The more guns the better (Page 3)

You are on page out of 3 | Reverse Order
Profile picture of Quantum
Rabbit
@Quantum
9 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 2 · Posts: 3802 · Topics: 14
Any power that manages to evade 1) Satellite surveillance, 2) Air Force assets, 3) Naval Assets, 4) National Guard assets, and 5) Local law enforcement assets is simply going to be too strong for a bunch of citizens with semi automatic rifles and handguns. The logistical problems the invading force would need to overcome are just too great that it would have to be far more powerful than any current military.

This isn't a Michael Bay movie, nor is it grade school revisionist feel good patriotic history lessons.
Profile picture of Soul
Soul
@Soul
10 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 2278 · Posts: 17009 · Topics: 110
Posted by blackphase

@Soul - Not a vegan, just love nature and wildlife. I have never eaten game meat before, I feel badly enough for all the animals slaughtered by factories and all the expired meat that gets thrown away. Such a sad waste. I know many people (animal lovers) would prefer to hunt their own meat as opposed to buying it, but there are already so many animals being slaughtered that we cannot keep from happening, I'd rather not see those lives end for nothing.. only to be thrown in the trash if expired before bought.
I agree and love nature also. When I fish I don't like using live bait because I hate the idea it has to die for my enjoyment. I also always release what I catch. In a survival situation I'd have no issue eating wildlife however. At that moment I would feel my life is extremely important for others survival, because I know a bunch of survival tips. All the way to what plants and flowers in north America are perfect for antibiotic bandages and medicine, what plants are good to eat, or which plants are deadly. I also know how to craft primitive weapons and traps.
Profile picture of Quantum
Rabbit
@Quantum
9 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 2 · Posts: 3802 · Topics: 14
Posted by CancerOnTheCusp
Posted by Quantum
Posted by truecap
Someone mentioned history. Let's look at the Revolutionary War. Local militia fought that war.
If it weren't for citizens with guns, we'd be hailing the Queen instead of bashing Obama.

No, I'm not forgetting France's help...but as a community we stood up against the strongest nation in the world at the time.

The Continetal Army fought that war, not militias.
Battle of Cowpens. King's Mountain.
click to expand

You know as well as I do that without forming the Continental Army, Britain would have won. Communication technology wasn't advanced enough to wage a full on VC-style guerilla campaign, so without coordination we would have been dead in the water.
Profile picture of CancerOnTheCusp
GFY
@CancerOnTheCusp
12 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 433 · Posts: 8306 · Topics: 311
Posted by Quantum
Any power that manages to evade 1) Satellite surveillance, 2) Air Force assets, 3) Naval Assets, 4) National Guard assets, and 5) Local law enforcement assets is simply going to be too strong for a bunch of citizens with semi automatic rifles and handguns. The logistical problems the invading force would need to overcome are just too great that it would have to be far more powerful than any current military.

This isn't a Michael Bay movie, nor is it grade school revisionist feel good patriotic history lessons.
Even if there was an invasion, good luck holding territory.
The Wehrmacht had fits in Yugoslavia.
Profile picture of CancerOnTheCusp
GFY
@CancerOnTheCusp
12 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 433 · Posts: 8306 · Topics: 311
Posted by Quantum
Posted by CancerOnTheCusp
Posted by Quantum
Posted by truecap
Someone mentioned history. Let's look at the Revolutionary War. Local militia fought that war.
If it weren't for citizens with guns, we'd be hailing the Queen instead of bashing Obama.

No, I'm not forgetting France's help...but as a community we stood up against the strongest nation in the world at the time.

The Continetal Army fought that war, not militias.
Battle of Cowpens. King's Mountain.
You know as well as I do that without forming the Continental Army, Britain would have won. Communication technology wasn't advanced enough to wage a full on VC-style guerilla campaign, so without coordination we would have been dead in the water.
click to expand

I don't disagree, but militia played a role in slowing the British advance through the south, buying time for Washington.
Profile picture of Quantum
Rabbit
@Quantum
9 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 2 · Posts: 3802 · Topics: 14
Posted by CancerOnTheCusp
Posted by Quantum
Posted by CancerOnTheCusp
Posted by Quantum
Posted by truecap
Someone mentioned history. Let's look at the Revolutionary War. Local militia fought that war.
If it weren't for citizens with guns, we'd be hailing the Queen instead of bashing Obama.

