibilities.
And with that being said, I figured out a long time ago that I haven't had a crush/fling with a girl that I really liked who was older than 27 since 2010. The last girl that I really liked was like 23 when I met her. I feel sooooooooo shallow now and I can't do anything about it... 😢
most of women's standards are conflicting when you pay attention to them apart from the looks department. A man can't be a good looking macho, strong yet sensitive, who loves kids, animals, money, the environment and spends money for charity projects. They just don't exist in real life.
And IF there actually was a perfect guy outhere who fullfills everything that a woman dreams about, then one thing is for sure: he will never commit to any woman, at least not on a long term. Why would he? He gets all the pussy for free and he is not going to change his life style s. If Mick Jagger and Keith Richards can sleep with thousands of women then Mr. Perfect is going triple that. ^^click to expand
Posted by TheSagStrange, mine are only getting stronger. I suppose it's all based on perspective at the end of the day. Your values are not another's.Posted by LadyNeptuneIn my view women, not all of them, lower their standards, throgh the yearsPosted by TheSag"Especially for women." So your saying women experience change more deeply than men...Posted by LadyNeptuneI agree that standards change, especially for women who get older but then again, let me tell you something about my AWESOME experiences with women:Posted by TheSagNo I'm serious. 100% fulfilled my ENTIRE list. But that's why I also said your standards change. Life experience teaches you what you truly need to be happy and that list of what your looking for evolves.
As for the height thing something is funny:
In Northern Europe countries most women wanted or still want to date men who are at least 1.80m (5'11) which is still way taller than the american/canadian average male height, yet american women want to date men around 6ft, which is like 1.83m. lol No woman in Europe says "I want him to be 1.83m". So I guess 6ft just like 1.80m just sound better because those are full numerals. And I also guess since the average height in Europe has gone up in recent years european women go for 1.85m nowadays which is almost 6'1 ( again almost no european woman says I want him to be 1.86m). The good thing for shorter men though is that a lot of women, especially shorter women can't even tell the difference between 5'10, 5'11 or 6ft.
Posted by LadyNeptuneYou know, from my experience every woman who claimed her man fullfilled all her needs and lists were actually lowering them in hindsight. He might have been 6'2 and a manger, yet he was balding, let alone being "dark and handsome". Or he might have been an Alpha male with a good body, yet he wasn't quite the career type of guy she had dreamt about, but so what, he could cook pancakes once a month, right? lol
And speaking as someone who has dated men that fulfilled my list and STILL found them wanting, life works better when you are open to all possibilities.
And with that being said, I figured out a long time ago that I haven't had a crush/fling with a girl that I really liked who was older than 27 since 2010. The last girl that I really liked was like 23 when I met her. I feel sooooooooo shallow now and I can't do anything about it... 😢
most of women's standards are conflicting when you pay attention to them apart from the looks department. A man can't be a good looking macho, strong yet sensitive, who loves kids, animals, money, the environment and spends money for charity projects. They just don't exist in real life.
And IF there actually was a perfect guy outhere who fullfills everything that a woman dreams about, then one thing is for sure: he will never commit to any woman, at least not on a long term. Why would he? He gets all the pussy for free and he is not going to change his life style s. If Mick Jagger and Keith Richards can sleep with thousands of women then Mr. Perfect is going triple that. ^^click to expand
Posted by BlackNovaWell I believe it's in a man's nature to go for many women the more valuable he becomes. He just can't fight it. The more women will chase him the more he will have a hard time giving up his life style .Posted by TheSag
I agree that standards change, especially for women who get older but then again, let me tell you something about my AWESOME experiences with women:
most of women's standards are conflicting when you pay attention to them apart from the looks department. A man can't be a good looking macho, strong yet sensitive, who loves kids, animals, money, the environment and spends money for charity projects. They just don't exist in real life.
And IF there actually was a perfect guy outhere who fullfills everything that a woman dreams about, then one thing is for sure: he will never commit to any woman, at least not on a long term. Why would he? He gets all the pussy for free and he is not going to change his life style s. If Mick Jagger and Keith Richards can sleep with thousands of women then Mr. Perfect is going triple that. ^^
I agree with u that most women's standards are conflicting and can change over time.
But not all men want endless streams of pussy lined up at their door.
Unless your heart is made of cold hard steel, a lifetime of endless sexual pleasure with no emotional, mental or spiritual connection would leave one empty and lonely.
Everyone's priorities in life change over time.
click to expand
I mean look at rock stars, movie actors, athletes, they all have had countless of women/affairs. I have seen rock stars claiming they wanted to make music to get girls in the first place and I believe the only reason for ancient Rock Bands for still touring around the world apart form money issues, is to get laid. lol
Why else do you think Brad Pitt and his Hollywood buddies are still cheating and havin affairs? Cause they can.
On the other side, if you look at women like Beyonce, Rhianna or Jennifer Aniston kind of women, yes they might have had their fare shares of affairs too but you almost never hear about them being involved in sex scandals, sex parties or with strippers resp. call boys. They are involved with men who are on their financial and social level while Arnold banged his housekeeper, Charlie Sheen prostitutes and Hugh Grant got a blowjob from a cheap street hooker. lol
Posted by AerazoIf you think so.Posted by TheSagNot me, I raise it!Posted by LadyNeptuneIn my view women, not all of them, lower their standards, throgh the yearsPosted by TheSag"Especially for women." So your saying women experience change more deeply than men...Posted by LadyNeptuneI agree that standards change, especially for women who get older but then again, let me tell you something about my AWESOME experiences with women:Posted by TheSagNo I'm serious. 100% fulfilled my ENTIRE list. But that's why I also said your standards change. Life experience teaches you what you truly need to be happy and that list of what your looking for evolves.
As for the height thing something is funny:
In Northern Europe countries most women wanted or still want to date men who are at least 1.80m (5'11) which is still way taller than the american/canadian average male height, yet american women want to date men around 6ft, which is like 1.83m. lol No woman in Europe says "I want him to be 1.83m". So I guess 6ft just like 1.80m just sound better because those are full numerals. And I also guess since the average height in Europe has gone up in recent years european women go for 1.85m nowadays which is almost 6'1 ( again almost no european woman says I want him to be 1.86m). The good thing for shorter men though is that a lot of women, especially shorter women can't even tell the difference between 5'10, 5'11 or 6ft.
Posted by LadyNeptuneYou know, from my experience every woman who claimed her man fullfilled all her needs and lists were actually lowering them in hindsight. He might have been 6'2 and a manger, yet he was balding, let alone being "dark and handsome". Or he might have been an Alpha male with a good body, yet he wasn't quite the career type of guy she had dreamt about, but so what, he could cook pancakes once a month, right? lol
And speaking as someone who has dated men that fulfilled my list and STILL found them wanting, life works better when you are open to all possibilities.
And with that being said, I figured out a long time ago that I haven't had a crush/fling with a girl that I really liked who was older than 27 since 2010. The last girl that I really liked was like 23 when I met her. I feel sooooooooo shallow now and I can't do anything about it... 😢
most of women's standards are conflicting when you pay attention to them apart from the looks department. A man can't be a good looking macho, strong yet sensitive, who loves kids, animals, money, the environment and spends money for charity projects. They just don't exist in real life.
