
Undine
@Undine
12 Years5,000+ Posts
Comments: 1552 · Posts: 8895 · Topics: 11


Posted by ArgusPosted by LoggerPosted by Moloko_vellocet
You do realize she can be both an attention seekers and drama queen and still have suffered racism.
Both realities can exist.
You people and your racism. If you're that hyper -sensitive to racism, why not just move back to the country of your ancestors where you'll blend right in? Good Lord - don't you people get tired of being perpetually offended?
More dominant question here is do you ever get tired of being obtuse?!click to expand
Posted by saggurl88
What Meg meant when she said she never studied the royals at all. lol LIEEEEEESSSSS2C368&ssl=1
Posted by UndinePosted by Moloko_vellocet
You do realize she can be both an attention seekers and drama queen and still have suffered racism.
Both realities can exist.
Give me some concrete example of racism she suffered after marrying the son of the future king.
Was she often overlooked when applied for jobs?
Had she a lower income than the average white person with the same skills?
Was she subjected to racist slurs on the streets of London? Treated like a potential thief in upmarket high street shops ?
Was her car stopped for no reason and asked to prove that it’s hers? Was she asked to get out with raised hands, like a criminal, and leave her baby behind on the back seat (real events)?
Claiming that this unpleasant half white woman who married a prince has suffered racism in the UK it’s an OFFENCE to all people who have endured racial abuse!click to expand

Posted by DonnaLibraPosted by bmoon8
We will see what the response of the Royals will be. My guess is Harry and Meghan exposed them and they will now strip them of their titles.
I thought they didn't want titles and wanted to give it up. I guess they don't want to be nobody's afterall.click to expand

Posted by Lunamara
Appearantly there is a fund made by a neighbor to collect money to pay for Harris mansion lol gtfo
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/14318972/harry-meghan-fundraising-page-america-mansion/?utm_term=Autofeed&utm_campaign=sunroyalsfacebook&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1615579132

Posted by Ram416Posted by Lunamara
Appearantly there is a fund made by a neighbor to collect money to pay for Harris mansion lol gtfo
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/14318972/harry-meghan-fundraising-page-america-mansion/?utm_term=Autofeed&utm_campaign=sunroyalsfacebook&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1615579132
Does this mean they've run out of money?click to expand


Posted by Lunamara
“ But it didn't take long for holes to emerge in the Duke and Duchess' story about money in particular, with a "well-placed source" telling The Telegraph Charles was fed up with the constant calls from Harry for more money".
"He ploughed a lot into the wedding and the refurbishment of Frogmore Cottage [the couple's Windsor home] and did his utmost to make them feel financially supported but when they said they were upping sticks, they asked for even more," the source said.”
Then what’s the hype about becoming financial independent n then crying about being cut off.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/life style /what-f-hypocrisy-prince-charles-friend-lashes-at-harry-over-money-claims/4MMICKNT7MCTIPMMV2XLVD4YWU/?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=nzh_fb&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR2ssgTO03lvmW4dUGVQyj-Tg5GnyLCS0BSsR1Q839ZasbJIot3UkKbaNBM#Echobox=1615784094


Posted by Moloko_vellocetPosted by Lunamara
“ But it didn't take long for holes to emerge in the Duke and Duchess' story about money in particular, with a "well-placed source" telling The Telegraph Charles was fed up with the constant calls from Harry for more money".
"He ploughed a lot into the wedding and the refurbishment of Frogmore Cottage [the couple's Windsor home] and did his utmost to make them feel financially supported but when they said they were upping sticks, they asked for even more," the source said.”
Then what’s the hype about becoming financial independent n then crying about being cut off.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/life style /what-f-hypocrisy-prince-charles-friend-lashes-at-harry-over-money-claims/4MMICKNT7MCTIPMMV2XLVD4YWU/?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=nzh_fb&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR2ssgTO03lvmW4dUGVQyj-Tg5GnyLCS0BSsR1Q839ZasbJIot3UkKbaNBM#Echobox=1615784094
He’s a spoiled little rich prince that can’t be independent.
What a betaclick to expand

