Vacation Queen
@saggurl88
12 Years25,000+ Posts
Comments: 22238 · Posts: 25616 · Topics: 84
Megan markle (Page 3)
You are on page out of 6 | Reverse Order
I believe she was very depressed and suicidal
Moon Saturn conjunction by 1° In 4th house of family and home. She also has Pluto there
I doubt she was lying about that
Moon Saturn conjunction by 1° In 4th house of family and home. She also has Pluto there
I doubt she was lying about that
Posted by MaxianPosted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by DonnaLibra
I can't believe Markle never googled Harry or the Royals after they dated. To say she had no idea what was expected of her is unbelievable too. Wouldn't she ask her Harry this important information after he proposed? Doesn't sound possible that she wouldn't ask that.
I agree!
I read a quote that said she didn't know she was supposed to curtsey in front of The Queen. IT'S ROYALTY. She made herself sound like a self absorbed idiot. " I just thought it was your grandmother"
Who doesn't look up customs, but thinks they can just wing it LMAO
The context of that quote was that she was meeting the queen in a relaxed setting, no press or event going on and was a bit taken back that it would be so formal and a curtsy would be require. I would think the same.
I don’t know how meeting a queen is ever informal.
Lol your determined to hate on her. Go on then
I’m not. Some things may be true regarding race, I’m unsure why her son would not be protected if they were to stay in the royal family.
It just seems like the typical Tudor style English drama in the 21st century.
Harry has always been the wild child. So if they like the life they have, then so be it. They chose it.
And I can be critical of her as well. Some things didn't quite line up for me in this interview.
The working in an ice-cream shop at 13 is illegal in California. So either she lied or her mother lied about her age for her to have that job. Or she is lying now.
Also her claiming to know nothing about the royal family is a bit suspect. I spent the first 15 years of my life without a tv and I knew who Diana was and that whole story. Everyone was talking about it. Unless your a hermit living in the woods you knew at least SOMETHING about the royal family, especially during the diana days. And common, there's no shame in googling the famous dude who wants to take you out on a date.
And I loled at her chickens being 'rescue chickens'. Lol anyone who has chickens who isn't eating them, congrats you've rescued them. They are living the rescued life.
Also no one does an interview for free, not really. They are getting something in return. Whether that is the chance to tell their side, promote their upcoming project with Oprah on netflix, etc.
As a response to working in ice cream shop. I also worked in a hotel/bar/bowling-complex when I was 15, and stayed after 23h. That's also illegal here, but it was fun because of colleagues and friends and saw it through their fingers me working there.
For the rest, I do agree. I question their interest and what they want to achieve with this whole puppetshow while advocating for privacy all the time. It's weird.click to expand
I worked at 15 and my mother had to sign off on a series of forms.
I do know in California it is illegal to work at 13 UNLESS its in the entertainment industry... acting modeling etc. But last I checked scooping icecream is not an acting gig.
It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. I see them taking a more active role in both the public eye here in the states and more control over how they are seen in the media.
I know there has been talk in the past about Harry's paternity being in question.
James Hewitt anyone?
IDK if this played a role in their decision not to award a title to his son. If there is truth to this rumor then its a possibility.
James Hewitt anyone?
IDK if this played a role in their decision not to award a title to his son. If there is truth to this rumor then its a possibility.
Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by MaxianPosted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by DonnaLibra
I can't believe Markle never googled Harry or the Royals after they dated. To say she had no idea what was expected of her is unbelievable too. Wouldn't she ask her Harry this important information after he proposed? Doesn't sound possible that she wouldn't ask that.
I agree!
I read a quote that said she didn't know she was supposed to curtsey in front of The Queen. IT'S ROYALTY. She made herself sound like a self absorbed idiot. " I just thought it was your grandmother"
Who doesn't look up customs, but thinks they can just wing it LMAO
The context of that quote was that she was meeting the queen in a relaxed setting, no press or event going on and was a bit taken back that it would be so formal and a curtsy would be require. I would think the same.
I don’t know how meeting a queen is ever informal.
Lol your determined to hate on her. Go on then
I’m not. Some things may be true regarding race, I’m unsure why her son would not be protected if they were to stay in the royal family.
It just seems like the typical Tudor style English drama in the 21st century.
Harry has always been the wild child. So if they like the life they have, then so be it. They chose it.
And I can be critical of her as well. Some things didn't quite line up for me in this interview.
The working in an ice-cream shop at 13 is illegal in California. So either she lied or her mother lied about her age for her to have that job. Or she is lying now.
Also her claiming to know nothing about the royal family is a bit suspect. I spent the first 15 years of my life without a tv and I knew who Diana was and that whole story. Everyone was talking about it. Unless your a hermit living in the woods you knew at least SOMETHING about the royal family, especially during the diana days. And common, there's no shame in googling the famous dude who wants to take you out on a date.
And I loled at her chickens being 'rescue chickens'. Lol anyone who has chickens who isn't eating them, congrats you've rescued them. They are living the rescued life.
Also no one does an interview for free, not really. They are getting something in return. Whether that is the chance to tell their side, promote their upcoming project with Oprah on netflix, etc.
As a response to working in ice cream shop. I also worked in a hotel/bar/bowling-complex when I was 15, and stayed after 23h. That's also illegal here, but it was fun because of colleagues and friends and saw it through their fingers me working there.
For the rest, I do agree. I question their interest and what they want to achieve with this whole puppetshow while advocating for privacy all the time. It's weird.
I worked at 15 and my mother had to sign off on a series of forms.
I do know in California it is illegal to work at 13 UNLESS its in the entertainment industry... acting modeling etc. But last I checked scooping icecream is not an acting gig.
It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. I see them taking a more active role in both the public eye here in the states and more control over how they are seen in the media.click to expand
I don't know how young you are, but I was able to work young too. I had a job at 12 selling candy, then went into a company mailroom at 13 for the summer, then worked at a fast food place after that.
Even my ex worked at a place similar to chuck e cheese when he was 13.
I'm not sure what they labor laws were back then but I'm close to her age.
I got hired through summer school programs.
DNA Would solve it but it will never happen
Posted by MisscappyPosted by MyStarsShine
I believe she was very depressed and suicidal
Moon Saturn conjunction by 1° In 4th house of family and home. She also has Pluto there
I doubt she was lying about that
One look at that moon-saturn and I immediately feel sorry for her. That same aspect destroyed my niece too.click to expand
Me too
Sorry to hear about your niece, that’s so very sad 😞
My father had it also....he was depressed all his life, poor guy
Posted by saggurl88
I hope Harry doesn't regret marrying her. Meg is acting like her shady ass dad, IMO. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
She was not raised in this class of royalty and she's trying to forge a way of her own, out of traditions that are upheld for thousands of years, that she has no family history of.
Just trashy American style . Americans think they are supposed to walk in to a place with something handed to them. She doesn't have much respect at all for his royal status or his family traditions.
Correct. She was saying how she was expected to do things a certain way but no one taught her. Honey... what about your whole fucking man of a husband who grew up with those traditions? It's his role to bring you up to speed. She's just a brat who wants to be treated exceptionally because she did fuckin' Suits. Get over yourself.... like you said no respect for the family traditions embedded in royalty... she makes no sense to me.
Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by jeanePosted by LadyNeptune
Ya'll are missing the point. Its not her being upset, THEY are upset that their child, Megan, and finally Harry's protection was removed per the institution and the royals themselves. Protection that is granted to anyone in the royal family regardless of title.
Sends a pretty clear message when they no longer care about your safety.
i thought that their security was not going to be funded by the public after they gave up royal duties. before that it was fully funded by the tax payer. only when they said they would no longer be on staff did they lose that although i think at the time charles said he would pay for it from his private earnings.
The way I understand the time table here is that the talks of not giving Archie or her security happened while she was pregnant. After stepping back (not down altogether) from royal duties Harry’s security was also revoked.
There’s nothing to say that not having royal duties means your security is removed. Prince Andrew hasn’t had any royal duties since 2019 and has both his security and his daughters security has been maintained. The Queen made sure of it.
She’s rather keep her pedophile rapist son safe then her innocent great grandson. Full stop.click to expand
actually it is to do with their lineage to the throne and at time of birth, Archie was not up for Prince title. Archie was given an Earl title that Harry/Meghan refused. And even then not all Princes and Princesses are afforded security. Then on top of that they decided to leave their duties completely regardless of Harry's prince title. So this just seems like back-peddling. They were hoping to have all the perks of royalty without the obligations such as keeping family matters private. And we know Meghan could never in a million years keep shit to herself sooooo..... all this comes from lack of the funding.
Also, it's a huge slap to the Queen's face taht her own grandchild would want to leave the Royalty obligations then to expect money, titles, security etc after it... just doesn't make sense. i'd cut them off too.
It's not just about title but loyalty. When Harry and Meghan wanted to leave their duties then why would the Queen fight for their rights? The only reason Prince Andrew got to keep his is because he was actually cut off then the Queen personally stepped in to make the request - and Prince Andrew was still working part-time for the palace.
