Megan markle (Page 5)

You are on page out of 6 | Reverse Order
Profile picture of Undine
Undine
@Undine
12 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 1552 · Posts: 8895 · Topics: 11
Posted by Jumpin_Jupiter
Posted by MyStarsShine
Posted by Jumpin_Jupiter
Posted by MyStarsShine
Posted by Jumpin_Jupiter
Posted by MyStarsShine
Posted by Jumpin_Jupiter
Posted by MyStarsShine
Posted by SnowBunny726
Posted by Nightcap-

Leo Sun and Merc with Libra Moon and Cancer Rising. What a terrible chart. Over emotionality mixed with self absorption/drama and playing the victim while still trying to appear nice. Most people had no idea she was black until she started to pull out the race card every turn. It's not like she was marching at BLM protests and fighting injustice. Also, she might want to be careful about invoking talk of suicide. There are people with actual issues related to suicide not some trivial issue from an over privileged opportunist pandering for sympathy.

I hate Libra Moons. Cancer, Leo and Libra all in one chart make for an entitled delusional brat. And I have major placements in all three of those signs so I'm not talking like I'm an angel above it all.

What do you hate about them?

I don't like to butt in and speak up on nobody's behalf but my own. Libra moons usually come off as legit delusional. I don't know if snowbunny got that placement (garsh I hope not) at least she's being straight up honest and real whether or not she got it. I don't know who this Meagan markle character is but I have read some negative things about her on this site. And honestly I don't care to know her.

Also need to say there are some delusional people from my own sign too. Delusionalist comes from all signs thru all walks of life. I'm man enough to own up to my own sign and say that it can be delusional. And if you doubt Gemini can be delusional, just look at yo boi, Donald trump.

What do you think makes the moon placed in Libra delusional?

The moon represent your emotions. And it all make sense Libra being placed in the moon makes one delusional. There's no getting around that. This is why Libra is best on the ascendant. And on the ascendant only. That is Libra's original placement. The ascendant.

Yes I know about the moon

I’d have thought Neptune, ie Pisces would be more prone to delusions, escapism etc?

Uhhh.... I would think that's illusions. Neptune and Pisces are both dreamy. So someone with Neptune in Pisces or Pisces/Neptune influence would be someone who has their head in the clouds. Well most of the time.

Based on the Pisces/strong Neptune people I know, I'd go with this

"Pisces prefer to float in a pleasant existence that avoids encounters with the harsh ugliness of life. So, they create delusions where everything is pleasant. Often it's harmless and it simply makes Pisces easy to live with. Other times, it can slowly eat away at relationships or lead to self-destruction"

Oh ok. This Pisces you know probably doesn't have Neptune in the 1st house or Neptune on the rise. Because most people with those Pisces placements usually act like they don't have a clue where they at. I don't think I can recall any Pisces that are delusional. They might be. I just don't know.

I know a Pisces dude I used to work with a very long time ago. He's very hard to comprehend anything and when you call him he'll look up at the sky first and you can be right there in front of him. Ain't hard to tell he's Neptune down. I don't know what time he was born tho so I could be wrong on that.
click to expand



I’m Pisces sun and moon with Neptune on my rising. Is there anything you want me to explain to you?
Profile picture of Moloko_vellocet
Moloko_vellocet
@Moloko_vellocet
4 Years500+ Posts

Comments: 143 · Posts: 559 · Topics: 0
Posted by Argus
Posted by Logger
Posted by Moloko_vellocet

You do realize she can be both an attention seekers and drama queen and still have suffered racism.

Both realities can exist.

You people and your racism. If you're that hyper -sensitive to racism, why not just move back to the country of your ancestors where you'll blend right in? Good Lord - don't you people get tired of being perpetually offended?

More dominant question here is do you ever get tired of being obtuse?!
click to expand


He’s following me because I found out he got a tug from a “black transgender woman”, and he doesn’t want to admit he liked it.
Profile picture of Moloko_vellocet
Moloko_vellocet
@Moloko_vellocet
4 Years500+ Posts

Comments: 143 · Posts: 559 · Topics: 0
Posted by Undine
Posted by Moloko_vellocet

You do realize she can be both an attention seekers and drama queen and still have suffered racism.

Both realities can exist.

Give me some concrete example of racism she suffered after marrying the son of the future king.

Was she often overlooked when applied for jobs?

Had she a lower income than the average white person with the same skills?

Was she subjected to racist slurs on the streets of London? Treated like a potential thief in upmarket high street shops ?

Was her car stopped for no reason and asked to prove that it’s hers? Was she asked to get out with raised hands, like a criminal, and leave her baby behind on the back seat (real events)?

Claiming that this unpleasant half white woman who married a prince has suffered racism in the UK it’s an OFFENCE to all people who have endured racial abuse!
click to expand



I think these are her perceptions. She thinks she’s suffered racism, and adds it to her attention seeking.

