@Generously1987
The Lindsay Clancy case
You are on page out of 2 | Reverse Order
Should I start a gender war or nah
Posted by PilatesBod
Should I start a gender war or nah
Oh please do, or I'll beat you to it!
Just watched this video and I now believe he was having an affair, maybe he even told her on that day she killed her kids, or probably she just found out herself, but sth must have happened at that moment, their texts exchange looks weird to me but I don't know.
50% say she's a cold-blooded murderer, the other half say it's real psychosis and the healthcare system failed her
Im not sure what to think though. There have been cases of mothers killing their children then offing themselves. I don't know exactly what the psychology behind that is..
Posted by RollergirlOrc
50% say she's a cold-blooded murderer, the other half say it's real psychosis and the healthcare system failed herIm not sure what to think though. There have been cases of mothers killing their children then offing themselves. I don't know exactly what the psychology behind that is..
Well society is getting harder and harder on mothers, in the past, women were just expected to have kids, so they did, but the way those kids were raised was not always under the microscope as it is now,
Nowadays, with all the new psychology research on how kids should be raised, is putting mothers under pressure to live up to those standards, "if you let a kid cry for too long he is gonna grow up to be a sociopath" kinda studies,
Then you have social media which shows how perfect influencers as mothers are (which is not true ofc)
And finally the cherry on top Postpartum Depression, which obviously makes the whole situation ten times worse,
A woman after giving birth will end up with a traumatized body, feeling exhausted and lonely, with a baby latching on her, constantly crying, no husband in sight (because let's face it, most men really don't help) and a million videos online telling her how she is doing everything wrong.
No wonder most women don't want to have kids anymore.
The same people who pretend to be deeply against genocide will happily defend someone deleting their own children.
In some way shape or form they will add more and more to the subject to justify it rather then just admitting the facts.
The truth is however, the only reason people actually care about this and many other similar topics, is purely because the media knows how to control the masses. They know how to make them think off topic, and manipulate every aspect about them. From my perspective it's less about what she did. A psychopath is a psychopath, end of story. To me its more about what making topics like this massively viral does to the minds of the general population.
Posted by Soul
The same people who pretend to be deeply against genocide will happily defend someone deleting their own children.In some way shape or form they will add more and more to the subject to justify it rather then just admitting the facts.
The truth is however, the only reason people actually care about this and many other similar topics, is purely because the media knows how to control the masses. They know how to make them think off topic, and manipulate every aspect about them. From my perspective it's less about what she did. A psychopath is a psychopath, end of story. To me its more about what making topics like this massively viral does to the minds of the general population.
To say she is a Natanayahu level psychopath is a bit of an exaggeration.
I'm also not saying she shouldn't do any jail time, but her psychological suffering should be taken into consideration, she did try to off herself too,
To me what's more disturbing is her husband knowing she had those ideas about her children and yet he let he alone with the kids, on many different occasions, he went skiing with his friends, work trips ...
What you wrote is a perfect example how men really don't understand the female experience, well how could you understand, you're not a woman after all,
But mental health only needs more empathy than anything else,
def some mental health issues on her side and her husband seems to have neglected her and the children
Posted by Generously1987
Posted by Soul
The same people who pretend to be deeply against genocide will happily defend someone deleting their own children.In some way shape or form they will add more and more to the subject to justify it rather then just admitting the facts.
The truth is however, the only reason people actually care about this and many other similar topics, is purely because the media knows how to control the masses. They know how to make them think off topic, and manipulate every aspect about them. From my perspective it's less about what she did. A psychopath is a psychopath, end of story. To me its more about what making topics like this massively viral does to the minds of the general population.
To say she is a Natanayahu level psychopath is a bit of an exaggeration.
I'm also not saying she shouldn't do any jail time, but her psychological suffering should be taken into consideration, she did try to off herself too,
To me what's more disturbing is her husband knowing she had those ideas about her children and yet he let he alone with the kids, on many different occasions, he went skiing with his friends, work trips ...
What you wrote is a perfect example how men really don't understand the female experience, well how could you understand, you're not a woman after all,
But mental health only needs more empathy than anything else,
click to expand
I don't think metal struggle is an excuse to off your own kids. It's not something I need to understand, because it doesn't matter. Why would I try to justify murderers to make the situation look less bad? Not saying its right to make it look worse, I just see it point blank. People that unwell should be completely removed from society imo. In situations where judges let a person free, and they go out and cause more harm to innocent people, the judge should hold equal charges to the person they let free imo.
I do 100% agree however that there is major mental health crisis, especially in the USA. If we want to make the issue about female vs male mental crisis however, men account for 75 to 80% of all deaths caused by suicide.
Posted by Soul
Posted by Generously1987
Posted by Soul
The same people who pretend to be deeply against genocide will happily defend someone deleting their own children.In some way shape or form they will add more and more to the subject to justify it rather then just admitting the facts.
The truth is however, the only reason people actually care about this and many other similar topics, is purely because the media knows how to control the masses. They know how to make them think off topic, and manipulate every aspect about them. From my perspective it's less about what she did. A psychopath is a psychopath, end of story. To me its more about what making topics like this massively viral does to the minds of the general population.
To say she is a Natanayahu level psychopath is a bit of an exaggeration.
I'm also not saying she shouldn't do any jail time, but her psychological suffering should be taken into consideration, she did try to off herself too,
To me what's more disturbing is her husband knowing she had those ideas about her children and yet he let he alone with the kids, on many different occasions, he went skiing with his friends, work trips ...
What you wrote is a perfect example how men really don't understand the female experience, well how could you understand, you're not a woman after all,
But mental health only needs more empathy than anything else,
click to expand
I don't think metal struggle is an excuse to off your own kids. It's not something I need to understand, because it doesn't matter. Why would I try to justify murderers to make the situation look less bad? Not saying its right to make it look worse, I just see it point blank. People that unwell should be completely removed from society imo. In situations where judges let a person free, and they go out and cause more harm to innocent people, the judge should hold equal charges to the person they let free imo.
I do 100% agree however that there is major mental health crisis, especially in the USA. If we want to make the issue about female vs male mental crisis however, men account for 75 to 80% of all deaths caused by suicide.
click to expand
Yeah what do you expect from a system that teaches men to bury their feelings?
Posted by virgoOPPP
def some mental health issues on her side and her husband seems to have neglected her and the children
Have you seen the video where they were at the museum, and her husband basically just stood there while letting her dealing with all three kids alone.
Posted by Flitzpiepe
Posted by Generously1987
Posted by Soul
The same people who pretend to be deeply against genocide will happily defend someone deleting their own children.
In some way shape or form they will add more and more to the subject to justify it rather then just admitting the facts.