Why would she do that for someone who is so close to her lineage but wants to walk away from their family obligations? She wouldn't. SO now you reap what you sow. Harry wants to be all mr.independent then be independent don't cry when you're treated as such. Take care of your own wife and family without letting your woman cry on public TV that you guys don't get security and titles etc.
Why would she do that for someone who is so close to her lineage but wants to walk away from their family obligations? She wouldn't. SO now you reap what you sow. Harry wants to be all mr.independent then be independent don't cry when you're treated as such. Take care of your own wife and family without letting your woman cry on public TV that you guys don't get security and titles etc.
Posted by LadyNeptune
I know there has been talk in the past about Harry's paternity being in question.
James Hewitt anyone?
IDK if this played a role in their decision not to award a title to his son. If there is truth to this rumor then its a possibility.
Under protocols established by George V in letters patent more than 100 years ago in 1917, the children and grandchildren of a sovereign have the automatic right to the title HRH and prince or princess.
Advertisement
At the time Archie was born, he was the great-grandchild of a sovereign, not a grandchild.
George V’s declaration sets out: “The grandchildren of the sons of any such sovereign in the direct male line (save only the eldest living son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales) shall have and enjoy in all occasions the style and title enjoyed by the children of dukes of this realm.”
As such, Archie will be entitled to the titles when Prince Charles accedes the throne.
George V’s declaration means that only Prince George, as a great-grandson of the monarch down the direct line of succession to the throne, was originally entitled to be a prince, as he is the eldest son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales.
The Queen did step in ahead of George’s birth to issue letters patent to ensure the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s children would have the titles of prince and princess.
But they are children of the future monarch, whereas Archie is not. His father, Harry, is sixth in line to the throne, and will move down the line of succession if William and Kate have more children, and as George, Charlotte and Louis have children of their own.
At the time of Archie’s birth, it was reported the couple had decided he should be plain Master Archie Mountbatten-Windsor – the surname adopted by the royal family reflecting Prince Philip’s family name, and the Windsor name adopted by George V.
It was suggested this was because the couple wanted him to be seen as normal, without the burden of being a prince.
But Meghan made clear this was not the case. “It was not our decision to make,” she said.
The Sussexes indicated in the interview that they had expected Archie would be given the title of prince after Charles acceded the throne, but that they had been told that protocols would be changed - in line with Charles’s wish for a slimmed down monarchy - so that Archie would be excluded from becoming an HRH and prince.
Who gets title of Prince/Princess?
Under protocols established by George V in letters patent more than 100 years ago in 1917, the children and grandchildren of a sovereign have the automatic right to the title HRH and prince or princess.
- Unless it is the children of the first born son who have succession to the crown (Prince William and his kids). Harry's kids are not that - they are great-grandchildren and not of the first born son. When Prince Charles steps in then they are up for the Prince title...
Probably Meghan wanted all the bells and whistles of marrying a Prince not realizing 1) the obligations 2) that his succession to the crown is faaaaaaaaaaar faaaaaaaaar behind Prince William and his kids.
Under protocols established by George V in letters patent more than 100 years ago in 1917, the children and grandchildren of a sovereign have the automatic right to the title HRH and prince or princess.
- Unless it is the children of the first born son who have succession to the crown (Prince William and his kids). Harry's kids are not that - they are great-grandchildren and not of the first born son. When Prince Charles steps in then they are up for the Prince title...
Probably Meghan wanted all the bells and whistles of marrying a Prince not realizing 1) the obligations 2) that his succession to the crown is faaaaaaaaaaar faaaaaaaaar behind Prince William and his kids.
As they are also investigating the allegations of Megan’s bulling of staffWill there be full reports on both investigations lol
Posted by peachy06
You guys are a bit tough on her. The Royal family is shady.
I still believe to this day they have something to do with Diana's death.
Princess Diana died because she did not think using professional close protection officers was important. She refused to use the ones the Royal Family use. Instead, she used a very inexperienced person who had zero idea of standard operating protocols (SOP'S). The plan for that night was poor.
However, had she fastened her seat belt when in the car then she may well have survived.
Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by DonnaLibra
I can't believe Markle never googled Harry or the Royals after they dated. To say she had no idea what was expected of her is unbelievable too. Wouldn't she ask her Harry this important information after he proposed? Doesn't sound possible that she wouldn't ask that.
I agree!
I read a quote that said she didn't know she was supposed to curtsey in front of The Queen. IT'S ROYALTY. She made herself sound like a self absorbed idiot. " I just thought it was your grandmother"
Who doesn't look up customs, but thinks they can just wing it LMAO
The context of that quote was that she was meeting the queen in a relaxed setting, no press or event going on and was a bit taken back that it would be so formal and a curtsy would be require. I would think the same.
I don’t know how meeting a queen is ever informal.
Lol your determined to hate on her. Go on then
I’m not. Some things may be true regarding race, I’m unsure why her son would not be protected if they were to stay in the royal family.
It just seems like the typical Tudor style English drama in the 21st century.
Harry has always been the wild child. So if they like the life they have, then so be it. They chose it.
And I can be critical of her as well. Some things didn't quite line up for me in this interview.
The working in an ice-cream shop at 13 is illegal in California. So either she lied or her mother lied about her age for her to have that job. Or she is lying now.
Also her claiming to know nothing about the royal family is a bit suspect. I spent the first 15 years of my life without a tv and I knew who Diana was and that whole story. Everyone was talking about it. Unless your a hermit living in the woods you knew at least SOMETHING about the royal family, especially during the diana days. And common, there's no shame in googling the famous dude who wants to take you out on a date.
And I loled at her chickens being 'rescue chickens'. Lol anyone who has chickens who isn't eating them, congrats you've rescued them. They are living the rescued life.
Also no one does an interview for free, not really. They are getting something in return. Whether that is the chance to tell their side, promote their upcoming project with Oprah on netflix, etc.click to expand
All of this.
There’s a picture of her at buckingham palace at age 15.
Her childhood friends said she idolized Diana.
Posted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by MaxianPosted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by DonnaLibra
I can't believe Markle never googled Harry or the Royals after they dated. To say she had no idea what was expected of her is unbelievable too. Wouldn't she ask her Harry this important information after he proposed? Doesn't sound possible that she wouldn't ask that.
I agree!
I read a quote that said she didn't know she was supposed to curtsey in front of The Queen. IT'S ROYALTY. She made herself sound like a self absorbed idiot. " I just thought it was your grandmother"
Who doesn't look up customs, but thinks they can just wing it LMAO
The context of that quote was that she was meeting the queen in a relaxed setting, no press or event going on and was a bit taken back that it would be so formal and a curtsy would be require. I would think the same.
I don’t know how meeting a queen is ever informal.
Lol your determined to hate on her. Go on then
I’m not. Some things may be true regarding race, I’m unsure why her son would not be protected if they were to stay in the royal family.
It just seems like the typical Tudor style English drama in the 21st century.
Harry has always been the wild child. So if they like the life they have, then so be it. They chose it.
And I can be critical of her as well. Some things didn't quite line up for me in this interview.
The working in an ice-cream shop at 13 is illegal in California. So either she lied or her mother lied about her age for her to have that job. Or she is lying now.
Also her claiming to know nothing about the royal family is a bit suspect. I spent the first 15 years of my life without a tv and I knew who Diana was and that whole story. Everyone was talking about it. Unless your a hermit living in the woods you knew at least SOMETHING about the royal family, especially during the diana days. And common, there's no shame in googling the famous dude who wants to take you out on a date.
And I loled at her chickens being 'rescue chickens'. Lol anyone who has chickens who isn't eating them, congrats you've rescued them. They are living the rescued life.
Also no one does an interview for free, not really. They are getting something in return. Whether that is the chance to tell their side, promote their upcoming project with Oprah on netflix, etc.
As a response to working in ice cream shop. I also worked in a hotel/bar/bowling-complex when I was 15, and stayed after 23h. That's also illegal here, but it was fun because of colleagues and friends and saw it through their fingers me working there.
For the rest, I do agree. I question their interest and what they want to achieve with this whole puppetshow while advocating for privacy all the time. It's weird.
I worked at 15 and my mother had to sign off on a series of forms.
I do know in California it is illegal to work at 13 UNLESS its in the entertainment industry... acting modeling etc. But last I checked scooping icecream is not an acting gig.
It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. I see them taking a more active role in both the public eye here in the states and more control over how they are seen in the media.
I don't know how young you are, but I was able to work young too. I had a job at 12 selling candy, then went into a company mailroom at 13 for the summer, then worked at a fast food place after that.
Even my ex worked at a place similar to chuck e cheese when he was 13.
I'm not sure what they labor laws were back then but I'm close to her age.
I got hired through summer school programs.click to expand
30s
I could understand getting a job through a summer school program or selling candy, lemonade, babysitting that sort of thing.
But to be hired by a chain of stores and on the adp at 13 seems suspect to me.
How'd you get a job so young? I swear its illegal, not just now but then as well.
Posted by Lunamara
As they are also investigating the allegations of Megan’s bulling of staffWill there be full reports on both investigations lol
Ahh priorities.
Must investigate rumors of bullying!