From my perspective, she uses her white privilege more than anything, and flips the race card when the far right racist extremists were getting air time in America.

Also when black Hollywood wanted her as their princess. Where did all her Canadian white friends go? Not needed anymore.

She’s an attention seeker
Profile picture of Ram416
Ram416
@Ram416
9 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 4530 · Posts: 12486 · Topics: 56
Posted by DonnaLibra
Posted by bmoon8

We will see what the response of the Royals will be. My guess is Harry and Meghan exposed them and they will now strip them of their titles.

I thought they didn't want titles and wanted to give it up. I guess they don't want to be nobody's afterall.
click to expand



I thought they already gave up their titles. But then you still see them being referred to by their titles.
Profile picture of Lunamara
Lunamara
@Lunamara
4 Years

Comments: 246 · Posts: 232 · Topics: 1
Posted by Ram416
Posted by Lunamara

Appearantly there is a fund made by a neighbor to collect money to pay for Harris mansion lol gtfo

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/14318972/harry-meghan-fundraising-page-america-mansion/?utm_term=Autofeed&utm_campaign=sunroyalsfacebook&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1615579132

Does this mean they've run out of money?
click to expand


I don’t know if these neighbor is just being Facetious
Profile picture of Lunamara
Lunamara
@Lunamara
4 Years

Comments: 246 · Posts: 232 · Topics: 1


“ But it didn't take long for holes to emerge in the Duke and Duchess' story about money in particular, with a "well-placed source" telling The Telegraph Charles was fed up with the constant calls from Harry for more money".

"He ploughed a lot into the wedding and the refurbishment of Frogmore Cottage [the couple's Windsor home] and did his utmost to make them feel financially supported but when they said they were upping sticks, they asked for even more," the source said.”

Then what’s the hype about becoming financial independent n then crying about being cut off.

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/life style /what-f-hypocrisy-prince-charles-friend-lashes-at-harry-over-money-claims/4MMICKNT7MCTIPMMV2XLVD4YWU/?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=nzh_fb&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR2ssgTO03lvmW4dUGVQyj-Tg5GnyLCS0BSsR1Q839ZasbJIot3UkKbaNBM#Echobox=1615784094
Profile picture of Moloko_vellocet
Moloko_vellocet
@Moloko_vellocet
4 Years500+ Posts

Comments: 143 · Posts: 559 · Topics: 0
Posted by Lunamara

“ But it didn't take long for holes to emerge in the Duke and Duchess' story about money in particular, with a "well-placed source" telling The Telegraph Charles was fed up with the constant calls from Harry for more money".

"He ploughed a lot into the wedding and the refurbishment of Frogmore Cottage [the couple's Windsor home] and did his utmost to make them feel financially supported but when they said they were upping sticks, they asked for even more," the source said.”

Then what’s the hype about becoming financial independent n then crying about being cut off.

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/life style /what-f-hypocrisy-prince-charles-friend-lashes-at-harry-over-money-claims/4MMICKNT7MCTIPMMV2XLVD4YWU/?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=nzh_fb&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR2ssgTO03lvmW4dUGVQyj-Tg5GnyLCS0BSsR1Q839ZasbJIot3UkKbaNBM#Echobox=1615784094


He’s a spoiled little rich prince that can’t be independent.

What a beta
Profile picture of Ram416
Ram416
@Ram416
9 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 4530 · Posts: 12486 · Topics: 56
Posted by Moloko_vellocet
Posted by Lunamara

“ But it didn't take long for holes to emerge in the Duke and Duchess' story about money in particular, with a "well-placed source" telling The Telegraph Charles was fed up with the constant calls from Harry for more money".

"He ploughed a lot into the wedding and the refurbishment of Frogmore Cottage [the couple's Windsor home] and did his utmost to make them feel financially supported but when they said they were upping sticks, they asked for even more," the source said.”

Then what’s the hype about becoming financial independent n then crying about being cut off.

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/life style /what-f-hypocrisy-prince-charles-friend-lashes-at-harry-over-money-claims/4MMICKNT7MCTIPMMV2XLVD4YWU/?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=nzh_fb&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR2ssgTO03lvmW4dUGVQyj-Tg5GnyLCS0BSsR1Q839ZasbJIot3UkKbaNBM#Echobox=1615784094

He’s a spoiled little rich prince that can’t be independent.

What a beta
click to expand



Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't it the bride's side who pays for the wedding? According to English customs. WTF was Charles doing paying for the wedding?
Profile picture of jeane
jeane
@jeane
11 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 22 · Posts: 8048 · Topics: 36
Posted by Ram416
Posted by Moloko_vellocet
Posted by Lunamara

“ But it didn't take long for holes to emerge in the Duke and Duchess' story about money in particular, with a "well-placed source" telling The Telegraph Charles was fed up with the constant calls from Harry for more money".

