Mr_Pinchy
@Mr_Pinchy
8 Years5,000+ Posts
Comments: 1068 · Posts: 5048 · Topics: 2
Las vegas shooter was an aries millionaire (Page 4)
You are on page out of 5 | Reverse Order
Posted by Mr_PinchyThose who live by the sword shall die by the sword. If people want to spend what short time they have on earth being idiots then they've made their choice. Unless someone is such a great speaker they can change all those people there is nothing anyone can do. And those great speakers just end up dead anyway so what the point?Posted by LadyNeptuneIt is only a matter of time....
Who is Soros?? BLM are not domestic terrorists. Your tripping.
Their ideological leader is on the FBI's most wanted list holed up in Cuba after escaping from prison for killing LEO's
"As a Black network committed to transformation, we are particularly grateful to Fidel for holding Mama Assata Shakur, who continues to inspire us," states the letter.
“Black Lives Matter, as far as I am concerned, is a radical hate group,” Allen said. “And for that purpose alone, I think the leadership of this country needs to look a little bit harder at that particular group. The consequences of what we saw in Dallas is due to their efforts.”
Gregg Allen, black, chief cop in El Paso, one of the safest cities in 'murica so he probably knows what he is doing.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/11/greg-allen-black-texas-police-chief-calls-black-li/
It is what it is /shrugs .....from the first link i shared in my first post here id just add the statement used which went "liberalism is white supremacy".....that should tell you enough how far the lefts incessant pushing of affirmative action has gone and where it has gotten it. Now they are turning on you.
Theres more links like this but im on the phone so cant be arsed for them atm.
click to expand
It's like you said though it's only a matter of time. One crazy man can kill how many people alone, let alone someone trained to kill people. You see that group of people? One cheap missile and they're all dead. It's just a matter of time till the reapers can justify death in the eyes of the masses. Unfortunately for those people the reapers are trained professionals in murder. If you want to chant for death you will get what you wish. It will consume you along with everything else though.
Posted by enfant_terribleIf we are going to define terrorism we should define it by Nevada State law which terms it as "any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population".Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by enfant_terribleTerrorism is an act of violence against peaceful citizens. It does not need to be politically motivated to be considered terror.Posted by EmhendoI see.. what's his ideological or political agenda then?
He's a goddamn terrorist, but because he didn't have a bomb and is rich white man, he's disqualified from such a label.
Terrorism
noun-
"The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims." -Yours truly, Oxford Dictionary.
If any act of violence against civilians would qualify as terrorism then we'd call every mass-shooting terrorism.
click to expand
www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-202.html#NRS202Sec4415
So yes, HE'S A FUCKING TERRORIST.
Posted by LadyNeptuneYou can make any word conform to your opinion all you want. People already do it for the word racist. Pretty soon people will want red to mean blue, it just depends how well it conforms to their opinions that day.Posted by enfant_terribleIf we are going to define terrorism we should define it by Nevada State law which terms it as "any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population".Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by enfant_terribleTerrorism is an act of violence against peaceful citizens. It does not need to be politically motivated to be considered terror.Posted by EmhendoI see.. what's his ideological or political agenda then?
He's a goddamn terrorist, but because he didn't have a bomb and is rich white man, he's disqualified from such a label.
Terrorism
noun-
"The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims." -Yours truly, Oxford Dictionary.
If any act of violence against civilians would qualify as terrorism then we'd call every mass-shooting terrorism.
www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-202.html#NRS202Sec4415
So yes, HE'S A FUCKING TERRORIST.click to expand
Posted by SoulThere it is 👆 defined in black and white.Posted by LadyNeptuneYou can make any word conform to your opinion all you want. People already do it for the word racist. Pretty soon people will want red to mean blue, it just depends how well it conforms to their opinions that day.Posted by enfant_terribleIf we are going to define terrorism we should define it by Nevada State law which terms it as "any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population".Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by enfant_terribleTerrorism is an act of violence against peaceful citizens. It does not need to be politically motivated to be considered terror.Posted by EmhendoI see.. what's his ideological or political agenda then?
He's a goddamn terrorist, but because he didn't have a bomb and is rich white man, he's disqualified from such a label.
Terrorism
noun-
"The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims." -Yours truly, Oxford Dictionary.
If any act of violence against civilians would qualify as terrorism then we'd call every mass-shooting terrorism.
www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-202.html#NRS202Sec4415
So yes, HE'S A FUCKING TERRORIST.
click to expand
He is a TERRORIST.
This was an act of TERROR.
How else to you describe a person who guns down and planned to bomb peaceful citizens? Your the one with your head in the sand.
"Lone wolf" is the media's special name for white man terrorist.
Domestic terrorism is alive and well in this country. To believe otherwise is stupidity at its finest.
Domestic terrorism is alive and well in this country. To believe otherwise is stupidity at its finest.
Posted by LadyNeptuneFuck can you blame me? You've got like 10 different people with different definition's for this guy. To me he is just an evil fucked up person that said fuck it I'm going to kill a bunch of people today. Then did it. Nothing else. I could care less what everyone else wants to define it as. Guy went crazy, a ton of people died. That is literally it.Posted by SoulThere it is 👆 defined in black and white.Posted by LadyNeptuneYou can make any word conform to your opinion all you want. People already do it for the word racist. Pretty soon people will want red to mean blue, it just depends how well it conforms to their opinions that day.Posted by enfant_terribleIf we are going to define terrorism we should define it by Nevada State law which terms it as "any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population".Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by enfant_terribleTerrorism is an act of violence against peaceful citizens. It does not need to be politically motivated to be considered terror.Posted by EmhendoI see.. what's his ideological or political agenda then?
He's a goddamn terrorist, but because he didn't have a bomb and is rich white man, he's disqualified from such a label.
Terrorism
noun-
"The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims." -Yours truly, Oxford Dictionary.
If any act of violence against civilians would qualify as terrorism then we'd call every mass-shooting terrorism.
www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-202.html#NRS202Sec4415
So yes, HE'S A FUCKING TERRORIST.
He is a TERRORIST.
This was an act of TERROR.
How else to you describe a person who guns down and planned to bomb peaceful citizens? Your the one with your head in the sand.
click to expand
Posted by LadyNeptune
If we are going to define terrorism we should define it by Nevada State law which terms it as "any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population".
www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-202.html#NRS202Sec4415
So yes, HE'S A FUCKING TERRORIST.
Let me get this straight, so every time someone aims to harm the general public in Nevada, even if it's a crazed hobo who shoots into a soup line we are suppose to define it as "terrorism"?
Breivik is a terrorist. And white. Then we have the whole Northern Ireland conflict. A lot of white terrorism there.
The Joker shooting up the Batman premiere, however.... not terrorism.
BLM shooting up white folks during Xmas shopping, definitely terrorism. See the difference?
I am sorry you feel offended there are not that many legit white terrorists. It's just that your average white man out west probably has less reasons to inflict terror to gain political or ideological awareness bc we've run out of causes. We do the occassional snap, no political motives. It's just good ole fashioned cray.
Stop twisting definitions around for your white feminist cause, you terrorist of political correctness.
Posted by SoulYour right he's evil af.Posted by LadyNeptuneFuck can you blame me? You've got like 10 different people with different definition's for this guy. To me he is just an evil fucked up person that said fuck it I'm going to kill a bunch of people today. Then did it. Nothing else. I could care less what everyone else wants to define it as. Guy went crazy, a ton of people died. That is literally it.Posted by SoulThere it is 👆 defined in black and white.Posted by LadyNeptuneYou can make any word conform to your opinion all you want. People already do it for the word racist. Pretty soon people will want red to mean blue, it just depends how well it conforms to their opinions that day.Posted by enfant_terribleIf we are going to define terrorism we should define it by Nevada State law which terms it as "any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population".Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by enfant_terribleTerrorism is an act of violence against peaceful citizens. It does not need to be politically motivated to be considered terror.Posted by EmhendoI see.. what's his ideological or political agenda then?
He's a goddamn terrorist, but because he didn't have a bomb and is rich white man, he's disqualified from such a label.
Terrorism
noun-
"The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims." -Yours truly, Oxford Dictionary.
If any act of violence against civilians would qualify as terrorism then we'd call every mass-shooting terrorism.
www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-202.html#NRS202Sec4415
So yes, HE'S A FUCKING TERRORIST.
He is a TERRORIST.
This was an act of TERROR.
How else to you describe a person who guns down and planned to bomb peaceful citizens? Your the one with your head in the sand.
click to expand
But the reason we care is because the media has been pushing this agenda of brown skin = terrorism.
Worse mass shooting in US history and they brand him a 'lone wolf'. It's bullshit. And it needs to be called out.
An Illinois man drove cross-country to personally deliver 58 crosses to the Las Vegas sign - one for each of the victims in the Las Vegas strip mass shooting, including Metro Officer Charleston Hartfield.
https://www.facebook.com/CherneyAmharaTV/videos/1752257468404388/
https://www.facebook.com/CherneyAmharaTV/videos/1752257468404388/
Posted by justagirlwow that's so nice and kind of him.
An Illinois man drove cross-country to personally deliver 58 crosses to the Las Vegas sign - one for each of the victims in the Las Vegas strip mass shooting, including Metro Officer Charleston Hartfield.
https://www.facebook.com/CherneyAmharaTV/videos/1752257468404388/
Posted by lisabethur8It was very nice, it just.. shouldn't have had to be done. That's what I am struggling with.Posted by justagirlwow that's so nice and kind of him.
