@_Dazed
7 Years10,000+ Posts
Guys.. If a woman says
Understanding a Woman's Communication About Relationship Boundaries
When a woman says she wants you to be hers but is open to you sleeping with others, she may be indicating a desire for emotional commitment but openness to non-monogamy. Clarify her intentions and boundaries to ensure mutual understanding and respect in the relationship.
Hahahahahahha, dumb bitch.
What's with you lately?
I find both this thread and the other one hyper fascinating to see the responses.
There is almost a weird aversion to anything that is socially "not the normal". Which makes me realize why so many swingers, polygamous couples, couples in open relationships, or couples where one partner doesn't even like sex, are so secretive, or often do not talk about it publicly for fear of being judged and ridiculed.
Though it may not be for many, maybe you guys need to look internally at why you have such a negative response.
She wants you to be hers, but you're welcome to sleep with other men/women (as long as you are safe)...
What is your response?
None, I just wake up. 🤣
I find both this thread and the other one hyper fascinating to see the responses.
There is almost a weird aversion to anything that is socially "not the normal". Which makes me realize why so many swingers, polygamous couples, couples in open relationships, or couples where one partner doesn't even like sex, are so secretive, or often do not talk about it publicly for fear of being judged and ridiculed.
Though it may not be for many, maybe you guys need to look internally at why you have such a negative response.
Times are changing. In the 1970s even oral sex was considered a taboo, still is amongst certain religious types who believe the mouth is for food only. But spunk contains protein and vitamin e.
click to expand
The thing is, I just don't understand why these two threads provoke such a negative response. Almost as if the very question personally attacks the person answering. It's weird to watch in observation for me.
The question is written so that there is no deceit in what the "partner" is telling "their significant other". Just putting down their guidelines on what they require in terms of sex within the "relationship". Nothing more, or nothing less. But it's either a weird power move, or its an immediate "he/she is cheating/lying".
I just find it odd.
I find both this thread and the other one hyper fascinating to see the responses.
There is almost a weird aversion to anything that is socially "not the normal". Which makes me realize why so many swingers, polygamous couples, couples in open relationships, or couples where one partner doesn't even like sex, are so secretive, or often do not talk about it publicly for fear of being judged and ridiculed.
Though it may not be for many, maybe you guys need to look internally at why you have such a negative response.
Times are changing. In the 1970s even oral sex was considered a taboo, still is amongst certain religious types who believe the mouth is for food only. But spunk contains protein and vitamin e.
click to expand
Oral sex was not taboo in the 70's. The 70's— C"mon.
I find both this thread and the other one hyper fascinating to see the responses.
There is almost a weird aversion to anything that is socially "not the normal". Which makes me realize why so many swingers, polygamous couples, couples in open relationships, or couples where one partner doesn't even like sex, are so secretive, or often do not talk about it publicly for fear of being judged and ridiculed.
Though it may not be for many, maybe you guys need to look internally at why you have such a negative response.
Times are changing. In the 1970s even oral sex was considered a taboo, still is amongst certain religious types who believe the mouth is for food only. But spunk contains protein and vitamin e.
The thing is, I just don't understand why these two threads provoke such a negative response. Almost as if the very question personally attacks the person answering. It's weird to watch in observation for me.
The question is written so that there is no deceit in what the "partner" is telling "their significant other". Just putting down their guidelines on what they require in terms of sex within the "relationship". Nothing more, or nothing less. But it's either a weird power move, or its an immediate "he/she is cheating/lying".
I just find it odd.
Both threads are seemingly trolling, but that aside I answered as I find it interesting.
Personally for me I could never be in an open relationship. With polyamory I try to keep an open mind but it really isn't for me. I don't like sharing.
click to expand
Not trolling.
I posted the first one after having a random drunk thought last night.
I find both this thread and the other one hyper fascinating to see the responses.
There is almost a weird aversion to anything that is socially "not the normal". Which makes me realize why so many swingers, polygamous couples, couples in open relationships, or couples where one partner doesn't even like sex, are so secretive, or often do not talk about it publicly for fear of being judged and ridiculed.
Though it may not be for many, maybe you guys need to look internally at why you have such a negative response.