"He ploughed a lot into the wedding and the refurbishment of Frogmore Cottage [the couple's Windsor home] and did his utmost to make them feel financially supported but when they said they were upping sticks, they asked for even more," the source said.”

Then what’s the hype about becoming financial independent n then crying about being cut off.

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/life style /what-f-hypocrisy-prince-charles-friend-lashes-at-harry-over-money-claims/4MMICKNT7MCTIPMMV2XLVD4YWU/?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=nzh_fb&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR2ssgTO03lvmW4dUGVQyj-Tg5GnyLCS0BSsR1Q839ZasbJIot3UkKbaNBM#Echobox=1615784094

He’s a spoiled little rich prince that can’t be independent.

What a beta

Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't it the bride's side who pays for the wedding? According to English customs. WTF was Charles doing paying for the wedding?
click to expand



traditionally for the royals, they pay for it themselves, although the taxpayer pays for security.

you could argue that the taxpayer pays for the wedding too as the royal family receive a significant stipend each year out of our pockets.
Profile picture of Jumpin_Jupiter
5 months without a single dip
@Jumpin_Jupiter
6 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 4223 · Posts: 8452 · Topics: 103
Posted by xiongmao
Posted by Jumpin_Jupiter
Posted by xiongmao
Posted by Jumpin_Jupiter

I don't know if snowbunny got that placement (garsh I hope not) at least she's being straight up honest and real whether or not she got it.

Venus in Virgo never gets enough credit....

Ohh I'm sorry, I don't know anything about Venus in Virgo to give it any credit. Its only the big 3 ascendant, sun and moon that really shines. To be honest with you I don't know much at all about Leo sun. I don't have none of them in my life. I only say snowbunny is safe because of the cancer placements in two of the big 3. I don't know how Leo sun manifest in that.

If (and a big if) Leo is attention seeking and entitled, Venus in Virgo is opposite of that. I think people with this placement don't get enough credit for how self-aware they are.
click to expand



I don't know nothing about Leo sun. I do however know a lot about Leo moon. And it seem to me no matter what Leo moon sun sign be's in, it still doesn't make Leo moon a good one. My Leo moon Sagittarius nephew is a good example of that. He's already in jail and he's only 17. All I know is Leo moons likes staying at home with their parents that doesn't like taking responsibilities. I could go on about Leo moons but ima stop right there.

I suppose Virgo Venuses are very detailed oriented in bed. I guess for them you got to be clean and good looking before falling in love with you. I myself can correlate to that and I don't have Virgo Venus. I am somewhat detailed in bed too. I like em pretty in the face and the very first thing I pay very special attention to in bed is a woman's feet and toes cus that's where I start. I would give myself credit for that but that would make me full of myself I would like to think.
Profile picture of Moloko_vellocet
Moloko_vellocet
@Moloko_vellocet
4 Years500+ Posts

Comments: 143 · Posts: 559 · Topics: 0
Posted by Ram416
Posted by Moloko_vellocet
Posted by Lunamara

“ But it didn't take long for holes to emerge in the Duke and Duchess' story about money in particular, with a "well-placed source" telling The Telegraph Charles was fed up with the constant calls from Harry for more money".

"He ploughed a lot into the wedding and the refurbishment of Frogmore Cottage [the couple's Windsor home] and did his utmost to make them feel financially supported but when they said they were upping sticks, they asked for even more," the source said.”

Then what’s the hype about becoming financial independent n then crying about being cut off.

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/life style /what-f-hypocrisy-prince-charles-friend-lashes-at-harry-over-money-claims/4MMICKNT7MCTIPMMV2XLVD4YWU/?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=nzh_fb&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR2ssgTO03lvmW4dUGVQyj-Tg5GnyLCS0BSsR1Q839ZasbJIot3UkKbaNBM#Echobox=1615784094

He’s a spoiled little rich prince that can’t be independent.

What a beta

Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't it the bride's side who pays for the wedding? According to English customs. WTF was Charles doing paying for the wedding?
click to expand



She acted an orphan so he’d pay.
Profile picture of Ram416
Ram416
@Ram416
9 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 4530 · Posts: 12486 · Topics: 56
Posted by jeane
Posted by Ram416
Posted by Moloko_vellocet
Posted by Lunamara

“ But it didn't take long for holes to emerge in the Duke and Duchess' story about money in particular, with a "well-placed source" telling The Telegraph Charles was fed up with the constant calls from Harry for more money".

"He ploughed a lot into the wedding and the refurbishment of Frogmore Cottage [the couple's Windsor home] and did his utmost to make them feel financially supported but when they said they were upping sticks, they asked for even more," the source said.”

