james tate
@james tate
20 Years10,000+ PostsCapricorn
Comments: 3 · Posts: 15387 · Topics: 830
Jury of your peers (Page 2)
You are on page out of 2 | Reverse Order
I DID NOT KNOW THAT
TROLLS WERE RACIST
I ALWAYS THOUGHT THAT THEY WERE SUFFERED
THE SAME OPPERTION AS BLACKS OR AS
I LIKE TO POINT OUT BROWNS
I DON'T SEE A LOT OF BLACK PEOPLE
MOST OF THE PEOPLE I SEE ARE BROWN.
TROLLS WERE RACIST
I ALWAYS THOUGHT THAT THEY WERE SUFFERED
THE SAME OPPERTION AS BLACKS OR AS
I LIKE TO POINT OUT BROWNS
I DON'T SEE A LOT OF BLACK PEOPLE
MOST OF THE PEOPLE I SEE ARE BROWN.
Just like OJ?
HUM
INTERESTING
BR CARFUL YOU COULD GET KILLED.
INTERESTING
BR CARFUL YOU COULD GET KILLED.
or I could kill to defend myself? 😛
GOOD POINT I MUST REMEMBER THAT
f I said it before, it bears repeating---
Posted by Neurotoxin
Both sides agreed on the jury.
It means nothing.
^ Exactly.
+1
Posted by james tate
READ THE POST HERE THE MAN IS ON TRIAL
WE THE PEOPLE OF DXP HAVE
VERY LITTLE EVEADENCE
BUT SOME ON HERE HAVE ALREADY TRIED HIM AND CONVICTED HIM
I FIND THAT AMAZING.click to expand
A lot of people have no problem judging with their *feelings* that have been engineered by the media over actual FACTS.
Many of which the media was not privy to.
+1
Fuck you , Trayvon trash.
His story and witnesses have all been verified in court so well that he won't even have to take the stand.
Are you gonna join your racist and worthless trash friends with Jamie Foxx's motion to riot and destroy once Z gets justifiably exhonerated?
His story and witnesses have all been verified in court so well that he won't even have to take the stand.
Are you gonna join your racist and worthless trash friends with Jamie Foxx's motion to riot and destroy once Z gets justifiably exhonerated?
The leftists defending trash like Martin are typically the same ones who advocate for murderers like OJ Simpson and other sordid trash. They are inherently attracted to defend garbage, amd attack that ehich is good.
Their heads are completely backwards in cases such as this one.
God only knows what a 40+ year old white woman likeElle would do if a shady black male with a criminal record was marauding around in her backyard at night. She would probably wish him away, hahaha.
Their heads are completely backwards in cases such as this one.
God only knows what a 40+ year old white woman likeElle would do if a shady black male with a criminal record was marauding around in her backyard at night. She would probably wish him away, hahaha.
Posted by ellessque
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/09/trayvon-martin-cops-botched-investigation_n_1409277.html<BR>
Around 6:30 p.m. on Feb. 26, Trayvon Martin left his father's girlfriend's house at the Retreat at Twin Lakes...
From USAToday:
NBC producer fired over Zimmerman 911 call
NEW YORK (AP) — NBC News has fired a producer for editing a recording of George Zimmerman's call to police the night he shot Trayvon Martin, a person with direct knowledge of the matter said Saturday.
The producer's dismissal followed an internal investigation that led to NBC apologizing for having aired the misleading audio.
LINK
(corroboration)
This is *also* from HuffPo; it was published a week or two later:
NBC Miami WTVJ Reporter, Fired Over Edited George Zimmerman 911 Call
Posted: 04/25/2012 6:54 pm
Updated: 04/26/2012 8:13 pm
A veteran NBC Miami reporter has been fired in the ongoing probe over an edited "Today" show clip of George Zimmerman's 911 call, placed moments before Zimmerman shot unarmed teen Trayvon Martin.