An Illinois man drove cross-country to personally deliver 58 crosses to the Las Vegas sign - one for each of the victims in the Las Vegas strip mass shooting, including Metro Officer Charleston Hartfield.
https://www.facebook.com/CherneyAmharaTV/videos/1752257468404388/
click to expand
The bump stock mod which allows semi-auto rifles (legal to own and obtain) to function as a poor man's auto (illegal to own if newer than 1986)was passed by ATF under Obama in 2010.
The irony.....
The irony.....
Posted by enfant_terribleThat just goes to show how little you know about domestic terrorism in the US.Posted by LadyNeptune
If we are going to define terrorism we should define it by Nevada State law which terms it as "any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population".
www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-202.html#NRS202Sec4415
So yes, HE'S A FUCKING TERRORIST.
Let me get this straight, so every time someone aims to harm the general public in Nevada, even if it's a crazed hobo who shoots into a soup line we are suppose to define it as "terrorism"?
Breivik is a terrorist. And white. Then we have the whole Northern Ireland conflict. A lot of white terrorism there.
The Joker shooting up the Batman premiere, however.... not terrorism.
BLM shooting up white folks during Xmas shopping, definitely terrorism. See the difference?
I am sorry you feel offended there are not that many legit white terrorists. It's just that your average white man out west probably has less reasons to inflict terror to gain political or ideological awareness bc we've run out of causes. We do the occassional snap, no political motives. It's just good ole fashioned cray.
Stop twisting definitions around for your white feminist cause, you terrorist of political correctness.
click to expand
Right wing (aka white people) attacks out number Islamist attacks 2 to 1 in the last 10 years alone. And considering how ISIS and other extremist Middle East groups claim EVERYTHING, even shit they didn't plan, that gap is most likely much larger.
This does not include left wing extremist domestic attacks. The reality is domestic terrorism is overwhelmingly perpetrated by white men. And yet the media has twisted it so that your perception is that a terrorist can only be a poc.
So stop fronting like you have knowledge on this subject. Your just making yourself look dumb.
This kind of mentality is so dangerous. Perpetuating the perception that white men are emotionally disturbed or mentally ill when they pick up a gun and should be pitied while a poc is a terrorist is vile.
An act of terror is an act of terror.
And calling it otherwise is a politically driven rhetoric that I find vile against humanity as a whole.
Here is the full list of names, sooo many from California 😢
http://lasvegas.cbslocal.com/2017/10/04/las-vegas-shooting-victims-complete-list-lost/
http://lasvegas.cbslocal.com/2017/10/04/las-vegas-shooting-victims-complete-list-lost/
Posted by justagirli love to see people's humanness and humanity. but yes i get you very much.Posted by lisabethur8It was very nice, it just.. shouldn't have had to be done. That's what I am struggling with.Posted by justagirlwow that's so nice and kind of him.
An Illinois man drove cross-country to personally deliver 58 crosses to the Las Vegas sign - one for each of the victims in the Las Vegas strip mass shooting, including Metro Officer Charleston Hartfield.
https://www.facebook.com/CherneyAmharaTV/videos/1752257468404388/
click to expand
my husband was reminding me, yesterday that there were shootings and killings in Spain
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10/01/catalan-referendum-spanish-riot-police-force-way-polling-station/
and today, severe winds in Germany killed some people on the road. Hurricanes just last month too.
and him and others reminded me that North Korea is something to be fearful of.
i dont understand why this murderer did what he did, was he so hateful of humans so much? that he wanted to off people? Was it because he had a disease maybe and wanted to take people with him?
all these questions and we are all trying to grasp why these mass murderers do these things.
Posted by justagirlomg, the first of the list was a mother and wife with three children and she was dancing with her husband and immediately shot in the head.
Here is the full list of names, sooo many from California 😢
http://lasvegas.cbslocal.com/2017/10/04/las-vegas-shooting-victims-complete-list-lost/
omg....and the next one was also a mother who ran a day care center or something and jesus christ..
all these mothers on the list.
and the men were with their wives too, who got killed, and some of them protected their wives.
Posted by lisabethur8yes... most are mothers or fathers, many with small children or those just starting adulthood.Posted by justagirlomg, the first of the list was a mother and wife with three children and she was dancing with her husband and immediately shot in the head.
Here is the full list of names, sooo many from California 😢
http://lasvegas.cbslocal.com/2017/10/04/las-vegas-shooting-victims-complete-list-lost/
omg....and the next one was also a mother who ran a day care center or something and jesus christ..
all these mothers on the list.
and the men were with their wives too, who got killed, and some of them protected their wives.
click to expand
It's beyond heartbreaking..
There was soooo many acts of heroism that happened with shielding others, carrying those shot to saftey.. piling people into truckbeds and cars and driving them to hospitals.
500+ people injured plus these people that passed.
Posted by justagirlit IS heartbreaking. 😢Posted by lisabethur8yes... most are mothers or fathers, many with small children or those just starting adulthood.Posted by justagirlomg, the first of the list was a mother and wife with three children and she was dancing with her husband and immediately shot in the head.
Here is the full list of names, sooo many from California 😢
http://lasvegas.cbslocal.com/2017/10/04/las-vegas-shooting-victims-complete-list-lost/
omg....and the next one was also a mother who ran a day care center or something and jesus christ..
all these mothers on the list.
and the men were with their wives too, who got killed, and some of them protected their wives.
It's beyond heartbreaking..
There was soooo many acts of heroism that happened with shielding others, carrying those shot to saftey.. piling people into truckbeds and cars and driving them to hospitals.
500+ people injured plus these people that passed.click to expand
Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by enfant_terribleThat just goes to show how little you know about domestic terrorism in the US.Posted by LadyNeptune
If we are going to define terrorism we should define it by Nevada State law which terms it as "any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population".
www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-202.html#NRS202Sec4415
So yes, HE'S A FUCKING TERRORIST.
Let me get this straight, so every time someone aims to harm the general public in Nevada, even if it's a crazed hobo who shoots into a soup line we are suppose to define it as "terrorism"?
Breivik is a terrorist. And white. Then we have the whole Northern Ireland conflict. A lot of white terrorism there.
The Joker shooting up the Batman premiere, however.... not terrorism.
BLM shooting up white folks during Xmas shopping, definitely terrorism. See the difference?
I am sorry you feel offended there are not that many legit white terrorists. It's just that your average white man out west probably has less reasons to inflict terror to gain political or ideological awareness bc we've run out of causes. We do the occassional snap, no political motives. It's just good ole fashioned cray.
Stop twisting definitions around for your white feminist cause, you terrorist of political correctness.
Right wing (aka white people) attacks out number Islamist attacks 2 to 1 in the last 10 years alone. And considering how ISIS and other extremist Middle East groups claim EVERYTHING, even shit they didn't plan, that gap is most likely much larger.
This does not include left wing extremist domestic attacks. The reality is domestic terrorism is overwhelmingly perpetrated by white men. And yet the media has twisted it so that your perception is that a terrorist can only be a poc.
So stop fronting like you have knowledge on this subject. Your just making yourself look dumb.
This kind of mentality is so dangerous. Perpetuating the perception that white men are emotionally disturbed or mentally ill when they pick up a gun and should be pitied while a poc is a terrorist is vile.
An act of terror is an act of terror.
And calling it otherwise is a politically driven rhetoric that I find vile against humanity as a whole.
click to expand
Give me a few examples of politically charged right/left wing terror that SHOULD have been defined as terrorism but wasn't cuz of the color of the skin of the perpetrator(s). McVeigh, Ted Kaczynski the UNA-bomber, to name a few... all white and legit terrorists.
The only I can think of off the top of my head is Dylann Roof
Posted by LadyNeptuneThe best part is how you feel a mass murder of people is an attack on another race. Some people will do anything to fill their own personal agenda of getting their opinion across. Even if that means standing on the graves of those brutally murdered. Forget them right, who cares about them when your real focus is what the media wants to say and how it doesn't conform to your own personal opinions.Posted by SoulYour right he's evil af.Posted by LadyNeptuneFuck can you blame me? You've got like 10 different people with different definition's for this guy. To me he is just an evil fucked up person that said fuck it I'm going to kill a bunch of people today. Then did it. Nothing else. I could care less what everyone else wants to define it as. Guy went crazy, a ton of people died. That is literally it.Posted by SoulThere it is 👆 defined in black and white.Posted by LadyNeptuneYou can make any word conform to your opinion all you want. People already do it for the word racist. Pretty soon people will want red to mean blue, it just depends how well it conforms to their opinions that day.Posted by enfant_terribleIf we are going to define terrorism we should define it by Nevada State law which terms it as "any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population".Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by enfant_terribleTerrorism is an act of violence against peaceful citizens. It does not need to be politically motivated to be considered terror.Posted by EmhendoI see.. what's his ideological or political agenda then?
He's a goddamn terrorist, but because he didn't have a bomb and is rich white man, he's disqualified from such a label.
Terrorism
noun-
"The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims." -Yours truly, Oxford Dictionary.
If any act of violence against civilians would qualify as terrorism then we'd call every mass-shooting terrorism.
www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-202.html#NRS202Sec4415
So yes, HE'S A FUCKING TERRORIST.
He is a TERRORIST.
This was an act of TERROR.
How else to you describe a person who guns down and planned to bomb peaceful citizens? Your the one with your head in the sand.
But the reason we care is because the media has been pushing this agenda of brown skin = terrorism.
