
Sn1p3r187
@Sn1p3r187
12 Years5,000+ PostsCapricorn
Comments: 546 · Posts: 6870 · Topics: 474




Posted by partiallyimpartial
okay, but remember, sirhorns... you seem to forget the context we were discussing. We were talking about the limitations of women in the workplace historically.
Women weren't even allowed in combat positions until recently, so I'm not sure why you're bringing that up.
I also specified that I'm not talking about manual labor jobs, or more broadly- jobs where physical ability makes an impact. I was talking about those soft cushy office jobs that, as you yourself pointed out, women were only recently allowed in. And they are often passed up in favor of equally or less qualified males. And when promotions come around, they are often overlooked in favor of equally or less qualified males.
Women are (and were moreso in the past) discriminated against in jobs where physical fitness is not a factor.
I brought that up to point out that as a result, women were forced into a position where UP UNTIL RECENTLY they were dependent on men. Men who had the right to beat and rape them. Men who believed that slapping a woman who steps out of line is acceptable, because the LAW wouldn't punish a disobedient wife for them. Men who thought that a woman's role was in the kitchen, or cleaning and doing laundry. that a woman's role was obedience to her husband.
Y'know, kind of the same role a slave has?
Men who are now confused about why some women would choose NOT to go along with that narrative. These aren't men who are happy and successful with women, these are men who wonder what needs to be done to restore the proper balance between the genders, and use feminism as justification for their sexual failings.
the "great evil" that's destroying their families.
but I'm emotional for pointing that out, right?




Posted by DwellingOnMovePosted by KVZZMIR11Posted by LilyBlossom
*unavailable mother
Statistics say otherwise...
https://thefatherlessgeneration.wordpress.com/statistics/<BR> ...
I'd love to see the statistics on unavailable mothers though.
...
On the "form"al level children saw the father often enough. On the "content" level fathers were rare to catch in the old days too. (exception: the real good fathers like in the "our small farm" or "the Waltons")
Today due to many divorces ... children see their fathers less than before. In form and content he is rare to catch.
...click to expand







Posted by GENERALIZOD
WHAT?

Posted by DwellingOnMovePosted by GENERALIZOD
WHAT?
idk. i was asking the americans. or the well read people. there must have been some labels for those white betrayers..click to expand

Posted by SirHornsPosted by DwellingOnMovePosted by GENERALIZOD
WHAT?
idk. i was asking the americans. or the well read people. there must have been some labels for those white betrayers..
N*gger lovers. That's what they were called.
As for Impartial, ... projecting so much ...click to expand

Posted by BlackNovaPosted by DwellingOnMove
whatever Nova, either we are in modern times and all parts learn to cooperate. or idk what.
yeah, human social structure is more complex than it needs to be and is mostly driven by fear and ego.
or maybe it is what it is for its own purpose?
for humanity to truely move forward we need to crack the power cells of the elite wide open and rebuild. ...click to expand

Posted by GENERALIZOD
THE INTEGRITY LEVELS OF THIS THREAD JUST WENT UP 2 POINTS!

Posted by tiziani
So the devil makes work for idle hands?

Posted by DwellingOnMovePosted by SirHorns
N*gger lovers. That's what they were called.
As for Impartial, ... projecting so much ...
Sir, mutable ones are bisexuell if not sexually at least mentally. we can understand all sides of the coin. and all sorts of people.
I'm wondering if a Cap can ever change his mind?click to expand

Posted by hydorah
I really thought partialyimpartial was a girl. Once I almost posted in a thread after her and I didn't because I thought "wow, this will be offensive to partiallyimpartial."
I'm serious

Posted by CapTennPosted by hydorah
I really thought partialyimpartial was a girl. Once I almost posted in a thread after her and I didn't because I thought "wow, this will be offensive to partiallyimpartial."
I'm serious
If he's not a girl, he certainly missed his calling.click to expand