But the criminal accusations of rape and pedophilia against the Queens son? Nah hush those up asap. No investigation needed smh.
he did another one, I can listen to this guy talk about pretty much anything but shit talking shapiro reaction to the interview. Sigh, I'm in heaven.
Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by MaxianPosted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by DonnaLibra
I can't believe Markle never googled Harry or the Royals after they dated. To say she had no idea what was expected of her is unbelievable too. Wouldn't she ask her Harry this important information after he proposed? Doesn't sound possible that she wouldn't ask that.
I agree!
I read a quote that said she didn't know she was supposed to curtsey in front of The Queen. IT'S ROYALTY. She made herself sound like a self absorbed idiot. " I just thought it was your grandmother"
Who doesn't look up customs, but thinks they can just wing it LMAO
The context of that quote was that she was meeting the queen in a relaxed setting, no press or event going on and was a bit taken back that it would be so formal and a curtsy would be require. I would think the same.
I don’t know how meeting a queen is ever informal.
Lol your determined to hate on her. Go on then
I’m not. Some things may be true regarding race, I’m unsure why her son would not be protected if they were to stay in the royal family.
It just seems like the typical Tudor style English drama in the 21st century.
Harry has always been the wild child. So if they like the life they have, then so be it. They chose it.
And I can be critical of her as well. Some things didn't quite line up for me in this interview.
The working in an ice-cream shop at 13 is illegal in California. So either she lied or her mother lied about her age for her to have that job. Or she is lying now.
Also her claiming to know nothing about the royal family is a bit suspect. I spent the first 15 years of my life without a tv and I knew who Diana was and that whole story. Everyone was talking about it. Unless your a hermit living in the woods you knew at least SOMETHING about the royal family, especially during the diana days. And common, there's no shame in googling the famous dude who wants to take you out on a date.
And I loled at her chickens being 'rescue chickens'. Lol anyone who has chickens who isn't eating them, congrats you've rescued them. They are living the rescued life.
Also no one does an interview for free, not really. They are getting something in return. Whether that is the chance to tell their side, promote their upcoming project with Oprah on netflix, etc.
As a response to working in ice cream shop. I also worked in a hotel/bar/bowling-complex when I was 15, and stayed after 23h. That's also illegal here, but it was fun because of colleagues and friends and saw it through their fingers me working there.
For the rest, I do agree. I question their interest and what they want to achieve with this whole puppetshow while advocating for privacy all the time. It's weird.
I worked at 15 and my mother had to sign off on a series of forms.
I do know in California it is illegal to work at 13 UNLESS its in the entertainment industry... acting modeling etc. But last I checked scooping icecream is not an acting gig.
It'll be interesting to see how this plays out. I see them taking a more active role in both the public eye here in the states and more control over how they are seen in the media.
I don't know how young you are, but I was able to work young too. I had a job at 12 selling candy, then went into a company mailroom at 13 for the summer, then worked at a fast food place after that.
Even my ex worked at a place similar to chuck e cheese when he was 13.
I'm not sure what they labor laws were back then but I'm close to her age.
I got hired through summer school programs.
30s
I could understand getting a job through a summer school program or selling candy, lemonade, babysitting that sort of thing.
But to be hired by a chain of stores and on the adp at 13 seems suspect to me.
How'd you get a job so young? I swear its illegal, not just now but then as well.click to expand
I don’t remember. I was so young. I could’ve sworn in the summers it didn’t matter. I remember not being able to work at that age while I was in school until I was about 16 or so. But I worked every summer starting at 12.
Posted by Lunamara
DNA Would solve it but it will never happen
i heard a long time ago they did a test and he was confirmed to be charles son. apparently if you follow the timeline (i can't be arsed) diana didn't start shagging jim until after harry was born.
Posted by stillstillwaterPosted by LadyNeptune
I know there has been talk in the past about Harry's paternity being in question.
James Hewitt anyone?
IDK if this played a role in their decision not to award a title to his son. If there is truth to this rumor then its a possibility.
Under protocols established by George V in letters patent more than 100 years ago in 1917, the children and grandchildren of a sovereign have the automatic right to the title HRH and prince or princess.
Advertisement
At the time Archie was born, he was the great-grandchild of a sovereign, not a grandchild.
George V’s declaration sets out: “The grandchildren of the sons of any such sovereign in the direct male line (save only the eldest living son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales) shall have and enjoy in all occasions the style and title enjoyed by the children of dukes of this realm.”
As such, Archie will be entitled to the titles when Prince Charles accedes the throne.
George V’s declaration means that only Prince George, as a great-grandson of the monarch down the direct line of succession to the throne, was originally entitled to be a prince, as he is the eldest son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales.
The Queen did step in ahead of George’s birth to issue letters patent to ensure the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s children would have the titles of prince and princess.
But they are children of the future monarch, whereas Archie is not. His father, Harry, is sixth in line to the throne, and will move down the line of succession if William and Kate have more children, and as George, Charlotte and Louis have children of their own.
At the time of Archie’s birth, it was reported the couple had decided he should be plain Master Archie Mountbatten-Windsor – the surname adopted by the royal family reflecting Prince Philip’s family name, and the Windsor name adopted by George V.
It was suggested this was because the couple wanted him to be seen as normal, without the burden of being a prince.
But Meghan made clear this was not the case. “It was not our decision to make,” she said.
The Sussexes indicated in the interview that they had expected Archie would be given the title of prince after Charles acceded the throne, but that they had been told that protocols would be changed - in line with Charles’s wish for a slimmed down monarchy - so that Archie would be excluded from becoming an HRH and prince.click to expand
the slimmed down monarchy i suspect is more aimed at a long time and on-going spat chuck is having with andrew. i suspect he wants to cut them (ie fergie etc) all off. i think it's unlikely he would have included his own grandson in the trimming.
Posted by UndinePosted by VenusAquarius
They might have teased, mildly coldly harassed, purposefully confused her with bits and pieces of misinformation.
They made the queen seem really dumb in that Netflix special. But, I did some research, it was appears she was a bit dumb. And, Charles seemed dumb too.
Being housed with pedestaled dummies.... Being ganged by idiots might test a person's sanity.
Good ol' british hazing, that wat it was.
Ever tried to explain the nuance of harrassment?
One of her claims would constitute a EEO. If royalty is such "work" where's the employment protections, lol?
Meghan has fallen out with her entire family, apart from her mother. Were they too stupid for her, as well as the royals?
She also had several helpers (private secretaries, nannies) leaving their job in close succession. People don't take a prestigious longterm job, working for royals (I could only imagine the lengthy security checks and high references) only to quit a few weeks/months later!
These speak of someone with a difficult, unpleasant personality, who most likely bully or belittle others.click to expand
Yep, that's what media, twitter, etc said was gonna be the "get back plan." Have the servants say she was this n' that. They said the royals planned to paint her as a bully or something like that on the news. Retaliation.
That's outlawed in American employment. You quickly lose an EEOC even if the filing was week. Cause retaliation adds to validity to the claim among other things.
Everybody's (media subtlety) pushing to see this as a "family" thing for a reason. I see it as an employment matter too.
Are they attempting the "angry black woman" american stereotype. If they do, it's gonna be a problem.
Posted by VenusAquariusPosted by UndinePosted by VenusAquarius
They might have teased, mildly coldly harassed, purposefully confused her with bits and pieces of misinformation.
They made the queen seem really dumb in that Netflix special. But, I did some research, it was appears she was a bit dumb. And, Charles seemed dumb too.
Being housed with pedestaled dummies.... Being ganged by idiots might test a person's sanity.
Good ol' british hazing, that wat it was.
Ever tried to explain the nuance of harrassment?
One of her claims would constitute a EEO. If royalty is such "work" where's the employment protections, lol?
Meghan has fallen out with her entire family, apart from her mother. Were they too stupid for her, as well as the royals?
She also had several helpers (private secretaries, nannies) leaving their job in close succession. People don't take a prestigious longterm job, working for royals (I could only imagine the lengthy security checks and high references) only to quit a few weeks/months later!
These speak of someone with a difficult, unpleasant personality, who most likely bully or belittle others.
Yep, that's what media, twitter, etc said was gonna be the "get back plan." Have the servants say she was this n' that. They said the royals planned to paint her as a bully or something like that on the news. Retaliation.
That's outlawed in American employment. You quickly lose an EEOC even if the filing was week. Cause retaliation adds to validity to the claim among other things.
Everybody's (media subtlety) pushing to see this as a "family" thing for a reason. I see it as an employment matter too.
Are they attempting the "angry black woman" american stereotype. If they do, it's gonna be a problem.click to expand
rumors of her staff not hanging around is not new
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1232004/meghan-markle-latest-news-prince-harry-sussex-foundation-staff-quits-royal-family
Posted by jeanePosted by VenusAquariusPosted by UndinePosted by VenusAquarius
They might have teased, mildly coldly harassed, purposefully confused her with bits and pieces of misinformation.
They made the queen seem really dumb in that Netflix special. But, I did some research, it was appears she was a bit dumb. And, Charles seemed dumb too.