Jeff Burnside was dismissed from network-owned NBC Miami (WTVJ) over a similarly edited clip on Friday, as first reported by South Florida news blog SFLTV.
According to the Miami Herald, two unidentified employees were also disciplined.
More: LINK
The point:
There has been a great deal of misdirection surrounding this case.
Why? Sensationalism sells, and reporters potentially stand to be rewarded (with Emmys, no less) for their coverage.
If you think the coverage had anything to do with justice being served, you would be mistaken.
Posted by ScorpioFish
The leftists defending trash like Martin are typically the same ones who advocate for murderers like OJ Simpson and other sordid trash. They are inherently attracted to defend garbage, amd attack that ehich is good.
Their heads are completely backwards in cases such as this one.
God only knows what a 40+ year old white woman likeElle would do if a shady black male with a criminal record was marauding around in her backyard at night. She would probably wish him away, hahaha.
Racist and hateful comments such as these do not deserve energy.
**On to the next**
Some dude on this thread thinks that the legal system is fair ... I'll have to go back to see who it was .... but, what a crock of shit.
Lawyers are crooked muther fukers ..... they make up the majority of our politicians.
:::: shakes head ::::
Niether of M or Z's peers are 100% female. to be fair, the jury should have been a mix of gender, class and race.
Of course, though, we only know what the media has told us ..... which they also tell us that justice is fair.
lol
Lawyers are crooked muther fukers ..... they make up the majority of our politicians.
:::: shakes head ::::
Niether of M or Z's peers are 100% female. to be fair, the jury should have been a mix of gender, class and race.
Of course, though, we only know what the media has told us ..... which they also tell us that justice is fair.
lol
Zimmerman isn't even white! He's hispanic and they share the brunt or racism. What are you talking about? For sure, Martin shouldn't have been shot, but when you go out looking for trouble, EXPECT trouble. You say Martin is a kid, well if he was a kid, he should have been home with his parents.
EVERYONE knows that OJ WAS guilty but the RACE card got him off.
EVERYONE knows that OJ WAS guilty but the RACE card got him off.
Posted by aquapiscescusp
Zimmerman isn't even white! He's hispanic and they share the brunt or racism. What are you talking about? For sure, Martin shouldn't have been shot, but when you go out looking for trouble, EXPECT trouble. You say Martin is a kid, well if he was a kid, he should have been home with his parents.
EVERYONE knows that OJ WAS guilty but the RACE card got him off.
The fact is Zimmerman was looking for trouble too. He got told not to pursue and he did anyway. Then a confrontation ensued and someone ended up dead.
That is manslaughter 101 folks. No disputing the prosecution and media is stupid as fuck. Regardless the law is the law and manslaughter charges should be brought up too. No stand your ground law should work if you too are pursuing the confrontation.
It was manslaughter regardless of color. But if the colors were reversed you're damn straight a conviction would be in the bag. Cuz it wouldnt be no celebrity football player.
WHY he was not arrested initially:
The answer is that U. S. Constitution and Florida law specifically forbade his arrest.
Florida law states clearly that when self-defense is asserted, an arrest can be made only if the agency determines that there is probable cause that the force used was unlawful. Absent probable cause, the arresting parties would be committing a crime against Mr. Zimmerman. Probable cause requires facts and/or evidence that would lead a reasonable person to believe the suspect committed a crime.
So from the police perspective on the night in question, they have the following facts at hand:
1. A resident calls police to report a suspicous person, asks for police to respond to his location.
2. Numerous 911 calls come in reporting screaming, fighting, and then shots fired from the same area.
3. When they come upon the scene, Mr. Zimmerman asserts he was attacked and defended himself. He obeys all police commands and never waivers from asserting he defended himself against Mr. Martin.
4. No witness contradicts Mr. Zimmerman's story, and multiple witness accounts confirm George Zimmerman's account that he was attacked by Mr. Martin.
5. No physical evidence exists to contradict Mr. Zimmerman's explanation, and multiple items of physical evidence support it.
