Thousand cock stare (Page 2)

Posted by Whorpio

Posted by exoskeleton_

i can dig this for strictly sex relationships. it's a love of pleasure, for sport.

but generally, what are your main objectives in having sex with say your boyfriend? to connect? to feel desired/power?

is there a ever a time in intimate moments when you genuinely want to express your emotional side and not hold back?

My objectives in sex with my bf is usually fun. Sometimes if I’m not in the mood I still do it to give him a release and make him feel desired/loved.

There have been times in intimate moments with the gem where I found something funny and laughed so hard to the point of crying, if that counts. Never sad emotions though; those I tend to bottle up and deal with on my own.

click to expand

would you say this for your protection/self-preservation? is there any man that you can trust with your feelings, whether good bad, and you know he will understand and not judge you?

Posted by Fanta

I read a study once that DNA from previous male lovers can be found in a woman's breast tissue years later. I've been trying to find the article but I can't find it.

I'm not sure that it matters much, but it grossed me out to read.

That’s fascinating, would love to read that

Posted by Fanta

I read a study once that DNA from previous male lovers can be found in a woman's breast tissue years later. I've been trying to find the article but I can't find it.

I'm not sure that it matters much, but it grossed me out to read.

Wow

😧

Posted by MyStarsShine

Posted by Whorpio My objectives in sex with my bf is usually fun. Sometimes if I’m not in the mood I still do it to give him a release and make him feel desired/loved.

There have been times in intimate moments with the gem where I found something funny and laughed so hard to the point of crying, if that counts. Never sad emotions though; those I tend to bottle up and deal with on my own.

Is he okay with that?

click to expand

I’d assume so since he’s madly in love with me to this day 🤷‍♀️

Posted by Whorpio

Posted by MyStarsShine

Posted by Whorpio My objectives in sex with my bf is usually fun. Sometimes if I’m not in the mood I still do it to give him a release and make him feel desired/loved.

There have been times in intimate moments with the gem where I found something funny and laughed so hard to the point of crying, if that counts. Never sad emotions though; those I tend to bottle up and deal with on my own.

Is he okay with that?

I’d assume so since he’s madly in love with me to this day 🤷‍♀️

click to expand

Awwwwww, sweet

Tell him you're madly in love with him ❤️😘

Posted by exoskeleton_

would you say this for your protection/self-preservation? is there any man that you can trust with your feelings, whether good bad, and you know he will understand and not judge you?

I would say there’s not many people in general I would trust except strangers on the internet or a therapist.

Posted by Fanta

I read a study once that DNA from previous male lovers can be found in a woman's breast tissue years later. I've been trying to find the article but I can't find it.

I'm not sure that it matters much, but it grossed me out to read.

I’ve heard something similar, that every time a man ejaculates inside a woman her DNA changes by adopting some of his DNA. I shared that info with my bf and told him “so if we have a baby together and it comes out black, that’s why” 😬🤣🤣 I thought it was funny 🤷‍♀️

Posted by Isolde

Posted by Fanta

I read a study once that DNA from previous male lovers can be found in a woman's breast tissue years later. I've been trying to find the article but I can't find it.

I'm not sure that it matters much, but it grossed me out to read.

That’s fascinating, would love to read that

click to expand

So I just read this.. interesting. I pasted the article below and the link

https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2017/08/15/male-dna-is-often-found-in-womens-brains-where-does-it-come-from/



Do women retain DNA from every man they have ever slept with? originally appeared on Quora: the place to gain and share knowledge, empowering people to learn from others and better understand the world.

Answer by Suzanne Sadedin, Ph.D. in evolutionary biology, on Quora:

Do women retain DNA from every man they have ever slept with? No. The claim comes from an absurd clickbait article on YourNewsWire which I won’t give more oxygen by linking. That article references this study, which found male cells in 37 out of 59 women’s brains studied (63% ).

Where did the cells come from? The most likely explanation is pregnancy. During implantation, embryonic cells are programmed to divide extremely fast and invade the mother’s bloodstream. Sometimes, they can establish populations in other parts of her body that survive for the rest of her life.

