
Elissar18
@Elissar18
7 Years500+ Posts
Comments: 224 · Posts: 556 · Topics: 16




Posted by Arielle83
You both cook and clean and take care of things.


Posted by Impulsv
I think we play our roles because we think that is how it’s supposed to be. N men may want that for honorable reason or to over power n keep them dependa t , not able to walk out if they misbehave.

Posted by -sierra-
this is ridiculous
my boyfriend and i both work
he cooks and i clean
if we had kids, i doubt this would change

Posted by hippiecrite
My second husband was a stay at home dad. I worked 40hrs a week, cleaned house and made the meals. That didn’t last very long.

Posted by LadyNeptune
I think both are valid roles, being the bread winner and being the caretaker. Only difference is if you work a 9-5 you get vaca days and sick days and weekends off. Zero time off for that stay at home mom/dad life. Also doesn’t come with a 401 k.
Cooking and cleaning should be equally split or pay for cleaning service.

Posted by LadyNeptune
I think the question “are women slaves” depends on what culture/time period you are talking about.
Real freedom imo is financial freedom. Having access to education, opportunity to earn, and equal pay is a path to freedom.


Posted by Arielle83Posted by Elissar18Posted by Arielle83
You both cook and clean and take care of things.
So you don't assume the "girl" duties? What's your take on those who do. Why do you think that expectation exists?
What is a “girl” duty?
My bf and I both work in the same industry. We both cook and clean, do maintenance and yard work.
We both take care of each other.
When I was married, I worked two jobs and cooked and cleaned and did yard work while husband coasted and went to the gym and had mom take care of him. I left that.
If you want something to work, you both have to share duties.click to expand

Posted by Elissar18Posted by LadyNeptune
I think the question “are women slaves” depends on what culture/time period you are talking about.
Real freedom imo is financial freedom. Having access to education, opportunity to earn, and equal pay is a path to freedom.
I agree. Until you have children... then I think things change in that area.click to expand

Posted by Elissar18Posted by hippiecrite
My second husband was a stay at home dad. I worked 40hrs a week, cleaned house and made the meals. That didn’t last very long.
That sounds like a crappy deal. Why did you accept or enter into that?click to expand

Posted by Elissar18Posted by LadyNeptune
I think both are valid roles, being the bread winner and being the caretaker. Only difference is if you work a 9-5 you get vaca days and sick days and weekends off. Zero time off for that stay at home mom/dad life. Also doesn’t come with a 401 k.
Cooking and cleaning should be equally split or pay for cleaning service.
Aren't those vacation days, after work, and weekends parenting time?click to expand

Posted by Elissar18Posted by Soul
I don’t believe they are.
If you want, put on a hard hat and go into a coal mine or something. Risk the reality of black lung or the mine caving in with the rest of them, and you will make as much. That or go to collage for the highest paying job, and rather then trying to be popular focus on what you want out of life. Like 100% , even when you feel like you can’t.
The opportunity is there for everyone, it’s just how bad do you want it?
I work on trucks so I have a "boy" job, I get my hands dirty, am financially independent and own my own home so I agree that opportunities exist. But if I were to get married and have a family, that changes.click to expand

Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by Elissar18Posted by LadyNeptune
I think the question “are women slaves” depends on what culture/time period you are talking about.
Real freedom imo is financial freedom. Having access to education, opportunity to earn, and equal pay is a path to freedom.
I agree. Until you have children... then I think things change in that area.
How so?click to expand

Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by Elissar18Posted by LadyNeptune
I think both are valid roles, being the bread winner and being the caretaker. Only difference is if you work a 9-5 you get vaca days and sick days and weekends off. Zero time off for that stay at home mom/dad life. Also doesn’t come with a 401 k.
Cooking and cleaning should be equally split or pay for cleaning service.
Aren't those vacation days, after work, and weekends parenting time?
20 mins here and there. But stay at home mom is still running the show. Let’s be real.click to expand