Times are changing. In the 1970s even oral sex was considered a taboo, still is amongst certain religious types who believe the mouth is for food only. But spunk contains protein and vitamin e.
Oral sex was not taboo in the 70's. The 70's— C"mon.
click to expand
Foreal.
People have been sucking, fucking, and eating ass since ancient times.
I find both this thread and the other one hyper fascinating to see the responses.
There is almost a weird aversion to anything that is socially "not the normal". Which makes me realize why so many swingers, polygamous couples, couples in open relationships, or couples where one partner doesn't even like sex, are so secretive, or often do not talk about it publicly for fear of being judged and ridiculed.
Though it may not be for many, maybe you guys need to look internally at why you have such a negative response.
Times are changing. In the 1970s even oral sex was considered a taboo, still is amongst certain religious types who believe the mouth is for food only. But spunk contains protein and vitamin e.
The thing is, I just don't understand why these two threads provoke such a negative response. Almost as if the very question personally attacks the person answering. It's weird to watch in observation for me.
The question is written so that there is no deceit in what the "partner" is telling "their significant other". Just putting down their guidelines on what they require in terms of sex within the "relationship". Nothing more, or nothing less. But it's either a weird power move, or its an immediate "he/she is cheating/lying".
I just find it odd.
Both threads are seemingly trolling, but that aside I answered as I find it interesting.
Personally for me I could never be in an open relationship. With polyamory I try to keep an open mind but it really isn't for me. I don't like sharing.
click to expand
Me either. I have a possessive nature, and I personally can't partake in an open/poly relationship. But I see no issues for those that do.
However, if for some reason, medically, I could not provide my fiance with any sexual gratification, I would be more than willing to allow him in doing so with similar rules to this very thread. I would also probably add stipulations about not dating them as well. But the thought of that, given that context, doesn't really offend me. Because I still remain the most important, while allowing him to fulfill whatever physical demands he would need if I couldn't do it.
Does that make me a "dumb bitch"?
I find both this thread and the other one hyper fascinating to see the responses.
There is almost a weird aversion to anything that is socially "not the normal". Which makes me realize why so many swingers, polygamous couples, couples in open relationships, or couples where one partner doesn't even like sex, are so secretive, or often do not talk about it publicly for fear of being judged and ridiculed.
Though it may not be for many, maybe you guys need to look internally at why you have such a negative response.
Times are changing. In the 1970s even oral sex was considered a taboo, still is amongst certain religious types who believe the mouth is for food only. But spunk contains protein and vitamin e.
The thing is, I just don't understand why these two threads provoke such a negative response. Almost as if the very question personally attacks the person answering. It's weird to watch in observation for me.
The question is written so that there is no deceit in what the "partner" is telling "their significant other". Just putting down their guidelines on what they require in terms of sex within the "relationship". Nothing more, or nothing less. But it's either a weird power move, or its an immediate "he/she is cheating/lying".
I just find it odd.
Both threads are seemingly trolling, but that aside I answered as I find it interesting.
Personally for me I could never be in an open relationship. With polyamory I try to keep an open mind but it really isn't for me. I don't like sharing.
Me either. I have a possessive nature, and I personally can't partake in an open/poly relationship. But I see no issues for those that do.
However, if for some reason, medically, I could not provide my fiance with any sexual gratification, I would be more than willing to allow him in doing so with similar rules to this very thread. I would also probably add stipulations about not dating them as well. But the thought of that, given that context, doesn't really offend me. Because I still remain the most important, while allowing him to fulfill whatever physical demands he would need if I couldn't do it.
Does that make me a "dumb bitch"?
I think we are in agreement and that makes you smart. If there was something I couldn't provide a partner I think I would be okay with her seeing other people such as lesbian experiences.
Poly relationships I am not jealous, but certainly disappointed in myself that I can't detach enough to have one. I think sharing a house and being in a relationship with twi people would be great and educational.
click to expand
Yea, as much as I feel I am open-minded in terms of not judging those that have differing requirements in a partner(s) from myself. I just would never be comfortable sharing intimacy and emotions with another woman with my fiance. My possessiveness would be an issue because I would want to be the focus of it all.