And IF there actually was a perfect guy outhere who fullfills everything that a woman dreams about, then one thing is for sure: he will never commit to any woman, at least not on a long term. Why would he? He gets all the pussy for free and he is not going to change his life style s. If Mick Jagger and Keith Richards can sleep with thousands of women then Mr. Perfect is going triple that. ^^click to expand
Posted by LadyPootsAlotSo you don't approach and you don't like to get approached by strangers, then how do you even meet men at all? How did you meet your model guy in that 1 week long term relationship?Posted by TheSagYou just don't get it, man. I don't work like that. I fall in love with individuals, not a set of traits. Now, if I met an awesome guy who was chubby or had acne or bad hair or something, or if he was in debt or had a crappy job, and he CHOSE to improve that, of course I'd be happy for him, and for the positive effects his self improvement would have on me. And, if I never talk to a guy in the first place, I won't know he's funny. That's true. But even if I see a strange guy and think he's hot, I'm not going near him. I do not approach men I don't know. I'm not a fan of being approached by men I don't know. I've only gone out with one guy who was like model hot, and he was well on his way to being rich (which I heard he is now) but he was so boring. We dated for a week, and I just sort of wandered off.Posted by LadyPootsAlotI think you do, YOU DO! 🙂Posted by TheSagDo we? DO WE? Or do we begin to understand that a funny, kind man who is good in the sack and makes us feel good about ourselves is actually BETTER than, not inferior to, an objectively hotter or more successful man?Posted by LadyNeptuneIn my view women, not all of them, lower their standards, throgh the yearsPosted by TheSag"Especially for women." So your saying women experience change more deeply than men...Posted by LadyNeptuneI agree that standards change, especially for women who get older but then again, let me tell you something about my AWESOME experiences with women:Posted by TheSagNo I'm serious. 100% fulfilled my ENTIRE list. But that's why I also said your standards change. Life experience teaches you what you truly need to be happy and that list of what your looking for evolves.
As for the height thing something is funny:
In Northern Europe countries most women wanted or still want to date men who are at least 1.80m (5'11) which is still way taller than the american/canadian average male height, yet american women want to date men around 6ft, which is like 1.83m. lol No woman in Europe says "I want him to be 1.83m". So I guess 6ft just like 1.80m just sound better because those are full numerals. And I also guess since the average height in Europe has gone up in recent years european women go for 1.85m nowadays which is almost 6'1 ( again almost no european woman says I want him to be 1.86m). The good thing for shorter men though is that a lot of women, especially shorter women can't even tell the difference between 5'10, 5'11 or 6ft.
Posted by LadyNeptuneYou know, from my experience every woman who claimed her man fullfilled all her needs and lists were actually lowering them in hindsight. He might have been 6'2 and a manger, yet he was balding, let alone being "dark and handsome". Or he might have been an Alpha male with a good body, yet he wasn't quite the career type of guy she had dreamt about, but so what, he could cook pancakes once a month, right? lol
And speaking as someone who has dated men that fulfilled my list and STILL found them wanting, life works better when you are open to all possibilities.
And with that being said, I figured out a long time ago that I haven't had a crush/fling with a girl that I really liked who was older than 27 since 2010. The last girl that I really liked was like 23 when I met her. I feel sooooooooo shallow now and I can't do anything about it... 😢
most of women's standards are conflicting when you pay attention to them apart from the looks department. A man can't be a good looking macho, strong yet sensitive, who loves kids, animals, money, the environment and spends money for charity projects. They just don't exist in real life.
And IF there actually was a perfect guy outhere who fullfills everything that a woman dreams about, then one thing is for sure: he will never commit to any woman, at least not on a long term. Why would he? He gets all the pussy for free and he is not going to change his life style s. If Mick Jagger and Keith Richards can sleep with thousands of women then Mr. Perfect is going triple that. ^^
What's the difference in both of our comments? Sure, women mature once they reach their 30s and "begin to understand" like you said, that other things might make them feel better, but let's face it: if you could, you would go for a funny, kind man who is good in the sack and makes you feel good about yourselves AND who is objectively hot and successful.click to expand
Posted by tizianilol
Men who have long lists of needs come across as very effeminate to me.
most men have simple needs.
Posted by BlackNovait's not about Hollywood or the lives of rich people at all dude, it's about the possibility what money and fame can do for a man. That's why I mentioned Hollywood and rock stars.Posted by TheSagWell bro, when you live your life based on what you see in Hollywood, the media, and the lives of the rich and famous.....you live by a very narrow world view.Posted by BlackNovaWell I believe it's in a man's nature to go for many women the more valuable he becomes. He just can't fight it. The more women will chase him the more he will have a hard time giving up his life style .Posted by TheSag
I agree that standards change, especially for women who get older but then again, let me tell you something about my AWESOME experiences with women:
most of women's standards are conflicting when you pay attention to them apart from the looks department. A man can't be a good looking macho, strong yet sensitive, who loves kids, animals, money, the environment and spends money for charity projects. They just don't exist in real life.
And IF there actually was a perfect guy outhere who fullfills everything that a woman dreams about, then one thing is for sure: he will never commit to any woman, at least not on a long term. Why would he? He gets all the pussy for free and he is not going to change his life style s. If Mick Jagger and Keith Richards can sleep with thousands of women then Mr. Perfect is going triple that. ^^
I agree with u that most women's standards are conflicting and can change over time.
But not all men want endless streams of pussy lined up at their door.
Unless your heart is made of cold hard steel, a lifetime of endless sexual pleasure with no emotional, mental or spiritual connection would leave one empty and lonely.
Everyone's priorities in life change over time.
I mean look at rock stars, movie actors, athletes, they all have had countless of women/affairs. I have seen rock stars claiming they wanted to make music to get girls in the first place and I believe the only reason for ancient Rock Bands for still touring around the world apart form money issues, is to get laid. lol
Why else do you think Brad Pitt and his Hollywood buddies are still cheating and havin affairs? Cause they can.
On the other side, if you look at women like Beyonce, Rhianna or Jennifer Aniston kind of women, yes they might have had their fare shares of affairs too but you almost never hear about them being involved in sex scandals, sex parties or with strippers resp. call boys. They are involved with men who are on their financial and social level while Arnold banged his housekeeper, Charlie Sheen prostitutes and Hugh Grant got a blowjob from a cheap street hooker. lol
Every man's nature is not the same...regardless of status and wealth.
Switch off the TV set.
click to expand
If you think most men's nature wasn't similar then how does mating work at all? Most men are attracted to the same attributes when it comes to women, just like most women are attracted to the same attributes then it comes to men, otherwise we wouldn't even exist.
Posted by LadyPootsAlotHe doesn't sound that boring to me, if he insulted your ex bf's new gf. lolPosted by TheSagUsually through friends, work, school, or hobbies. Model guy was someone I knew through mutual friends and hung out at parties with several times. He won me over by insulting my ex-boyfriend's new girlfriend. LOLPosted by LadyPootsAlotSo you don't approach and you don't like to get approached by strangers, then how do you even meet men at all? How did you meet your model guy in that 1 week long term relationship?Posted by TheSagYou just don't get it, man. I don't work like that. I fall in love with individuals, not a set of traits. Now, if I met an awesome guy who was chubby or had acne or bad hair or something, or if he was in debt or had a crappy job, and he CHOSE to improve that, of course I'd be happy for him, and for the positive effects his self improvement would have on me. And, if I never talk to a guy in the first place, I won't know he's funny. That's true. But even if I see a strange guy and think he's hot, I'm not going near him. I do not approach men I don't know. I'm not a fan of being approached by men I don't know. I've only gone out with one guy who was like model hot, and he was well on his way to being rich (which I heard he is now) but he was so boring. We dated for a week, and I just sort of wandered off.Posted by LadyPootsAlotI think you do, YOU DO! 🙂Posted by TheSagDo we? DO WE? Or do we begin to understand that a funny, kind man who is good in the sack and makes us feel good about ourselves is actually BETTER than, not inferior to, an objectively hotter or more successful man?Posted by LadyNeptuneIn my view women, not all of them, lower their standards, throgh the yearsPosted by TheSag"Especially for women." So your saying women experience change more deeply than men...Posted by LadyNeptuneI agree that standards change, especially for women who get older but then again, let me tell you something about my AWESOME experiences with women:Posted by TheSagNo I'm serious. 100% fulfilled my ENTIRE list. But that's why I also said your standards change. Life experience teaches you what you truly need to be happy and that list of what your looking for evolves.