The truth is however, the only reason people actually care about this and many other similar topics, is purely because the media knows how to control the masses. They know how to make them think off topic, and manipulate every aspect about them. From my perspective it's less about what she did. A psychopath is a psychopath, end of story. To me its more about what making topics like this massively viral does to the minds of the general population.
To say she is a Natanayahu level psychopath is a bit of an exaggeration.
I'm also not saying she shouldn't do any jail time, but her psychological suffering should be taken into consideration, she did try to off herself too,
To me what's more disturbing is her husband knowing she had those ideas about her children and yet he let he alone with the kids, on many different occasions, he went skiing with his friends, work trips ...
What you wrote is a perfect example how men really don't understand the female experience, well how could you understand, you're not a woman after all,
But mental health only needs more empathy than anything else,
click to expand
Disagree.. this is the equivalent of saying because testosterone is objectively and scientifically proven to increase violent tendencies, that men should automatically have an out. NO. Its the exact same baseline theory of a hormone imbalance youre using for a woman. I agree empathy and understanding help, but at the end of the day the label of "psychosis" is an umbrella term that describes symptoms not a diagnosis, so in essence the empathy is baked into the definition. Its the equivalent IMO as a "crime of passion", which in the States do, typically receive less harsh sentences because the empathy is baked in. (I do hope the HereForTaurus guy doesnt get any ideas with this)
The amount of grown men saying theyd choose the bear over a woman with babies, on the internet is so fucking dumb to me. But then again so was the "Id choose the bear".. .
click to expand
😂 Genuinely you don't know me if you think that
Dharmesh Patel attempted to murder his entire family by driving off a cliff… the charges were dismissed because he was having a psychotic break and major depressive disorder. He didn’t even go to trial at all. They just dismissed the charges altogether.
Everyone spoke highly of Lindsay, even her in laws seemed to still love her and support her and whether they intended it or not, their testimony made their son sound like a neglectful, uninvolved father. He was fully aware of her deterioration and left her alone with all of the children. Her mother in law testified that she begged for help. He fired the nanny that was helping relieve some of the stress.
I didn't watch every day or look up full case stuff.
Wasn't some of it being fought whether or not she could be in PPP due to the amount of time passing between birth and event? My understanding is that she admitted she did it and the only thing that's disputed is whether or not she was sane enough at the time of the actions to be imprisoned for it. Is that correct?
She's been telling family members that she's hearing voices who tell her to harm children and nobody did anything. They share equal responsibility. And her ex husbands behavior after all this is extremely suspicious. What man thinks about new marriage who's family has just been exterminated?
The holdout juror was a piece of shit loser with domestic violence charges. Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.
In September of 2021, the holdout juror in the Clancy case faced a criminal charge for assaulting his wife out of Brockton District Court.
According to a police report, the juror’s 13-year-old nephew called 911 after he said his uncle grabbed his wife by the throat and threw her into a dresser.
The report says the juror’s mom repeatedly screamed, “You’re evil!” as police arrested him.
Court records show the couple divorced after the incident and the criminal charge was later dismissed.
The ex-wife told NBC10 Boston this week that she did not want to testify in the case because she was worried about losing custody of her daughter.
Last year, that same teenage nephew referenced in the 2021 incident took out a restraining order after he said the juror pushed him to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the face.
Posted by PilatesBod
The holdout juror was a piece of shit loser with domestic violence charges. Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.yeah I feel the same way
men are so much more miserable than women. they're no good at building emotional communities and they're always attracted to all these manosphere gurus who romanticize bone fractures and child trafficking. they entrap these receptive women with some fragile, troubled, tragic past who weren't hugged enough by their parents and they drag them down with them into their endless pit of misery oh and the 'kinder good guys' get with women they treat like rehab centers. how lucky!
these awful haters deserve their epidemic.
men are so much more manipulative and insidious than women too. what's the worst a woman can do? drown your kids in a bathtub to 'save them' yeah but a man would surely but slowly resort to the degradation of your personhood not to 'save you' but to EXPLOIT you. they're so miserable and so paranoid even online that no happiness ever comes their way.
all they have is gta 6 in this lifetime.
One thing that this case has done is amplified what recent culture barely dared to address - the relentless, seemingly biological urge by women to feel like victims at any cost. Women LOVE reading about abuse and playing detectives spinning their little pseudo-psychologist brains how everything isn't always what it seems no matter how absurd or ridiculous their conclusions are. Purely anecdotal ofc from reading one too many social media comments.
Like the other day, another past case of a woman who killed her kids even with one of the surviving kids as eyewitnes, the armchair psychologists in the comment sections just could not wrap their heads around her being guilty cuz there's always some reality-warping explanation what REALLY happened. And they're so certain too, not a doubt in their minds🤣
You'd think if the greatest fear of a woman is to be assaultet, raped or abused by a man you wouldn't spend so much time happily dwelling into the misery of others. Don't come at me with your empath narcissism "ohh but I'm watching cuz I care, not cuz it's fun". Or "as a woman I find it relevant". Realllyyy?! You'd rather feel miserable partaking in other people's tragedies than ya know, feeling good? You don't have enough bad days in your own life?
I don't consider myself a particuraly empathetic person but I don't even engage in true crime documentaries bc it's just too fucking depressing and sad.
This whole trial has just made me take white bytches less seriousely and kind of see them as these clowns whose suffering - whatever it may be - I'm moderately indifferent to. Oh you can relate to X, Y, Z cuz your ex was an abusive "narcissist"? Ok, first question - how much true crime do you consume?
Posted by PilatesBod
The holdout juror was a piece of shit loser with domestic violence charges. Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.In September of 2021, the holdout juror in the Clancy case faced a criminal charge for assaulting his wife out of Brockton District Court.
According to a police report, the juror’s 13-year-old nephew called 911 after he said his uncle grabbed his wife by the throat and threw her into a dresser.
The report says the juror’s mom repeatedly screamed, “You’re evil!” as police arrested him.
Court records show the couple divorced after the incident and the criminal charge was later dismissed.
The ex-wife told NBC10 Boston this week that she did not want to testify in the case because she was worried about losing custody of her daughter.
Last year, that same teenage nephew referenced in the 2021 incident took out a restraining order after he said the juror pushed him to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the face.
Is he on trial? Got nothing to do with the case. Unless you care to thorougly examine every single woman on the jury and their headspace in the same fashion. "Oh you had post-partum depression too? You're excused due to risk of sympathizing with the defendant."
Every 10 minutes a woman is murdered by an intimate partner and you’ll still have some sloppy bologna smelling white dudes telling you how you should feel about it.
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Posted by PilatesBod
The holdout juror was a piece of shit loser with domestic violence charges. Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.In September of 2021, the holdout juror in the Clancy case faced a criminal charge for assaulting his wife out of Brockton District Court.
According to a police report, the juror’s 13-year-old nephew called 911 after he said his uncle grabbed his wife by the throat and threw her into a dresser.