Posted by Lunamara
Interesting breakdown

Posted by Ram416Posted by Lunamara
Interesting breakdown
Don't believe he's an empath. Empaths don't go around calling their Middle Eastern colleagues ragheads.click to expand

Posted by Ram416Posted by Moloko_vellocetPosted by Lunamara
“ But it didn't take long for holes to emerge in the Duke and Duchess' story about money in particular, with a "well-placed source" telling The Telegraph Charles was fed up with the constant calls from Harry for more money".
"He ploughed a lot into the wedding and the refurbishment of Frogmore Cottage [the couple's Windsor home] and did his utmost to make them feel financially supported but when they said they were upping sticks, they asked for even more," the source said.”
Then what’s the hype about becoming financial independent n then crying about being cut off.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/life style /what-f-hypocrisy-prince-charles-friend-lashes-at-harry-over-money-claims/4MMICKNT7MCTIPMMV2XLVD4YWU/?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=nzh_fb&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR2ssgTO03lvmW4dUGVQyj-Tg5GnyLCS0BSsR1Q839ZasbJIot3UkKbaNBM#Echobox=1615784094
He’s a spoiled little rich prince that can’t be independent.
What a beta
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't it the bride's side who pays for the wedding? According to English customs. WTF was Charles doing paying for the wedding?click to expand

Posted by xiongmaoPosted by Jumpin_JupiterPosted by xiongmaoPosted by Jumpin_Jupiter
I don't know if snowbunny got that placement (garsh I hope not) at least she's being straight up honest and real whether or not she got it.
Venus in Virgo never gets enough credit....
Ohh I'm sorry, I don't know anything about Venus in Virgo to give it any credit. Its only the big 3 ascendant, sun and moon that really shines. To be honest with you I don't know much at all about Leo sun. I don't have none of them in my life. I only say snowbunny is safe because of the cancer placements in two of the big 3. I don't know how Leo sun manifest in that.
If (and a big if) Leo is attention seeking and entitled, Venus in Virgo is opposite of that. I think people with this placement don't get enough credit for how self-aware they are.click to expand
Posted by Ram416Posted by Moloko_vellocetPosted by Lunamara
“ But it didn't take long for holes to emerge in the Duke and Duchess' story about money in particular, with a "well-placed source" telling The Telegraph Charles was fed up with the constant calls from Harry for more money".
"He ploughed a lot into the wedding and the refurbishment of Frogmore Cottage [the couple's Windsor home] and did his utmost to make them feel financially supported but when they said they were upping sticks, they asked for even more," the source said.”
Then what’s the hype about becoming financial independent n then crying about being cut off.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/life style /what-f-hypocrisy-prince-charles-friend-lashes-at-harry-over-money-claims/4MMICKNT7MCTIPMMV2XLVD4YWU/?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=nzh_fb&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR2ssgTO03lvmW4dUGVQyj-Tg5GnyLCS0BSsR1Q839ZasbJIot3UkKbaNBM#Echobox=1615784094
He’s a spoiled little rich prince that can’t be independent.
What a beta
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't it the bride's side who pays for the wedding? According to English customs. WTF was Charles doing paying for the wedding?click to expand

Posted by jeanePosted by Ram416Posted by Moloko_vellocetPosted by Lunamara
“ But it didn't take long for holes to emerge in the Duke and Duchess' story about money in particular, with a "well-placed source" telling The Telegraph Charles was fed up with the constant calls from Harry for more money".
"He ploughed a lot into the wedding and the refurbishment of Frogmore Cottage [the couple's Windsor home] and did his utmost to make them feel financially supported but when they said they were upping sticks, they asked for even more," the source said.”
Then what’s the hype about becoming financial independent n then crying about being cut off.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/life style /what-f-hypocrisy-prince-charles-friend-lashes-at-harry-over-money-claims/4MMICKNT7MCTIPMMV2XLVD4YWU/?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=nzh_fb&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR2ssgTO03lvmW4dUGVQyj-Tg5GnyLCS0BSsR1Q839ZasbJIot3UkKbaNBM#Echobox=1615784094
He’s a spoiled little rich prince that can’t be independent.
What a beta
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't it the bride's side who pays for the wedding? According to English customs. WTF was Charles doing paying for the wedding?
traditionally for the royals, they pay for it themselves, although the taxpayer pays for security.
you could argue that the taxpayer pays for the wedding too as the royal family receive a significant stipend each year out of our pockets.click to expand