No, I'm not forgetting France's help...but as a community we stood up against the strongest nation in the world at the time.

The Continetal Army fought that war, not militias.
Battle of Cowpens. King's Mountain.
You know as well as I do that without forming the Continental Army, Britain would have won. Communication technology wasn't advanced enough to wage a full on VC-style guerilla campaign, so without coordination we would have been dead in the water.
I don't disagree, but militia played a role in slowing the British advance through the south, buying time for Washington.
click to expand

That's a good point. The Appalachians were a thorn in their side. You can't fight hill folk by standing in columns and volley firing.

Profile picture of Soul
Soul
@Soul
10 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 2278 · Posts: 17009 · Topics: 110
Posted by Quantum
Posted by CancerOnTheCusp
Posted by Quantum
Posted by CancerOnTheCusp
Posted by Quantum
Posted by truecap
Someone mentioned history. Let's look at the Revolutionary War. Local militia fought that war.
If it weren't for citizens with guns, we'd be hailing the Queen instead of bashing Obama.

No, I'm not forgetting France's help...but as a community we stood up against the strongest nation in the world at the time.

The Continetal Army fought that war, not militias.
Battle of Cowpens. King's Mountain.
You know as well as I do that without forming the Continental Army, Britain would have won. Communication technology wasn't advanced enough to wage a full on VC-style guerilla campaign, so without coordination we would have been dead in the water.
I don't disagree, but militia played a role in slowing the British advance through the south, buying time for Washington.
That's a good point. The Appalachians were a thorn in their side. You can't fight hill folk by standing in columns and volley firing.

click to expand

The original settlers would have learned that the hard way. The natives pretty much wrote our way of warfare, at least at that time.
Profile picture of truecap
truecap
@truecap
13 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 8 · Posts: 20090 · Topics: 685
Posted by Quantum
Posted by truecap
Someone mentioned history. Let's look at the Revolutionary War. Local militia fought that war.
If it weren't for citizens with guns, we'd be hailing the Queen instead of bashing Obama.

No, I'm not forgetting France's help...but as a community we stood up against the strongest nation in the world at the time.

The Continetal Army fought that war, not militias.
click to expand

The continental army was created out of militias wasn't it?
Profile picture of truecap
truecap
@truecap
13 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 8 · Posts: 20090 · Topics: 685
Posted by Quantum
Any power that manages to evade 1) Satellite surveillance, 2) Air Force assets, 3) Naval Assets, 4) National Guard assets, and 5) Local law enforcement assets is simply going to be too strong for a bunch of citizens with semi automatic rifles and handguns. The logistical problems the invading force would need to overcome are just too great that it would have to be far more powerful than any current military.

This isn't a Michael Bay movie, nor is it grade school revisionist feel good patriotic history lessons.
It would be more difficult for them with armed citizens.
Profile picture of truecap
truecap
@truecap
13 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 8 · Posts: 20090 · Topics: 685
Posted by Soul
Posted by blackphase

@Soul - Not a vegan, just love nature and wildlife. I have never eaten game meat before, I feel badly enough for all the animals slaughtered by factories and all the expired meat that gets thrown away. Such a sad waste. I know many people (animal lovers) would prefer to hunt their own meat as opposed to buying it, but there are already so many animals being slaughtered that we cannot keep from happening, I'd rather not see those lives end for nothing.. only to be thrown in the trash if expired before bought.
I agree and love nature also. When I fish I don't like using live bait because I hate the idea it has to die for my enjoyment. I also always release what I catch. In a survival situation I'd have no issue eating wildlife however. At that moment I would feel my life is extremely important for others survival, because I know a bunch of survival tips. All the way to what plants and flowers in north America are perfect for antibiotic bandages and medicine, what plants are good to eat, or which plants are deadly. I also know how to craft primitive weapons and traps.
click to expand

