
NotYourAverageAquarius
@NotYourAverageAquarius
13 Years5,000+ PostsAquarius
Comments: 22 · Posts: 6178 · Topics: 30




Posted by GetMistedPosted by NotYourAverageAquariusPosted by Damnata
NYAA calm down and read my post again.
I never said you were against the new immunity challenge. I said you said if a majority is reached, you're on board with a new immunity challenge.
yeah well if it was a tie I would be fore there not being a new immunity challenge.
You said I would be.
Also, trying to say who can vote and who can't is totally bogus.
You two might was well be the judges then.
Changing the winner of immunity after votes have been casted is bogus.click to expand







Posted by GetMistedPosted by Damnata
^you did that on porpoise mofo
Fixedclick to expand



Posted by Damnata
Snoz hasn't any "-" after his name, I take it he is not allowed to vote?
j/k, just joining in the grammar circle jerk going on around here.







Posted by ScruffyPosted by StoicGoat
So, in the matter of whether the corrected verdict on the challenge (the one granting Nacho immunity) should be retained or a new challenge undertaken, we have the following votes. If the vote I have recorded for you below is incorrect, speak up. We will proceed according to the majority will of the players.
Damnata - new challenge
Flipper - new challenge
Nacho - keep the corrected verdict
Scruffy - keep the corrected verdict
APC -
Aquasnoz
Aquariuslove14 -
Duchessedenemours -
Steve -
Stillwater -
The Lady Scorpio -
Your reasoning made sense, Judge.
However please turn on your profanity filter in the future as I would like to spam your challenges with boobie pics.
*waves* to Sheets and Airheads 😛click to expand




Posted by aquariuslove14
*****Just and update Judge*****
Damnata - new challenge
Flipper - new challenge
Nacho - keep the corrected verdict
Scruffy - keep the corrected verdict
APC -keep the corrected verdict
Aquasnoz-
Aquariuslove14 -keep the corrected verdict
Duchessedenemours -new challenge
Steve -new challenge
Stillwater -
The Lady Scorpio -new challenge
Correct if wrong?

Posted by GetMisted
Goat, what happens if there is a tie when voting someone off?




Posted by Damnata
If a player quits, will the elimination challenge go on?

Posted by StoicGoat
There will not always be an odd number of players voting. It was a good and reasonable question.

Posted by AstrobynPosted by StoicGoat
There will not always be an odd number of players voting. It was a good and reasonable question.
Oooh! suggestion if there is a next game. In the event of a tie, the immunity challenge winner vote will be doubled to break the tie. Saving so much time and trouble.click to expand

Posted by AstrobynPosted by StoicGoat
There will not always be an odd number of players voting. It was a good and reasonable question.
Oooh! suggestion if there is a next game. In the event of a tie, the immunity challenge winner vote will be doubled to break the tie. Saving so much time and trouble.click to expand

Posted by GetMisted
What if the other team has the deciding vote in a tie? How does that sound? Not for this game, but for the next survivor.



Posted by GetMisted
Any word on when we conclude this voting session?


Posted by StillWaterPosted by TwirlingStrawberry
majority says new challenge.
finally!!!!!!!
I'm tired of all this crying and whining. new challenge. for pete's sakes let it be a smooth winner and get this over with so we can all move on with our DXP lives.click to expand







Posted by Damnata
Can we get the time on the next challenge or we'll vote on that also?
/sick of hearing both nyaa and the beluga complaining about time.
If we're going with time, nothing worked for me since we started this contest. I'm just saying.




Posted by NotYourAverageAquarius
Damnata a debate is a lot different than a challenege. You can participate in that whenever you want. But if you feel that way cool. Have it your way.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
yeah well if it was a tie I would be fore there not being a new immunity challenge.
You said I would be.
Also, trying to say who can vote and who can't is totally bogus.
You two might was well be the judges then.