How, while respecting the rule of law and our Constitutional protections from arrest without probable cause, could the police make an arrest?
Citizens should not bear the burden of arrest, much less prosecution for crime if the state cannot produce probable cause that they actually committed a crime.
There is no reason Mr. Zimmerman could not be arrested at any moment after he was released if evidence was developed or discovered to indicate he did commit a crime. His release was not a good forever bill of innocence. As the autopsy report (still secret as of this writing), ballistics, powder burn, and DNA testing are completed, compiled, and compared against Mr. Zimmerman's statements and already collected evidence there might very well be legally sufficient cause to arrest Mr. Zimmerman. There wasn't such cause on the night of Feb. 26 though and we should all be happy the police actually followed the law.
Too often the police do not respect citizens' Constitutionally protected rights, and very often Black people are the victims of such malfeasance. Disproportionally so. Given our history, Black Americans should be especia
The answer is that U. S. Constitution and Florida law specifically forbade his arrest.
Florida law states clearly that when self-defense is asserted, an arrest can be made only if the agency determines that there is probable cause that the force used was unlawful. Absent probable cause, the arresting parties would be committing a crime against Mr. Zimmerman. Probable cause requires facts and/or evidence that would lead a reasonable person to believe the suspect committed a crime.
So from the police perspective on the night in question, they have the following facts at hand:
1. A resident calls police to report a suspicous person, asks for police to respond to his location.
2. Numerous 911 calls come in reporting screaming, fighting, and then shots fired from the same area.
3. When they come upon the scene, Mr. Zimmerman asserts he was attacked and defended himself. He obeys all police commands and never waivers from asserting he defended himself against Mr. Martin.
4. No witness contradicts Mr. Zimmerman's story, and multiple witness accounts confirm George Zimmerman's account that he was attacked by Mr. Martin.
5. No physical evidence exists to contradict Mr. Zimmerman's explanation, and multiple items of physical evidence support it.
How, while respecting the rule of law and our Constitutional protections from arrest without probable cause, could the police make an arrest?
Citizens should not bear the burden of arrest, much less prosecution for crime if the state cannot produce probable cause that they actually committed a crime.
There is no reason Mr. Zimmerman could not be arrested at any moment after he was released if evidence was developed or discovered to indicate he did commit a crime. His release was not a good forever bill of innocence. As the autopsy report (still secret as of this writing), ballistics, powder burn, and DNA testing are completed, compiled, and compared against Mr. Zimmerman's statements and already collected evidence there might very well be legally sufficient cause to arrest Mr. Zimmerman. There wasn't such cause on the night of Feb. 26 though and we should all be happy the police actually followed the law.
Too often the police do not respect citizens' Constitutionally protected rights, and very often Black people are the victims of such malfeasance. Disproportionally so. Given our history, Black Americans should be especia
Posted by SUT3point0Posted by aquapiscescusp
Zimmerman isn't even white! He's hispanic and they share the brunt or racism. What are you talking about? For sure, Martin shouldn't have been shot, but when you go out looking for trouble, EXPECT trouble. You say Martin is a kid, well if he was a kid, he should have been home with his parents.
EVERYONE knows that OJ WAS guilty but the RACE card got him off.
Zimmerman is a Jewxican. His father was a judge and got him off of a lot of charges already. Even if he is half latino(Peruvian) he has the Hebrew advantage.
Race didnt get OJ, being black is never an assett in a murder trial NEVERclick to expand
JEWXICAN?
lol
Did you make that up yourself?
You know, it's very difficult to take someone seriously, when on the one hand-- they cry bitterly that blacks are unfairly burdened with blame--
But they turn around and unfairly burden the Jews with said blame, instead.
Or in this case, the "Jewxicans"-- whatever the fuck that's supposed to mean.
Posted by AfternoonDelights22
The fact is Zimmerman was looking for trouble too. He got told not to pursue and he did anyway. Then a confrontation ensued and someone ended up dead.