Worse mass shooting in US history and they brand him a 'lone wolf'. It's bullshit. And it needs to be called out.click to expand
at 4:30-4:34 mark this guy says "fukkin sandn-ggers, fukk'em" lmao
its funny how even during a horrifying situation such as this, these people still can't help but express their racist viewpoints smh
i guess he didn't think about the fact that 60% of US mass shootings is done by his own kind, but inherently racist people tend over look those type of statistics
its funny how even during a horrifying situation such as this, these people still can't help but express their racist viewpoints smh
i guess he didn't think about the fact that 60% of US mass shootings is done by his own kind, but inherently racist people tend over look those type of statistics
Posted by CaramelizedCoffeePosted by lisabethur8It's disgusting and instead of calling out this terrorist white people are concerned about black men not kneeling for the flag and protecting the image of evil.Posted by justagirlomg, the first of the list was a mother and wife with three children and she was dancing with her husband and immediately shot in the head.
Here is the full list of names, sooo many from California 😢
http://lasvegas.cbslocal.com/2017/10/04/las-vegas-shooting-victims-complete-list-lost/
omg....and the next one was also a mother who ran a day care center or something and jesus christ..
all these mothers on the list.
and the men were with their wives too, who got killed, and some of them protected their wives.
America is one insane illogical place
Posted by black_kevorkian
at 4:30-4:34 mark this guy says "fukkin sandn-ggers, fukk'em" lmao
its funny how even during a horrifying situation such as this, these people still can't help but express their racist viewpoints smh
i guess he didn't think about the fact that 60% of US mass shootings is done by his own kind, but inherently racist people tend over look those type of statisticsclick to expand
only a few are hateful. they make the rest of the other innocents bad.
i was wondering.....
if the terrorist did it out of spite, because his girlfriend he protected (he sent her away to the philiphines) was out not of his race/culture and maybe the people that were in that group called her names, and put them down.
it's NO excuse, but many people are driven by hate, and because of that hate they retaliated. but many innocents, in the end, it's not worth it.
i'm just trying to wrap my mind over this.
that saying, hate begits hate...
Posted by SoulPosted by LadyNeptuneThe best part is how you feel a mass murder of people is an attack on another race. Some people will do anything to fill their own personal agenda of getting their opinion across. Even if that means standing on the graves of those brutally murdered. Forget them right, who cares about them when your real focus is what the media wants to say and how it doesn't conform to your own personal opinions.Posted by SoulYour right he's evil af.Posted by LadyNeptuneFuck can you blame me? You've got like 10 different people with different definition's for this guy. To me he is just an evil fucked up person that said fuck it I'm going to kill a bunch of people today. Then did it. Nothing else. I could care less what everyone else wants to define it as. Guy went crazy, a ton of people died. That is literally it.Posted by SoulThere it is 👆 defined in black and white.Posted by LadyNeptuneYou can make any word conform to your opinion all you want. People already do it for the word racist. Pretty soon people will want red to mean blue, it just depends how well it conforms to their opinions that day.Posted by enfant_terribleIf we are going to define terrorism we should define it by Nevada State law which terms it as "any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population".Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by enfant_terribleTerrorism is an act of violence against peaceful citizens. It does not need to be politically motivated to be considered terror.Posted by EmhendoI see.. what's his ideological or political agenda then?
He's a goddamn terrorist, but because he didn't have a bomb and is rich white man, he's disqualified from such a label.
Terrorism
noun-
"The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims." -Yours truly, Oxford Dictionary.
If any act of violence against civilians would qualify as terrorism then we'd call every mass-shooting terrorism.
www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-202.html#NRS202Sec4415
So yes, HE'S A FUCKING TERRORIST.
He is a TERRORIST.
This was an act of TERROR.
How else to you describe a person who guns down and planned to bomb peaceful citizens? Your the one with your head in the sand.
But the reason we care is because the media has been pushing this agenda of brown skin = terrorism.
Worse mass shooting in US history and they brand him a 'lone wolf'. It's bullshit. And it needs to be called out.
click to expand
Ummm excuse you??!
I never claimed to feel that way. Pretty shitty of you to stoop to that level just cause your arguement falls short at every level.
To write of this dude at a 'shooter' is a disrespect to all those who lost their lives. That has been my point all along. Your the one who feels this is an insult towards race...for whatever reason.
Posted by ItsMeRomanIntredasting 🤔
Now let's focus on his health. Take a good look at his face. He's carrying a lot of water retention, broken capillaries, ruddy texture and extreme eye bags. His body is flabby and undefined with very little muscle structure.
The weapons he actually used to apparently shoot people are heavy automatic weapons. To use these you'd need to have an extremely strong back and and shoulder muscles.
Are you saying it was actually a muscular terrorist of Arab or African descent? SOLD!!! 😄
Posted by LadyNeptuneFirstly you brought up race. You said the media only thinks dark skinned people = terrorists.Posted by SoulPosted by LadyNeptuneThe best part is how you feel a mass murder of people is an attack on another race. Some people will do anything to fill their own personal agenda of getting their opinion across. Even if that means standing on the graves of those brutally murdered. Forget them right, who cares about them when your real focus is what the media wants to say and how it doesn't conform to your own personal opinions.Posted by SoulYour right he's evil af.Posted by LadyNeptuneFuck can you blame me? You've got like 10 different people with different definition's for this guy. To me he is just an evil fucked up person that said fuck it I'm going to kill a bunch of people today. Then did it. Nothing else. I could care less what everyone else wants to define it as. Guy went crazy, a ton of people died. That is literally it.Posted by SoulThere it is 👆 defined in black and white.Posted by LadyNeptuneYou can make any word conform to your opinion all you want. People already do it for the word racist. Pretty soon people will want red to mean blue, it just depends how well it conforms to their opinions that day.Posted by enfant_terribleIf we are going to define terrorism we should define it by Nevada State law which terms it as "any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population".Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by enfant_terribleTerrorism is an act of violence against peaceful citizens. It does not need to be politically motivated to be considered terror.Posted by EmhendoI see.. what's his ideological or political agenda then?
He's a goddamn terrorist, but because he didn't have a bomb and is rich white man, he's disqualified from such a label.
Terrorism
noun-
"The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims." -Yours truly, Oxford Dictionary.
If any act of violence against civilians would qualify as terrorism then we'd call every mass-shooting terrorism.
www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-202.html#NRS202Sec4415
So yes, HE'S A FUCKING TERRORIST.
He is a TERRORIST.
This was an act of TERROR.
How else to you describe a person who guns down and planned to bomb peaceful citizens? Your the one with your head in the sand.
But the reason we care is because the media has been pushing this agenda of brown skin = terrorism.
Worse mass shooting in US history and they brand him a 'lone wolf'. It's bullshit. And it needs to be called out.
Ummm excuse you??!
I never claimed to feel that way. Pretty shitty of you to stoop to that level just cause your arguement falls short at every level.
To write of this dude at a 'shooter' is a disrespect to all those who lost their lives. That has been my point all along. Your the one who feels this is an insult towards race...for whatever reason.
click to expand
Secondly I'm not the one trying to convince people that mass shooters, murders or criminals in general = terrorists. Quite frankly I don't care tbh, because people will call things whatever they want nowadays.
I'm not saying it's purely your fault. I'm just saying none of this information matters whatsoever. Who the hell cares if people consider him a terrorist or not in their own personal opinions? All that is doing is distracting people from the actual problem. That being tons of people died, gun laws need to change, and better teachings of mental health in society really needs to be taken into consideration. Everything else means nothing, and is just a distraction like I said.
Posted by SoulExcept you do care cause your all over my nuts.Posted by LadyNeptuneFirstly you brought up race. You said the media only thinks dark skinned people = terrorists.Posted by SoulPosted by LadyNeptuneThe best part is how you feel a mass murder of people is an attack on another race. Some people will do anything to fill their own personal agenda of getting their opinion across. Even if that means standing on the graves of those brutally murdered. Forget them right, who cares about them when your real focus is what the media wants to say and how it doesn't conform to your own personal opinions.Posted by SoulYour right he's evil af.Posted by LadyNeptuneFuck can you blame me? You've got like 10 different people with different definition's for this guy. To me he is just an evil fucked up person that said fuck it I'm going to kill a bunch of people today. Then did it. Nothing else. I could care less what everyone else wants to define it as. Guy went crazy, a ton of people died. That is literally it.Posted by SoulThere it is 👆 defined in black and white.Posted by LadyNeptuneYou can make any word conform to your opinion all you want. People already do it for the word racist. Pretty soon people will want red to mean blue, it just depends how well it conforms to their opinions that day.Posted by enfant_terribleIf we are going to define terrorism we should define it by Nevada State law which terms it as "any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population".Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by enfant_terribleTerrorism is an act of violence against peaceful citizens. It does not need to be politically motivated to be considered terror.Posted by EmhendoI see.. what's his ideological or political agenda then?
He's a goddamn terrorist, but because he didn't have a bomb and is rich white man, he's disqualified from such a label.
Terrorism
noun-
"The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims." -Yours truly, Oxford Dictionary.
If any act of violence against civilians would qualify as terrorism then we'd call every mass-shooting terrorism.
www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-202.html#NRS202Sec4415
So yes, HE'S A FUCKING TERRORIST.
He is a TERRORIST.
This was an act of TERROR.
How else to you describe a person who guns down and planned to bomb peaceful citizens? Your the one with your head in the sand.
But the reason we care is because the media has been pushing this agenda of brown skin = terrorism.