Then what’s the hype about becoming financial independent n then crying about being cut off.

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/life style /what-f-hypocrisy-prince-charles-friend-lashes-at-harry-over-money-claims/4MMICKNT7MCTIPMMV2XLVD4YWU/?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=nzh_fb&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR2ssgTO03lvmW4dUGVQyj-Tg5GnyLCS0BSsR1Q839ZasbJIot3UkKbaNBM#Echobox=1615784094

He’s a spoiled little rich prince that can’t be independent.

What a beta

Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't it the bride's side who pays for the wedding? According to English customs. WTF was Charles doing paying for the wedding?

traditionally for the royals, they pay for it themselves, although the taxpayer pays for security.

you could argue that the taxpayer pays for the wedding too as the royal family receive a significant stipend each year out of our pockets.
click to expand



Which brings me to my next question. Is the British taxpayer still funding Harry and Meghan's life style ?
Profile picture of Lunamara
Lunamara
@Lunamara
4 Years

Comments: 246 · Posts: 232 · Topics: 1
Harry says they'd been living off of his share of the inheritance his mother, Princess Diana, left to him and his brother William after her death in 1997. According to The Independent, after taxes, the half that Harry received upon turning 25 amounts to around $ 13 million USD. "Without that, we wouldn't have been able to do this," Harry said, suggesting their move to a new home in California was made possible thanks to those funds.

Harry and Meghan inked what's believed to be a very lucrative Netflix deal, estimated to be worth between 100 and 240 million in U.S. dollars (the streaming platform hasn't confirmed a sum). They also produce a podcast in a deal with Spotify, and Oprah and Harry are producing a docu-series on mental health for Apple TV+. Initially, "the Netflix and the Spotify of it all weren't part of the plan," Harry told Oprah in the interview.

These revenue streams are in addition to Markle's own money from her previous career as an actress—in her days on USA drama Suits, she earned a reported salary of about $ 450,000 in addition to endorsements and related income. While it's an unconfirmed number, a February 2020 Forbes report estimated Harry and Meghan's net worth at about $ 10 million.”

They just should of stuck with we’re are trying to be financially independent

No shame there no need to excuse baby Archie security need to work for nerflix. No sympathy when you bought a home you could not afford and prioritize on your babies security.
Profile picture of Jumpin_Jupiter
5 months without a single dip
@Jumpin_Jupiter
6 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 4223 · Posts: 8452 · Topics: 103
Posted by Undine
Posted by Jumpin_Jupiter
Posted by MyStarsShine
Posted by Jumpin_Jupiter
Posted by MyStarsShine
Posted by Jumpin_Jupiter
Posted by MyStarsShine
Posted by Jumpin_Jupiter
Posted by MyStarsShine
Posted by SnowBunny726
Posted by Nightcap-

Leo Sun and Merc with Libra Moon and Cancer Rising. What a terrible chart. Over emotionality mixed with self absorption/drama and playing the victim while still trying to appear nice. Most people had no idea she was black until she started to pull out the race card every turn. It's not like she was marching at BLM protests and fighting injustice. Also, she might want to be careful about invoking talk of suicide. There are people with actual issues related to suicide not some trivial issue from an over privileged opportunist pandering for sympathy.

I hate Libra Moons. Cancer, Leo and Libra all in one chart make for an entitled delusional brat. And I have major placements in all three of those signs so I'm not talking like I'm an angel above it all.

What do you hate about them?

I don't like to butt in and speak up on nobody's behalf but my own. Libra moons usually come off as legit delusional. I don't know if snowbunny got that placement (garsh I hope not) at least she's being straight up honest and real whether or not she got it. I don't know who this Meagan markle character is but I have read some negative things about her on this site. And honestly I don't care to know her.

Also need to say there are some delusional people from my own sign too. Delusionalist comes from all signs thru all walks of life. I'm man enough to own up to my own sign and say that it can be delusional. And if you doubt Gemini can be delusional, just look at yo boi, Donald trump.

What do you think makes the moon placed in Libra delusional?

The moon represent your emotions. And it all make sense Libra being placed in the moon makes one delusional. There's no getting around that. This is why Libra is best on the ascendant. And on the ascendant only. That is Libra's original placement. The ascendant.

Yes I know about the moon

I’d have thought Neptune, ie Pisces would be more prone to delusions, escapism etc?

Uhhh.... I would think that's illusions. Neptune and Pisces are both dreamy. So someone with Neptune in Pisces or Pisces/Neptune influence would be someone who has their head in the clouds. Well most of the time.