I find both this thread and the other one hyper fascinating to see the responses.
There is almost a weird aversion to anything that is socially "not the normal". Which makes me realize why so many swingers, polygamous couples, couples in open relationships, or couples where one partner doesn't even like sex, are so secretive, or often do not talk about it publicly for fear of being judged and ridiculed.
Though it may not be for many, maybe you guys need to look internally at why you have such a negative response.
Times are changing. In the 1970s even oral sex was considered a taboo, still is amongst certain religious types who believe the mouth is for food only. But spunk contains protein and vitamin e.
The thing is, I just don't understand why these two threads provoke such a negative response. Almost as if the very question personally attacks the person answering. It's weird to watch in observation for me.
The question is written so that there is no deceit in what the "partner" is telling "their significant other". Just putting down their guidelines on what they require in terms of sex within the "relationship". Nothing more, or nothing less. But it's either a weird power move, or its an immediate "he/she is cheating/lying".
I just find it odd.
Both threads are seemingly trolling, but that aside I answered as I find it interesting.
Personally for me I could never be in an open relationship. With polyamory I try to keep an open mind but it really isn't for me. I don't like sharing.
Not trolling.
I posted the first one after having a random drunk thought last night.
click to expand
@Phantom_Dangus wrong
Marry me? Lol 😋
Guys, @_Dazed, if a woman asked you to shave her arm pits would you do it?
Sure.
I find both this thread and the other one hyper fascinating to see the responses.
There is almost a weird aversion to anything that is socially "not the normal". Which makes me realize why so many swingers, polygamous couples, couples in open relationships, or couples where one partner doesn't even like sex, are so secretive, or often do not talk about it publicly for fear of being judged and ridiculed.
Though it may not be for many, maybe you guys need to look internally at why you have such a negative response.
Times are changing. In the 1970s even oral sex was considered a taboo, still is amongst certain religious types who believe the mouth is for food only. But spunk contains protein and vitamin e.
The thing is, I just don't understand why these two threads provoke such a negative response. Almost as if the very question personally attacks the person answering. It's weird to watch in observation for me.
The question is written so that there is no deceit in what the "partner" is telling "their significant other". Just putting down their guidelines on what they require in terms of sex within the "relationship". Nothing more, or nothing less. But it's either a weird power move, or its an immediate "he/she is cheating/lying".
I just find it odd.
Both threads are seemingly trolling, but that aside I answered as I find it interesting.
Personally for me I could never be in an open relationship. With polyamory I try to keep an open mind but it really isn't for me. I don't like sharing.
Not trolling.
I posted the first one after having a random drunk thought last night.
@Phantom_Dangus wrong
What does this prove? I still think you gave no context because you hoped for drama.
click to expand
And I'm saying that you are wrong.
Guys, @_Dazed, if a woman asked you to shave her arm pits would you do it?
Sure.
With a razor not scissors. Okay? Could you do it——
click to expand
Sure.
Hahahahahahha, dumb bitch.
What's with you lately?
I just found out of this after 11 hours later of why not answering ur question. Sorry!
And somehow I was envisioned it out of no where while answering this..
click to expand
Uhhhhhh....
Hahahahahahha, dumb bitch.
What's with you lately?
I just found out of this after 11 hours later of why not answering ur question. Sorry!
And somehow I was envisioned it out of no where while answering this..
Uhhhhhh....
click to expand
She was laughing at nikki 's last line in her post where she illustrates a scenario and how judgemental people would respond.
Hahahahahahha, dumb bitch.
What's with you lately?
I just found out of this after 11 hours later of why not answering ur question. Sorry!
And somehow I was envisioned it out of no where while answering this..
Uhhhhhh....
She was laughing at nikki 's last line in her post where she illustrates a scenario and how judgemental people would respond.
click to expand
No. She's had a few choice words lately. Some, even as a friend, that I take as disrespect.
Did this help you understand your situation?
dxpnet has hosted real conversations like this since 2000. If you value independent communities, you can support the site below.
Every contribution helps keep dxpnet independent and ad-light.
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
She wants you to be hers, but you're welcome to sleep with other men/women (as long as you are safe)...
What is your response?