Worse mass shooting in US history and they brand him a 'lone wolf'. It's bullshit. And it needs to be called out.
Ummm excuse you??!
I never claimed to feel that way. Pretty shitty of you to stoop to that level just cause your arguement falls short at every level.
To write of this dude at a 'shooter' is a disrespect to all those who lost their lives. That has been my point all along. Your the one who feels this is an insult towards race...for whatever reason.
Secondly I'm not the one trying to convince people that mass shooters, murders or criminals in general = terrorists. Quite frankly I don't care tbh, because people will call things whatever they want nowadays.
I'm not saying it's purely your fault. I'm just saying none of this information matters whatsoever. Who the hell cares if people consider him a terrorist or not in their own personal opinions? All that is doing is distracting people from the actual problem. That being tons of people died, gun laws need to change, and better teachings of mental health in society really needs to be taken into consideration. Everything else means nothing, and is just a distraction like I said.
click to expand
Of course its not my fault dipshit. And yes, it does matter. The media shapes most peoples perception. I can point out the hypocrisy of how a white terrorist is handled compared to a poc. And I will continue to do so. Whether or not it offends you.
Your defensiveness kinda says it all.
Posted by julietteePosted by LadyNeptunePosted by LittleFairyWtf are you talking about. What troops??Posted by CaramelizedCoffeeNotice they are not sending troops to white neighbourhoods ...or cops or doing raids on houses on the same street
I just find it weird the vitriol hate towards black athletes for kneeling against injustice but absolute dead silence about the man who mass murdered 59 people using automatic weapons from 32 floors above ground. These are the same individuals who froth at the mouth on social media on football pages calling grown family men thugs and talking about boycotting nfl ...yet same people dead silent on this terrorists actions.
I mean wtf is wrong with white people in America. Some of y'all area some retarded illogical sociopathic morons.
Still the same people who'll be anti abortion but defend the 2nd amendment accepting mass shootings as a cost to freedom.
Like wtf. Like bish you do realize the military can nuke your ass but okay moron. Play cowboys and robbers with people's lives.
ireland. again i assume.
click to expand
Afghanistan.
Posted by LittleFairyPosted by julietteePosted by LadyNeptunePosted by LittleFairyWtf are you talking about. What troops??Posted by CaramelizedCoffeeNotice they are not sending troops to white neighbourhoods ...or cops or doing raids on houses on the same street
I just find it weird the vitriol hate towards black athletes for kneeling against injustice but absolute dead silence about the man who mass murdered 59 people using automatic weapons from 32 floors above ground. These are the same individuals who froth at the mouth on social media on football pages calling grown family men thugs and talking about boycotting nfl ...yet same people dead silent on this terrorists actions.
I mean wtf is wrong with white people in America. Some of y'all area some retarded illogical sociopathic morons.
Still the same people who'll be anti abortion but defend the 2nd amendment accepting mass shootings as a cost to freedom.
Like wtf. Like bish you do realize the military can nuke your ass but okay moron. Play cowboys and robbers with people's lives.
ireland. again i assume.
Afghanistan.
click to expand
Or Ireland if you prefer ..or chechnya ..or just about any place you want to identify the entire population as a threat
Posted by SoulLaw is practiced in a few different ways. The way it's enforced and the way it's written are two these ways....Posted by LadyNeptuneFirstly you brought up race. You said the media only thinks dark skinned people = terrorists.Posted by SoulPosted by LadyNeptuneThe best part is how you feel a mass murder of people is an attack on another race. Some people will do anything to fill their own personal agenda of getting their opinion across. Even if that means standing on the graves of those brutally murdered. Forget them right, who cares about them when your real focus is what the media wants to say and how it doesn't conform to your own personal opinions.Posted by SoulYour right he's evil af.Posted by LadyNeptuneFuck can you blame me? You've got like 10 different people with different definition's for this guy. To me he is just an evil fucked up person that said fuck it I'm going to kill a bunch of people today. Then did it. Nothing else. I could care less what everyone else wants to define it as. Guy went crazy, a ton of people died. That is literally it.Posted by SoulThere it is 👆 defined in black and white.Posted by LadyNeptuneYou can make any word conform to your opinion all you want. People already do it for the word racist. Pretty soon people will want red to mean blue, it just depends how well it conforms to their opinions that day.Posted by enfant_terribleIf we are going to define terrorism we should define it by Nevada State law which terms it as "any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population".Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by enfant_terribleTerrorism is an act of violence against peaceful citizens. It does not need to be politically motivated to be considered terror.Posted by EmhendoI see.. what's his ideological or political agenda then?
He's a goddamn terrorist, but because he didn't have a bomb and is rich white man, he's disqualified from such a label.
Terrorism
noun-
"The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims." -Yours truly, Oxford Dictionary.
If any act of violence against civilians would qualify as terrorism then we'd call every mass-shooting terrorism.
www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-202.html#NRS202Sec4415
So yes, HE'S A FUCKING TERRORIST.
He is a TERRORIST.
This was an act of TERROR.
How else to you describe a person who guns down and planned to bomb peaceful citizens? Your the one with your head in the sand.
But the reason we care is because the media has been pushing this agenda of brown skin = terrorism.
Worse mass shooting in US history and they brand him a 'lone wolf'. It's bullshit. And it needs to be called out.
Ummm excuse you??!
I never claimed to feel that way. Pretty shitty of you to stoop to that level just cause your arguement falls short at every level.
To write of this dude at a 'shooter' is a disrespect to all those who lost their lives. That has been my point all along. Your the one who feels this is an insult towards race...for whatever reason.
Secondly I'm not the one trying to convince people that mass shooters, murders or criminals in general = terrorists. Quite frankly I don't care tbh, because people will call things whatever they want nowadays.
I'm not saying it's purely your fault. I'm just saying none of this information matters whatsoever. Who the hell cares if people consider him a terrorist or not in their own personal opinions? All that is doing is distracting people from the actual problem. That being tons of people died, gun laws need to change, and better teachings of mental health in society really needs to be taken into consideration. Everything else means nothing, and is just a distraction like I said.
click to expand
On paper both blacks and whites can own guns....but not in practise..
I often wonder at white people saying oh i carry a gun etc . FOR PROTECTION...
Do they not realize if you carry a gun as a black person a cop will prob shoot you. And if they find a gun on him /her ...oh CRIMINAL....well you carry one FOR PROTECTION..right??
Gun laws are not the only issue. It's that some people get away with everything.
And to be honest if you changed nothing about what guns you can own gave 50 yrs for EVERY ILLEGAL gun held and did searches you get somewhere and even the media campaign of 50 YRS FOR HOLDING AN ILLEGAL GUN ..would change things.
Posted by LittleFairyYour confused af and just talking out your ass as usual.Posted by SoulLaw is practiced in a few different ways. The way it's enforced and the way it's written are two these ways....Posted by LadyNeptuneFirstly you brought up race. You said the media only thinks dark skinned people = terrorists.Posted by SoulPosted by LadyNeptuneThe best part is how you feel a mass murder of people is an attack on another race. Some people will do anything to fill their own personal agenda of getting their opinion across. Even if that means standing on the graves of those brutally murdered. Forget them right, who cares about them when your real focus is what the media wants to say and how it doesn't conform to your own personal opinions.Posted by SoulYour right he's evil af.Posted by LadyNeptuneFuck can you blame me? You've got like 10 different people with different definition's for this guy. To me he is just an evil fucked up person that said fuck it I'm going to kill a bunch of people today. Then did it. Nothing else. I could care less what everyone else wants to define it as. Guy went crazy, a ton of people died. That is literally it.Posted by SoulThere it is 👆 defined in black and white.Posted by LadyNeptuneYou can make any word conform to your opinion all you want. People already do it for the word racist. Pretty soon people will want red to mean blue, it just depends how well it conforms to their opinions that day.Posted by enfant_terribleIf we are going to define terrorism we should define it by Nevada State law which terms it as "any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population".Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by enfant_terribleTerrorism is an act of violence against peaceful citizens. It does not need to be politically motivated to be considered terror.Posted by EmhendoI see.. what's his ideological or political agenda then?
He's a goddamn terrorist, but because he didn't have a bomb and is rich white man, he's disqualified from such a label.
Terrorism
noun-
"The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims." -Yours truly, Oxford Dictionary.
If any act of violence against civilians would qualify as terrorism then we'd call every mass-shooting terrorism.
www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-202.html#NRS202Sec4415
So yes, HE'S A FUCKING TERRORIST.
He is a TERRORIST.
This was an act of TERROR.
How else to you describe a person who guns down and planned to bomb peaceful citizens? Your the one with your head in the sand.
But the reason we care is because the media has been pushing this agenda of brown skin = terrorism.
Worse mass shooting in US history and they brand him a 'lone wolf'. It's bullshit. And it needs to be called out.
Ummm excuse you??!
I never claimed to feel that way. Pretty shitty of you to stoop to that level just cause your arguement falls short at every level.
To write of this dude at a 'shooter' is a disrespect to all those who lost their lives. That has been my point all along. Your the one who feels this is an insult towards race...for whatever reason.
Secondly I'm not the one trying to convince people that mass shooters, murders or criminals in general = terrorists. Quite frankly I don't care tbh, because people will call things whatever they want nowadays.
I'm not saying it's purely your fault. I'm just saying none of this information matters whatsoever. Who the hell cares if people consider him a terrorist or not in their own personal opinions? All that is doing is distracting people from the actual problem. That being tons of people died, gun laws need to change, and better teachings of mental health in society really needs to be taken into consideration. Everything else means nothing, and is just a distraction like I said.