That is manslaughter 101 folks. No disputing the prosecution and media is stupid as fuck. Regardless the law is the law and manslaughter charges should be brought up too. No stand your ground law should work if you too are pursuing the confrontation.
It was manslaughter regardless of color. But if the colors were reversed you're damn straight a conviction would be in the bag. Cuz it wouldnt be no celebrity football player.
I understand what you're saying here, and if one was going to assume a charge against Zimmerman, that would be it.
Involuntary Manslaughter
But absent *all* the details, which we haven't been privy to, and certainly no thanks to the "stupid as fuck" media, it is still unfair to level a charge, at this point imo.
That's what the trial is for.
Posted by AfternoonDelights22Posted by aquapiscescusp
Zimmerman isn't even white! He's hispanic and they share the brunt or racism. What are you talking about? For sure, Martin shouldn't have been shot, but when you go out looking for trouble, EXPECT trouble. You say Martin is a kid, well if he was a kid, he should have been home with his parents.
EVERYONE knows that OJ WAS guilty but the RACE card got him off.
The fact is Zimmerman was looking for trouble too. He got told not to pursue and he did anyway. Then a confrontation ensued and someone ended up dead.
That is manslaughter 101 folks. No disputing the prosecution and media is stupid as fuck. Regardless the law is the law and manslaughter charges should be brought up too. No stand your ground law should work if you too are pursuing the confrontation.
It was manslaughter regardless of color. But if the colors were reversed you're damn straight a conviction would be in the bag. Cuz it wouldnt be no celebrity football player.click to expand
+10000
Posted by SUT3point0Posted by aquapiscescusp
Zimmerman isn't even white! He's hispanic and they share the brunt or racism. What are you talking about? For sure, Martin shouldn't have been shot, but when you go out looking for trouble, EXPECT trouble. You say Martin is a kid, well if he was a kid, he should have been home with his parents.
EVERYONE knows that OJ WAS guilty but the RACE card got him off.
Zimmerman is a Jewxican. His father was a judge and got him off of a lot of charges already. Even if he is half latino(Peruvian) he has the Hebrew advantage.
Race didnt get OJ, being black is never an assett in a murder trial NEVERclick to expand
I have not spoken to one Black person on trial for anything whose race got them off. It worked the other way around. After all, most Black men are criminals anyway. This is what Trayvon Martin gets for "not being at home with his parents", walking down the street wearing a hooded sweat shirt. He was clearly casing places to rob. I mean WHAT Black young man walks down the street to ONLY get home!?!? He deserved this. He's no kid!!! He's was a thug and he got just what he deserved. Even though he was not known to act in deviant ways. His race trumps that. Bang bang your'e dead.
SMH.
Posted by SUT3point0Posted by natural25Posted by SUT3point0Posted by aquapiscescusp
Zimmerman isn't even white! He's hispanic and they share the brunt or racism. What are you talking about? For sure, Martin shouldn't have been shot, but when you go out looking for trouble, EXPECT trouble. You say Martin is a kid, well if he was a kid, he should have been home with his parents.
EVERYONE knows that OJ WAS guilty but the RACE card got him off.
Zimmerman is a Jewxican. His father was a judge and got him off of a lot of charges already. Even if he is half latino(Peruvian) he has the Hebrew advantage.
Race didnt get OJ, being black is never an assett in a murder trial NEVER
I have not spoken to one Black person on trial for anything whose race got them off. It worked the other way around. After all, most Black men are criminals anyway. This is what Trayvon Martin gets for "not being at home with his parents", walking down the street wearing a hooded sweat shirt. He was clearly casing places to rob. I mean WHAT Black young man walks down the street to ONLY get home!?!? He deserved this. He's no kid!!! He's was a thug and he got just what he deserved. Even though he was not known to act in deviant ways. His race trumps that. Bang bang your'e dead.
SMH.