Being housed with pedestaled dummies.... Being ganged by idiots might test a person's sanity.
Good ol' british hazing, that wat it was.
Ever tried to explain the nuance of harrassment?
One of her claims would constitute a EEO. If royalty is such "work" where's the employment protections, lol?
Meghan has fallen out with her entire family, apart from her mother. Were they too stupid for her, as well as the royals?
She also had several helpers (private secretaries, nannies) leaving their job in close succession. People don't take a prestigious longterm job, working for royals (I could only imagine the lengthy security checks and high references) only to quit a few weeks/months later!
These speak of someone with a difficult, unpleasant personality, who most likely bully or belittle others.
Yep, that's what media, twitter, etc said was gonna be the "get back plan." Have the servants say she was this n' that. They said the royals planned to paint her as a bully or something like that on the news. Retaliation.
That's outlawed in American employment. You quickly lose an EEOC even if the filing was week. Cause retaliation adds to validity to the claim among other things.
Everybody's (media subtlety) pushing to see this as a "family" thing for a reason. I see it as an employment matter too.
Are they attempting the "angry black woman" american stereotype. If they do, it's gonna be a problem.
rumors of her staff not hanging around is not new
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1232004/meghan-markle-latest-news-prince-harry-sussex-foundation-staff-quits-royal-family<div class="bqfade">click to expand
I read it and it's a mixed bag being paint with one broad stroke of suspicion. It's already been stated that british media was brutal and slick. I see it here. One person quit cause "in tears." Harry's bodyguard quit before the wedding. And, the focus of the article is the resignation of an aide they "poached" from a company who got, what appears to be, a better more corporate public job offer.
Posted by VenusAquariusPosted by jeanePosted by VenusAquariusPosted by UndinePosted by VenusAquarius
They might have teased, mildly coldly harassed, purposefully confused her with bits and pieces of misinformation.
They made the queen seem really dumb in that Netflix special. But, I did some research, it was appears she was a bit dumb. And, Charles seemed dumb too.
Being housed with pedestaled dummies.... Being ganged by idiots might test a person's sanity.
Good ol' british hazing, that wat it was.
Ever tried to explain the nuance of harrassment?
One of her claims would constitute a EEO. If royalty is such "work" where's the employment protections, lol?
Meghan has fallen out with her entire family, apart from her mother. Were they too stupid for her, as well as the royals?
She also had several helpers (private secretaries, nannies) leaving their job in close succession. People don't take a prestigious longterm job, working for royals (I could only imagine the lengthy security checks and high references) only to quit a few weeks/months later!
These speak of someone with a difficult, unpleasant personality, who most likely bully or belittle others.
Yep, that's what media, twitter, etc said was gonna be the "get back plan." Have the servants say she was this n' that. They said the royals planned to paint her as a bully or something like that on the news. Retaliation.
That's outlawed in American employment. You quickly lose an EEOC even if the filing was week. Cause retaliation adds to validity to the claim among other things.
Everybody's (media subtlety) pushing to see this as a "family" thing for a reason. I see it as an employment matter too.
Are they attempting the "angry black woman" american stereotype. If they do, it's gonna be a problem.
rumors of her staff not hanging around is not new
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1232004/meghan-markle-latest-news-prince-harry-sussex-foundation-staff-quits-royal-family
I read it and it's a mixed bag being paint with one broad stroke of suspicion. It's already been stated that british media was brutal and slick. I see it here. One person quit cause "in tears." Harry's bodyguard quit before the wedding. And, the focus of the article is the resignation of an aide they "poached" from a company who got, what appears to be, a better more corporate public job offer.click to expand
i don't know why or under what circumstances they left. just to say that staff complaining about them as employers didn't start yesterday in reaction to the oprah interview.
Posted by jeanePosted by VenusAquariusPosted by jeanePosted by VenusAquariusPosted by UndinePosted by VenusAquarius
They might have teased, mildly coldly harassed, purposefully confused her with bits and pieces of misinformation.
They made the queen seem really dumb in that Netflix special. But, I did some research, it was appears she was a bit dumb. And, Charles seemed dumb too.
Being housed with pedestaled dummies.... Being ganged by idiots might test a person's sanity.
Good ol' british hazing, that wat it was.
Ever tried to explain the nuance of harrassment?
One of her claims would constitute a EEO. If royalty is such "work" where's the employment protections, lol?
Meghan has fallen out with her entire family, apart from her mother. Were they too stupid for her, as well as the royals?
She also had several helpers (private secretaries, nannies) leaving their job in close succession. People don't take a prestigious longterm job, working for royals (I could only imagine the lengthy security checks and high references) only to quit a few weeks/months later!
These speak of someone with a difficult, unpleasant personality, who most likely bully or belittle others.
Yep, that's what media, twitter, etc said was gonna be the "get back plan." Have the servants say she was this n' that. They said the royals planned to paint her as a bully or something like that on the news. Retaliation.
That's outlawed in American employment. You quickly lose an EEOC even if the filing was week. Cause retaliation adds to validity to the claim among other things.
Everybody's (media subtlety) pushing to see this as a "family" thing for a reason. I see it as an employment matter too.
Are they attempting the "angry black woman" american stereotype. If they do, it's gonna be a problem.
rumors of her staff not hanging around is not new
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1232004/meghan-markle-latest-news-prince-harry-sussex-foundation-staff-quits-royal-family
I read it and it's a mixed bag being paint with one broad stroke of suspicion. It's already been stated that british media was brutal and slick. I see it here. One person quit cause "in tears." Harry's bodyguard quit before the wedding. And, the focus of the article is the resignation of an aide they "poached" from a company who got, what appears to be, a better more corporate public job offer.
i don't know why or under what circumstances they left. just to say that staff complaining about them as employers didn't start yesterday in reaction to the oprah interview.click to expand
I saw one complaint. Yeah, I see why twitter and news media mapped this out as a royal strategy... Play on the british media propaganda that's already been propagandized.
Megan mentioned no public affairs/relations assistance in her interview as well.
Perhaps it was royal long game all the while. Ties in nicely. Then, it has been also stated by british historians that british media is treated as an extension of the royals public relations.
Posted by VenusAquariusPosted by jeanePosted by VenusAquariusPosted by jeanePosted by VenusAquariusPosted by UndinePosted by VenusAquarius
They might have teased, mildly coldly harassed, purposefully confused her with bits and pieces of misinformation.
They made the queen seem really dumb in that Netflix special. But, I did some research, it was appears she was a bit dumb. And, Charles seemed dumb too.
Being housed with pedestaled dummies.... Being ganged by idiots might test a person's sanity.
Good ol' british hazing, that wat it was.
Ever tried to explain the nuance of harrassment?
One of her claims would constitute a EEO. If royalty is such "work" where's the employment protections, lol?
Meghan has fallen out with her entire family, apart from her mother. Were they too stupid for her, as well as the royals?
She also had several helpers (private secretaries, nannies) leaving their job in close succession. People don't take a prestigious longterm job, working for royals (I could only imagine the lengthy security checks and high references) only to quit a few weeks/months later!
These speak of someone with a difficult, unpleasant personality, who most likely bully or belittle others.
Yep, that's what media, twitter, etc said was gonna be the "get back plan." Have the servants say she was this n' that. They said the royals planned to paint her as a bully or something like that on the news. Retaliation.
That's outlawed in American employment. You quickly lose an EEOC even if the filing was week. Cause retaliation adds to validity to the claim among other things.
Everybody's (media subtlety) pushing to see this as a "family" thing for a reason. I see it as an employment matter too.
Are they attempting the "angry black woman" american stereotype. If they do, it's gonna be a problem.
rumors of her staff not hanging around is not new
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1232004/meghan-markle-latest-news-prince-harry-sussex-foundation-staff-quits-royal-family
I read it and it's a mixed bag being paint with one broad stroke of suspicion. It's already been stated that british media was brutal and slick. I see it here. One person quit cause "in tears." Harry's bodyguard quit before the wedding. And, the focus of the article is the resignation of an aide they "poached" from a company who got, what appears to be, a better more corporate public job offer.
i don't know why or under what circumstances they left. just to say that staff complaining about them as employers didn't start yesterday in reaction to the oprah interview.
I saw one complaint. Yeah, I see why twitter and news media mapped this out as a royal strategy... Play on the british media propaganda that's already been propagandized.
Megan mentioned no public affairs/relations assistance in her interview as well.
Perhaps it was royal long game all the while. Ties in nicely. Then, it has been also stated by british historians that british media is treated as an extension of the royals public relations.click to expand
i only watched it briefly but in her interview she referred to the comms team who could kill an article which featured her father. i guess it was there and not there according to her. someone named jason knauf was apparently their personal press secretary. what his duties were and did he do them effectively i don't know
Posted by jeanePosted by VenusAquariusPosted by jeanePosted by VenusAquariusPosted by jeanePosted by VenusAquariusPosted by UndinePosted by VenusAquarius
They might have teased, mildly coldly harassed, purposefully confused her with bits and pieces of misinformation.