On paper both blacks and whites can own guns....but not in practise..
I often wonder at white people saying oh i carry a gun etc . FOR PROTECTION...
Do they not realize if you carry a gun as a black person a cop will prob shoot you. And if they find a gun on him /her ...oh CRIMINAL....well you carry one FOR PROTECTION..right??
Gun laws are not the only issue. It's that some people get away with everything.
And to be honest if you changed nothing about what guns you can own gave 50 yrs for EVERY ILLEGAL gun held and did searches you get somewhere and even the media campaign of 50 YRS FOR HOLDING AN ILLEGAL GUN ..would change things.click to expand
1. Black men are being shot on the daily and they are UNARMED.
2. You need a carrying permit to have a gun on your person (in 13 states). That goes for white or black.
3. Jail time for having unregistered guns already exists but its not 50 years, its 30 days to a year depending on the states law. All guns are already required to be registered and there is already fines/jail time in place if they are not.
Posted by LadyNeptuneDo you think if a cop sees a black man carrying a gun that man will not be shot? I think he will be. I don't think it would matter if he had a permit. White people carry guns all the time ..no such issue. I think a lot of those white people don't have permits.Posted by LittleFairyYour confused af and just talking out your ass as usual.Posted by SoulLaw is practiced in a few different ways. The way it's enforced and the way it's written are two these ways....Posted by LadyNeptuneFirstly you brought up race. You said the media only thinks dark skinned people = terrorists.Posted by SoulPosted by LadyNeptuneThe best part is how you feel a mass murder of people is an attack on another race. Some people will do anything to fill their own personal agenda of getting their opinion across. Even if that means standing on the graves of those brutally murdered. Forget them right, who cares about them when your real focus is what the media wants to say and how it doesn't conform to your own personal opinions.Posted by SoulYour right he's evil af.Posted by LadyNeptuneFuck can you blame me? You've got like 10 different people with different definition's for this guy. To me he is just an evil fucked up person that said fuck it I'm going to kill a bunch of people today. Then did it. Nothing else. I could care less what everyone else wants to define it as. Guy went crazy, a ton of people died. That is literally it.Posted by SoulThere it is 👆 defined in black and white.Posted by LadyNeptuneYou can make any word conform to your opinion all you want. People already do it for the word racist. Pretty soon people will want red to mean blue, it just depends how well it conforms to their opinions that day.Posted by enfant_terribleIf we are going to define terrorism we should define it by Nevada State law which terms it as "any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population".Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by enfant_terribleTerrorism is an act of violence against peaceful citizens. It does not need to be politically motivated to be considered terror.Posted by EmhendoI see.. what's his ideological or political agenda then?
He's a goddamn terrorist, but because he didn't have a bomb and is rich white man, he's disqualified from such a label.
Terrorism
noun-
"The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims." -Yours truly, Oxford Dictionary.
If any act of violence against civilians would qualify as terrorism then we'd call every mass-shooting terrorism.
www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-202.html#NRS202Sec4415
So yes, HE'S A FUCKING TERRORIST.
He is a TERRORIST.
This was an act of TERROR.
How else to you describe a person who guns down and planned to bomb peaceful citizens? Your the one with your head in the sand.
But the reason we care is because the media has been pushing this agenda of brown skin = terrorism.
Worse mass shooting in US history and they brand him a 'lone wolf'. It's bullshit. And it needs to be called out.
Ummm excuse you??!
I never claimed to feel that way. Pretty shitty of you to stoop to that level just cause your arguement falls short at every level.
To write of this dude at a 'shooter' is a disrespect to all those who lost their lives. That has been my point all along. Your the one who feels this is an insult towards race...for whatever reason.
Secondly I'm not the one trying to convince people that mass shooters, murders or criminals in general = terrorists. Quite frankly I don't care tbh, because people will call things whatever they want nowadays.
I'm not saying it's purely your fault. I'm just saying none of this information matters whatsoever. Who the hell cares if people consider him a terrorist or not in their own personal opinions? All that is doing is distracting people from the actual problem. That being tons of people died, gun laws need to change, and better teachings of mental health in society really needs to be taken into consideration. Everything else means nothing, and is just a distraction like I said.
On paper both blacks and whites can own guns....but not in practise..
I often wonder at white people saying oh i carry a gun etc . FOR PROTECTION...
Do they not realize if you carry a gun as a black person a cop will prob shoot you. And if they find a gun on him /her ...oh CRIMINAL....well you carry one FOR PROTECTION..right??
Gun laws are not the only issue. It's that some people get away with everything.
And to be honest if you changed nothing about what guns you can own gave 50 yrs for EVERY ILLEGAL gun held and did searches you get somewhere and even the media campaign of 50 YRS FOR HOLDING AN ILLEGAL GUN ..would change things.
1. Black men are being shot on the daily and they are UNARMED.
2. You need a carrying permit to have a gun on your person (in 13 states). That goes for white or black.
3. Jail time for having unregistered guns already exists but its not 50 years, its 30 days to a year depending on the states law. All guns are already required to be registered and there is already fines/jail time in place if they are not.
click to expand
Obv 30 days to a year is not enough. And the law is not respected. It needs to be tougher sentences that are enforced.
Agreed unarmed black men and women get shot. Cops need better training and to be held to a much high standard. But also getting illegal guns off the streets and ...scaring the total shit out of people who own guns. There needs to be a voice at the back of the mind of every gun holder ..I must be careful or the state will ruin my life.
I would so hang people who own illegal guns publicly. Invite everyone to watch...but then i am evil ...and evil must be contained.
But 25 yrs for owning an illegal gun seems reasonable.
And the USA does need tougher gun laws. But even tougher sentences for having the guns you can't have now would change things.
And before we hang him ...you can beat him like a pinata! 😛
You what....at least he DIED alone ..and horribly. And now everyone hates him.
I know it brings no one back ....but still ...
Yea I saw this... I believe he is an aqua moon as well. The moon was transiting that sign when this took place during the fullmoon cycle of Aries. I am going to be honest this fullmoon cycle and last retrograde rocked my world. Virgo was my seventh house of partnerships and most likely this is the fall out from it all.
I however do not condone this guys actions... I am have heard he was tider to extremism but not sure if it was confirmed. Some people just are well not so smarter and bad.
Piscesmoon
I however do not condone this guys actions... I am have heard he was tider to extremism but not sure if it was confirmed. Some people just are well not so smarter and bad.
Piscesmoon
Posted by LadyNeptuneI'm just telling you I'm not going to change the definition of the word terrorist because it conforms to your opinion of the word. That is all.Posted by SoulExcept you do care cause your all over my nuts.Posted by LadyNeptuneFirstly you brought up race. You said the media only thinks dark skinned people = terrorists.Posted by SoulPosted by LadyNeptuneThe best part is how you feel a mass murder of people is an attack on another race. Some people will do anything to fill their own personal agenda of getting their opinion across. Even if that means standing on the graves of those brutally murdered. Forget them right, who cares about them when your real focus is what the media wants to say and how it doesn't conform to your own personal opinions.Posted by SoulYour right he's evil af.Posted by LadyNeptuneFuck can you blame me? You've got like 10 different people with different definition's for this guy. To me he is just an evil fucked up person that said fuck it I'm going to kill a bunch of people today. Then did it. Nothing else. I could care less what everyone else wants to define it as. Guy went crazy, a ton of people died. That is literally it.Posted by SoulThere it is 👆 defined in black and white.Posted by LadyNeptuneYou can make any word conform to your opinion all you want. People already do it for the word racist. Pretty soon people will want red to mean blue, it just depends how well it conforms to their opinions that day.Posted by enfant_terribleIf we are going to define terrorism we should define it by Nevada State law which terms it as "any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population".Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by enfant_terribleTerrorism is an act of violence against peaceful citizens. It does not need to be politically motivated to be considered terror.Posted by EmhendoI see.. what's his ideological or political agenda then?
He's a goddamn terrorist, but because he didn't have a bomb and is rich white man, he's disqualified from such a label.
Terrorism
noun-
"The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims." -Yours truly, Oxford Dictionary.
If any act of violence against civilians would qualify as terrorism then we'd call every mass-shooting terrorism.
www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-202.html#NRS202Sec4415
So yes, HE'S A FUCKING TERRORIST.
He is a TERRORIST.
This was an act of TERROR.
How else to you describe a person who guns down and planned to bomb peaceful citizens? Your the one with your head in the sand.
But the reason we care is because the media has been pushing this agenda of brown skin = terrorism.
Worse mass shooting in US history and they brand him a 'lone wolf'. It's bullshit. And it needs to be called out.
Ummm excuse you??!
I never claimed to feel that way. Pretty shitty of you to stoop to that level just cause your arguement falls short at every level.
To write of this dude at a 'shooter' is a disrespect to all those who lost their lives. That has been my point all along. Your the one who feels this is an insult towards race...for whatever reason.
Secondly I'm not the one trying to convince people that mass shooters, murders or criminals in general = terrorists. Quite frankly I don't care tbh, because people will call things whatever they want nowadays.
I'm not saying it's purely your fault. I'm just saying none of this information matters whatsoever. Who the hell cares if people consider him a terrorist or not in their own personal opinions? All that is doing is distracting people from the actual problem. That being tons of people died, gun laws need to change, and better teachings of mental health in society really needs to be taken into consideration. Everything else means nothing, and is just a distraction like I said.