You're my kind of man. 🙂

How does one going about learning more about the plants and their uses? Did you just research this yourself?
Profile picture of Soul
Soul
@Soul
10 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 2278 · Posts: 17009 · Topics: 110
Posted by truecap
Posted by Quantum
Any power that manages to evade 1) Satellite surveillance, 2) Air Force assets, 3) Naval Assets, 4) National Guard assets, and 5) Local law enforcement assets is simply going to be too strong for a bunch of citizens with semi automatic rifles and handguns. The logistical problems the invading force would need to overcome are just too great that it would have to be far more powerful than any current military.

This isn't a Michael Bay movie, nor is it grade school revisionist feel good patriotic history lessons.
It would be more difficult for them with armed citizens.
click to expand

As unlikely or even impossible as an invasion on American soil would be, I feel the idea with civilians with guns is a slight fear tactic over any enemy.

The way I see it is you couldn't really use nukes. The reason for this is unless you could do it quickly and take out all our nuke locations we would just send some back. You also couldn't wipe the whole country off the map with a nuke, because the radiation would kill so much more then the target, and it would linger for hundreds, maybe thousands of years. That means the only option would be a large scale invasion. Which the cops and civilians would make somewhat difficult, or at least scary for the invading troops let alone the military.

Obvously all of this invasion talk is hypothetical here in 2016 though.
Profile picture of truecap
truecap
@truecap
13 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 8 · Posts: 20090 · Topics: 685
Posted by Soul
Posted by truecap
Posted by Quantum
Any power that manages to evade 1) Satellite surveillance, 2) Air Force assets, 3) Naval Assets, 4) National Guard assets, and 5) Local law enforcement assets is simply going to be too strong for a bunch of citizens with semi automatic rifles and handguns. The logistical problems the invading force would need to overcome are just too great that it would have to be far more powerful than any current military.

This isn't a Michael Bay movie, nor is it grade school revisionist feel good patriotic history lessons.
It would be more difficult for them with armed citizens.
As unlikely or even impossible as an invasion on American soil would be, I feel the idea with civilians with guns is a slight fear tactic over any enemy.

The way I see it is you couldn't really use nukes. The reason for this is unless you could do it quickly and take out all our nuke locations we would just send some back. You also couldn't wipe the whole country off the map with a nuke, because the radiation would kill so much more then the target, and it would linger for hundreds, maybe thousands of years. That means the only option would be a large scale invasion. Which the cops and civilians would make somewhat difficult, or at least scary for the invading troops let alone the military.

Obvously all of this invasion talk is hypothetical here in 2016 though.
click to expand

I agree with you. It is a deterrent.

An unarmed society is a sitting duck.
Profile picture of Soul
Soul
@Soul
10 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 2278 · Posts: 17009 · Topics: 110
Posted by truecap
Posted by Soul
Posted by blackphase

@Soul - Not a vegan, just love nature and wildlife. I have never eaten game meat before, I feel badly enough for all the animals slaughtered by factories and all the expired meat that gets thrown away. Such a sad waste. I know many people (animal lovers) would prefer to hunt their own meat as opposed to buying it, but there are already so many animals being slaughtered that we cannot keep from happening, I'd rather not see those lives end for nothing.. only to be thrown in the trash if expired before bought.
I agree and love nature also. When I fish I don't like using live bait because I hate the idea it has to die for my enjoyment. I also always release what I catch. In a survival situation I'd have no issue eating wildlife however. At that moment I would feel my life is extremely important for others survival, because I know a bunch of survival tips. All the way to what plants and flowers in north America are perfect for antibiotic bandages and medicine, what plants are good to eat, or which plants are deadly. I also know how to craft primitive weapons and traps.
You're my kind of man. 🙂

How does one going about learning more about the plants and their uses? Did you just research this yourself?
click to expand

Some from library books, some from my dad and grandfather who are self sufficient country folk living off the land, and some from YouTube.
Profile picture of SirHorns
SirHorns
@SirHorns
11 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 75 · Posts: 5976 · Topics: 662
Posted by cowpuncher
Posted by cheekyfaerie
Despite all the research saying more guns = more gun violence. Yup. Just what we needed. Another "cold, dead hands" thread. 🙄
... and Chicago style gun control works? Obviously not.