The report says the juror’s mom repeatedly screamed, “You’re evil!” as police arrested him.
Court records show the couple divorced after the incident and the criminal charge was later dismissed.
The ex-wife told NBC10 Boston this week that she did not want to testify in the case because she was worried about losing custody of her daughter.
Last year, that same teenage nephew referenced in the 2021 incident took out a restraining order after he said the juror pushed him to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the face.
Is he on trial? Got nothing to do with the case. Unless you care to thorougly examine every single woman on the jury and their headspace in the same fashion. "Oh you had post-partum depression too? You're excused due to risk of sympathizing with the defendant."
click to expand
If you would read
“Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.”
Where’s your kid by the way? Who has primary custody? I bet it’s not you
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Posted by PilatesBod
The holdout juror was a piece of shit loser with domestic violence charges. Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.In September of 2021, the holdout juror in the Clancy case faced a criminal charge for assaulting his wife out of Brockton District Court.
According to a police report, the juror’s 13-year-old nephew called 911 after he said his uncle grabbed his wife by the throat and threw her into a dresser.
The report says the juror’s mom repeatedly screamed, “You’re evil!” as police arrested him.
Court records show the couple divorced after the incident and the criminal charge was later dismissed.
The ex-wife told NBC10 Boston this week that she did not want to testify in the case because she was worried about losing custody of her daughter.
Last year, that same teenage nephew referenced in the 2021 incident took out a restraining order after he said the juror pushed him to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the face.
Is he on trial? Got nothing to do with the case. Unless you care to thorougly examine every single woman on the jury and their headspace in the same fashion. "Oh you had post-partum depression too? You're excused due to risk of sympathizing with the defendant."click to expand
If you would read
“Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.”
Where’s your kid by the way? Who has primary custody? I bet it’s not you
click to expand
Your fantasy fabrications about where men are coming from regarding this case are just that. Speculations.
Men have always condemned other men's violence against women and children in high profile cases such as this. Go and read any comment section - men show no sympathy or mercy . There's always a few incel losers in there too, but there's certainly no culture of acceptance towards other men killing women and children no matter what kind of mental break they had. I'm assuming you are now witnessing a woman receive the short end of that stick. I don't see the bias. You see it bc that's what you want to see.
Meanwhile women are writing Chris Watts love letters. 🤡
Posted by PilatesBod
Every 10 minutes a woman is murdered by an intimate partner and you’ll still have some sloppy bologna smelling white dudes telling you how you should feel about it.
Got any statistics on how often a man is murdered by another man? You don't really give a shit about the victim, you are more interested in making it about men. It's politics to you.
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Posted by PilatesBod
The holdout juror was a piece of shit loser with domestic violence charges. Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.
In September of 2021, the holdout juror in the Clancy case faced a criminal charge for assaulting his wife out of Brockton District Court.
According to a police report, the juror’s 13-year-old nephew called 911 after he said his uncle grabbed his wife by the throat and threw her into a dresser.
The report says the juror’s mom repeatedly screamed, “You’re evil!” as police arrested him.
Court records show the couple divorced after the incident and the criminal charge was later dismissed.
The ex-wife told NBC10 Boston this week that she did not want to testify in the case because she was worried about losing custody of her daughter.
Last year, that same teenage nephew referenced in the 2021 incident took out a restraining order after he said the juror pushed him to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the face.
Is he on trial? Got nothing to do with the case. Unless you care to thorougly examine every single woman on the jury and their headspace in the same fashion. "Oh you had post-partum depression too? You're excused due to risk of sympathizing with the defendant."
click to expand
If you would read
“Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.”
Where’s your kid by the way? Who has primary custody? I bet it’s not you
click to expand
Personally I don't think that way. For me it was what happened, not by who. I would feel the exact same if the genders were flipped.
What I've learned from this is many people lost the plot a bit with the trial. Mostly due to the media being a complete psyop, and not even trying to hide it anymore. So I don't blame people for feeling how they do. World leaders let the population deteriorate mentally, then rather then try to fix it they did what they do best. They weaponized then monetized it.
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Posted by PilatesBod
The holdout juror was a piece of shit loser with domestic violence charges. Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.In September of 2021, the holdout juror in the Clancy case faced a criminal charge for assaulting his wife out of Brockton District Court.
According to a police report, the juror’s 13-year-old nephew called 911 after he said his uncle grabbed his wife by the throat and threw her into a dresser.
The report says the juror’s mom repeatedly screamed, “You’re evil!” as police arrested him.
Court records show the couple divorced after the incident and the criminal charge was later dismissed.
The ex-wife told NBC10 Boston this week that she did not want to testify in the case because she was worried about losing custody of her daughter.
Last year, that same teenage nephew referenced in the 2021 incident took out a restraining order after he said the juror pushed him to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the face.
Is he on trial? Got nothing to do with the case. Unless you care to thorougly examine every single woman on the jury and their headspace in the same fashion. "Oh you had post-partum depression too? You're excused due to risk of sympathizing with the defendant."click to expand
If you would read
“Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.”
Where’s your kid by the way? Who has primary custody? I bet it’s not you click to expand
Your fantasy fabrications about where men are coming from regarding this case are just that. Speculations.
Men have always condemned other men's violence against women and children in high profile cases such as this. Go and read any comment section - men show no sympathy or mercy . There's always a few incel losers in there too, but there's certainly no culture of acceptance towards other men killing women and children no matter what kind of mental break they had. I'm assuming you are now witnessing a woman receive the short end of that stick. I don't see the bias. You see it bc that's what you want to see.
Meanwhile women are writing Chris Watts love letters. 🤡
click to expand
“Men have always condemned other men’s violence against women and children”
LMFAOOOOOO get the fuck out of here.
It’s a cut and dry case. Her own ex husband has a pending medical malpractice lawsuit that alleges doctors failed to diagnose and treat her. Are you asserting that her husband, a man, is also in on making her a victim at all costs?
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Posted by PilatesBod
The holdout juror was a piece of shit loser with domestic violence charges. Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.In September of 2021, the holdout juror in the Clancy case faced a criminal charge for assaulting his wife out of Brockton District Court.
According to a police report, the juror’s 13-year-old nephew called 911 after he said his uncle grabbed his wife by the throat and threw her into a dresser.
The report says the juror’s mom repeatedly screamed, “You’re evil!” as police arrested him.
Court records show the couple divorced after the incident and the criminal charge was later dismissed.
The ex-wife told NBC10 Boston this week that she did not want to testify in the case because she was worried about losing custody of her daughter.
Last year, that same teenage nephew referenced in the 2021 incident took out a restraining order after he said the juror pushed him to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the face.