Of course its not my fault dipshit. And yes, it does matter. The media shapes most peoples perception. I can point out the hypocrisy of how a white terrorist is handled compared to a poc. And I will continue to do so. Whether or not it offends you.
Your defensiveness kinda says it all.click to expand
And for the record I'm not defensive at all. I've actually been pretty civil with you. See your problem with having a good debate is you can't see both sides of the story. Because of that you can't keep up, which leaves you with nothing but using profanity and calling people stupid. I don't blame you or people like you for being that way though. You just focus too much on the new and let it shap your opinions rather then using actual logic. That doesn't make you stupid, just mislead is all.
It's actually kind of funny. A white man kills a bunch of people at a country concert, and it's still considered an act of racisim on other cultures or races. My God society is sinking faster each day.
Posted by LittleFairyWhere are you getting your information from? What you 'think' is not factual.Posted by LadyNeptuneDo you think if a cop sees a black man carrying a gun that man will not be shot? I think he will be. I don't think it would matter if he had a permit. White people carry guns all the time ..no such issue. I think a lot of those white people don't have permits.Posted by LittleFairyYour confused af and just talking out your ass as usual.Posted by SoulLaw is practiced in a few different ways. The way it's enforced and the way it's written are two these ways....Posted by LadyNeptuneFirstly you brought up race. You said the media only thinks dark skinned people = terrorists.Posted by SoulPosted by LadyNeptuneThe best part is how you feel a mass murder of people is an attack on another race. Some people will do anything to fill their own personal agenda of getting their opinion across. Even if that means standing on the graves of those brutally murdered. Forget them right, who cares about them when your real focus is what the media wants to say and how it doesn't conform to your own personal opinions.Posted by SoulYour right he's evil af.Posted by LadyNeptuneFuck can you blame me? You've got like 10 different people with different definition's for this guy. To me he is just an evil fucked up person that said fuck it I'm going to kill a bunch of people today. Then did it. Nothing else. I could care less what everyone else wants to define it as. Guy went crazy, a ton of people died. That is literally it.Posted by SoulThere it is 👆 defined in black and white.Posted by LadyNeptuneYou can make any word conform to your opinion all you want. People already do it for the word racist. Pretty soon people will want red to mean blue, it just depends how well it conforms to their opinions that day.Posted by enfant_terribleIf we are going to define terrorism we should define it by Nevada State law which terms it as "any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population".Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by enfant_terribleTerrorism is an act of violence against peaceful citizens. It does not need to be politically motivated to be considered terror.Posted by EmhendoI see.. what's his ideological or political agenda then?
He's a goddamn terrorist, but because he didn't have a bomb and is rich white man, he's disqualified from such a label.
Terrorism
noun-
"The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims." -Yours truly, Oxford Dictionary.
If any act of violence against civilians would qualify as terrorism then we'd call every mass-shooting terrorism.
www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-202.html#NRS202Sec4415
So yes, HE'S A FUCKING TERRORIST.
He is a TERRORIST.
This was an act of TERROR.
How else to you describe a person who guns down and planned to bomb peaceful citizens? Your the one with your head in the sand.
But the reason we care is because the media has been pushing this agenda of brown skin = terrorism.
Worse mass shooting in US history and they brand him a 'lone wolf'. It's bullshit. And it needs to be called out.
Ummm excuse you??!
I never claimed to feel that way. Pretty shitty of you to stoop to that level just cause your arguement falls short at every level.
To write of this dude at a 'shooter' is a disrespect to all those who lost their lives. That has been my point all along. Your the one who feels this is an insult towards race...for whatever reason.
Secondly I'm not the one trying to convince people that mass shooters, murders or criminals in general = terrorists. Quite frankly I don't care tbh, because people will call things whatever they want nowadays.
I'm not saying it's purely your fault. I'm just saying none of this information matters whatsoever. Who the hell cares if people consider him a terrorist or not in their own personal opinions? All that is doing is distracting people from the actual problem. That being tons of people died, gun laws need to change, and better teachings of mental health in society really needs to be taken into consideration. Everything else means nothing, and is just a distraction like I said.
On paper both blacks and whites can own guns....but not in practise..
I often wonder at white people saying oh i carry a gun etc . FOR PROTECTION...
Do they not realize if you carry a gun as a black person a cop will prob shoot you. And if they find a gun on him /her ...oh CRIMINAL....well you carry one FOR PROTECTION..right??
Gun laws are not the only issue. It's that some people get away with everything.
And to be honest if you changed nothing about what guns you can own gave 50 yrs for EVERY ILLEGAL gun held and did searches you get somewhere and even the media campaign of 50 YRS FOR HOLDING AN ILLEGAL GUN ..would change things.
1. Black men are being shot on the daily and they are UNARMED.
2. You need a carrying permit to have a gun on your person (in 13 states). That goes for white or black.
3. Jail time for having unregistered guns already exists but its not 50 years, its 30 days to a year depending on the states law. All guns are already required to be registered and there is already fines/jail time in place if they are not.
Obv 30 days to a year is not enough. And the law is not respected. It needs to be tougher sentences that are enforced.
Agreed unarmed black men and women get shot. Cops need better training and to be held to a much high standard. But also getting illegal guns off the streets and ...scaring the total shit out of people who own guns. There needs to be a voice at the back of the mind of every gun holder ..I must be careful or the state will ruin my life.
I would so hang people who own illegal guns publicly. Invite everyone to watch...but then i am evil ...and evil must be contained.
But 25 yrs for owning an illegal gun seems reasonable.
And the USA does need tougher gun laws. But even tougher sentences for having the guns you can't have now would change things.click to expand
Posted by SoulI never called it an act of racism, YOU DID.Posted by LadyNeptuneI'm just telling you I'm not going to change the definition of the word terrorist because it conforms to your opinion of the word. That is all.Posted by SoulExcept you do care cause your all over my nuts.Posted by LadyNeptuneFirstly you brought up race. You said the media only thinks dark skinned people = terrorists.Posted by SoulPosted by LadyNeptuneThe best part is how you feel a mass murder of people is an attack on another race. Some people will do anything to fill their own personal agenda of getting their opinion across. Even if that means standing on the graves of those brutally murdered. Forget them right, who cares about them when your real focus is what the media wants to say and how it doesn't conform to your own personal opinions.Posted by SoulYour right he's evil af.Posted by LadyNeptuneFuck can you blame me? You've got like 10 different people with different definition's for this guy. To me he is just an evil fucked up person that said fuck it I'm going to kill a bunch of people today. Then did it. Nothing else. I could care less what everyone else wants to define it as. Guy went crazy, a ton of people died. That is literally it.Posted by SoulThere it is 👆 defined in black and white.Posted by LadyNeptuneYou can make any word conform to your opinion all you want. People already do it for the word racist. Pretty soon people will want red to mean blue, it just depends how well it conforms to their opinions that day.Posted by enfant_terribleIf we are going to define terrorism we should define it by Nevada State law which terms it as "any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population".Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by enfant_terribleTerrorism is an act of violence against peaceful citizens. It does not need to be politically motivated to be considered terror.Posted by EmhendoI see.. what's his ideological or political agenda then?
He's a goddamn terrorist, but because he didn't have a bomb and is rich white man, he's disqualified from such a label.
Terrorism
noun-
"The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims." -Yours truly, Oxford Dictionary.
If any act of violence against civilians would qualify as terrorism then we'd call every mass-shooting terrorism.
www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-202.html#NRS202Sec4415
So yes, HE'S A FUCKING TERRORIST.
He is a TERRORIST.
This was an act of TERROR.
How else to you describe a person who guns down and planned to bomb peaceful citizens? Your the one with your head in the sand.
But the reason we care is because the media has been pushing this agenda of brown skin = terrorism.
Worse mass shooting in US history and they brand him a 'lone wolf'. It's bullshit. And it needs to be called out.
Ummm excuse you??!
I never claimed to feel that way. Pretty shitty of you to stoop to that level just cause your arguement falls short at every level.
To write of this dude at a 'shooter' is a disrespect to all those who lost their lives. That has been my point all along. Your the one who feels this is an insult towards race...for whatever reason.
Secondly I'm not the one trying to convince people that mass shooters, murders or criminals in general = terrorists. Quite frankly I don't care tbh, because people will call things whatever they want nowadays.
I'm not saying it's purely your fault. I'm just saying none of this information matters whatsoever. Who the hell cares if people consider him a terrorist or not in their own personal opinions? All that is doing is distracting people from the actual problem. That being tons of people died, gun laws need to change, and better teachings of mental health in society really needs to be taken into consideration. Everything else means nothing, and is just a distraction like I said.
Of course its not my fault dipshit. And yes, it does matter. The media shapes most peoples perception. I can point out the hypocrisy of how a white terrorist is handled compared to a poc. And I will continue to do so. Whether or not it offends you.
Your defensiveness kinda says it all.
And for the record I'm not defensive at all. I've actually been pretty civil with you. See your problem with having a good debate is you can't see both sides of the story. Because of that you can't keep up, which leaves you with nothing but using profanity and calling people stupid. I don't blame you or people like you for being that way though. You just focus too much on the new and let it shap your opinions rather then using actual logic. That doesn't make you stupid, just mislead is all.
It's actually kind of funny. A white man kills a bunch of people at a country concert, and it's still considered an act of racisim on other cultures or races. My God society is sinking faster each day.
click to expand
Yes I take offense to you saying I'm 'standing on the graves of those brutally murdered'. Your completely confused on the points I'm making, or perhaps your just purposefully playing at being ignorant. Whatever.