Posted by UndinePosted by Jumpin_JupiterPosted by MyStarsShinePosted by Jumpin_JupiterPosted by MyStarsShinePosted by Jumpin_JupiterPosted by MyStarsShinePosted by Jumpin_JupiterPosted by MyStarsShinePosted by SnowBunny726Posted by Nightcap-
Leo Sun and Merc with Libra Moon and Cancer Rising. What a terrible chart. Over emotionality mixed with self absorption/drama and playing the victim while still trying to appear nice. Most people had no idea she was black until she started to pull out the race card every turn. It's not like she was marching at BLM protests and fighting injustice. Also, she might want to be careful about invoking talk of suicide. There are people with actual issues related to suicide not some trivial issue from an over privileged opportunist pandering for sympathy.
I hate Libra Moons. Cancer, Leo and Libra all in one chart make for an entitled delusional brat. And I have major placements in all three of those signs so I'm not talking like I'm an angel above it all.
What do you hate about them?
I don't like to butt in and speak up on nobody's behalf but my own. Libra moons usually come off as legit delusional. I don't know if snowbunny got that placement (garsh I hope not) at least she's being straight up honest and real whether or not she got it. I don't know who this Meagan markle character is but I have read some negative things about her on this site. And honestly I don't care to know her.
Also need to say there are some delusional people from my own sign too. Delusionalist comes from all signs thru all walks of life. I'm man enough to own up to my own sign and say that it can be delusional. And if you doubt Gemini can be delusional, just look at yo boi, Donald trump.
What do you think makes the moon placed in Libra delusional?
The moon represent your emotions. And it all make sense Libra being placed in the moon makes one delusional. There's no getting around that. This is why Libra is best on the ascendant. And on the ascendant only. That is Libra's original placement. The ascendant.
Yes I know about the moon
I’d have thought Neptune, ie Pisces would be more prone to delusions, escapism etc?
Uhhh.... I would think that's illusions. Neptune and Pisces are both dreamy. So someone with Neptune in Pisces or Pisces/Neptune influence would be someone who has their head in the clouds. Well most of the time.
Based on the Pisces/strong Neptune people I know, I'd go with this
"Pisces prefer to float in a pleasant existence that avoids encounters with the harsh ugliness of life. So, they create delusions where everything is pleasant. Often it's harmless and it simply makes Pisces easy to live with. Other times, it can slowly eat away at relationships or lead to self-destruction"
Oh ok. This Pisces you know probably doesn't have Neptune in the 1st house or Neptune on the rise. Because most people with those Pisces placements usually act like they don't have a clue where they at. I don't think I can recall any Pisces that are delusional. They might be. I just don't know.
I know a Pisces dude I used to work with a very long time ago. He's very hard to comprehend anything and when you call him he'll look up at the sky first and you can be right there in front of him. Ain't hard to tell he's Neptune down. I don't know what time he was born tho so I could be wrong on that.
I’m Pisces sun and moon with Neptune on my rising. Is there anything you want me to explain to you?click to expand

Posted by Ram416Posted by jeanePosted by Ram416Posted by Moloko_vellocetPosted by Lunamara
“ But it didn't take long for holes to emerge in the Duke and Duchess' story about money in particular, with a "well-placed source" telling The Telegraph Charles was fed up with the constant calls from Harry for more money".
"He ploughed a lot into the wedding and the refurbishment of Frogmore Cottage [the couple's Windsor home] and did his utmost to make them feel financially supported but when they said they were upping sticks, they asked for even more," the source said.”
Then what’s the hype about becoming financial independent n then crying about being cut off.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/life style /what-f-hypocrisy-prince-charles-friend-lashes-at-harry-over-money-claims/4MMICKNT7MCTIPMMV2XLVD4YWU/?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=nzh_fb&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR2ssgTO03lvmW4dUGVQyj-Tg5GnyLCS0BSsR1Q839ZasbJIot3UkKbaNBM#Echobox=1615784094
He’s a spoiled little rich prince that can’t be independent.
What a beta
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't it the bride's side who pays for the wedding? According to English customs. WTF was Charles doing paying for the wedding?
traditionally for the royals, they pay for it themselves, although the taxpayer pays for security.
you could argue that the taxpayer pays for the wedding too as the royal family receive a significant stipend each year out of our pockets.
Which brings me to my next question. Is the British taxpayer still funding Harry and Meghan's life style ?click to expand