Is he on trial? Got nothing to do with the case. Unless you care to thorougly examine every single woman on the jury and their headspace in the same fashion. "Oh you had post-partum depression too? You're excused due to risk of sympathizing with the defendant."click to expand
If you would read
“Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.”
Where’s your kid by the way? Who has primary custody? I bet it’s not you click to expand
Your fantasy fabrications about where men are coming from regarding this case are just that. Speculations.
Men have always condemned other men's violence against women and children in high profile cases such as this. Go and read any comment section - men show no sympathy or mercy . There's always a few incel losers in there too, but there's certainly no culture of acceptance towards other men killing women and children no matter what kind of mental break they had. I'm assuming you are now witnessing a woman receive the short end of that stick. I don't see the bias. You see it bc that's what you want to see.
Meanwhile women are writing Chris Watts love letters. 🤡click to expand
“Men have always condemned other men’s violence against women and children”
LMFAOOOOOO get the fuck out of here.
It’s a cut and dry case. Her own ex husband has a pending medical malpractice lawsuit that alleges doctors failed to diagnose and treat her. Are you asserting that her husband, a man, is also in on making her a victim at all costs?
click to expand
Oh we're way past that. I thought you knew.. apparently the husband killed the kids!!
Posted by Soul
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Posted by PilatesBod
The holdout juror was a piece of shit loser with domestic violence charges. Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.
In September of 2021, the holdout juror in the Clancy case faced a criminal charge for assaulting his wife out of Brockton District Court.
According to a police report, the juror’s 13-year-old nephew called 911 after he said his uncle grabbed his wife by the throat and threw her into a dresser.
The report says the juror’s mom repeatedly screamed, “You’re evil!” as police arrested him.
Court records show the couple divorced after the incident and the criminal charge was later dismissed.
The ex-wife told NBC10 Boston this week that she did not want to testify in the case because she was worried about losing custody of her daughter.
Last year, that same teenage nephew referenced in the 2021 incident took out a restraining order after he said the juror pushed him to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the face.
Is he on trial? Got nothing to do with the case. Unless you care to thorougly examine every single woman on the jury and their headspace in the same fashion. "Oh you had post-partum depression too? You're excused due to risk of sympathizing with the defendant."
click to expand
If you would read
“Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.”
Where’s your kid by the way? Who has primary custody? I bet it’s not you
click to expand
Personally I don't think that way. For me it was what happened, not by who. I would feel the exact same if the genders were flipped.
What I've learned from this is many people lost the plot a bit with the trial. Mostly due to the media being a complete psyop, and not even trying to hide it anymore. So I don't blame people for feeling how they do. World leaders let the population deteriorate mentally, then rather then try to fix it they did what they do best. They weaponized then monetized it.
click to expand
It was newsworthy because it was a woman.
A man strangled his son several years ago and went to trial a few months before Lindsay Clancy. He was found not guilty by reason of insanity. The same outcome should have happened in this trial. But men saw a woman receiving sympathy and support and decided they all of a sudden care about children.
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Posted by PilatesBod
The holdout juror was a piece of shit loser with domestic violence charges. Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.
In September of 2021, the holdout juror in the Clancy case faced a criminal charge for assaulting his wife out of Brockton District Court.
According to a police report, the juror’s 13-year-old nephew called 911 after he said his uncle grabbed his wife by the throat and threw her into a dresser.
The report says the juror’s mom repeatedly screamed, “You’re evil!” as police arrested him.
Court records show the couple divorced after the incident and the criminal charge was later dismissed.
The ex-wife told NBC10 Boston this week that she did not want to testify in the case because she was worried about losing custody of her daughter.
Last year, that same teenage nephew referenced in the 2021 incident took out a restraining order after he said the juror pushed him to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the face.
Is he on trial? Got nothing to do with the case. Unless you care to thorougly examine every single woman on the jury and their headspace in the same fashion. "Oh you had post-partum depression too? You're excused due to risk of sympathizing with the defendant."click to expand
If you would read
“Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.”
Where’s your kid by the way? Who has primary custody? I bet it’s not you click to expand
Your fantasy fabrications about where men are coming from regarding this case are just that. Speculations.
Men have always condemned other men's violence against women and children in high profile cases such as this. Go and read any comment section - men show no sympathy or mercy . There's always a few incel losers in there too, but there's certainly no culture of acceptance towards other men killing women and children no matter what kind of mental break they had. I'm assuming you are now witnessing a woman receive the short end of that stick. I don't see the bias. You see it bc that's what you want to see.
Meanwhile women are writing Chris Watts love letters. 🤡click to expand
“Men have always condemned other men’s violence against women and children”
LMFAOOOOOO get the fuck out of here.
It’s a cut and dry case. Her own ex husband has a pending medical malpractice lawsuit that alleges doctors failed to diagnose and treat her. Are you asserting that her husband, a man, is also in on making her a victim at all costs?
click to expand
Oh we're way past that. I thought you knew.. apparently the husband killed the kids!!
click to expand
I never said that nor do I believe that’s what happened
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Posted by PilatesBod
Every 10 minutes a woman is murdered by an intimate partner and you’ll still have some sloppy bologna smelling white dudes telling you how you should feel about it.
Got any statistics on how often a man is murdered by another man? You don't really give a shit about the victim, you are more interested in making it about men. It's politics to you.
click to expand
You’d think if a man had a fear of other men they wouldn’t consume media that depicts wars, terrorists and violence like James Bond, John Wick, mafia movies. Isn’t it too depressing and sad to watch those movies of men hurting other men?
See how gay your logic is?
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Soul
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Posted by PilatesBod
The holdout juror was a piece of shit loser with domestic violence charges. Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.
In September of 2021, the holdout juror in the Clancy case faced a criminal charge for assaulting his wife out of Brockton District Court.
According to a police report, the juror’s 13-year-old nephew called 911 after he said his uncle grabbed his wife by the throat and threw her into a dresser.
The report says the juror’s mom repeatedly screamed, “You’re evil!” as police arrested him.
Court records show the couple divorced after the incident and the criminal charge was later dismissed.
The ex-wife told NBC10 Boston this week that she did not want to testify in the case because she was worried about losing custody of her daughter.
Last year, that same teenage nephew referenced in the 2021 incident took out a restraining order after he said the juror pushed him to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the face.
Is he on trial? Got nothing to do with the case. Unless you care to thorougly examine every single woman on the jury and their headspace in the same fashion. "Oh you had post-partum depression too? You're excused due to risk of sympathizing with the defendant."
click to expand
If you would read
“Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.”
Where’s your kid by the way? Who has primary custody? I bet it’s not you
click to expand
Personally I don't think that way. For me it was what happened, not by who. I would feel the exact same if the genders were flipped.
What I've learned from this is many people lost the plot a bit with the trial. Mostly due to the media being a complete psyop, and not even trying to hide it anymore. So I don't blame people for feeling how they do. World leaders let the population deteriorate mentally, then rather then try to fix it they did what they do best. They weaponized then monetized it.click to expand
It was newsworthy because it was a woman.