As for the height thing something is funny:
In Northern Europe countries most women wanted or still want to date men who are at least 1.80m (5'11) which is still way taller than the american/canadian average male height, yet american women want to date men around 6ft, which is like 1.83m. lol No woman in Europe says "I want him to be 1.83m". So I guess 6ft just like 1.80m just sound better because those are full numerals. And I also guess since the average height in Europe has gone up in recent years european women go for 1.85m nowadays which is almost 6'1 ( again almost no european woman says I want him to be 1.86m). The good thing for shorter men though is that a lot of women, especially shorter women can't even tell the difference between 5'10, 5'11 or 6ft.
Posted by LadyNeptuneYou know, from my experience every woman who claimed her man fullfilled all her needs and lists were actually lowering them in hindsight. He might have been 6'2 and a manger, yet he was balding, let alone being "dark and handsome". Or he might have been an Alpha male with a good body, yet he wasn't quite the career type of guy she had dreamt about, but so what, he could cook pancakes once a month, right? lol
And speaking as someone who has dated men that fulfilled my list and STILL found them wanting, life works better when you are open to all possibilities.
And with that being said, I figured out a long time ago that I haven't had a crush/fling with a girl that I really liked who was older than 27 since 2010. The last girl that I really liked was like 23 when I met her. I feel sooooooooo shallow now and I can't do anything about it... 😢
most of women's standards are conflicting when you pay attention to them apart from the looks department. A man can't be a good looking macho, strong yet sensitive, who loves kids, animals, money, the environment and spends money for charity projects. They just don't exist in real life.
And IF there actually was a perfect guy outhere who fullfills everything that a woman dreams about, then one thing is for sure: he will never commit to any woman, at least not on a long term. Why would he? He gets all the pussy for free and he is not going to change his life style s. If Mick Jagger and Keith Richards can sleep with thousands of women then Mr. Perfect is going triple that. ^^
What's the difference in both of our comments? Sure, women mature once they reach their 30s and "begin to understand" like you said, that other things might make them feel better, but let's face it: if you could, you would go for a funny, kind man who is good in the sack and makes you feel good about yourselves AND who is objectively hot and successful.
How did you meet your best friend? How did you meet the next three or four closest people you hang out with? Have you known them all since childhood?
Look, other people can do whatever they want. I even know a couple married couples who met via dating apps and seem happy. But for me it's just artificial and antithetical to romance, sex, or love.click to expand
I am still friends with guys that I have known for 20+, 10+ years. I have almost never met a girl that I had been with through friends or family.
Posted by Fun4Lifevery very true!!Posted by LadyNeptuneI really do like you!
Men are always talking about what’s “natural” but in nature it’s always the males of the species that have to be pretty or work really hard to get the females.
I want to see more men dressing up and wearing makeup. Dance for me. Build me a fucking house. Impress me, you mediocre fucks.
Good stuff!
click to expand
that's why men (in general) get successful and build a house for us ladies.
they peacock around hoping to catch one of us fine ladies. lol 😆
see? that's all you have to think and it's easy peasy for men to be groveling over you and wanting to marry you and wanting to have a home and children with you. ^___^
Posted by TheSagWomen who lower their standards throughout the years do it bc they get desperate to have someone, maybe bc of stability, economy, sex, character, personality,. etc.Posted by AerazoIf you think so.Posted by TheSagNot me, I raise it!Posted by LadyNeptuneIn my view women, not all of them, lower their standards, throgh the yearsPosted by TheSag"Especially for women." So your saying women experience change more deeply than men...Posted by LadyNeptuneI agree that standards change, especially for women who get older but then again, let me tell you something about my AWESOME experiences with women:Posted by TheSagNo I'm serious. 100% fulfilled my ENTIRE list. But that's why I also said your standards change. Life experience teaches you what you truly need to be happy and that list of what your looking for evolves.
As for the height thing something is funny:
In Northern Europe countries most women wanted or still want to date men who are at least 1.80m (5'11) which is still way taller than the american/canadian average male height, yet american women want to date men around 6ft, which is like 1.83m. lol No woman in Europe says "I want him to be 1.83m". So I guess 6ft just like 1.80m just sound better because those are full numerals. And I also guess since the average height in Europe has gone up in recent years european women go for 1.85m nowadays which is almost 6'1 ( again almost no european woman says I want him to be 1.86m). The good thing for shorter men though is that a lot of women, especially shorter women can't even tell the difference between 5'10, 5'11 or 6ft.
Posted by LadyNeptuneYou know, from my experience every woman who claimed her man fullfilled all her needs and lists were actually lowering them in hindsight. He might have been 6'2 and a manger, yet he was balding, let alone being "dark and handsome". Or he might have been an Alpha male with a good body, yet he wasn't quite the career type of guy she had dreamt about, but so what, he could cook pancakes once a month, right? lol
And speaking as someone who has dated men that fulfilled my list and STILL found them wanting, life works better when you are open to all possibilities.
And with that being said, I figured out a long time ago that I haven't had a crush/fling with a girl that I really liked who was older than 27 since 2010. The last girl that I really liked was like 23 when I met her. I feel sooooooooo shallow now and I can't do anything about it... 😢
most of women's standards are conflicting when you pay attention to them apart from the looks department. A man can't be a good looking macho, strong yet sensitive, who loves kids, animals, money, the environment and spends money for charity projects. They just don't exist in real life.
And IF there actually was a perfect guy outhere who fullfills everything that a woman dreams about, then one thing is for sure: he will never commit to any woman, at least not on a long term. Why would he? He gets all the pussy for free and he is not going to change his life style s. If Mick Jagger and Keith Richards can sleep with thousands of women then Mr. Perfect is going triple that. ^^click to expand
Usually if a woman lowers her standards, the guy will lack one or many of those listed above.
He might have money but not be loyal, might be loyal but have a shitty character, no money but wants stability etc.
The more people I meet, the closer I get to what I want in a guy.
I usually like guys who are smart, have a distinctive personality, are ambitious, and athletic. I'm not too worried about physical appearance, but I do have a certain type of men I'm very attracted to:
Tall, dark and steamy ?
Posted by Aerazo"Tall, dark and steamy" - that's what 99% of all women claim to want. ^^Posted by TheSagWomen who lower their standards throughout the years do it bc they get desperate to have someone, maybe bc of stability, economy, sex, character, personality,. etc.Posted by AerazoIf you think so.Posted by TheSagNot me, I raise it!Posted by LadyNeptuneIn my view women, not all of them, lower their standards, throgh the yearsPosted by TheSag"Especially for women." So your saying women experience change more deeply than men...Posted by LadyNeptuneI agree that standards change, especially for women who get older but then again, let me tell you something about my AWESOME experiences with women:Posted by TheSagNo I'm serious. 100% fulfilled my ENTIRE list. But that's why I also said your standards change. Life experience teaches you what you truly need to be happy and that list of what your looking for evolves.
As for the height thing something is funny:
In Northern Europe countries most women wanted or still want to date men who are at least 1.80m (5'11) which is still way taller than the american/canadian average male height, yet american women want to date men around 6ft, which is like 1.83m. lol No woman in Europe says "I want him to be 1.83m". So I guess 6ft just like 1.80m just sound better because those are full numerals. And I also guess since the average height in Europe has gone up in recent years european women go for 1.85m nowadays which is almost 6'1 ( again almost no european woman says I want him to be 1.86m). The good thing for shorter men though is that a lot of women, especially shorter women can't even tell the difference between 5'10, 5'11 or 6ft.