But hey.... bans for the avg Joe worked out great with drugs and prohibition... right?
click to expand

Yeah Prohibition proves an outright ban will just give the black market more profit/power.
Profile picture of truecap
truecap
@truecap
13 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 8 · Posts: 20090 · Topics: 685
Posted by SirHorns
Posted by cowpuncher
Posted by cheekyfaerie
Despite all the research saying more guns = more gun violence. Yup. Just what we needed. Another "cold, dead hands" thread. 🙄
... and Chicago style gun control works? Obviously not.


But hey.... bans for the avg Joe worked out great with drugs and prohibition... right?
Yeah Prohibition proves an outright ban will just give the black market more profit/power.
click to expand

Exactly.
Profile picture of Quantum
Rabbit
@Quantum
9 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 2 · Posts: 3802 · Topics: 14
Posted by truecap
Posted by Quantum
Posted by truecap
Someone mentioned history. Let's look at the Revolutionary War. Local militia fought that war.
If it weren't for citizens with guns, we'd be hailing the Queen instead of bashing Obama.

No, I'm not forgetting France's help...but as a community we stood up against the strongest nation in the world at the time.

The Continetal Army fought that war, not militias.
The continental army was created out of militias wasn't it?
click to expand

Army =/= militia in today's world.

We live in an age of professional soldiers.

Going to the shooting range and/or hunting deer does not prepare a citizen to engage in combat with trained soldiers.

These aren't meth heads looking for easy money or something to steal. These are trained killers. No modern day American "militia" has been anything but target practice when it came to conflicts with even nonmilitary units from the FBI or ATF. The idea that they can stand up to coordinated modern military combat is silly.

Patriotic chest thumping and zeitgeist won't stop a drone from planting a guided missile right in the middle of your militia camp at 2 am.
Profile picture of truecap
truecap
@truecap
13 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 8 · Posts: 20090 · Topics: 685
Posted by Quantum
Posted by truecap
Posted by Quantum
Posted by truecap
Someone mentioned history. Let's look at the Revolutionary War. Local militia fought that war.
If it weren't for citizens with guns, we'd be hailing the Queen instead of bashing Obama.

No, I'm not forgetting France's help...but as a community we stood up against the strongest nation in the world at the time.

The Continetal Army fought that war, not militias.
The continental army was created out of militias wasn't it?
Army =/= militia in today's world.

We live in an age of professional soldiers.

Going to the shooting range and/or hunting deer does not prepare a citizen to engage in combat with trained soldiers.

These aren't meth heads looking for easy money or something to steal. These are trained killers. No modern day American "militia" has been anything but target practice when it came to conflicts with even nonmilitary units from the FBI or ATF. The idea that they can stand up to coordinated modern military combat is silly.

Patriotic chest thumping and zeitgeist won't stop a drone from planting a guided missile right in the middle of your militia camp at 2 am.
click to expand

I didn't say it was equal.
However, those guys are more prepared than someone who's never even had any kind of training.
Profile picture of CapTenn
CapTenn
@CapTenn
11 Years1,000+ PostsCapricorn

Comments: 15 · Posts: 2575 · Topics: 9
Posted by Quantum
Posted by truecap
Posted by Quantum
Posted by truecap
Someone mentioned history. Let's look at the Revolutionary War. Local militia fought that war.
If it weren't for citizens with guns, we'd be hailing the Queen instead of bashing Obama.

No, I'm not forgetting France's help...but as a community we stood up against the strongest nation in the world at the time.

The Continetal Army fought that war, not militias.
The continental army was created out of militias wasn't it?
Army =/= militia in today's world.