A man strangled his son several years ago and went to trial a few months before Lindsay Clancy. He was found not guilty by reason of insanity. The same outcome should have happened in this trial. But men saw a woman receiving sympathy and support and decided they all of a sudden care about children.
https://www.kcrg.com/2026/07/15/father-found-not-guilty-young-sons-death-remain-mental-health-facility/?outputType=amp
class="bqfade">click to expand
Yet that didn't go viral. They get to pick and chose, so you are right in that sense.
My question would be should the guy that killed his son and Lindsay Clancy both equally get an insanity verdict for ruthlessly murdering their own kids, or should both equally server the fullest punishment for murdering their own kids?
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Soul
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Posted by PilatesBod
The holdout juror was a piece of shit loser with domestic violence charges. Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.
In September of 2021, the holdout juror in the Clancy case faced a criminal charge for assaulting his wife out of Brockton District Court.
According to a police report, the juror’s 13-year-old nephew called 911 after he said his uncle grabbed his wife by the throat and threw her into a dresser.
The report says the juror’s mom repeatedly screamed, “You’re evil!” as police arrested him.
Court records show the couple divorced after the incident and the criminal charge was later dismissed.
The ex-wife told NBC10 Boston this week that she did not want to testify in the case because she was worried about losing custody of her daughter.
Last year, that same teenage nephew referenced in the 2021 incident took out a restraining order after he said the juror pushed him to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the face.
Is he on trial? Got nothing to do with the case. Unless you care to thorougly examine every single woman on the jury and their headspace in the same fashion. "Oh you had post-partum depression too? You're excused due to risk of sympathizing with the defendant."
click to expand
If you would read
“Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.”
Where’s your kid by the way? Who has primary custody? I bet it’s not you
click to expand
Personally I don't think that way. For me it was what happened, not by who. I would feel the exact same if the genders were flipped.
What I've learned from this is many people lost the plot a bit with the trial. Mostly due to the media being a complete psyop, and not even trying to hide it anymore. So I don't blame people for feeling how they do. World leaders let the population deteriorate mentally, then rather then try to fix it they did what they do best. They weaponized then monetized it.
click to expand
It was newsworthy because it was a woman.
A man strangled his son several years ago and went to trial a few months before Lindsay Clancy. He was found not guilty by reason of insanity. The same outcome should have happened in this trial. But men saw a woman receiving sympathy and support and decided they all of a sudden care about children.
https://www.kcrg.com/2026/07/15/father-found-not-guilty-young-sons-death-remain-mental-health-facility/?outputType=amp
class="bqfade">click to expand
That's an EXTREMELY rare outcome as most male murderers are sentenced to death or life in prison. You are picking from an absolute anomaly. How many male murderers are known to have suffered mental episodes and psychosis during the act, yet they are still on death row? I could produce a list if you want..
Women are known to receive lower sentences across the board, even after legally relevant factors have been taken into consideration
And furthermore yes, this is more newsworthy, not "cuz mysogyny", but because a woman did it, which is rare. And taboo.
@PilatesBod how much do you know about the case? I don't know a ton, I caught bits here and there. Was it the same in the timeframe? Wasn't the LC event months later after birth? Did she tell her mental people that she was hearing voices or just her family?
Not tryna "getya." Things I don't know
Fuck, I reread my own shit and realize I'd probably just have to watch for specific wording and shit.. siiiiiighhhhh
Posted by Soul
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Soul
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Posted by PilatesBod
The holdout juror was a piece of shit loser with domestic violence charges. Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.
In September of 2021, the holdout juror in the Clancy case faced a criminal charge for assaulting his wife out of Brockton District Court.
According to a police report, the juror’s 13-year-old nephew called 911 after he said his uncle grabbed his wife by the throat and threw her into a dresser.
The report says the juror’s mom repeatedly screamed, “You’re evil!” as police arrested him.
Court records show the couple divorced after the incident and the criminal charge was later dismissed.
The ex-wife told NBC10 Boston this week that she did not want to testify in the case because she was worried about losing custody of her daughter.
Last year, that same teenage nephew referenced in the 2021 incident took out a restraining order after he said the juror pushed him to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the face.
Is he on trial? Got nothing to do with the case. Unless you care to thorougly examine every single woman on the jury and their headspace in the same fashion. "Oh you had post-partum depression too? You're excused due to risk of sympathizing with the defendant."
click to expand
If you would read
“Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.”
Where’s your kid by the way? Who has primary custody? I bet it’s not you
click to expand
Personally I don't think that way. For me it was what happened, not by who. I would feel the exact same if the genders were flipped.
What I've learned from this is many people lost the plot a bit with the trial. Mostly due to the media being a complete psyop, and not even trying to hide it anymore. So I don't blame people for feeling how they do. World leaders let the population deteriorate mentally, then rather then try to fix it they did what they do best. They weaponized then monetized it.click to expand
It was newsworthy because it was a woman.
A man strangled his son several years ago and went to trial a few months before Lindsay Clancy. He was found not guilty by reason of insanity. The same outcome should have happened in this trial. But men saw a woman receiving sympathy and support and decided they all of a sudden care about children.
https://www.kcrg.com/2026/07/15/father-found-not-guilty-young-sons-death-remain-mental-health-facility/?outputType=amp class="bqfade">click to expand
Yet that didn't go viral. They get to pick and chose, so you are right in that sense.
My question would be should the guy that killed his son and Lindsay Clancy both equally get an insanity verdict for ruthlessly murdering their own kids, or should both equally server the fullest punishment for murdering their own kids?
click to expand
Then we’re jumping to a different discussion? One where you don’t believe in mental illness? I’m not excusing murder. They should never be free but psychiatric treatment is not freedom. It makes me think of the end of shutter island when Leo says “which would be worse? To live as a monster or to die as a good man”. I would argue bringing them back to reality and having them face what they’ve done is far worse than letting them sit in their own delusions where they believe they sent their children to god or whatever their psychosis was telling them.
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Posted by PilatesBod
Every 10 minutes a woman is murdered by an intimate partner and you’ll still have some sloppy bologna smelling white dudes telling you how you should feel about it.
Got any statistics on how often a man is murdered by another man? You don't really give a shit about the victim, you are more interested in making it about men. It's politics to you.click to expand
You’d think if a man had a fear of other men they wouldn’t consume media that depicts wars, terrorists and violence like James Bond, John Wick, mafia movies. Isn’t it too depressing and sad to watch those movies of men hurting other men?
See how gay your logic is?
click to expand
James Bond is entertainment. True crime is dwelling in real stories, real victims, real suffering. And y'all watching it as entertainment. I rest my case.