They made the queen seem really dumb in that Netflix special. But, I did some research, it was appears she was a bit dumb. And, Charles seemed dumb too.
Being housed with pedestaled dummies.... Being ganged by idiots might test a person's sanity.
Good ol' british hazing, that wat it was.
Ever tried to explain the nuance of harrassment?
One of her claims would constitute a EEO. If royalty is such "work" where's the employment protections, lol?
Meghan has fallen out with her entire family, apart from her mother. Were they too stupid for her, as well as the royals?
She also had several helpers (private secretaries, nannies) leaving their job in close succession. People don't take a prestigious longterm job, working for royals (I could only imagine the lengthy security checks and high references) only to quit a few weeks/months later!
These speak of someone with a difficult, unpleasant personality, who most likely bully or belittle others.
Yep, that's what media, twitter, etc said was gonna be the "get back plan." Have the servants say she was this n' that. They said the royals planned to paint her as a bully or something like that on the news. Retaliation.
That's outlawed in American employment. You quickly lose an EEOC even if the filing was week. Cause retaliation adds to validity to the claim among other things.
Everybody's (media subtlety) pushing to see this as a "family" thing for a reason. I see it as an employment matter too.
Are they attempting the "angry black woman" american stereotype. If they do, it's gonna be a problem.
rumors of her staff not hanging around is not new
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1232004/meghan-markle-latest-news-prince-harry-sussex-foundation-staff-quits-royal-family
I read it and it's a mixed bag being paint with one broad stroke of suspicion. It's already been stated that british media was brutal and slick. I see it here. One person quit cause "in tears." Harry's bodyguard quit before the wedding. And, the focus of the article is the resignation of an aide they "poached" from a company who got, what appears to be, a better more corporate public job offer.
i don't know why or under what circumstances they left. just to say that staff complaining about them as employers didn't start yesterday in reaction to the oprah interview.
I saw one complaint. Yeah, I see why twitter and news media mapped this out as a royal strategy... Play on the british media propaganda that's already been propagandized.
Megan mentioned no public affairs/relations assistance in her interview as well.
Perhaps it was royal long game all the while. Ties in nicely. Then, it has been also stated by british historians that british media is treated as an extension of the royals public relations.
i only watched it briefly but in her interview she referred to the comms team who could kill an article which featured her father. i guess it was there and not there according to her. someone named jason knauf was apparently their personal press secretary. what his duties were and did he do them effectively i don't knowclick to expand
They didn't kill shit where her father was concerned, lol. I mean I saw the nastiest ugliest pictures and history on him. He's like a cockroach.
I imagine they will approach all previous employees and see who will paint the picture of the "angry black woman."
The aide featured in the article probably won't be approached. She's highly professional and went on to be a CEO. It'll be low level people most likely. People willing to do something strange for some change.
But, as I said, American twitter, news media is already on to them. They play that card in current american climate. It's gonna be a problem.
They better focus on Andrew.
But, this may be apart of that strategy too (as someone already stated).
Posted by VenusAquariusPosted by jeanePosted by VenusAquariusPosted by jeanePosted by VenusAquariusPosted by jeanePosted by VenusAquariusPosted by UndinePosted by VenusAquarius
They might have teased, mildly coldly harassed, purposefully confused her with bits and pieces of misinformation.
They made the queen seem really dumb in that Netflix special. But, I did some research, it was appears she was a bit dumb. And, Charles seemed dumb too.
Being housed with pedestaled dummies.... Being ganged by idiots might test a person's sanity.
Good ol' british hazing, that wat it was.
Ever tried to explain the nuance of harrassment?
One of her claims would constitute a EEO. If royalty is such "work" where's the employment protections, lol?
Meghan has fallen out with her entire family, apart from her mother. Were they too stupid for her, as well as the royals?
She also had several helpers (private secretaries, nannies) leaving their job in close succession. People don't take a prestigious longterm job, working for royals (I could only imagine the lengthy security checks and high references) only to quit a few weeks/months later!
These speak of someone with a difficult, unpleasant personality, who most likely bully or belittle others.
Yep, that's what media, twitter, etc said was gonna be the "get back plan." Have the servants say she was this n' that. They said the royals planned to paint her as a bully or something like that on the news. Retaliation.
That's outlawed in American employment. You quickly lose an EEOC even if the filing was week. Cause retaliation adds to validity to the claim among other things.
Everybody's (media subtlety) pushing to see this as a "family" thing for a reason. I see it as an employment matter too.
Are they attempting the "angry black woman" american stereotype. If they do, it's gonna be a problem.
rumors of her staff not hanging around is not new
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1232004/meghan-markle-latest-news-prince-harry-sussex-foundation-staff-quits-royal-family
I read it and it's a mixed bag being paint with one broad stroke of suspicion. It's already been stated that british media was brutal and slick. I see it here. One person quit cause "in tears." Harry's bodyguard quit before the wedding. And, the focus of the article is the resignation of an aide they "poached" from a company who got, what appears to be, a better more corporate public job offer.
i don't know why or under what circumstances they left. just to say that staff complaining about them as employers didn't start yesterday in reaction to the oprah interview.
I saw one complaint. Yeah, I see why twitter and news media mapped this out as a royal strategy... Play on the british media propaganda that's already been propagandized.
Megan mentioned no public affairs/relations assistance in her interview as well.
Perhaps it was royal long game all the while. Ties in nicely. Then, it has been also stated by british historians that british media is treated as an extension of the royals public relations.
i only watched it briefly but in her interview she referred to the comms team who could kill an article which featured her father. i guess it was there and not there according to her. someone named jason knauf was apparently their personal press secretary. what his duties were and did he do them effectively i don't know
They didn't kill shit where her father was concerned, lol. I mean I saw the nastiest ugliest pictures and history on him. He's like a cockroach.
I imagine they will approach all previous employees and see who will paint the picture of the "angry black woman."
The aide featured in the article probably won't be approached. She's highly professional and went on to be a CEO. It'll be low level people most likely. People willing to do something strange for some change.
But, as I said, American twitter, news media is already on to them. They play that card in current american climate. It's gonna be a problem.
They better focus on Andrew.
But, this may be apart of that strategy too (as someone already stated).click to expand
i think you have to consider the possibility even for a moment that there maybe truth to them being arseholes. the whole family are degenerates (including i-don't-sweat-andy) i don't see why harry and meghan would be spared.
Posted by jeanePosted by VenusAquariusPosted by jeanePosted by VenusAquariusPosted by jeanePosted by VenusAquariusPosted by jeanePosted by VenusAquariusPosted by UndinePosted by VenusAquarius
They might have teased, mildly coldly harassed, purposefully confused her with bits and pieces of misinformation.
They made the queen seem really dumb in that Netflix special. But, I did some research, it was appears she was a bit dumb. And, Charles seemed dumb too.
Being housed with pedestaled dummies.... Being ganged by idiots might test a person's sanity.
Good ol' british hazing, that wat it was.
Ever tried to explain the nuance of harrassment?
One of her claims would constitute a EEO. If royalty is such "work" where's the employment protections, lol?
Meghan has fallen out with her entire family, apart from her mother. Were they too stupid for her, as well as the royals?
She also had several helpers (private secretaries, nannies) leaving their job in close succession. People don't take a prestigious longterm job, working for royals (I could only imagine the lengthy security checks and high references) only to quit a few weeks/months later!
These speak of someone with a difficult, unpleasant personality, who most likely bully or belittle others.
Yep, that's what media, twitter, etc said was gonna be the "get back plan." Have the servants say she was this n' that. They said the royals planned to paint her as a bully or something like that on the news. Retaliation.
That's outlawed in American employment. You quickly lose an EEOC even if the filing was week. Cause retaliation adds to validity to the claim among other things.
Everybody's (media subtlety) pushing to see this as a "family" thing for a reason. I see it as an employment matter too.
Are they attempting the "angry black woman" american stereotype. If they do, it's gonna be a problem.
rumors of her staff not hanging around is not new
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1232004/meghan-markle-latest-news-prince-harry-sussex-foundation-staff-quits-royal-family
I read it and it's a mixed bag being paint with one broad stroke of suspicion. It's already been stated that british media was brutal and slick. I see it here. One person quit cause "in tears." Harry's bodyguard quit before the wedding. And, the focus of the article is the resignation of an aide they "poached" from a company who got, what appears to be, a better more corporate public job offer.
i don't know why or under what circumstances they left. just to say that staff complaining about them as employers didn't start yesterday in reaction to the oprah interview.
I saw one complaint. Yeah, I see why twitter and news media mapped this out as a royal strategy... Play on the british media propaganda that's already been propagandized.
Megan mentioned no public affairs/relations assistance in her interview as well.
Perhaps it was royal long game all the while. Ties in nicely. Then, it has been also stated by british historians that british media is treated as an extension of the royals public relations.
i only watched it briefly but in her interview she referred to the comms team who could kill an article which featured her father. i guess it was there and not there according to her. someone named jason knauf was apparently their personal press secretary. what his duties were and did he do them effectively i don't know
They didn't kill shit where her father was concerned, lol. I mean I saw the nastiest ugliest pictures and history on him. He's like a cockroach.