Based on the Pisces/strong Neptune people I know, I'd go with this

"Pisces prefer to float in a pleasant existence that avoids encounters with the harsh ugliness of life. So, they create delusions where everything is pleasant. Often it's harmless and it simply makes Pisces easy to live with. Other times, it can slowly eat away at relationships or lead to self-destruction"

Oh ok. This Pisces you know probably doesn't have Neptune in the 1st house or Neptune on the rise. Because most people with those Pisces placements usually act like they don't have a clue where they at. I don't think I can recall any Pisces that are delusional. They might be. I just don't know.

I know a Pisces dude I used to work with a very long time ago. He's very hard to comprehend anything and when you call him he'll look up at the sky first and you can be right there in front of him. Ain't hard to tell he's Neptune down. I don't know what time he was born tho so I could be wrong on that.

I’m Pisces sun and moon with Neptune on my rising. Is there anything you want me to explain to you?
click to expand



Na I'm good. No need to explain anything. My problem ain't with Neptunians. I wouldnt mind the Leo moons to explain their actions. As a Gemini I need educating on Leo moon more.
Profile picture of jeane
jeane
@jeane
11 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 22 · Posts: 8048 · Topics: 36
Posted by Ram416
Posted by jeane
Posted by Ram416
Posted by Moloko_vellocet
Posted by Lunamara

“ But it didn't take long for holes to emerge in the Duke and Duchess' story about money in particular, with a "well-placed source" telling The Telegraph Charles was fed up with the constant calls from Harry for more money".

"He ploughed a lot into the wedding and the refurbishment of Frogmore Cottage [the couple's Windsor home] and did his utmost to make them feel financially supported but when they said they were upping sticks, they asked for even more," the source said.”

Then what’s the hype about becoming financial independent n then crying about being cut off.

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/life style /what-f-hypocrisy-prince-charles-friend-lashes-at-harry-over-money-claims/4MMICKNT7MCTIPMMV2XLVD4YWU/?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=nzh_fb&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR2ssgTO03lvmW4dUGVQyj-Tg5GnyLCS0BSsR1Q839ZasbJIot3UkKbaNBM#Echobox=1615784094

He’s a spoiled little rich prince that can’t be independent.

What a beta

Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't it the bride's side who pays for the wedding? According to English customs. WTF was Charles doing paying for the wedding?

traditionally for the royals, they pay for it themselves, although the taxpayer pays for security.

you could argue that the taxpayer pays for the wedding too as the royal family receive a significant stipend each year out of our pockets.

Which brings me to my next question. Is the British taxpayer still funding Harry and Meghan's life style ?
click to expand


no. not that i am aware of.

(although you could argue money that he gets from dad is possibly taxpayer's money. it depends on where you draw the line i guess.)
Profile picture of jeane
jeane
@jeane
11 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 22 · Posts: 8048 · Topics: 36
Posted by Lunamara

Harry says they'd been living off of his share of the inheritance his mother, Princess Diana, left to him and his brother William after her death in 1997. According to The Independent, after taxes, the half that Harry received upon turning 25 amounts to around $ 13 million USD. "Without that, we wouldn't have been able to do this," Harry said, suggesting their move to a new home in California was made possible thanks to those funds.

Harry and Meghan inked what's believed to be a very lucrative Netflix deal, estimated to be worth between 100 and 240 million in U.S. dollars (the streaming platform hasn't confirmed a sum). They also produce a podcast in a deal with Spotify, and Oprah and Harry are producing a docu-series on mental health for Apple TV+. Initially, "the Netflix and the Spotify of it all weren't part of the plan," Harry told Oprah in the interview.

These revenue streams are in addition to Markle's own money from her previous career as an actress—in her days on USA drama Suits, she earned a reported salary of about $ 450,000 in addition to endorsements and related income. While it's an unconfirmed number, a February 2020 Forbes report estimated Harry and Meghan's net worth at about $ 10 million.”

They just should of stuck with we’re are trying to be financially independent

No shame there no need to excuse baby Archie security need to work for nerflix. No sympathy when you bought a home you could not afford and prioritize on your babies security.


the spencer family is not poor. not sure if he is getting regular payments out of their coffers but you can see why he is selling his arse to anyone who will have him (james cordon? really? next he'll be doing ads for kfc)
Profile picture of LadyNeptune
LadyNeptune
@LadyNeptune
10 Years25,000+ Posts

Comments: 11076 · Posts: 35718 · Topics: 110
Posted by DonnaLibra

Why does Meghan want Archie to have a title?

If we take what they said in their interview at face value, they didn't care either way about the title. They were upset that him not having a title was used as an excuse not to provide their child with security.

And just because Archie was not eligible to be awarded prince title (until Charles ascends the throne) doesn't mean he couldn't be granted any number of other titles like every other freakin member of that family.

Meghan specifically said Archie was not going to be granted a title — not that he was specifically being denied the title of prince. What she did say, was that by decree of King George V, the grandchildren of the monarch are granted the title of prince or princess.