But wait! Another study showed that a few women had male cells, even though (so far as they knew) they had never been pregnant. Based on this, the authors of the YourNewsWire article make a gigantic leap to claiming that these cells must be sperm collected from sex partners.

Now, think about sperm. They’re haploid; they can’t function like normal human cells. They’re highly specialized, having evolved solely to compete to get to the egg. They don’t survive more than a few days, even in the oviduct, which evolved to store them. And most importantly, they can’t divide.

So no, women don’t retain men’s sperm for life. That’s just silly.

Why do some women who’ve never been pregnant still have male cells? Most likely they had been pregnant, they just didn’t know it. It’s thought that around half of all pregnancies end in spontaneous miscarriage, very often before they are detected.

There are also two other plausible sources for these cells: (1) cells from an older brother that had been retained in the woman’s mother were incorporated by the woman when she was growing in the womb or (2) cells from a male twin that was absorbed before birth.

It’s remotely possible that women might sometimes retain some non-sperm cells from male partners, since that’s never been studied and biology is weird. But there’s currently no reason to think it’s true, and many reasons to think it’s not. For starters, the female reproductive tract is actually a horribly unfriendly place to start a new cell colony. If it weren’t, you’d have embryos growing all over the place, and an ectopic pregnancy is really bad news.

You would be far more likely to “catch” someone else’s cells in an open wound, but that’s also extraordinarily rare (e.g. the case of the surgeon who developed cancer after cutting his hand during surgery on a cancer patient). Cancers are cancers because they proliferate aggressively — in fact they often use the same genetic architecture as embryos. But even so, we don’t generally worry about catching cancer, because our immune defenses rapidly eradicate foreign cells. The chance of propagating normal adult male cells in the reproductive tract is presumably far smaller.

This question originally appeared on Quora

Posted by Whorpio

Posted by exoskeleton_

would you say this for your protection/self-preservation? is there any man that you can trust with your feelings, whether good bad, and you know he will understand and not judge you?

I would say there’s not many people in general I would trust except strangers on the internet or a therapist.

click to expand

i get that, i think some dxpers feel me better than my peeps smh lol. it's sad when someone who is physically close to you all the time still can't pick up on your emotional cues or even comprehend all your facets.

if you want more fulfilling sex on all levels emotional, mental, spiritual, physical then find the man who you can give your full self to and trust him with it. 🙂

Posted by Whorpio

Someone once described to me the cause of the stare like this: every time you have casual sex with someone it’s the equivalent of putting a strip of duct tape on your skin and ripping it off. If you repeat this action several times the duct tape loses its stick so you stop feeling it being ripped off.

They told me this is also why I have trouble “making love” with my boyfriend; because I have such an extensive history of stripping the emotional side out of sex that I am incapable of associating emotions with sex. All I know is fucking 🤷‍♀️

I saw a video on this when I was younger, where a woman was lecturing teens on why they should remain abstinent, and she went around with the strip of duct tape on her arm, demonstrating this, and saying the exact same thing...lol. I think this is total bullshit.

I've been with several women who had 30+ partners, my current partner included. One, who had actually been an escort for a bit, was all about "making love" and couldn't even get in the mood unless we were completely on the same page emotionally; my current SO cries uncontrollably every time she orgasms; she gets emotional to the point where it embarrasses her and would typically try to avoid orgasms for that reason, feeling like she was losing control, etc. I don't think you can really generalize about sexuality like this. I've known women that go through a lot of partners precisely because sex is the means they use to feel emotionally close to someone, and from a biochemical standpoint (just thinking about the role of oxytocin which spikes during the act), that is its actual purpose.