Posted by partiallyimpartialPosted by CapTennPosted by hydorah
I really thought partialyimpartial was a girl. Once I almost posted in a thread after her and I didn't because I thought "wow, this will be offensive to partiallyimpartial."
I'm serious
If he's not a girl, he certainly missed his calling.
maybe. I mean, I guess if its a male thing to blame your weakness on other people?click to expand




Posted by BlackNovaPosted by size zero superheroPosted by partiallyimpartial
Masculinity is being viewed negatively? Then how come people are in here trying to goad me by essentially calling me feminine?
...
... effeminate, i'm saying she IS ACTUALLY a WOMAN!click to expand

Posted by auroraPosted by Rabbit
**shrugs**
I don't think any of this has to do with feminism. I think there's an entire generation whose helicopter parents did everything for them and are too lazy to put forth any real effort into anything including relationships.
FFS college freshman in the US average a 7th grade reading level.
Way to go GenY/Parents of GenY.
was thinking the very same thing. who said life is easy?click to expand


Posted by RabbitPosted by Damnata
The male ego is truly a fragile thing.
*picks it up and puts it next to antique chinese vases*
*Knocks all that shit off the shelf to make room for Star Wars crap*click to expand




Posted by partiallyimpartialPosted by SirHorns
Its the fact while technology made it possible to survive on your own, human hormones give no fucks. Biology still plays a part in mate selection for both genders. Now biology can be overcome with an extreme enough environment or trauma. Examples being not breeding or killing yourself.
They see the environment as hostile and the rewards of being in a relationship not worth the costs and risks.
All it really is.
is this a response to me? i thought that you had enough.
i don't know what you're talking about though. i never suggested biology doesn't play a part in mate selection. biology encompasses mate selection. what does that have to do with anything?
you think that social structures and gender roles were constructed entirely by biology? You are a na??ve fool. Yes, in the sense that the more aggressive creatures naturally took control. That doesn't make it right, or relevant. Because human social structures are far more complex than just "biology" anyway. Explain matriarchal societies.
Cultures are human constructs. The patriarchy was established by the religious hierarchy. It was used to manipulate both men and women into thinking their social roles were God's will. Y'all ate it up and still do.
The point of the article is that females having rights is why men aren't doing well in college. You can't explain that other than to say that its because the men view drugs/video games/etc. as more important than relationships. Because they don't care to put in the energy it takes to deal with women. who gives a shit? They don't have to HAVE relationships. It's not the end of the world if some dudes don't procreate because its not easy enough to be worth it to them. It's either worth it or it isn't.
still not victimsclick to expand

Posted by partiallyimpartialPosted by SirHorns
Its the fact while technology made it possible to survive on your own, human hormones give no fucks. Biology still plays a part in mate selection for both genders. Now biology can be overcome with an extreme enough environment or trauma. Examples being not breeding or killing yourself.
They see the environment as hostile and the rewards of being in a relationship not worth the costs and risks.
All it really is.
is this a response to me? i thought that you had enough.
i don't know what you're talking about though. i never suggested biology doesn't play a part in mate selection. biology encompasses mate selection. what does that have to do with anything?
you think that social structures and gender roles were constructed entirely by biology? You are a na??ve fool. Yes, in the sense that the more aggressive creatures naturally took control. That doesn't make it right, or relevant. Because human social structures are far more complex than just "biology" anyway. Explain matriarchal societies.
Cultures are human constructs. The patriarchy was established by the religious hierarchy. It was used to manipulate both men and women into thinking their social roles were God's will. Y'all ate it up and still do.
The point of the article is that females having rights is why men aren't doing well in college. You can't explain that other than to say that its because the men view drugs/video games/etc. as more important than relationships. Because they don't care to put in the energy it takes to deal with women. who gives a shit? They don't have to HAVE relationships. It's not the end of the world if some dudes don't procreate because its not easy enough to be worth it to them. It's either worth it or it isn't.
still not victimsclick to expand




Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
Hmm I should possibly adapt it. But I never relied on women or anyone else to give me a handout to begin with. But true I can say relationships may benefit more.