We live in an age of professional soldiers.

Going to the shooting range and/or hunting deer does not prepare a citizen to engage in combat with trained soldiers.

These aren't meth heads looking for easy money or something to steal. These are trained killers. No modern day American "militia" has been anything but target practice when it came to conflicts with even nonmilitary units from the FBI or ATF. The idea that they can stand up to coordinated modern military combat is silly.

Patriotic chest thumping and zeitgeist won't stop a drone from planting a guided missile right in the middle of your militia camp at 2 am.
click to expand

A militia camp, yeah.

In the "invasion" scenario, there would hopefully be a unification of 300 million strong.

That's a lot of militias.

Guerilla warfare worked for the Vietnamese.

Who knows?
Profile picture of Quantum
Rabbit
@Quantum
9 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 2 · Posts: 3802 · Topics: 14
Posted by CapTenn
Posted by Quantum
Posted by truecap
Posted by Quantum
Posted by truecap
Someone mentioned history. Let's look at the Revolutionary War. Local militia fought that war.
If it weren't for citizens with guns, we'd be hailing the Queen instead of bashing Obama.

No, I'm not forgetting France's help...but as a community we stood up against the strongest nation in the world at the time.

The Continetal Army fought that war, not militias.
The continental army was created out of militias wasn't it?
Army =/= militia in today's world.

We live in an age of professional soldiers.

Going to the shooting range and/or hunting deer does not prepare a citizen to engage in combat with trained soldiers.

These aren't meth heads looking for easy money or something to steal. These are trained killers. No modern day American "militia" has been anything but target practice when it came to conflicts with even nonmilitary units from the FBI or ATF. The idea that they can stand up to coordinated modern military combat is silly.

Patriotic chest thumping and zeitgeist won't stop a drone from planting a guided missile right in the middle of your militia camp at 2 am.
A militia camp, yeah.

In the "invasion" scenario, there would hopefully be a unification of 300 million strong.

That's a lot of militias.

Guerilla warfare worked for the Vietnamese.

Who knows?
click to expand

Maybe. But this country doesn't have an ideology to stand behind like the VC or the Japanese or even Muslim terrorists. We're all fighting for our own little piece of the shit pie we've been thrown.

I think most of the US would crumple like one of Don Johnson's cheap suits.

Especially if the invaders offered free college.
Profile picture of truecap
truecap
@truecap
13 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 8 · Posts: 20090 · Topics: 685
Well, maybe if our government wasn't so insistent on dividing us Americans up, then we'd have more a chance at unity. I'm talking sexuality divisions, race divisions, gender divisions, making gun owners out to be terrorists, etc - our government seems to encourage that. For what reason....hmmmm....

I do honestly believe though that if America were attacked, then the people would band together as Americans regardless of race, culture, gender, sexuality preference etc.

I do remember when our country united after 9-1-1.
Profile picture of truecap
truecap
@truecap
13 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 8 · Posts: 20090 · Topics: 685
Posted by Quantum
Posted by CapTenn
Posted by Quantum
Posted by truecap
Posted by Quantum
Posted by truecap
Someone mentioned history. Let's look at the Revolutionary War. Local militia fought that war.
If it weren't for citizens with guns, we'd be hailing the Queen instead of bashing Obama.

No, I'm not forgetting France's help...but as a community we stood up against the strongest nation in the world at the time.

The Continetal Army fought that war, not militias.
The continental army was created out of militias wasn't it?
Army =/= militia in today's world.

We live in an age of professional soldiers.

Going to the shooting range and/or hunting deer does not prepare a citizen to engage in combat with trained soldiers.

These aren't meth heads looking for easy money or something to steal. These are trained killers. No modern day American "militia" has been anything but target practice when it came to conflicts with even nonmilitary units from the FBI or ATF. The idea that they can stand up to coordinated modern military combat is silly.

Patriotic chest thumping and zeitgeist won't stop a drone from planting a guided missile right in the middle of your militia camp at 2 am.
A militia camp, yeah.