I think there's just a lot of variation from person to person here. For my own part, I've never had sex with anyone I didn't feel strong emotional attachment to. I just find it awkward. At the same time, I think I prefer a detached kind of sex w/that person, and I've been lying to myself about "making love" for a long time. I used to use this phrase to just describe slower/more sensual sex, which some past partners preferred, but that's even really more of a physical thing for me. I think people are using it to imply a deep emotional engagement or sentimentalism during the act maybe (I really have no idea lol), and I can only remember experiencing that once. It was really nice but it would be hard to conjure that often, and even then there was a lot of laughing, and it wasn't that heavy - just felt 100% comfortable with this person and like I was exactly where I needed to be. "Having fun", to me is an emotion though, and even lust for me is emotional. I love eye contact but its more of a turn-on bc I see it as a confidence thing and eyes are just beautiful/sexy to me. I do feel a connection but its more raw/animalistic than it is about some lover's gaze. If I'm being honest, I think I'd rather have a partner give me a lustful/devious grin and a 1,000 cock stare, than a look of love.

Not knocking anyone else's experience though. And I think, even without being super emotional, you can express love through how you please your partner selflessly. A selfish lover always translates, for me, as someone who just isn't that into me. I'm always thinking about what turns my partner on, what will give them the most pleasure, putting their own needs before my own. Granted, there's a lot of ego gratification in that for me, but I think on some level, that is definitely loving a person through sex...

Posted by Metatron

I saw a video on this when I was younger, where a woman was lecturing teens on why they should remain abstinent, and she went around with the strip of duct tape on her arm, demonstrating this, and saying the exact same thing...lol. I think this is total bullshit.

I've been with several women who had 30+ partners, my current partner included. One, who had actually been an escort for a bit, was all about "making love" and couldn't even get in the mood unless we were completely on the same page emotionally; my current SO cries uncontrollably every time she orgasms; she gets emotional to the point where it embarrasses her and would typically try to avoid orgasms for that reason, feeling like she was losing control, etc. I don't think you can really generalize about sexuality like this. I've known women that go through a lot of partners precisely because sex is the means they use to feel emotionally close to someone, and from a biochemical standpoint (just thinking about the role of oxytoxin which spikes during the act), that is its actual purpose.

I think there's just a lot of variation from person to person here. For my own part, I've never had sex with anyone I didn't feel strong emotional attachment to. I just find it awkward. At the same time, I think I prefer a detached kind of sex w/that person, and I've been lying to myself about "making love" for a long time. I used to use this phrase to just describe slower/more sensual sex, which some past partners preferred, but that's even really more of a physical thing for me. I think people are using it to imply a deep emotional engagement or sentimentalism during the act maybe (I really have no idea lol), and I can only remember experiencing that once. It was really nice but it would be hard to conjure that often, and even then there was a lot of laughing, and it wasn't that heavy - just felt 100% comfortable with this person and like I was exactly where I needed to be. "Having fun", to me is an emotion though, and even lust for me is emotional. I love eye contact but its more of a turn-on bc I see it as a confidence thing and eyes are just beautiful/sexy to me. I do feel a connection but its more raw/animalistic than it is about some lover's gaze. If I'm being honest, I think I'd rather have a partner give me a lustful/devious grin and a 1,000 cock stare, than a look of love.

Not knocking anyone else's experience though. And I think, even without being super emotional, you can express love through how you please your partner selflessly. A selfish lover always translates, for me, as someone who just isn't that into me. I'm always thinking about what turns my partner on, what will give them the most pleasure, putting their own needs before my own. Granted, there's a lot of ego gratification in that for me, but I think on some level, that is definitely loving a person through sex...

Well, the person who told me the duct tape thing is my therapist and she is a Baptist so maybe you are on to something about the whole abstinence talk 🤣🤣

I agree with the rest of what you wrote. I may not show/feel love during sex, but I feel happiness and lust and doing things that I know my partner will enjoy is an expression of love.

Posted by Whorpio

Posted by Metatron

I saw a video on this when I was younger, where a woman was lecturing teens on why they should remain abstinent, and she went around with the strip of duct tape on her arm, demonstrating this, and saying the exact same thing...lol. I think this is total bullshit.