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Soul
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Soul
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Posted by PilatesBod
The holdout juror was a piece of shit loser with domestic violence charges. Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.
In September of 2021, the holdout juror in the Clancy case faced a criminal charge for assaulting his wife out of Brockton District Court.
According to a police report, the juror’s 13-year-old nephew called 911 after he said his uncle grabbed his wife by the throat and threw her into a dresser.
The report says the juror’s mom repeatedly screamed, “You’re evil!” as police arrested him.
Court records show the couple divorced after the incident and the criminal charge was later dismissed.
The ex-wife told NBC10 Boston this week that she did not want to testify in the case because she was worried about losing custody of her daughter.
Last year, that same teenage nephew referenced in the 2021 incident took out a restraining order after he said the juror pushed him to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the face.
Is he on trial? Got nothing to do with the case. Unless you care to thorougly examine every single woman on the jury and their headspace in the same fashion. "Oh you had post-partum depression too? You're excused due to risk of sympathizing with the defendant."
click to expand
If you would read
“Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.”
Where’s your kid by the way? Who has primary custody? I bet it’s not you
click to expand
Personally I don't think that way. For me it was what happened, not by who. I would feel the exact same if the genders were flipped.
What I've learned from this is many people lost the plot a bit with the trial. Mostly due to the media being a complete psyop, and not even trying to hide it anymore. So I don't blame people for feeling how they do. World leaders let the population deteriorate mentally, then rather then try to fix it they did what they do best. They weaponized then monetized it.click to expand
It was newsworthy because it was a woman.
A man strangled his son several years ago and went to trial a few months before Lindsay Clancy. He was found not guilty by reason of insanity. The same outcome should have happened in this trial. But men saw a woman receiving sympathy and support and decided they all of a sudden care about children.
https://www.kcrg.com/2026/07/15/father-found-not-guilty-young-sons-death-remain-mental-health-facility/?outputType=amp class="bqfade">click to expand
Yet that didn't go viral. They get to pick and chose, so you are right in that sense.
My question would be should the guy that killed his son and Lindsay Clancy both equally get an insanity verdict for ruthlessly murdering their own kids, or should both equally server the fullest punishment for murdering their own kids?
click to expand
Then we’re jumping to a different discussion? One where you don’t believe in mental illness? I’m not excusing murder. They should never be free but psychiatric treatment is not freedom. It makes me think of the end of shutter island when Leo says “which would be worse? To live as a monster or to die as a good man”. I would argue bringing them back to reality and having them face what they’ve done is far worse than letting them sit in their own delusions where they believe they sent their children to god or whatever their psychosis was telling them.
click to expand
I do believe in mental illness, just on equal terms. I could argue that anyone who commits murder has mental illness. At what point does mental illness start and end, and when does locked up forever from mental illness become something other then life in a prison? I consider murder exactly what the definition is. It doesn't matter who is doing it, and in 99% of cases why they are doing it. At that point putting the label of mental illness doesn't matter, because a murderer in general is mentally ill.
Also this is why I'm not in law or any type of judicial job. My morality can't see things in anything other then black and white. I would agree that the prison system doesn't do an efficient job at rehabilitation, but also think that people who commit murder should be locked away indefinitely. Though I do believe people have the capacity to change, which is why when I try to think too deeply into it I end up conflicting my own morals with emotion and empathy.
Posted by SoloDolo
@PilatesBod how much do you know about the case? I don't know a ton, I caught bits here and there. Was it the same in the timeframe? Wasn't the LC event months later after birth? Did she tell her mental people that she was hearing voices or just her family?Not tryna "getya." Things I don't know
I don’t know what she told her mental health providers and it’s irrelevant to me. Did you know one study of people diagnosed with schizophrenia reveled that they’d been hearing auditory hallucinations on average 6.5 years before they revealed it to a therapist.
What matters to me is the testimony of her family, friends, nanny and husband. By all accounts she was a loving and doting mother. Her in laws seemed to support her during the trial. Do you know how hard it is to get in-laws to support a wife that killed their grandchildren? Her husband believes she experienced psychosis.
The entire final girl trope in horror movies is a reflection of how we as society actually sympathize more with female suffering than male suffering. It's been misdiagnosed by new wave feminists as a sort of mysogynistic fantasy of sadism - and yes, there's an entertainment value because it is entertainment, not a cancer ward - but at its core if you had a horror movie with predominantely males being bumped off and the final stand being between a serial killer and a dude - it just doesn't hit the same. No one would feel particuraly scared or thrilled bc we just don't sympathize with men as victims of violence .
Case in point, I was just reflecting on why I always considered "The Hitcher" to be an action movie, or at least thriller, when in fact it's conceived as a horror movie. It struck me it's bc it's a standoff between two males , one stalking the other, and I only felt it entering horror territory when that shortlived female love interest was torn apart by two trucks.
This is not a "boo hoo nobody have sympathy for men" thing - I think things are how they're meant to be - but don't tell me this is mysogyny bc a woman is getting judged by men same way men judge and show no mercy for other men murdering or assaulting children, regardless of their mental state.
Posted by Soul
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Soul
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Soul
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Posted by PilatesBod
The holdout juror was a piece of shit loser with domestic violence charges. Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.
In September of 2021, the holdout juror in the Clancy case faced a criminal charge for assaulting his wife out of Brockton District Court.
According to a police report, the juror’s 13-year-old nephew called 911 after he said his uncle grabbed his wife by the throat and threw her into a dresser.
The report says the juror’s mom repeatedly screamed, “You’re evil!” as police arrested him.
Court records show the couple divorced after the incident and the criminal charge was later dismissed.
The ex-wife told NBC10 Boston this week that she did not want to testify in the case because she was worried about losing custody of her daughter.
Last year, that same teenage nephew referenced in the 2021 incident took out a restraining order after he said the juror pushed him to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the face.
Is he on trial? Got nothing to do with the case. Unless you care to thorougly examine every single woman on the jury and their headspace in the same fashion. "Oh you had post-partum depression too? You're excused due to risk of sympathizing with the defendant."
click to expand
If you would read
“Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.”
Where’s your kid by the way? Who has primary custody? I bet it’s not you
click to expand
Personally I don't think that way. For me it was what happened, not by who. I would feel the exact same if the genders were flipped.
What I've learned from this is many people lost the plot a bit with the trial. Mostly due to the media being a complete psyop, and not even trying to hide it anymore. So I don't blame people for feeling how they do. World leaders let the population deteriorate mentally, then rather then try to fix it they did what they do best. They weaponized then monetized it.click to expand
It was newsworthy because it was a woman.