I imagine they will approach all previous employees and see who will paint the picture of the "angry black woman."
The aide featured in the article probably won't be approached. She's highly professional and went on to be a CEO. It'll be low level people most likely. People willing to do something strange for some change.
But, as I said, American twitter, news media is already on to them. They play that card in current american climate. It's gonna be a problem.
They better focus on Andrew.
But, this may be apart of that strategy too (as someone already stated).
i think you have to consider the possibility even for a moment that there maybe truth to them being arseholes. the whole family are degenerates (including i-don't-sweat-andy) i don't see why harry and meghan would be spared.click to expand
Guilty by association huh? Lol
...cause pedophillia...
...cause racist statements about an infant...
...cause Camilla Bowles nasty ass....
Posted by Moloko_vellocetPosted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by DonnaLibra
I can't believe Markle never googled Harry or the Royals after they dated. To say she had no idea what was expected of her is unbelievable too. Wouldn't she ask her Harry this important information after he proposed? Doesn't sound possible that she wouldn't ask that.
I agree!
I read a quote that said she didn't know she was supposed to curtsey in front of The Queen. IT'S ROYALTY. She made herself sound like a self absorbed idiot. " I just thought it was your grandmother"
Who doesn't look up customs, but thinks they can just wing it LMAO
The context of that quote was that she was meeting the queen in a relaxed setting, no press or event going on and was a bit taken back that it would be so formal and a curtsy would be require. I would think the same.
I don’t know how meeting a queen is ever informal.
Lol your determined to hate on her. Go on then
I’m not. Some things may be true regarding race, I’m unsure why her son would not be protected if they were to stay in the royal family.
It just seems like the typical Tudor style English drama in the 21st century.
Harry has always been the wild child. So if they like the life they have, then so be it. They chose it.
And I can be critical of her as well. Some things didn't quite line up for me in this interview.
The working in an ice-cream shop at 13 is illegal in California. So either she lied or her mother lied about her age for her to have that job. Or she is lying now.
Also her claiming to know nothing about the royal family is a bit suspect. I spent the first 15 years of my life without a tv and I knew who Diana was and that whole story. Everyone was talking about it. Unless your a hermit living in the woods you knew at least SOMETHING about the royal family, especially during the diana days. And common, there's no shame in googling the famous dude who wants to take you out on a date.
And I loled at her chickens being 'rescue chickens'. Lol anyone who has chickens who isn't eating them, congrats you've rescued them. They are living the rescued life.
Also no one does an interview for free, not really. They are getting something in return. Whether that is the chance to tell their side, promote their upcoming project with Oprah on netflix, etc.
All of this.
There’s a picture of her at buckingham palace at age 15.
Her childhood friends said she idolized Diana.click to expand
I mean didn't everyone?
Like no harm in saying you knew who they were surface level wise but didn't want to do a deep google dive because you wanted to meet them all and form your own unbiased opinions.
But if I'm considering marrying into a 1200 yr institution imma do some detective work first. Ijs
I thought Meghan said she wasn't going to move back to the United States until after Trump was no longer Pres and was gonna stay in Canada until then. I see she lied about that.
Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by Moloko_vellocetPosted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by DonnaLibra
I can't believe Markle never googled Harry or the Royals after they dated. To say she had no idea what was expected of her is unbelievable too. Wouldn't she ask her Harry this important information after he proposed? Doesn't sound possible that she wouldn't ask that.
I agree!
I read a quote that said she didn't know she was supposed to curtsey in front of The Queen. IT'S ROYALTY. She made herself sound like a self absorbed idiot. " I just thought it was your grandmother"
Who doesn't look up customs, but thinks they can just wing it LMAO
The context of that quote was that she was meeting the queen in a relaxed setting, no press or event going on and was a bit taken back that it would be so formal and a curtsy would be require. I would think the same.
I don’t know how meeting a queen is ever informal.
Lol your determined to hate on her. Go on then
I’m not. Some things may be true regarding race, I’m unsure why her son would not be protected if they were to stay in the royal family.
It just seems like the typical Tudor style English drama in the 21st century.
Harry has always been the wild child. So if they like the life they have, then so be it. They chose it.
And I can be critical of her as well. Some things didn't quite line up for me in this interview.
The working in an ice-cream shop at 13 is illegal in California. So either she lied or her mother lied about her age for her to have that job. Or she is lying now.
Also her claiming to know nothing about the royal family is a bit suspect. I spent the first 15 years of my life without a tv and I knew who Diana was and that whole story. Everyone was talking about it. Unless your a hermit living in the woods you knew at least SOMETHING about the royal family, especially during the diana days. And common, there's no shame in googling the famous dude who wants to take you out on a date.
And I loled at her chickens being 'rescue chickens'. Lol anyone who has chickens who isn't eating them, congrats you've rescued them. They are living the rescued life.
Also no one does an interview for free, not really. They are getting something in return. Whether that is the chance to tell their side, promote their upcoming project with Oprah on netflix, etc.
All of this.
There’s a picture of her at buckingham palace at age 15.
Her childhood friends said she idolized Diana.
I mean didn't everyone?
Like no harm in saying you knew who they were surface level wise but didn't want to do a deep google dive because you wanted to meet them all and form your own unbiased opinions.
But if I'm considering marrying into a 1200 yr institution imma do some detective work first. Ijsclick to expand
Exactly. She would of visited just after the year of Diana’s death as well.
She played “naive” yet she knew exactly who these people were. It’s just lies. Leo loves the attention and victim play.
Posted by VenusAquariusPosted by UndinePosted by VenusAquarius
They might have teased, mildly coldly harassed, purposefully confused her with bits and pieces of misinformation.
They made the queen seem really dumb in that Netflix special. But, I did some research, it was appears she was a bit dumb. And, Charles seemed dumb too.
Being housed with pedestaled dummies.... Being ganged by idiots might test a person's sanity.
Good ol' british hazing, that wat it was.
Ever tried to explain the nuance of harrassment?
One of her claims would constitute a EEO. If royalty is such "work" where's the employment protections, lol?
Meghan has fallen out with her entire family, apart from her mother. Were they too stupid for her, as well as the royals?
She also had several helpers (private secretaries, nannies) leaving their job in close succession. People don't take a prestigious longterm job, working for royals (I could only imagine the lengthy security checks and high references) only to quit a few weeks/months later!
These speak of someone with a difficult, unpleasant personality, who most likely bully or belittle others.
Yep, that's what media, twitter, etc said was gonna be the "get back plan." Have the servants say she was this n' that. They said the royals planned to paint her as a bully or something like that on the news. Retaliation.
That's outlawed in American employment. You quickly lose an EEOC even if the filing was week. Cause retaliation adds to validity to the claim among other things.
Everybody's (media subtlety) pushing to see this as a "family" thing for a reason. I see it as an employment matter too.
Are they attempting the "angry black woman" american stereotype. If they do, it's gonna be a problem.click to expand
The servants said this an that two years ago! So much for the get back plan as it already occurred.
Posted by LunamaraPosted by VenusAquariusPosted by UndinePosted by VenusAquarius
They might have teased, mildly coldly harassed, purposefully confused her with bits and pieces of misinformation.
They made the queen seem really dumb in that Netflix special. But, I did some research, it was appears she was a bit dumb. And, Charles seemed dumb too.
Being housed with pedestaled dummies.... Being ganged by idiots might test a person's sanity.
Good ol' british hazing, that wat it was.
Ever tried to explain the nuance of harrassment?
One of her claims would constitute a EEO. If royalty is such "work" where's the employment protections, lol?
Meghan has fallen out with her entire family, apart from her mother. Were they too stupid for her, as well as the royals?
She also had several helpers (private secretaries, nannies) leaving their job in close succession. People don't take a prestigious longterm job, working for royals (I could only imagine the lengthy security checks and high references) only to quit a few weeks/months later!
These speak of someone with a difficult, unpleasant personality, who most likely bully or belittle others.
Yep, that's what media, twitter, etc said was gonna be the "get back plan." Have the servants say she was this n' that. They said the royals planned to paint her as a bully or something like that on the news. Retaliation.
That's outlawed in American employment. You quickly lose an EEOC even if the filing was week. Cause retaliation adds to validity to the claim among other things.
Everybody's (media subtlety) pushing to see this as a "family" thing for a reason. I see it as an employment matter too.
Are they attempting the "angry black woman" american stereotype. If they do, it's gonna be a problem.
The servants said this an that two years ago! So much for the get back plan as it already occurred.click to expand
These types of "strategies" start early...planned, socialized out the gate. I've seen where people exaggerate and/or lie cause they don't want to take orders from [ insert gender, race, color, social class, religion].
That's the thing about insidious behaviors, they are meant to fool "straight thinkers," seeing only black & white.
Posted by LunamaraPosted by VenusAquariusPosted by UndinePosted by VenusAquarius
They might have teased, mildly coldly harassed, purposefully confused her with bits and pieces of misinformation.
They made the queen seem really dumb in that Netflix special. But, I did some research, it was appears she was a bit dumb. And, Charles seemed dumb too.