Posted by Lunamara
Harry says they'd been living off of his share of the inheritance his mother, Princess Diana, left to him and his brother William after her death in 1997. According to The Independent, after taxes, the half that Harry received upon turning 25 amounts to around $ 13 million USD. "Without that, we wouldn't have been able to do this," Harry said, suggesting their move to a new home in California was made possible thanks to those funds.
Harry and Meghan inked what's believed to be a very lucrative Netflix deal, estimated to be worth between 100 and 240 million in U.S. dollars (the streaming platform hasn't confirmed a sum). They also produce a podcast in a deal with Spotify, and Oprah and Harry are producing a docu-series on mental health for Apple TV+. Initially, "the Netflix and the Spotify of it all weren't part of the plan," Harry told Oprah in the interview.
These revenue streams are in addition to Markle's own money from her previous career as an actress—in her days on USA drama Suits, she earned a reported salary of about $ 450,000 in addition to endorsements and related income. While it's an unconfirmed number, a February 2020 Forbes report estimated Harry and Meghan's net worth at about $ 10 million.”
They just should of stuck with we’re are trying to be financially independent
No shame there no need to excuse baby Archie security need to work for nerflix. No sympathy when you bought a home you could not afford and prioritize on your babies security.



Posted by DonnaLibra
Why does Meghan want Archie to have a title?

Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by DonnaLibra
Why does Meghan want Archie to have a title?
If we take what they said in their interview at face value, they didn't care either way about the title. They were upset that him not having a title was used as an excuse not to provide their child with security.
And just because Archie was not eligible to be awarded prince title (until Charles ascends the throne) doesn't mean he couldn't be granted any number of other titles like every other freakin member of that family.
Meghan specifically said Archie was not going to be granted a title — not that he was specifically being denied the title of prince. What she did say, was that by decree of King George V, the grandchildren of the monarch are granted the title of prince or princess.
Meghan specifically said to Oprah that once Harry’s dad, Charles, becomes king that Archie was due to become a Prince, AND that the powers that be in the palace specifically wanted to alter the King George V decree just to exclude Archie from ever gaining the title of Prince. Her point was why would the palace be going out of it’s way just to exclude Archie from becoming a prince when his time comes. Coupled with the ‘top dark’ comments...click to expand




Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by DonnaLibra
Why does Meghan want Archie to have a title?
If we take what they said in their interview at face value, they didn't care either way about the title. They were upset that him not having a title was used as an excuse not to provide their child with security.
And just because Archie was not eligible to be awarded prince title (until Charles ascends the throne) doesn't mean he couldn't be granted any number of other titles like every other freakin member of that family.
Meghan specifically said Archie was not going to be granted a title — not that he was specifically being denied the title of prince. What she did say, was that by decree of King George V, the grandchildren of the monarch are granted the title of prince or princess.
Meghan specifically said to Oprah that once Harry’s dad, Charles, becomes king that Archie was due to become a Prince, AND that the powers that be in the palace specifically wanted to alter the King George V decree just to exclude Archie from ever gaining the title of Prince. Her point was why would the palace be going out of it’s way just to exclude Archie from becoming a prince when his time comes. Coupled with the ‘top dark’ comments...click to expand