A man strangled his son several years ago and went to trial a few months before Lindsay Clancy. He was found not guilty by reason of insanity. The same outcome should have happened in this trial. But men saw a woman receiving sympathy and support and decided they all of a sudden care about children.
https://www.kcrg.com/2026/07/15/father-found-not-guilty-young-sons-death-remain-mental-health-facility/?outputType=amp class="bqfade">click to expand
Yet that didn't go viral. They get to pick and chose, so you are right in that sense.
My question would be should the guy that killed his son and Lindsay Clancy both equally get an insanity verdict for ruthlessly murdering their own kids, or should both equally server the fullest punishment for murdering their own kids?
click to expand
Then we’re jumping to a different discussion? One where you don’t believe in mental illness? I’m not excusing murder. They should never be free but psychiatric treatment is not freedom. It makes me think of the end of shutter island when Leo says “which would be worse? To live as a monster or to die as a good man”. I would argue bringing them back to reality and having them face what they’ve done is far worse than letting them sit in their own delusions where they believe they sent their children to god or whatever their psychosis was telling them.
click to expand
I do believe in mental illness, just on equal terms. I could argue that anyone who commits murder has mental illness. At what point does mental illness start and end, and when does locked up forever from mental illness become something other then life in a prison? I consider murder exactly what the definition is. It doesn't matter who is doing it, and in 99% of cases why they are doing it. At that point putting the label of mental illness doesn't matter, because a murderer in general is mentally ill.
Also this is why I'm not in law or any type of judicial job. My morality can't see things in anything other then black and white. I would agree that the prison system doesn't do an efficient job at rehabilitation, but also think that people who commit murder should be locked away indefinitely. Though I do believe people have the capacity to change, which is why when I try to think too deeply into it I end up conflicting my own morals with emotion and empathy.
click to expand
Then how do you feel about people in the military?
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Soul
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Soul
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Soul
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Posted by PilatesBod
The holdout juror was a piece of shit loser with domestic violence charges. Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.
In September of 2021, the holdout juror in the Clancy case faced a criminal charge for assaulting his wife out of Brockton District Court.
According to a police report, the juror’s 13-year-old nephew called 911 after he said his uncle grabbed his wife by the throat and threw her into a dresser.
The report says the juror’s mom repeatedly screamed, “You’re evil!” as police arrested him.
Court records show the couple divorced after the incident and the criminal charge was later dismissed.
The ex-wife told NBC10 Boston this week that she did not want to testify in the case because she was worried about losing custody of her daughter.
Last year, that same teenage nephew referenced in the 2021 incident took out a restraining order after he said the juror pushed him to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the face.
Is he on trial? Got nothing to do with the case. Unless you care to thorougly examine every single woman on the jury and their headspace in the same fashion. "Oh you had post-partum depression too? You're excused due to risk of sympathizing with the defendant."
click to expand
If you would read
“Which just confirms my suspicions that a majority of men taking a strong stance on this case want to see a woman punished more than they care about justice or children.”
Where’s your kid by the way? Who has primary custody? I bet it’s not you
click to expand
Personally I don't think that way. For me it was what happened, not by who. I would feel the exact same if the genders were flipped.
What I've learned from this is many people lost the plot a bit with the trial. Mostly due to the media being a complete psyop, and not even trying to hide it anymore. So I don't blame people for feeling how they do. World leaders let the population deteriorate mentally, then rather then try to fix it they did what they do best. They weaponized then monetized it.click to expand
It was newsworthy because it was a woman.
A man strangled his son several years ago and went to trial a few months before Lindsay Clancy. He was found not guilty by reason of insanity. The same outcome should have happened in this trial. But men saw a woman receiving sympathy and support and decided they all of a sudden care about children.
https://www.kcrg.com/2026/07/15/father-found-not-guilty-young-sons-death-remain-mental-health-facility/?outputType=amp class="bqfade">click to expand
Yet that didn't go viral. They get to pick and chose, so you are right in that sense.
My question would be should the guy that killed his son and Lindsay Clancy both equally get an insanity verdict for ruthlessly murdering their own kids, or should both equally server the fullest punishment for murdering their own kids?
click to expand
Then we’re jumping to a different discussion? One where you don’t believe in mental illness? I’m not excusing murder. They should never be free but psychiatric treatment is not freedom. It makes me think of the end of shutter island when Leo says “which would be worse? To live as a monster or to die as a good man”. I would argue bringing them back to reality and having them face what they’ve done is far worse than letting them sit in their own delusions where they believe they sent their children to god or whatever their psychosis was telling them.
click to expand
I do believe in mental illness, just on equal terms. I could argue that anyone who commits murder has mental illness. At what point does mental illness start and end, and when does locked up forever from mental illness become something other then life in a prison? I consider murder exactly what the definition is. It doesn't matter who is doing it, and in 99% of cases why they are doing it. At that point putting the label of mental illness doesn't matter, because a murderer in general is mentally ill.
Also this is why I'm not in law or any type of judicial job. My morality can't see things in anything other then black and white. I would agree that the prison system doesn't do an efficient job at rehabilitation, but also think that people who commit murder should be locked away indefinitely. Though I do believe people have the capacity to change, which is why when I try to think too deeply into it I end up conflicting my own morals with emotion and empathy.click to expand
Then how do you feel about people in the military?
click to expand
There are many layers to that one. I can see many sides, but again my opinions will eventually conflict with my morals, emotions, and empathy. It seems like an out for many young people, especially if they don't go to collage or in a trade. When I turned 18 I got a gillette razor, and a letter recommending the military mailed to me from the government. I likely would have gone if not for already doing tile.
I'll stop myself from getting extreamly off track though. What exactly about the military do you mean? I'll try to focus on just that part if possible. I'll admit, that single sentence sent my mind in about 10 different directions on the topic.
Posted by PilatesBod
Posted by SoloDolo
@PilatesBod how much do you know about the case? I don't know a ton, I caught bits here and there. Was it the same in the timeframe? Wasn't the LC event months later after birth? Did she tell her mental people that she was hearing voices or just her family?Not tryna "getya." Things I don't know
I don’t know what she told her mental health providers and it’s irrelevant to me. Did you know one study of people diagnosed with schizophrenia reveled that they’d been hearing auditory hallucinations on average 6.5 years before they revealed it to a therapist.
What matters to me is the testimony of her family, friends, nanny and husband. By all accounts she was a loving and doting mother. Her in laws seemed to support her during the trial. Do you know how hard it is to get in-laws to support a wife that killed their grandchildren? Her husband believes she experienced psychosis.
click to expand
Nah I didn't know about the study but that doesn't really surprise me that someone would hide it/certain mental aspects. Yeah I saw the husband was for her.
I asked about the professionals for people wanting them to be punished. But again that's just something I might know if I watched it whether it's reasonable or not.
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-II
Posted by PilatesBod
Every 10 minutes a woman is murdered by an intimate partner and you’ll still have some sloppy bologna smelling white dudes telling you how you should feel about it.