Posted by LadyNeptuneYou know, from my experience every woman who claimed her man fullfilled all her needs and lists were actually lowering them in hindsight. He might have been 6'2 and a manger, yet he was balding, let alone being "dark and handsome". Or he might have been an Alpha male with a good body, yet he wasn't quite the career type of guy she had dreamt about, but so what, he could cook pancakes once a month, right? lol
And speaking as someone who has dated men that fulfilled my list and STILL found them wanting, life works better when you are open to all possibilities.
And with that being said, I figured out a long time ago that I haven't had a crush/fling with a girl that I really liked who was older than 27 since 2010. The last girl that I really liked was like 23 when I met her. I feel sooooooooo shallow now and I can't do anything about it... 😢
most of women's standards are conflicting when you pay attention to them apart from the looks department. A man can't be a good looking macho, strong yet sensitive, who loves kids, animals, money, the environment and spends money for charity projects. They just don't exist in real life.
And IF there actually was a perfect guy outhere who fullfills everything that a woman dreams about, then one thing is for sure: he will never commit to any woman, at least not on a long term. Why would he? He gets all the pussy for free and he is not going to change his life style s. If Mick Jagger and Keith Richards can sleep with thousands of women then Mr. Perfect is going triple that. ^^
Usually if a woman lowers her standards, the guy will lack one or many of those listed above.
He might have money but not be loyal, might be loyal but have a shitty character, no money but wants stability etc.
The more people I meet, the closer I get to what I want in a guy.
I usually like guys who are smart, have a distinctive personality, are ambitious, and athletic. I'm not too worried about physical appearance, but I do have a certain type of men I'm very attracted to:
Tall, dark and steamy ?
click to expand
Obviously a woman will lower her standards because not too many guys will meet her standards anyways but also there will be less men avaible for her at a certain age because even if a guy meets her standards he will have a bigger pool of younger women who he will be also attracted to.
So even though I agree with some of your points your pool of guys will lower naturally with age, cause let's face it: most women go for guys who are older than them, so when you are in your 30s you will look for guys at your age or older, maybe much older. Problem though is, there are not too many guys left in their mid to late 30s and 40s in good shape, let alone having 6 packs and. who are in their physical prime. A lot of them will have thinner hair or just get bald. They still might be attractive but you will automatically turn a blind eye. Some of them might have kids, be divorced and maybe they will have some money issues too. There might also be a lot of single men around, working in good jobs and with no children or any baggage from the past, yet they might be inexperienced with women. if they are inexperienced with women, then chances are they are not as hot or attractive than you would like them to be.
Posted by BlackNovaI am realistic, that's all but maybe you are just a little naive.Posted by TheSagIf you wanna stay stuck on the celebrity pathway.....Posted by BlackNovait's not about Hollywood or the lives of rich people at all dude, it's about the possibility what money and fame can do for a man. That's why I mentioned Hollywood and rock stars.Posted by TheSagWell bro, when you live your life based on what you see in Hollywood, the media, and the lives of the rich and famous.....you live by a very narrow world view.Posted by BlackNovaWell I believe it's in a man's nature to go for many women the more valuable he becomes. He just can't fight it. The more women will chase him the more he will have a hard time giving up his life style .Posted by TheSag
I agree that standards change, especially for women who get older but then again, let me tell you something about my AWESOME experiences with women:
most of women's standards are conflicting when you pay attention to them apart from the looks department. A man can't be a good looking macho, strong yet sensitive, who loves kids, animals, money, the environment and spends money for charity projects. They just don't exist in real life.
And IF there actually was a perfect guy outhere who fullfills everything that a woman dreams about, then one thing is for sure: he will never commit to any woman, at least not on a long term. Why would he? He gets all the pussy for free and he is not going to change his life style s. If Mick Jagger and Keith Richards can sleep with thousands of women then Mr. Perfect is going triple that. ^^
I agree with u that most women's standards are conflicting and can change over time.
But not all men want endless streams of pussy lined up at their door.
Unless your heart is made of cold hard steel, a lifetime of endless sexual pleasure with no emotional, mental or spiritual connection would leave one empty and lonely.
Everyone's priorities in life change over time.
I mean look at rock stars, movie actors, athletes, they all have had countless of women/affairs. I have seen rock stars claiming they wanted to make music to get girls in the first place and I believe the only reason for ancient Rock Bands for still touring around the world apart form money issues, is to get laid. lol
Why else do you think Brad Pitt and his Hollywood buddies are still cheating and havin affairs? Cause they can.
On the other side, if you look at women like Beyonce, Rhianna or Jennifer Aniston kind of women, yes they might have had their fare shares of affairs too but you almost never hear about them being involved in sex scandals, sex parties or with strippers resp. call boys. They are involved with men who are on their financial and social level while Arnold banged his housekeeper, Charlie Sheen prostitutes and Hugh Grant got a blowjob from a cheap street hooker. lol
Every man's nature is not the same...regardless of status and wealth.
Switch off the TV set.
If you think most men's nature wasn't similar then how does mating work at all? Most men are attracted to the same attributes when it comes to women, just like most women are attracted to the same attributes then it comes to men, otherwise we wouldn't even exist.
Hugh Jackman would be considered famous, attractive, he's wealthy, he's well liked in his industry.
He married his wife, Deborra-Lee Furness when he was 28 years old (1996)....before his career really took off.
He's now 48 yo and still happily married, with two children.
There are many reasons why famous, wealthy men have affairs, it's probably more to do with opportunity and personal life circumstance, than men's innate nature.
click to expand
Yeah Jackman married before his career took off, that's the point.
Hugh Jackman is surrounded by countless of hot women yet we don't know what he does in his private life. But Even if he was a true faithful gentleman you have like 1000 other celebrity males who are not.
There is a reason why men can sleep with women without even talking to them, let alone knowing them at all, if they find them attractive. It's in our genes.
Posted by MagicMonaIt's not bullshit.....Posted by LadyNeptuneOr is that another lie they tell us to rush us into marriage and kids? Women can give birth well into their 50s so I don't buy that biological clock bull they try to feed us.Posted by xXxQueenliciaXxXCause women have a shorter biological clock then men. Funny thing is that people who have these opinions seem stuck in the 1950s. Like has no one told you we are not in the 'Little House in the Prairie' days and no longer need to populate the earth?
I'm trying to understand why the spotlight is always on women when they're single as opposed to a man.
Moreover, why does a strangers relationship status matter that much to other people?
We need more childless people in the world.click to expand
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3857638/
TheSag is laying down facts in this thread.
Posted by CapTennLol but using celebrities to back up his views isn't realistic. Most of us won't have fame, fortune, and sex being thrown across our path. Be real.
TheSag is laying down facts in this thread.
Posted by RedShoesNo... they don't get to know a guy well enough. Then they would realize woman no man would make the standanrds...
Do you agree or disagree?
I believe a lot of it has to do with America in general causing major issues between sexs... basically with all the race stuff as well. It is part of a way to control people that are some what smarter not to have kids. However other not as educated breed liked rabbits. It is always easier to control the poor if they are uneducated.
It is very sad but progressives have made it there business to try and change everyone to hate anyone that is or looks white. I have been discriminated against more then ever and I live in one of the most liberal states. Funny thing is I non I my family was around during salvery was going on... I am more Mexican Irish... then anything but because I look enough "white." To some people they think I get something they call white privileg. Which is bs... now I could and do know in other states there is racism that still goes on... but all I can say when did it make it right to descriminate in the state that I grew up... and do not really identify with much of my ethic culture except Mexican side... food mmmm so good. I guess if your skin is white people just judge...