Posted by AndalusiaPosted by LadyNeptunePosted by DonnaLibra
Why does Meghan want Archie to have a title?
If we take what they said in their interview at face value, they didn't care either way about the title. They were upset that him not having a title was used as an excuse not to provide their child with security.
And just because Archie was not eligible to be awarded prince title (until Charles ascends the throne) doesn't mean he couldn't be granted any number of other titles like every other freakin member of that family.
Meghan specifically said Archie was not going to be granted a title — not that he was specifically being denied the title of prince. What she did say, was that by decree of King George V, the grandchildren of the monarch are granted the title of prince or princess.
Meghan specifically said to Oprah that once Harry’s dad, Charles, becomes king that Archie was due to become a Prince, AND that the powers that be in the palace specifically wanted to alter the King George V decree just to exclude Archie from ever gaining the title of Prince. Her point was why would the palace be going out of it’s way just to exclude Archie from becoming a prince when his time comes. Coupled with the ‘top dark’ comments...
She bothered to learn all the ins and outs of succession patterns and the hierarchy of titles but not the fact that she's supposed to curtsy when meeting the Queen?
LMAO.click to expand


Posted by Lunamara
2029
"I think the Andrew crisis has definitely strengthened Prince Charles's desire for a slimmed-down monarchy," Royal Central deputy editor Brittani Barger told the outlet. "Prince Andrew is now out of the picture. I don't see him ever undertaking royal duties again, and any hope that his daughters would is now gone. So the process of slimming the monarchy has already begun as we know Charles was pushing his mother to meet with Andrew and have him step back from his royal duties."
"I think when it's all said and done, the monarchy will be Charles and his children and grandchildren," she added.
Editor of Royal Central Charlie Proctor echoed Barger's sentiments, adding that the likes of Princess Anne and the Earl and Countess of Wessex "are some of the hardest working royals," but under Charles' reign, their official duties could be cut off to avoid any other scandal.
Sounds reasonable
https://news.yahoo.com/prince-charles-set-trim-down-171411559.html

Posted by VenusAquariusPosted by LadyNeptunePosted by DonnaLibra
Why does Meghan want Archie to have a title?
If we take what they said in their interview at face value, they didn't care either way about the title. They were upset that him not having a title was used as an excuse not to provide their child with security.
And just because Archie was not eligible to be awarded prince title (until Charles ascends the throne) doesn't mean he couldn't be granted any number of other titles like every other freakin member of that family.
Meghan specifically said Archie was not going to be granted a title — not that he was specifically being denied the title of prince. What she did say, was that by decree of King George V, the grandchildren of the monarch are granted the title of prince or princess.
Meghan specifically said to Oprah that once Harry’s dad, Charles, becomes king that Archie was due to become a Prince, AND that the powers that be in the palace specifically wanted to alter the King George V decree just to exclude Archie from ever gaining the title of Prince. Her point was why would the palace be going out of it’s way just to exclude Archie from becoming a prince when his time comes. Coupled with the ‘top dark’ comments...
Girl, they ain't listin... They too busy wit da![]()
Lmao, shits cra-a-z.click to expand


Posted by LadyNeptune
Lol ya'll act like if you married into royalty you wouldn't research your future children's roles more in depth. As if you wouldn't be informed and taught by 'the firm' what role you play and what role your spawn would play.
I mean, just say you don't like her cause she's pretty and landed the cuter prince and your jelly of her. I mean yuck, gingers, but to each their own.
I just find it funny to read such contradictions from the people who hate on her. Because she's a gold digger of course who manipulated her way into the princes pants and heart. But then also she's yoko levels by manipulating him to break up with his family and leave the money behind. So which is it?

Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by Lunamara
2029
"I think the Andrew crisis has definitely strengthened Prince Charles's desire for a slimmed-down monarchy," Royal Central deputy editor Brittani Barger told the outlet. "Prince Andrew is now out of the picture. I don't see him ever undertaking royal duties again, and any hope that his daughters would is now gone. So the process of slimming the monarchy has already begun as we know Charles was pushing his mother to meet with Andrew and have him step back from his royal duties."
"I think when it's all said and done, the monarchy will be Charles and his children and grandchildren," she added.
Editor of Royal Central Charlie Proctor echoed Barger's sentiments, adding that the likes of Princess Anne and the Earl and Countess of Wessex "are some of the hardest working royals," but under Charles' reign, their official duties could be cut off to avoid any other scandal.
Sounds reasonable
https://news.yahoo.com/prince-charles-set-trim-down-171411559.html
Archie is Charles grandchild. Or is this Charles way of confirming the rumors that Harry is in fact not his son 🤔click to expand

Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by DonnaLibra
Why does Meghan want Archie to have a title?
If we take what they said in their interview at face value, they didn't care either way about the title. They were upset that him not having a title was used as an excuse not to provide their child with security.
And just because Archie was not eligible to be awarded prince title (until Charles ascends the throne) doesn't mean he couldn't be granted any number of other titles like every other freakin member of that family.
Meghan specifically said Archie was not going to be granted a title — not that he was specifically being denied the title of prince. What she did say, was that by decree of King George V, the grandchildren of the monarch are granted the title of prince or princess.
Meghan specifically said to Oprah that once Harry’s dad, Charles, becomes king that Archie was due to become a Prince, AND that the powers that be in the palace specifically wanted to alter the King George V decree just to exclude Archie from ever gaining the title of Prince. Her point was why would the palace be going out of it’s way just to exclude Archie from becoming a prince when his time comes. Coupled with the ‘too dark’ comments...click to expand

Posted by Lunamara
2029
"I think the Andrew crisis has definitely strengthened Prince Charles's desire for a slimmed-down monarchy," Royal Central deputy editor Brittani Barger told the outlet. "Prince Andrew is now out of the picture. I don't see him ever undertaking royal duties again, and any hope that his daughters would is now gone. So the process of slimming the monarchy has already begun as we know Charles was pushing his mother to meet with Andrew and have him step back from his royal duties."
"I think when it's all said and done, the monarchy will be Charles and his children and grandchildren," she added.
Editor of Royal Central Charlie Proctor echoed Barger's sentiments, adding that the likes of Princess Anne and the Earl and Countess of Wessex "are some of the hardest working royals," but under Charles' reign, their official duties could be cut off to avoid any other scandal.
Sounds reasonable
https://news.yahoo.com/prince-charles-set-trim-down-171411559.html

Posted by LadyNeptune
Furthering my suspicion that this was a calculated move by Harry.
He now has a podcast.
TV and movie producer credits.
Zero entertainment background.
Was spotted eating with David Foster in Santa Barbara over the weekend. Prince Harry EP hitting your playlist soon!


Posted by jeanePosted by LadyNeptune
Furthering my suspicion that this was a calculated move by Harry.
He now has a podcast.
TV and movie producer credits.
Zero entertainment background.
Was spotted eating with David Foster in Santa Barbara over the weekend. Prince Harry EP hitting your playlist soon!
he did want out. bringing meghan into the family was a calculated move on his part. he knew what it would do to the family. (i'm not just surmising, this was told to me). i don't think he calculated on the queen kicking him out entirely but i suspected he wanted to have his cake and eat it too.
i read years ago (possibly pre-meghan, definitely pre-wedding) that neither harry, nor kate, nor wills were particularly fond of royal duties. they all want to do as little as possible.
while the queen just goes and goes and goes. i guess that's a taurus for you.click to expand

Posted by Parkourler
Some people actually insisit she is a black woman that's crazy.

Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by Parkourler
Some people actually insisit she is a black woman that's crazy.
not crazy in America where the one drop rule went beyond social and cultural constructs and was coded into law in many states. Know your historyclick to expand
Posted by LadyNeptunePosted by Parkourler
Some people actually insisit she is a black woman that's crazy.
not crazy in America where the one drop rule went beyond social and cultural constructs and was coded into law in many states. Know your historyclick to expand

Posted by Moloko_vellocetPosted by LadyNeptunePosted by Parkourler
Some people actually insisit she is a black woman that's crazy.
not crazy in America where the one drop rule went beyond social and cultural constructs and was coded into law in many states. Know your history
She’s riding her white privilege like Becky looking for handouts.
She hasn’t been oppressed or dealt with racism like a Black woman.
Sorry.click to expand
Discover insights, swap stories, and find people. dxpnet is where experiences turn into understanding.
Create Your Free Account →
I’m Pisces sun and moon with Neptune on my rising. Is there anything you want me to explain to you?