Posted by Arielle83Posted by Elissar18Posted by Arielle83Posted by Elissar18Posted by Arielle83
You both cook and clean and take care of things.
So you don't assume the "girl" duties? What's your take on those who do. Why do you think that expectation exists?
What is a “girl” duty?
My bf and I both work in the same industry. We both cook and clean, do maintenance and yard work.
We both take care of each other.
When I was married, I worked two jobs and cooked and cleaned and did yard work while husband coasted and went to the gym and had mom take care of him. I left that.
If you want something to work, you both have to share duties.
Girl duties is what you referred to in your married life. Where you do almost everything.
Is it weird adjusting from doing everything to being with someone who shares the load?
No it’s what you deserve. I’m not dealing with a man child again. A man that can’t take care of himself gets a woman out of necessity, not out of want.click to expand

Posted by SoulPosted by Elissar18Posted by Soul
I don’t believe they are.
If you want, put on a hard hat and go into a coal mine or something. Risk the reality of black lung or the mine caving in with the rest of them, and you will make as much. That or go to collage for the highest paying job, and rather then trying to be popular focus on what you want out of life. Like 100% , even when you feel like you can’t.
The opportunity is there for everyone, it’s just how bad do you want it?
I work on trucks so I have a "boy" job, I get my hands dirty, am financially independent and own my own home so I agree that opportunities exist. But if I were to get married and have a family, that changes.
You just need to find a man that feels like balance and teamwork is most important. Life nowadays almost always requires two independent people. So rather then one doing all the cleaning and cooking, you should both do it together. Or at the least have one taking care of the cleaning, while the other cooks or something.click to expand

Posted by Black-Mamba
If I'm working 40 hours a week at 10 dollars at an hour and my husband works 40 hours a week for 100 $
This means nothing to me. The labor will be divided.
If he's not working yet I'm earning than he better take care of home and cooking

Posted by Black-Mamba
Yeah i mean look whomever is home all day should take care of the home etcetc
If its both division of labor

Posted by Arachnophobia
That imply's that women like my grandmother are push overs, yeah nah. She had 4 kids in the 1960's, she raised them in butfuck no where, on the edge of the wilderness. Her family were lumberjacks, all her brothers were loggers and all the women raised the kids together in a big unit, where they needed to work they did, chopping wood, raising sheep in the yard, mostly wrangling a dozen wild Maori kids, that was the hard part. These women and men worked hard to feed their big family's. Real hard, they loved their children like the world and raised them well. They weren't thinking about some freedom somewhere else or being financially independent or security, they did not need to because my grandad looked after her and still does. My grandfather was a payed hunter, he spent his life hunting wild deer and carrying entire deer out of the wilderness to sell to the butcher, he had too, it was all he knew how to do and he loved to do it, he got to no time with his kids because he had to bust his ass to feed them. He is hard as nails. They are still together today, even though the spark left, they could not just split up, and a much stronger bond than chemistry formed in it's wake. A family. They will get buried beside each other like the king and queen that they are.

Posted by Impulsv
I think we play our roles because we think that is how it’s supposed to be. N men may want that for honorable reason or to over power n keep them dependa t , not able to walk out if they misbehave.

Posted by Black-MambaPosted by Elissar18Posted by Black-Mamba
If I'm working 40 hours a week at 10 dollars at an hour and my husband works 40 hours a week for 100 $
This means nothing to me. The labor will be divided.
If he's not working yet I'm earning than he better take care of home and cooking
If you're dating someone, would you not cook for them or clean up after them, unless they cook and clean up after you?
I can't be someone's mom
I'm tired too
I like the idea of a partnership
I'd prefer to be with someone who cleans up after themselves and who likes to cook
I Dont want to be the only person responsible for cleaning and cooking for the household
That's old school
Plus I'm just not a fan
It puts a bunch of burden on one person
I'm not not into babying ppl i see cleaning and cooking as work
Not fun
click to expand
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
In a kingdom, the servants are offered food and shelter, in exchange for services. So do you think men want to play king and make the rules, even though they have no intention of following them? Or do we set those expectations upon ourselves and follow them because that's what we think we're supposed to do to show we would make a "good wife"?
Disclaimer: this is not an opinion, but rather a random perspective and topic for discussion so don't get all defensive and take it personally.