These are large social economical problems that are only going to get worse... millinials are the lost generation... the generation that refuses to have kids. Thoughts that do often have the highest percentage of not being selfsafishant... and father less kids. Most the woman I know are around my age are becoming cugars... thinking thy live in a mix of sex and the city and the bachelor.
I give it about another year before the market fully crashes and gives everyone in the world an aditude adjustment.
Piscesmoon
Posted by LadyNeptuneIt's a universal example that all are familiar with.Posted by CapTennLol but using celebrities to back up his views isn't realistic. Most of us won't have fame, fortune, and sex being thrown across our path. Be real.
TheSag is laying down facts in this thread.click to expand
It's a great example.
It shows that even the highest status makes will scrape the bottom barrel, not because they have to, but because they can.
With that being the case, how do you suppose average joes operate?
Posted by CapTennYou miss his point completely. Jackman's 'average' wife was his wife BEFORE he got famous. Read my comments here to understand my viewpoint on the average joe. Let me know if you have questions.Posted by LadyNeptuneIt's a universal example that all are familiar with.Posted by CapTennLol but using celebrities to back up his views isn't realistic. Most of us won't have fame, fortune, and sex being thrown across our path. Be real.
TheSag is laying down facts in this thread.
It's a great example.
It shows that even the highest status makes will scrape the bottom barrel, not because they have to, but because they can.
With that being the case, how do you suppose average joes operate?click to expand
Maybe but don't give a damn.
Posted by LadyNeptuneI missed nothing, and I have no questions.Posted by CapTennYou miss his point completely. Jackman's 'average' wife was his wife BEFORE he got famous. Read my comments here to understand my viewpoint on the average joe. Let me know if you have questions.Posted by LadyNeptuneIt's a universal example that all are familiar with.Posted by CapTennLol but using celebrities to back up his views isn't realistic. Most of us won't have fame, fortune, and sex being thrown across our path. Be real.
TheSag is laying down facts in this thread.
It's a great example.
It shows that even the highest status makes will scrape the bottom barrel, not because they have to, but because they can.
With that being the case, how do you suppose average joes operate?
click to expand
If Jackman is truely faithful, and always has been, then good on him. I do assume his average wife wouldn't be his wife had he met her post fame, however.
You?
I wish there were more like him. I despise cheaters, and his faithfulness through fame is admirable.
Posted by TheSagThats why I said, I like guys who are smart, have a distinctive personality, etc.Posted by Aerazo"Tall, dark and steamy" - that's what 99% of all women claim to want. ^^Posted by TheSagWomen who lower their standards throughout the years do it bc they get desperate to have someone, maybe bc of stability, economy, sex, character, personality,. etc.Posted by AerazoIf you think so.Posted by TheSagNot me, I raise it!Posted by LadyNeptuneIn my view women, not all of them, lower their standards, throgh the yearsPosted by TheSag"Especially for women." So your saying women experience change more deeply than men...Posted by LadyNeptuneI agree that standards change, especially for women who get older but then again, let me tell you something about my AWESOME experiences with women:Posted by TheSagNo I'm serious. 100% fulfilled my ENTIRE list. But that's why I also said your standards change. Life experience teaches you what you truly need to be happy and that list of what your looking for evolves.
As for the height thing something is funny:
In Northern Europe countries most women wanted or still want to date men who are at least 1.80m (5'11) which is still way taller than the american/canadian average male height, yet american women want to date men around 6ft, which is like 1.83m. lol No woman in Europe says "I want him to be 1.83m". So I guess 6ft just like 1.80m just sound better because those are full numerals. And I also guess since the average height in Europe has gone up in recent years european women go for 1.85m nowadays which is almost 6'1 ( again almost no european woman says I want him to be 1.86m). The good thing for shorter men though is that a lot of women, especially shorter women can't even tell the difference between 5'10, 5'11 or 6ft.
Posted by LadyNeptuneYou know, from my experience every woman who claimed her man fullfilled all her needs and lists were actually lowering them in hindsight. He might have been 6'2 and a manger, yet he was balding, let alone being "dark and handsome". Or he might have been an Alpha male with a good body, yet he wasn't quite the career type of guy she had dreamt about, but so what, he could cook pancakes once a month, right? lol
And speaking as someone who has dated men that fulfilled my list and STILL found them wanting, life works better when you are open to all possibilities.
And with that being said, I figured out a long time ago that I haven't had a crush/fling with a girl that I really liked who was older than 27 since 2010. The last girl that I really liked was like 23 when I met her. I feel sooooooooo shallow now and I can't do anything about it... 😢
most of women's standards are conflicting when you pay attention to them apart from the looks department. A man can't be a good looking macho, strong yet sensitive, who loves kids, animals, money, the environment and spends money for charity projects. They just don't exist in real life.
And IF there actually was a perfect guy outhere who fullfills everything that a woman dreams about, then one thing is for sure: he will never commit to any woman, at least not on a long term. Why would he? He gets all the pussy for free and he is not going to change his life style s. If Mick Jagger and Keith Richards can sleep with thousands of women then Mr. Perfect is going triple that. ^^
Usually if a woman lowers her standards, the guy will lack one or many of those listed above.
He might have money but not be loyal, might be loyal but have a shitty character, no money but wants stability etc.
The more people I meet, the closer I get to what I want in a guy.
I usually like guys who are smart, have a distinctive personality, are ambitious, and athletic. I'm not too worried about physical appearance, but I do have a certain type of men I'm very attracted to:
Tall, dark and steamy ?
Obviously a woman will lower her standards because not too many guys will meet her standards anyways but also there will be less men avaible for her at a certain age because even if a guy meets her standards he will have a bigger pool of younger women who he will be also attracted to.
So even though I agree with some of your points your pool of guys will lower naturally with age, cause let's face it: most women go for guys who are older than them, so when you are in your 30s you will look for guys at your age or older, maybe much older. Problem though is, there are not too many guys left in their mid to late 30s and 40s in good shape, let alone having 6 packs and. who are in their physical prime. A lot of them will have thinner hair or just get bald. They still might be attractive but you will automatically turn a blind eye. Some of them might have kids, be divorced and maybe they will have some money issues too. There might also be a lot of single men around, working in good jobs and with no children or any baggage from the past, yet they might be inexperienced with women. if they are inexperienced with women, then chances are they are not as hot or attractive than you would like them to be.click to expand
But my type of guy is usually tall, dark and steamy. it doesn't mean that's all I'm looking for.
Another problem with some women is that they simply sit down and wait for guys to approach her, that's why they mostly get the jerks, cheaters, etc. They want someone to go clubbing, someone they want to show off to friends and social media. etc. They want the man that other women want, the hunk, the guy with the nice car, who parties all the time with different girls..the pimp. lol
I tend to like the shy guys, the ones who don't like to be flashy, or show off what they have or don't have. the down-to-earth, smart, hard-working men.
When it comes to people who have kids, well I myself have 2 and this is another reason why I don't date just any guy. Not because they won't accept me with my baggage like most people think, is actually bc they know I'm strong and independent woman who doesn't need a man to "carry my baggage" so I'm not looking for just any person.
Yes, it makes it harder, and my chances of finding someone are slim but it doesn't mean that I have to settle for just any person. Also, I wouldn't mind if a guy already has kids as long as he can support them and loves them.
Is hard to generalize as we all meet different people and each person makes us feel different as well.
Posted by julietteeLMAO!
the people i know that they are single for a looong time, and they don't want to, are socially awkward people. all of them. the story about standards is just there to mask the fact that they don't know how to communicate with people without leaving an impression that they are insane.
Posted by LadyPootsAlotLolPosted by Damnata
I really think people talk a lot of shit but don't ascribe to it in reality.