Meghan specifically said to Oprah that once Harry’s dad, Charles, becomes king that Archie was due to become a Prince, AND that the powers that be in the palace specifically wanted to alter the King George V decree just to exclude Archie from ever gaining the title of Prince. Her point was why would the palace be going out of it’s way just to exclude Archie from becoming a prince when his time comes. Coupled with the ‘too dark’ comments...
Profile picture of VenusAquarius
"So I can show off my gold chain, gold ring. Roll through the hood on them gold thangs"
@VenusAquarius
13 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 4341 · Posts: 13269 · Topics: 69
Posted by LadyNeptune
Posted by DonnaLibra

Why does Meghan want Archie to have a title?

If we take what they said in their interview at face value, they didn't care either way about the title. They were upset that him not having a title was used as an excuse not to provide their child with security.

And just because Archie was not eligible to be awarded prince title (until Charles ascends the throne) doesn't mean he couldn't be granted any number of other titles like every other freakin member of that family.

Meghan specifically said Archie was not going to be granted a title — not that he was specifically being denied the title of prince. What she did say, was that by decree of King George V, the grandchildren of the monarch are granted the title of prince or princess.

Meghan specifically said to Oprah that once Harry’s dad, Charles, becomes king that Archie was due to become a Prince, AND that the powers that be in the palace specifically wanted to alter the King George V decree just to exclude Archie from ever gaining the title of Prince. Her point was why would the palace be going out of it’s way just to exclude Archie from becoming a prince when his time comes. Coupled with the ‘top dark’ comments...
click to expand


Girl, they ain't listin... They too busy wit da

Image Not Found

Lmao, shits cra-a-z.
Profile picture of Lunamara
Lunamara
@Lunamara
4 Years

Comments: 246 · Posts: 232 · Topics: 1
2029

"I think the Andrew crisis has definitely strengthened Prince Charles's desire for a slimmed-down monarchy," Royal Central deputy editor Brittani Barger told the outlet. "Prince Andrew is now out of the picture. I don't see him ever undertaking royal duties again, and any hope that his daughters would is now gone. So the process of slimming the monarchy has already begun as we know Charles was pushing his mother to meet with Andrew and have him step back from his royal duties."

"I think when it's all said and done, the monarchy will be Charles and his children and grandchildren," she added.

Editor of Royal Central Charlie Proctor echoed Barger's sentiments, adding that the likes of Princess Anne and the Earl and Countess of Wessex "are some of the hardest working royals," but under Charles' reign, their official duties could be cut off to avoid any other scandal.



Sounds reasonable

https://news.yahoo.com/prince-charles-set-trim-down-171411559.html
Profile picture of Andalusia
Andalusia
@Andalusia
11 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 372 · Posts: 6468 · Topics: 165
Posted by LadyNeptune
Posted by DonnaLibra

Why does Meghan want Archie to have a title?

If we take what they said in their interview at face value, they didn't care either way about the title. They were upset that him not having a title was used as an excuse not to provide their child with security.

And just because Archie was not eligible to be awarded prince title (until Charles ascends the throne) doesn't mean he couldn't be granted any number of other titles like every other freakin member of that family.

Meghan specifically said Archie was not going to be granted a title — not that he was specifically being denied the title of prince. What she did say, was that by decree of King George V, the grandchildren of the monarch are granted the title of prince or princess.

Meghan specifically said to Oprah that once Harry’s dad, Charles, becomes king that Archie was due to become a Prince, AND that the powers that be in the palace specifically wanted to alter the King George V decree just to exclude Archie from ever gaining the title of Prince. Her point was why would the palace be going out of it’s way just to exclude Archie from becoming a prince when his time comes. Coupled with the ‘top dark’ comments...
click to expand



She bothered to learn all the ins and outs of succession patterns and the hierarchy of titles but not the fact that she's supposed to curtsy when meeting the Queen?

LMAO.
Profile picture of LadyNeptune
LadyNeptune
@LadyNeptune
10 Years25,000+ Posts

Comments: 11076 · Posts: 35718 · Topics: 110
Posted by Andalusia
Posted by LadyNeptune
Posted by DonnaLibra

Why does Meghan want Archie to have a title?

If we take what they said in their interview at face value, they didn't care either way about the title. They were upset that him not having a title was used as an excuse not to provide their child with security.

And just because Archie was not eligible to be awarded prince title (until Charles ascends the throne) doesn't mean he couldn't be granted any number of other titles like every other freakin member of that family.

Meghan specifically said Archie was not going to be granted a title — not that he was specifically being denied the title of prince. What she did say, was that by decree of King George V, the grandchildren of the monarch are granted the title of prince or princess.