Posted by LadyNeptuneYes it is https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/07/alton-sterling-philando-castile-2nd-amendment-guns/490301/Posted by LittleFairyWhere are you getting your information from? What you 'think' is not factual.Posted by LadyNeptuneDo you think if a cop sees a black man carrying a gun that man will not be shot? I think he will be. I don't think it would matter if he had a permit. White people carry guns all the time ..no such issue. I think a lot of those white people don't have permits.Posted by LittleFairyYour confused af and just talking out your ass as usual.Posted by SoulLaw is practiced in a few different ways. The way it's enforced and the way it's written are two these ways....Posted by LadyNeptuneFirstly you brought up race. You said the media only thinks dark skinned people = terrorists.Posted by SoulPosted by LadyNeptuneThe best part is how you feel a mass murder of people is an attack on another race. Some people will do anything to fill their own personal agenda of getting their opinion across. Even if that means standing on the graves of those brutally murdered. Forget them right, who cares about them when your real focus is what the media wants to say and how it doesn't conform to your own personal opinions.Posted by SoulYour right he's evil af.Posted by LadyNeptuneFuck can you blame me? You've got like 10 different people with different definition's for this guy. To me he is just an evil fucked up person that said fuck it I'm going to kill a bunch of people today. Then did it. Nothing else. I could care less what everyone else wants to define it as. Guy went crazy, a ton of people died. That is literally it.Posted by SoulThere it is 👆 defined in black and white.Posted by LadyNeptuneYou can make any word conform to your opinion all you want. People already do it for the word racist. Pretty soon people will want red to mean blue, it just depends how well it conforms to their opinions that day.Posted by enfant_terribleIf we are going to define terrorism we should define it by Nevada State law which terms it as "any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population".Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by enfant_terribleTerrorism is an act of violence against peaceful citizens. It does not need to be politically motivated to be considered terror.Posted by EmhendoI see.. what's his ideological or political agenda then?
He's a goddamn terrorist, but because he didn't have a bomb and is rich white man, he's disqualified from such a label.
Terrorism
noun-
"The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims." -Yours truly, Oxford Dictionary.
If any act of violence against civilians would qualify as terrorism then we'd call every mass-shooting terrorism.
www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-202.html#NRS202Sec4415
So yes, HE'S A FUCKING TERRORIST.
He is a TERRORIST.
This was an act of TERROR.
How else to you describe a person who guns down and planned to bomb peaceful citizens? Your the one with your head in the sand.
But the reason we care is because the media has been pushing this agenda of brown skin = terrorism.
Worse mass shooting in US history and they brand him a 'lone wolf'. It's bullshit. And it needs to be called out.
Ummm excuse you??!
I never claimed to feel that way. Pretty shitty of you to stoop to that level just cause your arguement falls short at every level.
To write of this dude at a 'shooter' is a disrespect to all those who lost their lives. That has been my point all along. Your the one who feels this is an insult towards race...for whatever reason.
Secondly I'm not the one trying to convince people that mass shooters, murders or criminals in general = terrorists. Quite frankly I don't care tbh, because people will call things whatever they want nowadays.
I'm not saying it's purely your fault. I'm just saying none of this information matters whatsoever. Who the hell cares if people consider him a terrorist or not in their own personal opinions? All that is doing is distracting people from the actual problem. That being tons of people died, gun laws need to change, and better teachings of mental health in society really needs to be taken into consideration. Everything else means nothing, and is just a distraction like I said.
On paper both blacks and whites can own guns....but not in practise..
I often wonder at white people saying oh i carry a gun etc . FOR PROTECTION...
Do they not realize if you carry a gun as a black person a cop will prob shoot you. And if they find a gun on him /her ...oh CRIMINAL....well you carry one FOR PROTECTION..right??
Gun laws are not the only issue. It's that some people get away with everything.
And to be honest if you changed nothing about what guns you can own gave 50 yrs for EVERY ILLEGAL gun held and did searches you get somewhere and even the media campaign of 50 YRS FOR HOLDING AN ILLEGAL GUN ..would change things.
1. Black men are being shot on the daily and they are UNARMED.
2. You need a carrying permit to have a gun on your person (in 13 states). That goes for white or black.
3. Jail time for having unregistered guns already exists but its not 50 years, its 30 days to a year depending on the states law. All guns are already required to be registered and there is already fines/jail time in place if they are not.
Obv 30 days to a year is not enough. And the law is not respected. It needs to be tougher sentences that are enforced.
Agreed unarmed black men and women get shot. Cops need better training and to be held to a much high standard. But also getting illegal guns off the streets and ...scaring the total shit out of people who own guns. There needs to be a voice at the back of the mind of every gun holder ..I must be careful or the state will ruin my life.
I would so hang people who own illegal guns publicly. Invite everyone to watch...but then i am evil ...and evil must be contained.
But 25 yrs for owning an illegal gun seems reasonable.
And the USA does need tougher gun laws. But even tougher sentences for having the guns you can't have now would change things.click to expand
Posted by ItsMeRomanNot necessarily agreeing or disagreeing with the 2nd shooter narrative, just some thoughts from someone who knows how to shoot.
Do you really think someone his age, weight, health could possibly unload that much bullets at that angle?
Seriously 😒. Not only do I find it impossible that he's capable of loading that many guns and bullets up 32 flights of stairs (they have no elevator footage of him apparently loading these bags to his room over a weeks time).
Now let's focus on his health. Take a good look at his face. He's carrying a lot of water retention, broken capillaries, ruddy texture and extreme eye bags. His body is flabby and undefined with very little muscle structure.
The weapons he actually used to apparently shoot people are heavy automatic weapons. To use these you'd need to have an extremely strong back and and shoulder muscles. The sheer amount of smoke that'd come off from these guns alone (from overheating of the cartridge and lubricant in chamber) alone make the hotel room extremely unbreathable which makes sense as per the double windows broken out.
Next issue is the angle. To shoot at that angle and distance while shooting downward would mean he was an extremely talented shooter. Those long range angled shots are actually very difficult to accomplish. The amount of concentration and physical strength to hold that angle would require someone trained, healthy with extremely amazing eyesight.
This man isn't the shooter. He is however the patsy. That hotel room was gifted to him with an attached room to make it even larger. Why give him an attached room if he was alone?
Now looking at the footage you'll see no flashback coming from his room/floor. However there is flashbacks on the 12th floor as well as behind the sign.
There was multiple reports from civilians talking about shooters in the ground. There's also videos of shooters in malls and casinos. There's tons of photos of these situations unfolding as well. The shooters were clad in all black. No military markings. They apparently moved without communicating with one another so they obviously has closed communication.
They corralled people into the parking lot area and then opened fire on them while in the parking lot.
If you honestly believe the story you were sold by the media then you deserve the enslavement and I have no pity for you.
I feel for those countless people who died for this.
Since the government is selling a false narrative then that means they're connected to it. If they're connected to this in order to push specific laws or regulations which we all know they're capable of then it's even more atrocious. These people died being shot in the back.
There's no way a single gunman was able to execute this.
What I think happened?
I think the "shooter" was killed much earlier in the night. I think he was given that room as a gift by the hotel because he was an avid gambler and "winner". I think the hotel made some key donations prior to this incident. I find it concerning the president of the hotel sold a huge amount of stock on the hotel days prior. I think the funds/organization the hotel gave to are very telling.
I think it was a carefully skilled and operated shooting. 12th floor and 4th floor shooter. Multiple broken out windows. Shooters on the ground. Multiple videos and pictures of individual and small group shooters making their way through Vegas. 4chan spoke to its followers days prior to this shooting telling people not to go outside if they are in Vegas that weekend.
The voice going over the ratio just moments before the shooting. What the actual fuck.
It's disrespectful to not seek the truth. People died for this and they deserve the truth. Not some convenient story the media and law enforcement want to sell.
The media was given this narrative as an outline to follow while questioning witnesses.
All those weapons can be broken down in half a meter long parts.
They are not heavy automatic weapons, in re to the recoil strength that you say it would be improbable to wield because of.
He used a bump stock mod, he had 12 rifles modded this way.
Here is a video of a pretty gurl shooting it, she don't look dat strong except maybe in the bedroom antics department. 😄
Smoke and different sounding shots could be explained with him first shooting from the inside of the room to conceal himself and when it filled up with smoke he leaned outwards. Overheating is why he used so many guns, so he can maximize kill ratio in the short amount of time before someone gets to him. The backdraft resulting from two smashed windows at that height would make sure some of the smoke is blown away too.
In re to accuracy, beyb, it doesn't take a marksman to spray a hail of bullets into a crowd of thousands and reasonably assume you will hit something. In fact the bump stock mod actually decreases pinpoint accuracy, but for a crowd, that's irelevant.
I cannot comment on the conflicting reports of multiple shooters from the crowd because when in line of fire a persons sensors aren't all that accurate because you're scrambling for your life. You are actually the first that i've seen mentioning gunmen in the crowd on the floor.
Multiple of my close friends that attended, have not mentioned multiple shooters in the crowd or even at the other casinos, they all said the same thing, it all came from above them. Could there have been more shooters, sure, even they don't know for sure, but there was no shooters in crowds or on stage.