Being housed with pedestaled dummies.... Being ganged by idiots might test a person's sanity.
Good ol' british hazing, that wat it was.
Ever tried to explain the nuance of harrassment?
One of her claims would constitute a EEO. If royalty is such "work" where's the employment protections, lol?
Meghan has fallen out with her entire family, apart from her mother. Were they too stupid for her, as well as the royals?
She also had several helpers (private secretaries, nannies) leaving their job in close succession. People don't take a prestigious longterm job, working for royals (I could only imagine the lengthy security checks and high references) only to quit a few weeks/months later!
These speak of someone with a difficult, unpleasant personality, who most likely bully or belittle others.
Yep, that's what media, twitter, etc said was gonna be the "get back plan." Have the servants say she was this n' that. They said the royals planned to paint her as a bully or something like that on the news. Retaliation.
That's outlawed in American employment. You quickly lose an EEOC even if the filing was week. Cause retaliation adds to validity to the claim among other things.
Everybody's (media subtlety) pushing to see this as a "family" thing for a reason. I see it as an employment matter too.
Are they attempting the "angry black woman" american stereotype. If they do, it's gonna be a problem.
The servants said this an that two years ago! So much for the get back plan as it already occurred.click to expand
These types of "strategies" start early...planned, socialized out the gate. I've seen where people exaggerate and/or lie cause they don't want to take orders from [ insert gender, race, color, social class, religion].
That's the thing about insidious behaviors, they are meant to fool "straight thinkers," seeing only black & white.
IDK if this is photoshopped or real but lol
Posted by hydorah
IDK if this is photoshopped or real but lol
That’s one of the traits the video discusses about Megan n narcissism
“ And there appeared to be a contradiction about when it was said, with Meghan saying it was while she was pregnant, while Harry said it had happened before their wedding.”
Another thing she made it sound like decision to not give Archie was recently to twist it to her agenda . Charles has already indicated (years ago, not a last minute thing) that he will continue to slim down to direct line of succession so basically William line
I don't know her, i don't judge. She's been getting mad shit since day one and it's just sad. No one can deny another's mental health issue or depression or suicidal thoughts. We're not her, or in her head. It's easier to hate and believe bullshit stories instead of leaving her alone. We don't walk in her shoes or know her personally. I got no hate or judgement for Megan at all.
Posted by Moloko_vellocetPosted by LadyNeptunePosted by Moloko_vellocetPosted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by DonnaLibra
I can't believe Markle never googled Harry or the Royals after they dated. To say she had no idea what was expected of her is unbelievable too. Wouldn't she ask her Harry this important information after he proposed? Doesn't sound possible that she wouldn't ask that.
I agree!
I read a quote that said she didn't know she was supposed to curtsey in front of The Queen. IT'S ROYALTY. She made herself sound like a self absorbed idiot. " I just thought it was your grandmother"
Who doesn't look up customs, but thinks they can just wing it LMAO
The context of that quote was that she was meeting the queen in a relaxed setting, no press or event going on and was a bit taken back that it would be so formal and a curtsy would be require. I would think the same.
I don’t know how meeting a queen is ever informal.
Lol your determined to hate on her. Go on then
I’m not. Some things may be true regarding race, I’m unsure why her son would not be protected if they were to stay in the royal family.
It just seems like the typical Tudor style English drama in the 21st century.
Harry has always been the wild child. So if they like the life they have, then so be it. They chose it.
And I can be critical of her as well. Some things didn't quite line up for me in this interview.
The working in an ice-cream shop at 13 is illegal in California. So either she lied or her mother lied about her age for her to have that job. Or she is lying now.
Also her claiming to know nothing about the royal family is a bit suspect. I spent the first 15 years of my life without a tv and I knew who Diana was and that whole story. Everyone was talking about it. Unless your a hermit living in the woods you knew at least SOMETHING about the royal family, especially during the diana days. And common, there's no shame in googling the famous dude who wants to take you out on a date.
And I loled at her chickens being 'rescue chickens'. Lol anyone who has chickens who isn't eating them, congrats you've rescued them. They are living the rescued life.
Also no one does an interview for free, not really. They are getting something in return. Whether that is the chance to tell their side, promote their upcoming project with Oprah on netflix, etc.
All of this.
There’s a picture of her at buckingham palace at age 15.
Her childhood friends said she idolized Diana.
I mean didn't everyone?
Like no harm in saying you knew who they were surface level wise but didn't want to do a deep google dive because you wanted to meet them all and form your own unbiased opinions.
But if I'm considering marrying into a 1200 yr institution imma do some detective work first. Ijs
Exactly. She would of visited just after the year of Diana’s death as well.
She played “naive” yet she knew exactly who these people were. It’s just lies. Leo loves the attention and victim play.click to expand
On the leo thing, it's especially true if they have crab placements or cusp. Not coming for megan, still neutral. But this leo comment got me to thinking about something I'm facing now.
Posted by OnigenZPosted by Moloko_vellocetPosted by LadyNeptunePosted by Moloko_vellocetPosted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by DonnaLibra
I can't believe Markle never googled Harry or the Royals after they dated. To say she had no idea what was expected of her is unbelievable too. Wouldn't she ask her Harry this important information after he proposed? Doesn't sound possible that she wouldn't ask that.
I agree!
I read a quote that said she didn't know she was supposed to curtsey in front of The Queen. IT'S ROYALTY. She made herself sound like a self absorbed idiot. " I just thought it was your grandmother"
Who doesn't look up customs, but thinks they can just wing it LMAO
The context of that quote was that she was meeting the queen in a relaxed setting, no press or event going on and was a bit taken back that it would be so formal and a curtsy would be require. I would think the same.
I don’t know how meeting a queen is ever informal.
Lol your determined to hate on her. Go on then
I’m not. Some things may be true regarding race, I’m unsure why her son would not be protected if they were to stay in the royal family.
It just seems like the typical Tudor style English drama in the 21st century.
Harry has always been the wild child. So if they like the life they have, then so be it. They chose it.
And I can be critical of her as well. Some things didn't quite line up for me in this interview.
The working in an ice-cream shop at 13 is illegal in California. So either she lied or her mother lied about her age for her to have that job. Or she is lying now.
Also her claiming to know nothing about the royal family is a bit suspect. I spent the first 15 years of my life without a tv and I knew who Diana was and that whole story. Everyone was talking about it. Unless your a hermit living in the woods you knew at least SOMETHING about the royal family, especially during the diana days. And common, there's no shame in googling the famous dude who wants to take you out on a date.
And I loled at her chickens being 'rescue chickens'. Lol anyone who has chickens who isn't eating them, congrats you've rescued them. They are living the rescued life.
Also no one does an interview for free, not really. They are getting something in return. Whether that is the chance to tell their side, promote their upcoming project with Oprah on netflix, etc.
All of this.
There’s a picture of her at buckingham palace at age 15.
Her childhood friends said she idolized Diana.
I mean didn't everyone?
Like no harm in saying you knew who they were surface level wise but didn't want to do a deep google dive because you wanted to meet them all and form your own unbiased opinions.
But if I'm considering marrying into a 1200 yr institution imma do some detective work first. Ijs
Exactly. She would of visited just after the year of Diana’s death as well.
She played “naive” yet she knew exactly who these people were. It’s just lies. Leo loves the attention and victim play.
On the leo thing, it's especially true if they have crab placements or cusp. Not coming for megan, still neutral. But this leo comment got me to thinking about something I'm facing now.click to expand
Which one the victim hood n attention? I know many Leo’s that are t victim seeking
Maybe cancer placement?
Posted by hydorah
IDK if this is photoshopped or real but lol
Oh no...they trying to whack her too...
Posted by LunamaraPosted by OnigenZPosted by Moloko_vellocetPosted by LadyNeptunePosted by Moloko_vellocetPosted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by saggurl88Posted by DonnaLibra
I can't believe Markle never googled Harry or the Royals after they dated. To say she had no idea what was expected of her is unbelievable too. Wouldn't she ask her Harry this important information after he proposed? Doesn't sound possible that she wouldn't ask that.
I agree!
I read a quote that said she didn't know she was supposed to curtsey in front of The Queen. IT'S ROYALTY. She made herself sound like a self absorbed idiot. " I just thought it was your grandmother"
Who doesn't look up customs, but thinks they can just wing it LMAO
The context of that quote was that she was meeting the queen in a relaxed setting, no press or event going on and was a bit taken back that it would be so formal and a curtsy would be require. I would think the same.
I don’t know how meeting a queen is ever informal.
Lol your determined to hate on her. Go on then
I’m not. Some things may be true regarding race, I’m unsure why her son would not be protected if they were to stay in the royal family.
It just seems like the typical Tudor style English drama in the 21st century.
Harry has always been the wild child. So if they like the life they have, then so be it. They chose it.
And I can be critical of her as well. Some things didn't quite line up for me in this interview.
The working in an ice-cream shop at 13 is illegal in California. So either she lied or her mother lied about her age for her to have that job. Or she is lying now.