If you read some of the stuff online written by "dem people" It's fckin scary. A lot of white people really think trayvon was a goon with a pistol smoking weed, snorting coke lookin for a lick. It's really disgusting.click to expand
LOL! This is precisely why I do not walk at night in this God forsaken little midwestern town I now reside. Ignorance can be dangerous. In fact, it more than likely cost Martin his life. SMH. Very scary indeed.
People do not understand that being racist and being prejudice are not one in the same. A person will argue they are not racist, but say "well if he's a little kid he should have been at his parents house." As if that is justification for being murdered. Or, "he was clearly looking for a houses to rob." Racist comments? Maybe, maybe not. Prejudice comments? TO. THE. FREAKING. CORE!
Sometimes being prejudice can be just as harmful as b
Sometimes being prejudice can be just as harmful as being racist. **
Posted by WoundedLeoPosted by aquapiscescusp
If Zimmerman was black no one would even care about Martin.
I don't agree with this statement.click to expand
WHAT, you don't agree with me— 😛
Posted by WoundedLeoPosted by aquapiscescusp
EVERYONE knows that OJ WAS guilty but the RACE card got him off.
Strongly disagree. I followed the OJ case from A-Z. Yes, my gut instinct says that he was certainly guilty. But if I had been a juror, I would have let him off too because the evidence did not prove him guilty "beyond the shadow of a doubt". The jury was clearly told that the conviction had to be based on "no doubt" and evidence. These criteria were not met. So OJ walked. It had nothing to do with the race card IMO.click to expand
Again, you disagree?! LOL
Well, I disagree with you too. I am too tired to dig up all that old crap and prove a point... maybe some other time 😛
COULD BE A NUDE COCOBUTTER FIGHT
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →Related Topics
Dom Monaghan prank interviews Elijah Wood. It starts at 2:00. lol! Louis CK, lmao! He said, My wife assassin
First of all I never liked Paula Deens personality--it seemed fake to me. I still don't care for her or her fat-rich fo
What's everyone doing at this VERY moment? I am laying on my couch watching Love Actually. :-/ LOL.
Me first... It's very frustrating to learn that some people judge you too incredibly hastily as a corrupt, dishonest
Why do you love to eat pussy?
MICHAEL DOUGLAS SAYS HE GOT THROAT CANCER FROM HAVING ORAL SEX WITH HIS WIFE. IS THIS A SOUND MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS OR JUST
To bite your tongue on Facebook? Example. One mom posted on facebook upset because boys keep bresking up with her 1
Ladies and Gentlemen, Do you believe that your local police sometimes take things too far and brutalize the citizens?
I AM THINKING NUDE TAG TEAM WRESTLING TEAM ONE AQUA & CAP GRIL vR WOUNDED LEO &ELLE WHO IS FOR THIS?
I just finished reading Scape from Sobibor and the author talked about history repeating itself and asked survivors if
i wish I could bust a few eggs over a guys face. hell, i want a money shot.
I would pick a 1920s era speakeasy. You'd have to dress in the era, say a password to get in the door, have your picture
What is the strangest thing you've done within the realm of dxp? Something that would make others raise an eyebrow or sa
Well, which one are you or do you most readily identify with? Are you a hero or a villain? DC, MARVEL, doesn't mat
r profile pic? That's the kind of elegant I'm looking for. At least, it qualifies to my standards. And yet, it's se
What does it mean to you? Are you offended by bad grammar? Feel free to post any other questions for topic sake...
I'm a believer in art imitating life. Music/Films often express the overall opinions and attitudes of the times. 60
I HAVE TRIED TO SEND BOTH OF YOU MESSAGES BUT KNOW LUCK I GOT THE MESSAGES FROM YOU AQUA LOV. I HAVE RECIEVED NOTHING
Inspired by the short men topic I am wondering how women with glasses are looked upon by men. I personally wear glass
For starters, no I did not want this in the relationship forum because men barely frequent that area, so that's why it's
INTERESTING THING ON THIS THREAD
IS AQUA NIPPLES
QUITE THE TURN ON.