In the "invasion" scenario, there would hopefully be a unification of 300 million strong.

That's a lot of militias.

Guerilla warfare worked for the Vietnamese.

Who knows?
Maybe. But this country doesn't have an ideology to stand behind like the VC or the Japanese or even Muslim terrorists. We're all fighting for our own little piece of the shit pie we've been thrown.

I think most of the US would crumple like one of Don Johnson's cheap suits.

Especially if the invaders offered free college.
click to expand

If America were attacked, we'd find our ideology - Don't Mess with Us.
Profile picture of Quantum
Rabbit
@Quantum
9 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 2 · Posts: 3802 · Topics: 14
@truecap

That's more of an attitude than an ideology.

All the enemies I've listed believed in something greater than themselves. Something they were willing to die for.
For the Japanese it was their emperor. For the VC it was straight up Communism. For ISIS it's Allah.

That doesn't exist in the US anymore. The only contemporary example might have been the Communist USSR, but Communism has failed over and over again so it's more of a joke than a threat.

It's going to take something we've never experienced before to bring people together like that.
Profile picture of Quantum
Rabbit
@Quantum
9 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 2 · Posts: 3802 · Topics: 14
Obama would apologize.

Trump would yell something about building a wall around the earth.

Sanders would blame Wall Street and corporate subsidies.

Clinton would offer a speaking engagement for 250k...275k if they want to see her penis.

Jill Stein would welcome them like the good left wing looney she is.

Gary Johnson would sell them pot.


THAT is how our president/POTUS candidates would respond.
Profile picture of Quantum
Rabbit
@Quantum
9 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 2 · Posts: 3802 · Topics: 14
Posted by Soul
We've yet to see an alien invasion, or top secret government experiments that escaped.

Or to be more spacific, government experiments the Satanists will create and release on humanity and call them aliens to abolish God and begin the new world order.
Aliens will likely never happen. For a species to advance to the point they can travel instellar distances (space and time) they would have advanced far beyond the need to wage war. Even for resources.

I just read an article about two astrophysicists developing an equation to solve the Fermi Paradox, and in average it should take 1500 years to make contact with another form of intelligent life. We've been broadcasting for 80 years. We still have time.
Profile picture of CancerOnTheCusp
GFY
@CancerOnTheCusp
12 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 433 · Posts: 8306 · Topics: 311
Posted by Quantum
Posted by Soul
We've yet to see an alien invasion, or top secret government experiments that escaped.

Or to be more spacific, government experiments the Satanists will create and release on humanity and call them aliens to abolish God and begin the new world order.
Aliens will likely never happen. For a species to advance to the point they can travel instellar distances (space and time) they would have advanced far beyond the need to wage war. Even for resources.

I just read an article about two astrophysicists developing an equation to solve the Fermi Paradox, and in average it should take 1500 years to make contact with another form of intelligent life. We've been broadcasting for 80 years. We still have time.
click to expand

Or, they may have already received broadcasts, discussed coming here, and said "no way are we going there", even if they did have the capability to wipe us out.
Profile picture of Quantum
Rabbit
@Quantum
9 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 2 · Posts: 3802 · Topics: 14
Posted by CancerOnTheCusp
Posted by Quantum
Posted by Soul
We've yet to see an alien invasion, or top secret government experiments that escaped.

Or to be more spacific, government experiments the Satanists will create and release on humanity and call them aliens to abolish God and begin the new world order.
Aliens will likely never happen. For a species to advance to the point they can travel instellar distances (space and time) they would have advanced far beyond the need to wage war. Even for resources.

I just read an article about two astrophysicists developing an equation to solve the Fermi Paradox, and in average it should take 1500 years to make contact with another form of intelligent life. We've been broadcasting for 80 years. We still have time.
Or, they may have already received broadcasts, discussed coming here, and said "no way are we going there", even if they did have the capability to wipe us out.
click to expand

I think that was in the article as well. There's no guarantee they give a shit about us enough to respond back.
Profile picture of Soul
Soul
@Soul
10 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 2278 · Posts: 17009 · Topics: 110
Posted by Quantum
Posted by Soul
We've yet to see an alien invasion, or top secret government experiments that escaped.