Also her claiming to know nothing about the royal family is a bit suspect. I spent the first 15 years of my life without a tv and I knew who Diana was and that whole story. Everyone was talking about it. Unless your a hermit living in the woods you knew at least SOMETHING about the royal family, especially during the diana days. And common, there's no shame in googling the famous dude who wants to take you out on a date.
And I loled at her chickens being 'rescue chickens'. Lol anyone who has chickens who isn't eating them, congrats you've rescued them. They are living the rescued life.
Also no one does an interview for free, not really. They are getting something in return. Whether that is the chance to tell their side, promote their upcoming project with Oprah on netflix, etc.
All of this.
There’s a picture of her at buckingham palace at age 15.
Her childhood friends said she idolized Diana.
I mean didn't everyone?
Like no harm in saying you knew who they were surface level wise but didn't want to do a deep google dive because you wanted to meet them all and form your own unbiased opinions.
But if I'm considering marrying into a 1200 yr institution imma do some detective work first. Ijs
Exactly. She would of visited just after the year of Diana’s death as well.
She played “naive” yet she knew exactly who these people were. It’s just lies. Leo loves the attention and victim play.
On the leo thing, it's especially true if they have crab placements or cusp. Not coming for megan, still neutral. But this leo comment got me to thinking about something I'm facing now.
Which one the victim hood n attention? I know many Leo’s that are t victim seeking
Maybe cancer placement?click to expand
Leos are usually cocky, but added crab placements gives them victim mentality.
Posted by VenusAquariusPosted by jeanePosted by VenusAquariusPosted by jeanePosted by VenusAquariusPosted by jeanePosted by VenusAquariusPosted by jeanePosted by VenusAquariusPosted by UndinePosted by VenusAquarius
They might have teased, mildly coldly harassed, purposefully confused her with bits and pieces of misinformation.
They made the queen seem really dumb in that Netflix special. But, I did some research, it was appears she was a bit dumb. And, Charles seemed dumb too.
Being housed with pedestaled dummies.... Being ganged by idiots might test a person's sanity.
Good ol' british hazing, that wat it was.
Ever tried to explain the nuance of harrassment?
One of her claims would constitute a EEO. If royalty is such "work" where's the employment protections, lol?
Meghan has fallen out with her entire family, apart from her mother. Were they too stupid for her, as well as the royals?
She also had several helpers (private secretaries, nannies) leaving their job in close succession. People don't take a prestigious longterm job, working for royals (I could only imagine the lengthy security checks and high references) only to quit a few weeks/months later!
These speak of someone with a difficult, unpleasant personality, who most likely bully or belittle others.
Yep, that's what media, twitter, etc said was gonna be the "get back plan." Have the servants say she was this n' that. They said the royals planned to paint her as a bully or something like that on the news. Retaliation.
That's outlawed in American employment. You quickly lose an EEOC even if the filing was week. Cause retaliation adds to validity to the claim among other things.
Everybody's (media subtlety) pushing to see this as a "family" thing for a reason. I see it as an employment matter too.
Are they attempting the "angry black woman" american stereotype. If they do, it's gonna be a problem.
rumors of her staff not hanging around is not new
https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1232004/meghan-markle-latest-news-prince-harry-sussex-foundation-staff-quits-royal-family
I read it and it's a mixed bag being paint with one broad stroke of suspicion. It's already been stated that british media was brutal and slick. I see it here. One person quit cause "in tears." Harry's bodyguard quit before the wedding. And, the focus of the article is the resignation of an aide they "poached" from a company who got, what appears to be, a better more corporate public job offer.
i don't know why or under what circumstances they left. just to say that staff complaining about them as employers didn't start yesterday in reaction to the oprah interview.
I saw one complaint. Yeah, I see why twitter and news media mapped this out as a royal strategy... Play on the british media propaganda that's already been propagandized.
Megan mentioned no public affairs/relations assistance in her interview as well.
Perhaps it was royal long game all the while. Ties in nicely. Then, it has been also stated by british historians that british media is treated as an extension of the royals public relations.
i only watched it briefly but in her interview she referred to the comms team who could kill an article which featured her father. i guess it was there and not there according to her. someone named jason knauf was apparently their personal press secretary. what his duties were and did he do them effectively i don't know
They didn't kill shit where her father was concerned, lol. I mean I saw the nastiest ugliest pictures and history on him. He's like a cockroach.
I imagine they will approach all previous employees and see who will paint the picture of the "angry black woman."
The aide featured in the article probably won't be approached. She's highly professional and went on to be a CEO. It'll be low level people most likely. People willing to do something strange for some change.
But, as I said, American twitter, news media is already on to them. They play that card in current american climate. It's gonna be a problem.
They better focus on Andrew.
But, this may be apart of that strategy too (as someone already stated).
i think you have to consider the possibility even for a moment that there maybe truth to them being arseholes. the whole family are degenerates (including i-don't-sweat-andy) i don't see why harry and meghan would be spared.
Guilty by association huh? Lol
...cause pedophillia...
...cause racist statements about an infant...
...cause Camilla Bowles nasty ass....click to expand
Lmao @ Camilla comment
Posted by bmoon8Posted by MyStarsShinePosted by Nightcap-
Leo Sun and Merc with Libra Moon and Cancer Rising. What a terrible chart. Over emotionality mixed with self absorption/drama and playing the victim while still trying to appear nice. Most people had no idea she was black until she started to pull out the race card every turn. It's not like she was marching at BLM protests and fighting injustice. Also, she might want to be careful about invoking talk of suicide. There are people with actual issues related to suicide not some trivial issue from an over privileged opportunist pandering for sympathy.
Have you any idea about the severity and brutality the British press inflicted on Diana and then years down the line on Meghan, coupled with the fact that she was hardly allowed to breath within the walls of the institution and then all the shit about how dark skinned their baby would be. I’d say she was pretty much going crazy. Yes she was naive going into it but I also believe listening to her, she hit rock bottom. You’d have to be made of wood or steel not to be affected by that.
Nutcap deleted his post?
What part of her chart do you associate “playing the victim” with?
Usually, that is Pisces MO.click to expand
That would be the cancer placements, 100%
Join the Conversation. Explore Yourself. Connect with Others.
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →Related Topics
I think it's finally safe to say we are dead. I remember when a top tier post, or even a new edgy member would get 20+ likes with no effort. Anyone remember when a juicy thread could easily get 40+ pages? This use to happen weekly on multiple occasions. M
If so, what was your experience? I'm under the impression that while it's not 100% risk free, its generally safe to fly due to high in-plane air circulation. Also, where did you go? I want to go to Cali to meet a honey..
What's something fun and crazy that you remember doing as a teenager?
I do remember something hilarious and Astrology related. It started with a conversation I had with a friend back in middle school. She brought up horoscopes and then I came up with the
Does anyone know of any shindigs in the US that’s like a Bnb wake n bake?
I wanna oil paint, get high, and gossip about the hierarchy.
And what was your experience?
A thread to post inspiration, images, resources etc of alternative dwellings. Lets get creative!
http://www.bitelabs.org/
Has anyone seen this lately? Gotta say mind blown - particularly in light of the age old Hollywood ‘phelia / cannibal saga rumours that have been circulating for years... anyways
Hoax or reality
What’s your take DeeExpuhs
We lost the buffet restaurants here, and I really miss the freedom to get up and grab whatever I wanted and to try different foods.
Are they open where you are?
What else is gone forever where you live?
https://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/aLwK3Kx_46
How many phone calls or texts is the limit before some realizes they’ve been ghosted?
Are there any other ways people think they’ve been ghosted?
There is this rumor that the ERCOT (manages the power grid) cut off power to millions of people when its 0 degrees, not because there was a lack of supply to meet demand. Because price on unregulated Natural Gas prices went up as the Railroad commission
Post anything you think is appropriate for Valentine's Day. Videos, songs, pictures, personal stories, etc.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Vv-BfVoq4g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xg3vE8Ie_E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLkEkLje0dU
https://www.you
Post anything and everything Bridgerton in hereee. 🥰🥰
Why so many people support capitalism? When they don't benefit much from it because they're poor and struggling just like the majority of the country.
We all love to watch those rescue videos, right? But what would you do if you knew that there are people out there whose rescues are 100% FAKE and orchestrated by themselves for the money?
Worse so than that, that they put defenseless puppies and kittens
When this pandemic is more under control, have you made a bucket list of things you now want to do? Will you aim to tick these things off? What are they, what have you realised that you need and want to experience?
https://i.redd.it/njvzodfucnh41.jpg
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/88/5e/4e/885e4ea73c7853180d9c9b60e8153218.jpg
What exactly is Cardinal energy?
They say its an energy that goes after something, but I think of it more as just a quick start to something, there is just as much inconsistent energy as mutables have. I think Fixed signs are the most consistent. I don't
So ever since my last two ex's (Libra is not really an ex but situationship I guess) I think I have super low standards and expectations from men.
I just wanna check myself. What kinna things are to be expected and a simple thank you or a smile is enough
I was gone one two three four five six thousand years..... and DXP turned on its head? Where da fudging forums at man?
Anyone else feeling a lil crazy with the full moon? Just me?