I've been with several women who had 30+ partners, my current partner included. One, who had actually been an escort for a bit, was all about "making love" and couldn't even get in the mood unless we were completely on the same page emotionally; my current SO cries uncontrollably every time she orgasms; she gets emotional to the point where it embarrasses her and would typically try to avoid orgasms for that reason, feeling like she was losing control, etc. I don't think you can really generalize about sexuality like this. I've known women that go through a lot of partners precisely because sex is the means they use to feel emotionally close to someone, and from a biochemical standpoint (just thinking about the role of oxytoxin which spikes during the act), that is its actual purpose.

I think there's just a lot of variation from person to person here. For my own part, I've never had sex with anyone I didn't feel strong emotional attachment to. I just find it awkward. At the same time, I think I prefer a detached kind of sex w/that person, and I've been lying to myself about "making love" for a long time. I used to use this phrase to just describe slower/more sensual sex, which some past partners preferred, but that's even really more of a physical thing for me. I think people are using it to imply a deep emotional engagement or sentimentalism during the act maybe (I really have no idea lol), and I can only remember experiencing that once. It was really nice but it would be hard to conjure that often, and even then there was a lot of laughing, and it wasn't that heavy - just felt 100% comfortable with this person and like I was exactly where I needed to be. "Having fun", to me is an emotion though, and even lust for me is emotional. I love eye contact but its more of a turn-on bc I see it as a confidence thing and eyes are just beautiful/sexy to me. I do feel a connection but its more raw/animalistic than it is about some lover's gaze. If I'm being honest, I think I'd rather have a partner give me a lustful/devious grin and a 1,000 cock stare, than a look of love.

Not knocking anyone else's experience though. And I think, even without being super emotional, you can express love through how you please your partner selflessly. A selfish lover always translates, for me, as someone who just isn't that into me. I'm always thinking about what turns my partner on, what will give them the most pleasure, putting their own needs before my own. Granted, there's a lot of ego gratification in that for me, but I think on some level, that is definitely loving a person through sex...

Well, the person who told me the duct tape thing is my therapist and she is a Baptist so maybe you are on to something about the whole abstinence talk 🤣🤣

I agree with the rest of what you wrote. I may not show/feel love during sex, but I feel happiness and lust and doing things that I know my partner will enjoy is an expression of love.

click to expand

Here we go lol:

Posted by exoskeleton_

i get that, i think some dxpers feel me better than my peeps smh lol. it's sad when someone who is physically close to you all the time still can't pick up on your emotional cues or even comprehend all your facets.

if you want more fulfilling sex on all levels emotional, mental, spiritual, physical then find the man who you can give your full self to and trust him with it. 🙂

The gem does pick up on my emotional cues and somewhat understand my facets to the extent I’ve allowed him to understand. But I just can’t give my full self to anyone, which goes back to the self preservation thing.

Posted by Metatron Here we go lol:

Oh god 🤦🏻‍♀️ That’s not exactly how it was explained to me, but that video is so cringe 😬 Also, I can’t believe some areas wait til HS to teach sex ed. I’m sure there’s a statistic somewhere that says teaching sex ed in fifth grade results in a lower minor pregnancy rate than waiting til HS.

Posted by Whorpio

Posted by exoskeleton_

i get that, i think some dxpers feel me better than my peeps smh lol. it's sad when someone who is physically close to you all the time still can't pick up on your emotional cues or even comprehend all your facets.

if you want more fulfilling sex on all levels emotional, mental, spiritual, physical then find the man who you can give your full self to and trust him with it. 🙂

The gem does pick up on my emotional cues and somewhat understand my facets to the extent I’ve allowed him to understand. But I just can’t give my full self to anyone, which goes back to the self preservation thing.

click to expand

yea, you have to want to give yourself despite the risk.