Like mile long standards lists...is anyone going to have it engraved on their tombstone at their funeral? "Here lies X, they never dated men below 6 feet and now she is 6 feet under"
I am a romantic and have faith in humanity. No way people are this insane to where they will forego a connection because the other person doesn't match a list. Especially women...once emotions are involved buh bye lists. There's always a leeway in life, no reason to not be here.
UNLESS you think you are the best thing in the world and the world revolves around you in which case maybe some humbleness is in order.
I see fat and ugly people dating all the time. And pretty people. And pretty people with ugly people. And old people with young people. Don lives in Don's world when it comes to this stuff. Ask him about Algol, though. He's got that covered.
click to expand
Posted by LadyNeptuneLMAOPosted by UnusualVaginalDischargeGood. Keep swiping left till you find your next victim.Posted by LadyNeptuneYeah I know. I decided yesterday that i'm going to stop making the plans.Posted by UnusualVaginalDischargeThat's a sign that he isn't interested or has better options. If your asking him out and travelling to him then your making yourself too available and will only ever be the fall back option while he searches for 'the one'.Posted by LadyPootsAlotNo it isntPosted by UnusualVaginalDischargeThat's progress. 😉Posted by DamnataYou are right!Posted by LadyPootsAlotI remember this topic about lists of standards and I have never seen a list longer than UVD's in my life. I still don't think she will forego a nice guy she's into for the requirements on that list. That's insane.Posted by Damnata
I really think people talk a lot of shit but don't ascribe to it in reality.
Like mile long standards lists...is anyone going to have it engraved on their tombstone at their funeral? "Here lies X, they never dated men below 6 feet and now she is 6 feet under"
I am a romantic and have faith in humanity. No way people are this insane to where they will forego a connection because the other person doesn't match a list. Especially women...once emotions are involved buh bye lists. There's always a leeway in life, no reason to not be here.
UNLESS you think you are the best thing in the world and the world revolves around you in which case maybe some humbleness is in order.
I see fat and ugly people dating all the time. And pretty people. And pretty people with ugly people. And old people with young people. Don lives in Don's world when it comes to this stuff. Ask him about Algol, though. He's got that covered.
The guy I'm currently infatuated with--is not perfect. He's quite flawed. But I still want him
He doesn't initiate or ask me on dates etcclick to expand
Posted by CapTennSo then if you didn't missed that why do you call it a 'universal example'. There's nothing universal or average about arguably Australia's biggest male actor. So...Posted by LadyNeptuneI missed nothing, and I have no questions.Posted by CapTennYou miss his point completely. Jackman's 'average' wife was his wife BEFORE he got famous. Read my comments here to understand my viewpoint on the average joe. Let me know if you have questions.Posted by LadyNeptuneIt's a universal example that all are familiar with.Posted by CapTennLol but using celebrities to back up his views isn't realistic. Most of us won't have fame, fortune, and sex being thrown across our path. Be real.
TheSag is laying down facts in this thread.
It's a great example.
It shows that even the highest status makes will scrape the bottom barrel, not because they have to, but because they can.
With that being the case, how do you suppose average joes operate?
If Jackman is truely faithful, and always has been, then good on him. I do assume his average wife wouldn't be his wife had he met her post fame, however.
You?
I wish there were more like him. I despise cheaters, and his faithfulness through fame is admirable.
click to expand
Posted by BlackNovaI know. Three of my eggs commuted suicide since I've been commenting on this thread —
Lady Neptune
The confirmation bias, narrow world view and emotive projection is strong in TheSag & CapTenn
Engaging them further is an exercise in futility, as opposed to fertility 😉
Posted by Damnatai agree,. i know i make jokes about people must be this tall to ride.. but that's all it is, JOKES, Almost every guy i have been seriously involved with has been under 6 feet tall with the exception of the crab. i mean shit, every guy is pretty much taller than me anyways lmao.
I really think people talk a lot of shit but don't ascribe to it in reality.
Like mile long standards lists...is anyone going to have it engraved on their tombstone at their funeral? "Here lies X, they never dated men below 6 feet and now she is 6 feet under"
I am a romantic and have faith in humanity. No way people are this insane to where they will forego a connection because the other person doesn't match a list. Especially women...once emotions are involved buh bye lists. There's always a leeway in life, no reason to not be here.
UNLESS you think you are the best thing in the world and the world revolves around you in which case maybe some humbleness is in order.
I know why i'm still single, i was broken for years and I still sometimes think part of me still is. Sometimes, it's easier to not be involved with another person, if that's a cop out so be it. I love me, i love my life and am happy, so to me i think that is what's really important. But man ,yes i do miss being intimate with someone... that shareing heart to heart, not just sex. But you know how i am about being vunerable... having to share everything that has happened in my past.. yaaaaa not many want to hang around after finding that stuff out. I still have the dream that someday it will happen thou,
#keepthedreamalive
Posted by MagicMonaPosted by CancerOnTheCuspIts bullshit. For generations, women have given birth in late ages. My great grandmother had 17 children. Her last two were at 45 and 50. I believe nature over an article any day.Posted by MagicMonaIt's not bullshit.....Posted by LadyNeptuneOr is that another lie they tell us to rush us into marriage and kids? Women can give birth well into their 50s so I don't buy that biological clock bull they try to feed us.Posted by xXxQueenliciaXxXCause women have a shorter biological clock then men. Funny thing is that people who have these opinions seem stuck in the 1950s. Like has no one told you we are not in the 'Little House in the Prairie' days and no longer need to populate the earth?
I'm trying to understand why the spotlight is always on women when they're single as opposed to a man.
Moreover, why does a strangers relationship status matter that much to other people?
We need more childless people in the world.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3857638/
click to expand
My mom was in a horrific car crash in her 20s that crushed her pelvis into many pieces. The doctor told her she would never have children. She had 5 total...my youngest brother when she was 41 (all of us with only a midwife on hand and no medication cause she's a mega hippie). The human body is AMAZING!!
Posted by LadyNeptuneYEAH!
Men are always talking about what’s “natural” but in nature it’s always the males of the species that have to be pretty or work really hard to get the females.
I want to see more men dressing up and wearing makeup. Dance for me. Build me a fucking house. Impress me, you mediocre fucks.
Posted by MagicMonaI'm gonna take a wild guess that it was written by a man. And the sources came from doctors who have a vested financial interest in gaining new patients hence the "have children before x age".Posted by LadyNeptuneExactly. So what biological clock? I didn't even read that article lol. I know what I know.Posted by MagicMonaPosted by CancerOnTheCuspIts bullshit. For generations, women have given birth in late ages. My great grandmother had 17 children. Her last two were at 45 and 50. I believe nature over an article any day.Posted by MagicMonaIt's not bullshit.....Posted by LadyNeptuneOr is that another lie they tell us to rush us into marriage and kids? Women can give birth well into their 50s so I don't buy that biological clock bull they try to feed us.Posted by xXxQueenliciaXxXCause women have a shorter biological clock then men. Funny thing is that people who have these opinions seem stuck in the 1950s. Like has no one told you we are not in the 'Little House in the Prairie' days and no longer need to populate the earth?
I'm trying to understand why the spotlight is always on women when they're single as opposed to a man.
Moreover, why does a strangers relationship status matter that much to other people?