As for the other Casinos, it was a chain reaction to what happened as large groups of people running from the concert would run through casinos and where screaming, it created pandemonium and several gamblers/casino workers started thinking there was attacks in those casinos. Again, I have heard this repeatedly from the folks that went to the concert, not from media outlets creating their own scenarios of what happened.
No one was corralled into a parking lot. The concert venue is a huge open field with a stage. I-Heart music festive is held there every year as well.
As for the other Casinos, it was a chain reaction to what happened as large groups of people running from the concert would run through casinos and where screaming, it created pandemonium and several gamblers/casino workers started thinking there was attacks in those casinos. Again, I have heard this repeatedly from the folks that went to the concert, not from media outlets creating their own scenarios of what happened.
No one was corralled into a parking lot. The concert venue is a huge open field with a stage. I-Heart music festive is held there every year as well.
Posted by ItsMeRomanTBH I'm not going to debate something that should never of happened in the first place. I agree with some of what you have said and if you read my earlier posts I have even shared that I felt as if there was more than just him involved.Posted by justagirl
Multiple of my close friends that attended, have not mentioned multiple shooters in the crowd or even at the other casinos, they all said the same thing, it all came from above them. Could there have been more shooters, sure, even they don't know for sure, but there was no shooters in crowds or on stage.
As for the other Casinos, it was a chain reaction to what happened as large groups of people running from the concert would run through casinos and where screaming, it created pandemonium and several gamblers/casino workers started thinking there was attacks in those casinos. Again, I have heard this repeatedly from the folks that went to the concert, not from media outlets creating their own scenarios of what happened.
No one was corralled into a parking lot. The concert venue is a huge open field with a stage. I-Heart music festive is held there every year as well.
So I guess I shouldn't believe the six couples that I grew up with my whole life that they knew there was shooters in multiple areas. They were at the right side of the stage maybe 20 people back and had direct head shots in there area at the very start.
Two of the men I know that were there are actually extremely skilled hunters. They are very familiar with guns and knew what they heard and saw.
It's why I don't believe in media spin. You can believe in what you like. I know it's easy to want to believe the news. It's their job to paint a picture. The multiple videos and pictures and evidence coming in from civilians...contradicts the news narrative.
There are videos and pictures available if you look.click to expand
Obviously there was different versions of what happened, and since neither of us was there and we only can go by what our friends have told us or the media, which as you have seen is also skewed from one website to an another...
I did drive down to lay flowers at the southern end of the strip Tuesday and I saw no windows other than the 2 that have been shown. But maybe they repaired them on Monday. I don't know.
Posted by ItsMeRomanRommy beyb, when i say gun i mean assault rifle, not shotgun which is a close quarter weapon, pretty much useless at ranges farther than 30-50 meters because the pellets inside the round spread. He had multiple weapons so as when the one he was firing with overheated (a continuous burst does that in the time frame you empty 2-3 magazines) he picked the other and continued.
None of the gunshots were shotgun sounding. The weapon he was using was modified in several ways. Why would he need a dozen shot guns when he had a few of the weapon he was using and apparently tons of bullets. The woman in the video had a gun similar but not quite to this shooter. Since this shooter had this gun and a spare he wouldn't have bothered hauling up that many guns lol.
Posted by ItsMeRomanWhich is the exact distance assault rifles are made to engage the enemy (soldiers). 300-400 meters which is roughly 1000 yards. Look, when shooting at a crowd of thousands you can't miss, even at that range. You just hold it steady as much as you can and spray. The guns he used are designed to kill or wound a single target at that range.
Take a look at the trajectory of where the hotel is and where he apparently opened fire. It's quite literally the equivalent of being on a mountain shooting across a football field onto the other side.
The distance and angle is pretty challenging and his success rate wouldn't have been so high.
Posted by ItsMeRomanI'd be very interested in seeing this video.
There's a video of a man opening fire in civilian clothes in that crowd.click to expand
AFAIK the only indication of an accomplice came from came from LEO's who said they are looking for a woman accomplice Paddock was seen with days prior to the shooting. But they don't mention she was shooting directly only the LV sheriff expresses his disbelief that he could do this alone with a sarcastic "maybe he was a super guy".
Posted by ellesbellesya..
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/04/us/politics/fact-check-vegas-gunman.html
people keep saying "there are videos and pictures if you look" but I have yet to see anyone produce anything.
I did see the video of the cab driver that clearly showed the muzzle flashes in the side mirror on the driver side car... she was in line at the Mandalay waiting to drive the circle to pick up people. Cori something...it clearly was coming from the upper window.
Far be it to take the word of someone that lives here and drives just south of the strip every day to work and I can see the casinos/windows etc.
I need to exit the thread again for awhile, as I am getting emotional, again.
THIS guy should not have had to do this. Those 58 PEOPLE should NOT BE DEAD.
Posted by ItsMeRomanI wouldn't know if it's the same woman.
Was this the same woman accompanied by someone else that went to the front of the concert stage 45 mins before the shooting started and told everyone there they were going to die.
There's news clippings of multiple people at the front talking about this but these also never made it to national news.
There are multiple videos. All you have to do is look and NOT on CNN or NyTimes. Facebook removed all these videos yesterday
Don't worry Rommy, i do not use WaPo, CNN or NYT, perhaps only when they (seldomly) scold their own leftists so i can fling poo in the faces of the same lefty nutjobs they support.
Found this video tho, idk if that's the one you're referring to.
https://www.facebook.com/News3LasVegas/videos/vb.101158809938537/1449891055065299/?type=2&theater
In my opinion, if such things are orchestrated to limit the rights the 2nd ammendment rights it backfires everytime, because after each such incident weapon sales rise.
Case in point: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/stephen-paddock-bump-stock-gun-sales-las-vegas-shooting-latest-a7983741.html
btw Rommy @ItsMeRoman a good start for conspiracy theories would be this picture
Note the "13" on his neck, there's pictures of him shot dead on the floor which i don't want to share here because for aesthetic reasons, but the "13" is nowhere to be seen.
Note the "13" on his neck, there's pictures of him shot dead on the floor which i don't want to share here because for aesthetic reasons, but the "13" is nowhere to be seen.
Posted by CaramelizedCoffeeI know 😩Posted by LadyNeptuneyou ain't lying tho.
"Lone wolf" is the media's special name for white man terrorist.
Domestic terrorism is alive and well in this country. To believe otherwise is stupidity at its finest.click to expand
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →Related Topics
Questions for you, have you or would you volunteer information about how much you make to a woman ? Whether that will be a woman u r seeing or togheee or married? Without her asking Ofcoz... esp if it's not that much ... if you did, would you say you tota
My poor child i22 s in love with her co-worker 31 who is visibly for everyone at place is fascinated by her and guys just giving him hard time, laughing and telling her he is in love with her but he has a girlfriend whom he doesn't let to move in with him
Just curious how would u describe a gemini with aries moon? ?Ready to see these responses lol
Also which signs do u think would i attract with my aries moon?
Any advice from Aries Moon people out there?
So, my Aries and I talked and we planned a trip. For hours we just vibed about it, decided where we wanna go. He's never been elsewhere. I, on the other hand, am an experienced traveller, thanks to the Sag in my chart.
Then, nothing for 2 days. After
Do you consider yourself to be a push over?
Hello,
i am Aries. 21.03.1990
Aries sun,
Cap Moon,
Mars, Venus in Aqua
i just wanted to ask , maybe you know why do i keep attracting Virgos? I have nothing connected with Virgo in my chart. Except the fact that i am a hardworker and my 6th house is
i really really think it's libra
The virgo post got me kind of curious about what u gems think about aries people!
But when is Mariah Carey gonna give it up?
https://youtu.be/Hg8ZBT-AbV8
I have a female friend with this placement and she says that she enjoys it too much...
her chart...
[IMG]http://i67.tinypic.com/j6jv5y.jpg[/IMG]
Please.
I'm trying to reach out to my ex boyfriend because I miss him and want to friends with him , and after giving him some time after our "kind of" mutual break up he's just been ignoring tf out of me! I don't think he has a real issue with me , he liked my r
TL;DR: Is there typically tension between Taurus children and Aries parents?
My mom is an Aries; she is very quick to anger, childish, and very emotional. I am noting the negative qualities because these are the things that have caused a strain in o
are you a mean drunk or a funny drunk? the thought popped in my head tonight. maybe all aries are fun drunks lol i am . hehehe
How does a man with an Aries moon typically go about with developing an intimate relationship?
i'm aries sun libra moon/rising aries mercury/venus and taurus mars
i neeeevvvverrrr get out of bed and i fall asleep at parties always sleepy, why
The perfect couple of the zodiac?
Their ideological leader is on the FBI's most wanted list holed up in Cuba after escaping from prison for killing LEO's
"As a Black network committed to transformation, we are particularly grateful to Fidel for holding Mama Assata Shakur, who continues to inspire us," states the letter.
“Black Lives Matter, as far as I am concerned, is a radical hate group,” Allen said. “And for that purpose alone, I think the leadership of this country needs to look a little bit harder at that particular group. The consequences of what we saw in Dallas is due to their efforts.”
Gregg Allen, black, chief cop in El Paso, one of the safest cities in 'murica so he probably knows what he is doing.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/11/greg-allen-black-texas-police-chief-calls-black-li/
It is what it is /shrugs .....from the first link i shared in my first post here id just add the statement used which went "liberalism is white supremacy".....that should tell you enough how far the lefts incessant pushing of affirmative action has gone and where it has gotten it. Now they are turning on you.
Theres more links like this but im on the phone so cant be arsed for them atm.