Got any statistics on how often a man is murdered by another man? You don't really give a shit about the victim, you are more interested in making it about men. It's politics to you.
click to expand
Well a man killing a man. Is not the same as a man killing a woman, you should know that by now, unless you failed biology class at school.
The problem I have with this case, is not whether she is guilty or not, she is guilty, and she should be in jail or psychiatric hospital,
But the question that raises itself in all this is, why are men so ignorant to women's physical and mental health issues?
She expressed those thoughts to her husband many times, and he didn't do anything, instead he just carried on with his life, the work trips and the hanging out with the buddies,
If one parent is sick, isn't it the other parent's job to take care of them?
Why isn't the husband being accountable for not protecting those kids?
And when are men going to open their eyes and their hearts, and be a bit compassionate towards women and what they go through when they actually have their babies?
Posted by Enfant-Terrible-II
The entire final girl trope in horror movies is a reflection of how we as society actually sympathize more with female suffering than male suffering. It's been misdiagnosed by new wave feminists as a sort of mysogynistic fantasy of sadism - and yes, there's an entertainment value because it is entertainment, not a cancer ward - but at its core if you had a horror movie with predominantely males being bumped off and the final stand being between a serial killer and a dude - it just doesn't hit the same. No one would feel particuraly scared or thrilled bc we just don't sympathize with men as victims of violence .Case in point, I was just reflecting on why I always considered "The Hitcher" to be an action movie, or at least thriller, when in fact it's conceived as a horror movie. It struck me it's bc it's a standoff between two males , one stalking the other, and I only felt it entering horror territory when that shortlived female love interest was torn apart by two trucks.
This is not a "boo hoo nobody have sympathy for men" thing - I think things are how they're meant to be - but don't tell me this is mysogyny bc a woman is getting judged by men same way men judge and show no mercy for other men murdering or assaulting children, regardless of their mental state.
The same gender bias that casts women as more sympathetic victims on a movie screen gives her less credibility and authority as a real world professional, which you benefit from.
You’ve spent the entire argument building a narrative in which women receive more sympathy, more leniency and more favorable treatment than men becuse society supposedly values female suffering more. But this case is about a woman who was treated with extreme condemnation for killing her children and all of a sudden that’s evidence that she’s being treated the same as men.
So which is it? Because to me it seems you proved my point that you have contempt over gender expectations and you want to see her suffer in the same way you think men suffer.
Her lawyer is now arguing there was no evidence that she committed the crimes and a thorough investigation was not done
Throw the husband and wife off a cliff and be done with the topic.
Posted by PilatesBod
Her lawyer is now arguing there was no evidence that she committed the crimes and a thorough investigation was not done
That is a wild turn lmao
Posted by SoloDolo
Posted by PilatesBod
Her lawyer is now arguing there was no evidence that she committed the crimes and a thorough investigation was not doneThat is a wild turn lmao
click to expand
Yeah I didn’t see this coming.
But after watching the documentary on Mica Miller and also watching the trial on Caleb Flynn, I want to see more evidence too. Both nice church going men who you’d never expect doing the things they did to their wives and yet they both ended up dead.
This case is an eye opener - in more ways than just one. For one thing - it proved that there's a rather large number of women who are far from the stereotypical "caring mother who would put children first - as innocent souls in need of protection.... " Oh no, this women adopt this image - only when it suits them (while looking to be praised and such), but can easily switch to their cold-hearted vile nature -where they see children (even toddlers of age) - as nothing more than objects - to use and/or abuse as they see fit.... One of this female looking creatures - quite literally compared them to vases - and got a LOT of likes for it... As if Lindsay Clancy broke some replaceable objects.... you can just buy, or birth new ones... Same thing.... Right?! Wrong. You vile poor excuse for a human being.... -_- The trans trend made people question the meaning of a woman - and now this case.... indirectly validates that prerogative. Apparently, being born a woman - does not make you one, let alone a mother - or even a human being for that matter... at least, not in the stereotypically moral sense.
Then there's the "modern" feminist side to it: "Even if she's guilty, the man should be blamed.... It's always the men's fault." Sigh.... Yes, my dear child of 30... 50.... 70... or what ever is your actual age. You should be absolved of any adult responsibility, exactly as a child - who isn't capable of adult understanding or... accountability. Only Men can be treated as adults and held accountable, but at same time.... you do expect... demand even - the rights of an actual adult. Which generally speaking - seemed like common sense.... for every women to have such rights. But here we are.... with this case "and the long line of female supporters.... who clearly aren't suited for such privilege... and the accountability that comes with that." For this women - children are nothing more than a means to an end.... And God forbid - for things to go against her expectations.... or she's take it out on the children - as if a TV, a vase or any piece of propriety which she'd smash to pieces.... feeling remorse only for IT not being useful enough - in controlling her husband to do her every bidding and such. A husband, whom living with her - got to see her true colors and looked for warmth.... elsewhere. Cause this women are clearly not capable of such, even when it comes to a child.... And the beat goes on...
But hey, don't get me wrong... this is not a generalization of all women. That's clearly not the case, fortunately. There's still a lot of women - who are actually loving and caring - in the real sense, not just for the camera. Who yearn and are capable of loving a child as a mother should. But that's definitely not the case with any of Lindsay Clancy's supporters. Cause this women see themselves in her... and that speaks volumes about the dark side of their character. Was honestly, quite shocking - to realize that - their number is so large. And now i do question - how many of the women i was involved with was - yet another version of Lindsay Clancy. The signs (red flags) - were there... out in the open - but i always believed.... to be a side effect of past traumas and hardship - something that's manageable, that they could never hurt a child. But now i wonder...
Another intriguing aspect of this case - is the defense lawyer... Kevin Reddington. A real life Devil's advocate, quite literally - taking his past cases into account.
As for the mental health aspect.... if a man worked in the military - and end-up doing some horrible things in a mission involving children - from which he end-up with a severe case of PTSD... Let's say he killed some children - who were struggling to survive, and then came back home - and witnessed his spoiled teenage brats throwing a tantrum for getting an iPhone 16 instead of 17 Pro Max - and picks that phone and hits the teenager in the head.... killing him. Even with severe PTSD, he will take accountability - and go to jail in most cases. No men supporting outside and definitely no women. And sure, the system is broken in so many ways - especially the medical system. But even in the countries with best medical system - people like Lindsay Clancy will reach the same breaking point in similar circumstances. It's not as if you could lockup each and everyone of them - since there's millions of them... There's no society that can support such costs.
Did this help you understand your situation?
dxpnet has hosted real conversations like this since 2000. If you value independent communities, you can support the site below.
Every contribution helps keep dxpnet independent and ad-light.
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
Share your theories, opinions and everything you know about this case.
I find it weird her husband got remarried too soon, he was probably having an affair?