Meghan specifically said to Oprah that once Harry’s dad, Charles, becomes king that Archie was due to become a Prince, AND that the powers that be in the palace specifically wanted to alter the King George V decree just to exclude Archie from ever gaining the title of Prince. Her point was why would the palace be going out of it’s way just to exclude Archie from becoming a prince when his time comes. Coupled with the ‘top dark’ comments...

She bothered to learn all the ins and outs of succession patterns and the hierarchy of titles but not the fact that she's supposed to curtsy when meeting the Queen?

LMAO.
click to expand



Big difference between the first time your meeting the grams of your current beau vs living with the royals and their/your handlers for 3 years and being educated by both them and your husband. But yeah, totes the same.
Profile picture of LadyNeptune
LadyNeptune
@LadyNeptune
10 Years25,000+ Posts

Comments: 11076 · Posts: 35718 · Topics: 110
Lol ya'll act like if you married into royalty you wouldn't research your future children's roles more in depth. As if you wouldn't be informed and taught by 'the firm' what role you play and what role your spawn would play.

I mean, just say you don't like her cause she's pretty and landed the cuter prince and your jelly of her. I mean yuck, gingers, but to each their own.

I just find it funny to read such contradictions from the people who hate on her. Because she's a gold digger of course who manipulated her way into the princes pants and heart. But then also she's yoko levels by manipulating him to break up with his family and leave the money behind. So which is it?



Profile picture of LadyNeptune
LadyNeptune
@LadyNeptune
10 Years25,000+ Posts

Comments: 11076 · Posts: 35718 · Topics: 110
Posted by Lunamara

2029

"I think the Andrew crisis has definitely strengthened Prince Charles's desire for a slimmed-down monarchy," Royal Central deputy editor Brittani Barger told the outlet. "Prince Andrew is now out of the picture. I don't see him ever undertaking royal duties again, and any hope that his daughters would is now gone. So the process of slimming the monarchy has already begun as we know Charles was pushing his mother to meet with Andrew and have him step back from his royal duties."

"I think when it's all said and done, the monarchy will be Charles and his children and grandchildren," she added.

Editor of Royal Central Charlie Proctor echoed Barger's sentiments, adding that the likes of Princess Anne and the Earl and Countess of Wessex "are some of the hardest working royals," but under Charles' reign, their official duties could be cut off to avoid any other scandal.



Sounds reasonable

https://news.yahoo.com/prince-charles-set-trim-down-171411559.html

Archie is Charles grandchild. Or is this Charles way of confirming the rumors that Harry is in fact not his son 🤔
Profile picture of LadyNeptune
LadyNeptune
@LadyNeptune
10 Years25,000+ Posts

Comments: 11076 · Posts: 35718 · Topics: 110
Posted by VenusAquarius
Posted by LadyNeptune
Posted by DonnaLibra

Why does Meghan want Archie to have a title?

If we take what they said in their interview at face value, they didn't care either way about the title. They were upset that him not having a title was used as an excuse not to provide their child with security.

And just because Archie was not eligible to be awarded prince title (until Charles ascends the throne) doesn't mean he couldn't be granted any number of other titles like every other freakin member of that family.

Meghan specifically said Archie was not going to be granted a title — not that he was specifically being denied the title of prince. What she did say, was that by decree of King George V, the grandchildren of the monarch are granted the title of prince or princess.

Meghan specifically said to Oprah that once Harry’s dad, Charles, becomes king that Archie was due to become a Prince, AND that the powers that be in the palace specifically wanted to alter the King George V decree just to exclude Archie from ever gaining the title of Prince. Her point was why would the palace be going out of it’s way just to exclude Archie from becoming a prince when his time comes. Coupled with the ‘top dark’ comments...

Girl, they ain't listin... They too busy wit da

Image Not Found

Lmao, shits cra-a-z.
click to expand


Image Not Found
Profile picture of Andalusia
Andalusia
@Andalusia
11 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 372 · Posts: 6468 · Topics: 165
Posted by LadyNeptune

Lol ya'll act like if you married into royalty you wouldn't research your future children's roles more in depth. As if you wouldn't be informed and taught by 'the firm' what role you play and what role your spawn would play.

I mean, just say you don't like her cause she's pretty and landed the cuter prince and your jelly of her. I mean yuck, gingers, but to each their own.

I just find it funny to read such contradictions from the people who hate on her. Because she's a gold digger of course who manipulated her way into the princes pants and heart. But then also she's yoko levels by manipulating him to break up with his family and leave the money behind. So which is it?