Posted by Whorpio

Posted by Metatron Here we go lol:

Oh god 🤦🏻‍♀️ That’s not exactly how it was explained to me, but that video is so cringe 😬 Also, I can’t believe some areas wait til HS to teach sex ed. I’m sure there’s a statistic somewhere that says teaching sex ed in fifth grade results in a lower minor pregnancy rate than waiting til HS.

click to expand

my weed brownie just hit lmao

Posted by exoskeleton_

my weed brownie just hit lmao

Is it any good? If yes, can you ship some to me??

Posted by Whorpio

Posted by exoskeleton_

my weed brownie just hit lmao

Is it any good? If yes, can you ship some to me??

click to expand

yea, it's a nanaimo bar, 140 mg indica

good convo though! catch you later, girl 🙂

Posted by exoskeleton_

Posted by MyStarsShine My friend who has slept with 250 men tells me the energy of each lover stays in your energy field for 7 years

Imagine that? 😳😐

i wouldn't doubt it. i think that energy stays as long as you allow it to.

click to expand

I agree 100% with this. First of all you have to want that energy inside you to even let it influence you, and then it will stay as long as you want it to. Therefore it’s more of a conscious thing than something that just happens subconsciously.

Posted by Fanta

Posted by WhorpioOh god 🤦🏻‍♀️ That’s not exactly how it was explained to me, but that video is so cringe 😬 Also, I can’t believe some areas wait til HS to teach sex ed. I’m sure there’s a statistic somewhere that says teaching sex ed in fifth grade results in a lower minor pregnancy rate than waiting til HS.

Some states do not teach sex ed other than abstinence-only. Texas doesn't require any sex ed and requires that if you do teach it, it has to be abstinence-focused.

click to expand

I grew up in Colorado so I was lucky to learn it young.

But the gem has told me he was taught in high school and by that point there was already a pregnant chick in his sex ed class 🤣🤣

It’s the same in Louisiana; abstinence-based and taught in high school. I remember in Louisiana I took a microbiology class and there was this mom in my class who had an 11-year-old daughter. One day the professor showed us a photo slide show of STD’s, including HPV, and what their cells look like under a microscope.

At the end of class this mom was talking to the professor about the HPV vaccine, saying the photo slide show was scary but she won’t get her daughter vaccinated for HPV because she didn’t want her daughter to think sex is okay. My jaw dropped to the floor because I didn’t understand how someone can be so selfish and ignorant.

Posted by ElectronCowboy

When I was an anatomy and physiology teacher at the high school level, I taught sex-ed through the lens of anatomy and physiology so I didn't really need consent from parents. You would be surprised the questions I got, lol! 🤣

I'm very familiar with human anatomy and physiology, I almost went to medical school. 😁

You know, it’s probably good you didn’t go to medical school. The gem was telling me his A&P teacher had a medical degree and yet she insisted PMS is not an excuse for women to have mood changes.

Posted by Whorpio

Posted by exoskeleton_

i can dig this for strictly sex relationships. it's a love of pleasure, for sport.

but generally, what are your main objectives in having sex with say your boyfriend? to connect? to feel desired/power?

is there a ever a time in intimate moments when you genuinely want to express your emotional side and not hold back?

My objectives in sex with my bf is usually fun. Sometimes if I’m not in the mood I still do it to give him a release and make him feel desired/loved.

There have been times in intimate moments with the gem where I found something funny and laughed so hard to the point of crying, if that counts. Never sad emotions though; those I tend to bottle up and deal with on my own.

click to expand

I don't think you're different or damaged, this just proves it.

Your relationship with the gemini is peculiar because of the nature of your "profession", he can accept it which means he finds love in you beyond the usual standards of couples.

which is great because most people are actually miserable in normal couples.

Gems can be good to instinctively find important truths in the domain of interactions, the problem is that they do it reflexively without undestanding it themselves and they can shut off or be distracted.

You should make sure to find a way to keep the dynamic relevant and needing work, and not try to fall into comfort and routine.

I think the most peculiar relationships are the one where true love can really exist. Like Twilight or that movie with the dude who dominates his secretary. When you feel ther is no more effort to be done, and no distance across your partner, that's when it's done.

You still have the magic