We need more childless people in the world.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3857638/
My mom was in a horrific car crash in her 20s that crushed her pelvis into many pieces. The doctor told her she would never have children. She had 5 total...my youngest brother when she was 41 (all of us with only a midwife on hand and no medication cause she's a mega hippie). The human body is AMAZING!!
click to expand
Posted by MagicMonaFolks on this site love to latch on to a statistical outlier and claim it as the norm.Posted by CancerOnTheCuspIts bullshit. For generations, women have given birth in late ages. My great grandmother had 17 children. Her last two were at 45 and 50. I believe nature over an article any day.Posted by MagicMonaIt's not bullshit.....Posted by LadyNeptuneOr is that another lie they tell us to rush us into marriage and kids? Women can give birth well into their 50s so I don't buy that biological clock bull they try to feed us.Posted by xXxQueenliciaXxXCause women have a shorter biological clock then men. Funny thing is that people who have these opinions seem stuck in the 1950s. Like has no one told you we are not in the 'Little House in the Prairie' days and no longer need to populate the earth?
I'm trying to understand why the spotlight is always on women when they're single as opposed to a man.
Moreover, why does a strangers relationship status matter that much to other people?
We need more childless people in the world.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3857638/
click to expand
Posted by LadyNeptuneMaybe I am lost after reading post after post? It's possible.Posted by CapTennSo then if you didn't missed that why do you call it a 'universal example'. There's nothing universal or average about arguably Australia's biggest male actor. So...Posted by LadyNeptuneI missed nothing, and I have no questions.Posted by CapTennYou miss his point completely. Jackman's 'average' wife was his wife BEFORE he got famous. Read my comments here to understand my viewpoint on the average joe. Let me know if you have questions.Posted by LadyNeptuneIt's a universal example that all are familiar with.Posted by CapTennLol but using celebrities to back up his views isn't realistic. Most of us won't have fame, fortune, and sex being thrown across our path. Be real.
TheSag is laying down facts in this thread.
It's a great example.
It shows that even the highest status makes will scrape the bottom barrel, not because they have to, but because they can.
With that being the case, how do you suppose average joes operate?
If Jackman is truely faithful, and always has been, then good on him. I do assume his average wife wouldn't be his wife had he met her post fame, however.
You?
I wish there were more like him. I despise cheaters, and his faithfulness through fame is admirable.
click to expand
Was just saying universal as in-- we all are familiar with celebrities so they are always an easy reference point in general discussion.
Hahaha, as a man who encourages men to be men, I'd say that MEN are the culprit of why women are single. Yes uncompromising standards are a detriment, BUT those standards came from somewhere. Sorry fellas, but we only have ourselves to blame.
"won't date a guy under 6 ft. "
average man is 13-14 cm taller than the average woman.
U.S. 175.9 cm (5 ft 9 1/2 in) 162.1 cm (5 ft 4 in) All Americans, 20+
U.S. 176.3 cm (5 ft 9 1/2 in) 163.1 cm (5 ft 4 in) All Americans, 20-29
U.S. 176.9 cm (5 ft 9 1/2 in) 163.7 cm (5 ft 4 1/2 in) African Americans, 20-39
U.S. 171.1 cm (5 ft 7 1/2 in) 158.2 cm (5 ft 2 1/2 in) Hispanic/Latino, 20-39
U.S. 178.4 cm (5 ft 10 in) 164.9 cm (5 ft 5 in) Non-Hispanic White, 20-39
maybe we girls should simply add 13 to our own height. only if that was a problem of course.
average man is 13-14 cm taller than the average woman.
U.S. 175.9 cm (5 ft 9 1/2 in) 162.1 cm (5 ft 4 in) All Americans, 20+
U.S. 176.3 cm (5 ft 9 1/2 in) 163.1 cm (5 ft 4 in) All Americans, 20-29
U.S. 176.9 cm (5 ft 9 1/2 in) 163.7 cm (5 ft 4 1/2 in) African Americans, 20-39
U.S. 171.1 cm (5 ft 7 1/2 in) 158.2 cm (5 ft 2 1/2 in) Hispanic/Latino, 20-39
U.S. 178.4 cm (5 ft 10 in) 164.9 cm (5 ft 5 in) Non-Hispanic White, 20-39
maybe we girls should simply add 13 to our own height. only if that was a problem of course.
Posted by enfant_terriblePosted by DonJohn
plenty of women here. they don't need you to speak for them.
Ditto
click to expand
Leos rule!!!!!!!!
Posted by LadyNeptune1. lol Let me remind you of something: it's women who have sky high standards so all I did was taking those "perfect" celebrity males with high status, money and looks to show you what a high valuable man is capable of doing once he gets access to money and fame. So what I was basicly saying was, that a high status male, even if he wasn't famous or a multi millionaire is unlikely to settle down for the average or even a high status woman at all cause women will always throw themselves at him. 😉Posted by CapTennLol but using celebrities to back up his views isn't realistic. Most of us won't have fame, fortune, and sex being thrown across our path. Be real.
TheSag is laying down facts in this thread.
You miss his point completely. Jackman's 'average' wife was his wife BEFORE he got famous. Read my comments here to understand my viewpoint on the average joe. Let me know if you have questions.click to expand
2. That's what we were saying, Jackman married her BEFORE he got famous.
And like I said there might be one Hugh Jackman but there are thousands of Charlie Sheens.
Posted by AerazoAgreed, especially the first part.Posted by TheSagThats why I said, I like guys who are smart, have a distinctive personality, etc.Posted by Aerazo"Tall, dark and steamy" - that's what 99% of all women claim to want. ^^Posted by TheSagWomen who lower their standards throughout the years do it bc they get desperate to have someone, maybe bc of stability, economy, sex, character, personality,. etc.Posted by AerazoIf you think so.Posted by TheSagNot me, I raise it!Posted by LadyNeptuneIn my view women, not all of them, lower their standards, throgh the yearsPosted by TheSag"Especially for women." So your saying women experience change more deeply than men...Posted by LadyNeptuneI agree that standards change, especially for women who get older but then again, let me tell you something about my AWESOME experiences with women:Posted by TheSagNo I'm serious. 100% fulfilled my ENTIRE list. But that's why I also said your standards change. Life experience teaches you what you truly need to be happy and that list of what your looking for evolves.
As for the height thing something is funny:
In Northern Europe countries most women wanted or still want to date men who are at least 1.80m (5'11) which is still way taller than the american/canadian average male height, yet american women want to date men around 6ft, which is like 1.83m. lol No woman in Europe says "I want him to be 1.83m". So I guess 6ft just like 1.80m just sound better because those are full numerals. And I also guess since the average height in Europe has gone up in recent years european women go for 1.85m nowadays which is almost 6'1 ( again almost no european woman says I want him to be 1.86m). The good thing for shorter men though is that a lot of women, especially shorter women can't even tell the difference between 5'10, 5'11 or 6ft.
Posted by LadyNeptuneYou know, from my experience every woman who claimed her man fullfilled all her needs and lists were actually lowering them in hindsight. He might have been 6'2 and a manger, yet he was balding, let alone being "dark and handsome". Or he might have been an Alpha male with a good body, yet he wasn't quite the career type of guy she had dreamt about, but so what, he could cook pancakes once a month, right? lol
And speaking as someone who has dated men that fulfilled my list and STILL found them wanting, life works better when you are open to all possibilities.
And with that being said, I figured out a long time ago that I haven't had a crush/fling with a girl that I really liked who was older than 27 since 2010. The last girl that I really liked was like 23 when I met her. I feel sooooooooo shallow now and I can't do anything about it... 😢
most of women's standards are conflicting when you pay attention to them apart from the looks department. A man can't be a good looking macho, strong yet sensitive, who loves kids, animals, money, the environment and spends money for charity projects. They just don't exist in real life.
And IF there actually was a perfect guy outhere who fullfills everything that a woman dreams about, then one thing is for sure: he will never commit to any woman, at least not on a long term. Why would he? He gets all the pussy for free and he is not going to change his life style s. If Mick Jagger and Keith Richards can sleep with thousands of women then Mr. Perfect is going triple that. ^^
Usually if a woman lowers her standards, the guy will lack one or many of those listed above.