Or to be more spacific, government experiments the Satanists will create and release on humanity and call them aliens to abolish God and begin the new world order.
Aliens will likely never happen. For a species to advance to the point they can travel instellar distances (space and time) they would have advanced far beyond the need to wage war. Even for resources.

I just read an article about two astrophysicists developing an equation to solve the Fermi Paradox, and in average it should take 1500 years to make contact with another form of intelligent life. We've been broadcasting for 80 years. We still have time.
click to expand

Or if it's even possible for any lifeform to develop to a point they can keep progressing even after their sun burns out. Then again, we don't know if something non carbon based can be considered living, so maybe things can live even with no sun.

Also having the ability to travel the speed of light would do some weird twisted things to time, space, and the atoms in our body. Idk if something like that is even possible with what the universe and laws of physics give us. Then again, if there's one thing humans are good at it's to defy and exploit all the laws and rules.
Profile picture of Montgomery
Montgomery
@Montgomery
12 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 552 · Posts: 18848 · Topics: 149
Posted by Quantum
Posted by Soul
We've yet to see an alien invasion, or top secret government experiments that escaped.

Or to be more spacific, government experiments the Satanists will create and release on humanity and call them aliens to abolish God and begin the new world order.
Aliens will likely never happen. For a species to advance to the point they can travel instellar distances (space and time) they would have advanced far beyond the need to wage war. Even for resources.

I just read an article about two astrophysicists developing an equation to solve the Fermi Paradox, and in average it should take 1500 years to make contact with another form of intelligent life. We've been broadcasting for 80 years. We still have time.
click to expand

He said government experiments

released on humanity

that are merely *called* aliens--


theres no such thing as aliens.

Chimeras... maybe.










Profile picture of Quantum
Rabbit
@Quantum
9 Years1,000+ Posts

Comments: 2 · Posts: 3802 · Topics: 14
Posted by geegee
Posted by Quantum
@truecap

That's more of an attitude than an ideology.

All the enemies I've listed believed in something greater than themselves. Something they were willing to die for.
For the Japanese it was their emperor. For the VC it was straight up Communism. For ISIS it's Allah.

That doesn't exist in the US anymore. The only contemporary example might have been the Communist USSR, but Communism has failed over and over again so it's more of a joke than a threat.

It's going to take something we've never experienced before to bring people together like that.

Aliens from outer space.
click to expand

You bigot.

The proper terminology is "Undocumented Space Travellers”.
Profile picture of Soul
Soul
@Soul
10 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 2278 · Posts: 17009 · Topics: 110
Posted by Montgomery
Posted by Quantum
Posted by Soul
We've yet to see an alien invasion, or top secret government experiments that escaped.

Or to be more spacific, government experiments the Satanists will create and release on humanity and call them aliens to abolish God and begin the new world order.
Aliens will likely never happen. For a species to advance to the point they can travel instellar distances (space and time) they would have advanced far beyond the need to wage war. Even for resources.

I just read an article about two astrophysicists developing an equation to solve the Fermi Paradox, and in average it should take 1500 years to make contact with another form of intelligent life. We've been broadcasting for 80 years. We still have time.
He said government experiments

released on humanity

that are merely *called* aliens--


theres no such thing as aliens.

Chimeras... maybe.










click to expand

Yes. Hybrids made from combining human and animal DNA. I imagine it would look like a person, but have a savage mentality. Likely taking on the aspects of it's animal parts, but also extremely smart and fully aware of self like a human.
Profile picture of Montgomery
Montgomery
@Montgomery
12 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 552 · Posts: 18848 · Topics: 149
Posted by truecap
Posted by Quantum
Posted by CapTenn
Posted by Quantum
Posted by truecap
Posted by Quantum
Posted by truecap
Someone mentioned history. Let's look at the Revolutionary War. Local militia fought that war.
If it weren't for citizens with guns, we'd be hailing the Queen instead of bashing Obama.