He might have money but not be loyal, might be loyal but have a shitty character, no money but wants stability etc.
The more people I meet, the closer I get to what I want in a guy.
I usually like guys who are smart, have a distinctive personality, are ambitious, and athletic. I'm not too worried about physical appearance, but I do have a certain type of men I'm very attracted to:
Tall, dark and steamy ?
Obviously a woman will lower her standards because not too many guys will meet her standards anyways but also there will be less men avaible for her at a certain age because even if a guy meets her standards he will have a bigger pool of younger women who he will be also attracted to.
So even though I agree with some of your points your pool of guys will lower naturally with age, cause let's face it: most women go for guys who are older than them, so when you are in your 30s you will look for guys at your age or older, maybe much older. Problem though is, there are not too many guys left in their mid to late 30s and 40s in good shape, let alone having 6 packs and. who are in their physical prime. A lot of them will have thinner hair or just get bald. They still might be attractive but you will automatically turn a blind eye. Some of them might have kids, be divorced and maybe they will have some money issues too. There might also be a lot of single men around, working in good jobs and with no children or any baggage from the past, yet they might be inexperienced with women. if they are inexperienced with women, then chances are they are not as hot or attractive than you would like them to be.
But my type of guy is usually tall, dark and steamy. it doesn't mean that's all I'm looking for.
Another problem with some women is that they simply sit down and wait for guys to approach her, that's why they mostly get the jerks, cheaters, etc. They want someone to go clubbing, someone they want to show off to friends and social media. etc. They want the man that other women want, the hunk, the guy with the nice car, who parties all the time with different girls..the pimp. lol
I tend to like the shy guys, the ones who don't like to be flashy, or show off what they have or don't have. the down-to-earth, smart, hard-working men.
When it comes to people who have kids, well I myself have 2 and this is another reason why I don't date just any guy. Not because they won't accept me with my baggage like most people think, is actually bc they know I'm strong and independent woman who doesn't need a man to "carry my baggage" so I'm not looking for just any person.
Yes, it makes it harder, and my chances of finding someone are slim but it doesn't mean that I have to settle for just any person. Also, I wouldn't mind if a guy already has kids as long as he can support them and loves them.
Is hard to generalize as we all meet different people and each person makes us feel different as well.
click to expand
And let me tell you something else, you might not like it but in my view most women in the western world go for the same men, depending on their age:
15-19 year old women - they are kind of "brainwashed" by Hollywood and look for the perfect, yet good looking nice guy, the guy everybody likes but they get bored of him soon
20-30 year old women want action, good looking bad boy basicly the guys you described in your post. And from what I know the good looking tall hunks are the ones who cheat the most, cause they can since women go for them. Talking about high valuable guys and Hollywood... 😉
30+ year old women - they want the solid guy, the provider
Sounds very cliche, right? But I think it's true.
I highly believe most women have dated at least 1-2 bad boys in their lives and those who claim they would never date them are the ones who already have.
Posted by MagicMonaThere's always exceptions to the rule.Posted by CancerOnTheCuspIts bullshit. For generations, women have given birth in late ages. My great grandmother had 17 children. Her last two were at 45 and 50. I believe nature over an article any day.Posted by MagicMonaIt's not bullshit.....Posted by LadyNeptuneOr is that another lie they tell us to rush us into marriage and kids? Women can give birth well into their 50s so I don't buy that biological clock bull they try to feed us.Posted by xXxQueenliciaXxXCause women have a shorter biological clock then men. Funny thing is that people who have these opinions seem stuck in the 1950s. Like has no one told you we are not in the 'Little House in the Prairie' days and no longer need to populate the earth?
I'm trying to understand why the spotlight is always on women when they're single as opposed to a man.
Moreover, why does a strangers relationship status matter that much to other people?
We need more childless people in the world.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3857638/
click to expand
Which is why obstetricians are full of shit when they counsel older women on the risks associated with pregnancy (like down's syndromr), right?
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →Related Topics
Y'all don't KISS & TELL!!!
Love that shit....
http://www.toutelatele.com/IMG/arton60053.jpg Philippe Vasseur (actor) Born: July 8, 1966
http://img.uefa.com/imgml/TP/players/24/2013/324x324/250024981.jpg Benjamin Mendy ( footballer)
http://www.quizz.biz/uploads/quizz/156652/10_0N800.jpg LIM (rapper)
http://imgur.com/Yn3SZdr.gif
Been feeling abit down lately, not motivated to do anything even though i have work and uni. i'll be missing days of work, just really dont care, dont want any friends atm. Whats going on :/
??
Posted by SpaceOddity___________________________________Prime example:_______________________________
Step 1
Ignorant and uninformed cow stays ignorant and uninformed and is quick to blame. Luckily, cloudy the scapegoat is an easy targed if the mentall
Guess I'm officially meant to be with earth signs.,, The only signs who I always end up in relationships with and that actually accept me for me.. just venting
Air signs (Aquarius mainly )wishy washy , flaky, nonchalant , detached
Water sign (Pis
I'm so confused. So okay me and my ex broke up almost a month ago and the day we broke up we had an hour talk just to get closure and set the record straight. We had a I guess a 'good breakup' there was no like bad vibes when we did, it just was what it w
On a friendship level?
In a workplace setting?
Thanks in advance.
Hello board, str8 to the issue I have, This sag I started talking to May 2nd, will not leave me alone; Although he is always claim "YOU don't have to ever worry ABOUT me anymore" !!!
Thing is I always have to worry about him, because he began popping
Yes i was on here before about a leeb man stalker his moon is an aries. He got most of libra in his charts. I been getting messages off insta from him for a week off and on. We stop contact. I will get a message i see it's his name then he will delete it
Hello,
You can find my threads here about a Sag and I. But to cut a long story short: we dated 6 months, he was not ready for a relationship and I wanted more. So I stopped our 'relationship' beggining of January.
On the last day we were together we
one of my favourite book writers, and she is a Sagittarius Sun/Libra moon/Scorpio Venus/Capricorn mars/ Virgo rising.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4RWfuAVmsY&gl=FR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jVuEWwWwv8
but she had a tragic love story,
The never ending push-pull lol
And I never even demanded a commitment or anything of the sort. He ran before we could even get into that. He just recently told me after several months of me wondering WTF, that he disappears 'on everyone, even friends.' A
We've been dong this break-up to make up for about 18 years but I'm at my wits end. Opinions about the following text thread between the two of us is needed.
Him: Sun Sag Moon Cap Venus Cap
Me: Sun Aries Moon Pisces Venus Pisces
Him: What is the a
So. A question.
The status is: my Cap is pulling away completely. His messages are usually one word or none. He says he needs space. When we are together he makes no effort to talk and spends most of the time on his phone and says our time together is b
so today i asked him how his night was / as usual..we talk and chat and he replies almost every time he's read my message.. i haven't heard from him... 6 hours later i sent a question mark...he read it and said nothing... so it got me thinking, wait a min
SOOOOO
Me and my Sagittarius decided to 'mutually' break up on valentines day. Long story short I'm trying to get over my broken heart obviously it won't be anytime soon, but I've looked at so many articles on how us Taurus's usually get over break up
In honor of Valentine's Day, all married, engaged or dating couples answer honestly. Just copy, paste and put your own answers if you want to answer this one. Thanks.
1. What's your and partner zodiac sign? I'm a Virgo and My wife is a Sagittarius.
I'll go first.
I love how optimistic my sign can be. Our vibes and energy is such a beautiful thing. We are true definition of live life to the fullest with no regrets lol... #sag
https://media3.giphy.com/media/3o6Ei25EFpwqJmGKdO/giphy.gif