No, I'm not forgetting France's help...but as a community we stood up against the strongest nation in the world at the time.

The Continetal Army fought that war, not militias.
The continental army was created out of militias wasn't it?
Army =/= militia in today's world.

We live in an age of professional soldiers.

Going to the shooting range and/or hunting deer does not prepare a citizen to engage in combat with trained soldiers.

These aren't meth heads looking for easy money or something to steal. These are trained killers. No modern day American "militia" has been anything but target practice when it came to conflicts with even nonmilitary units from the FBI or ATF. The idea that they can stand up to coordinated modern military combat is silly.

Patriotic chest thumping and zeitgeist won't stop a drone from planting a guided missile right in the middle of your militia camp at 2 am.
A militia camp, yeah.

In the "invasion" scenario, there would hopefully be a unification of 300 million strong.

That's a lot of militias.

Guerilla warfare worked for the Vietnamese.

Who knows?
Maybe. But this country doesn't have an ideology to stand behind like the VC or the Japanese or even Muslim terrorists. We're all fighting for our own little piece of the shit pie we've been thrown.

I think most of the US would crumple like one of Don Johnson's cheap suits.

Especially if the invaders offered free college.
If America were attacked, we'd find our ideology - Don't Mess with Us.
click to expand

I agree.

We'll always have a segment of pinko commie

bastards, but they are a minority.



😄
Profile picture of Montgomery
Montgomery
@Montgomery
12 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 552 · Posts: 18848 · Topics: 149
Posted by Soul
Posted by Montgomery
Posted by Quantum
Posted by Soul
We've yet to see an alien invasion, or top secret government experiments that escaped.

Or to be more spacific, government experiments the Satanists will create and release on humanity and call them aliens to abolish God and begin the new world order.
Aliens will likely never happen. For a species to advance to the point they can travel instellar distances (space and time) they would have advanced far beyond the need to wage war. Even for resources.

I just read an article about two astrophysicists developing an equation to solve the Fermi Paradox, and in average it should take 1500 years to make contact with another form of intelligent life. We've been broadcasting for 80 years. We still have time.
He said government experiments

released on humanity

that are merely *called* aliens--


theres no such thing as aliens.

Chimeras... maybe.









Yes. Hybrids made from combining human and animal DNA. I imagine it would look like a person, but have a savage mentality. Likely taking on the aspects of it's animal parts, but also extremely smart and fully aware of self like a human.
click to expand

Just no conscience-- no soul.

Standard.

Profile picture of Soul
Soul
@Soul
10 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 2278 · Posts: 17009 · Topics: 110
Posted by Montgomery
Posted by Soul
Posted by Montgomery
Posted by Quantum
Posted by Soul
We've yet to see an alien invasion, or top secret government experiments that escaped.

Or to be more spacific, government experiments the Satanists will create and release on humanity and call them aliens to abolish God and begin the new world order.
Aliens will likely never happen. For a species to advance to the point they can travel instellar distances (space and time) they would have advanced far beyond the need to wage war. Even for resources.

I just read an article about two astrophysicists developing an equation to solve the Fermi Paradox, and in average it should take 1500 years to make contact with another form of intelligent life. We've been broadcasting for 80 years. We still have time.
He said government experiments

released on humanity

that are merely *called* aliens--


theres no such thing as aliens.

Chimeras... maybe.









Yes. Hybrids made from combining human and animal DNA. I imagine it would look like a person, but have a savage mentality. Likely taking on the aspects of it's animal parts, but also extremely smart and fully aware of self like a human.
Just no conscience-- no soul.

Standard.

click to expand

That depends on how a soul is made. Does a soul chose It's location, or is a soul forced into Its location? Does a soul have a choice, has a soul long existed, or is the soul created with the fetus? Or is a soul the reaccuring energy that once created upon death can't escape the universe? Souls are complex it seems. More complex then a living lifeform. Which is even more off topic then I've already taken it lol.