I don't hate her. I don't love her. She is neutral to me at best. I haven't seen the interview in its entirety and am only going off the clips / memes i have seen and what I've read in this thread.
Profile picture of Ram416
Ram416
@Ram416
9 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 4530 · Posts: 12486 · Topics: 56
Posted by LadyNeptune
Posted by Lunamara

2029

"I think the Andrew crisis has definitely strengthened Prince Charles's desire for a slimmed-down monarchy," Royal Central deputy editor Brittani Barger told the outlet. "Prince Andrew is now out of the picture. I don't see him ever undertaking royal duties again, and any hope that his daughters would is now gone. So the process of slimming the monarchy has already begun as we know Charles was pushing his mother to meet with Andrew and have him step back from his royal duties."

"I think when it's all said and done, the monarchy will be Charles and his children and grandchildren," she added.

Editor of Royal Central Charlie Proctor echoed Barger's sentiments, adding that the likes of Princess Anne and the Earl and Countess of Wessex "are some of the hardest working royals," but under Charles' reign, their official duties could be cut off to avoid any other scandal.



Sounds reasonable

https://news.yahoo.com/prince-charles-set-trim-down-171411559.html

Archie is Charles grandchild. Or is this Charles way of confirming the rumors that Harry is in fact not his son 🤔
click to expand



Charles did a DNA test to dispel these rumours. Turns out he is Harry's father. I would say though that he's always had it in for his siblings (Andrew and Anne), so I'm not surprised he would want to slim down the monarchy. Too many leeches in the family, him being the biggest of them all.
Profile picture of Ram416
Ram416
@Ram416
9 Years10,000+ Posts

Comments: 4530 · Posts: 12486 · Topics: 56
Posted by LadyNeptune
Posted by DonnaLibra

Why does Meghan want Archie to have a title?

If we take what they said in their interview at face value, they didn't care either way about the title. They were upset that him not having a title was used as an excuse not to provide their child with security.

And just because Archie was not eligible to be awarded prince title (until Charles ascends the throne) doesn't mean he couldn't be granted any number of other titles like every other freakin member of that family.

Meghan specifically said Archie was not going to be granted a title — not that he was specifically being denied the title of prince. What she did say, was that by decree of King George V, the grandchildren of the monarch are granted the title of prince or princess.

Meghan specifically said to Oprah that once Harry’s dad, Charles, becomes king that Archie was due to become a Prince, AND that the powers that be in the palace specifically wanted to alter the King George V decree just to exclude Archie from ever gaining the title of Prince. Her point was why would the palace be going out of it’s way just to exclude Archie from becoming a prince when his time comes. Coupled with the ‘too dark’ comments...
click to expand



This is weird because they were offered the title of Earl for Archie, but rejected it because he wasn't going to be given the title of prince.
Profile picture of jeane
jeane
@jeane
11 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 22 · Posts: 8048 · Topics: 36
Posted by Lunamara

2029

"I think the Andrew crisis has definitely strengthened Prince Charles's desire for a slimmed-down monarchy," Royal Central deputy editor Brittani Barger told the outlet. "Prince Andrew is now out of the picture. I don't see him ever undertaking royal duties again, and any hope that his daughters would is now gone. So the process of slimming the monarchy has already begun as we know Charles was pushing his mother to meet with Andrew and have him step back from his royal duties."

"I think when it's all said and done, the monarchy will be Charles and his children and grandchildren," she added.

Editor of Royal Central Charlie Proctor echoed Barger's sentiments, adding that the likes of Princess Anne and the Earl and Countess of Wessex "are some of the hardest working royals," but under Charles' reign, their official duties could be cut off to avoid any other scandal.



Sounds reasonable

https://news.yahoo.com/prince-charles-set-trim-down-171411559.html


yes this is what i had been told as well. it actually is down to a power grab for when the queen dies. this has been going on before even meghan was in the picture.
Profile picture of jeane
jeane
@jeane
11 Years5,000+ Posts

Comments: 22 · Posts: 8048 · Topics: 36
Posted by LadyNeptune

Furthering my suspicion that this was a calculated move by Harry.

He now has a podcast.

TV and movie producer credits.

Zero entertainment background.

Was spotted eating with David Foster in Santa Barbara over the weekend. Prince Harry EP hitting your playlist soon!


he did want out. bringing meghan into the family was a calculated move on his part. he knew what it would do to the family. (i'm not just surmising, this was told to me). i don't think he calculated on the queen kicking him out entirely but i suspected he wanted to have his cake and eat it too.

i read years ago (possibly pre-meghan, definitely pre-wedding) that neither harry, nor kate, nor wills were particularly fond of royal duties. they all want to do as little as possible.

while the queen just goes and goes and goes. i guess that's a taurus for you.
Profile picture of LadyNeptune
LadyNeptune
@LadyNeptune
10 Years25,000+ Posts

Comments: 11076 · Posts: 35718 · Topics: 110
Posted by jeane
Posted by LadyNeptune

Furthering my suspicion that this was a calculated move by Harry.

He now has a podcast.

TV and movie producer credits.

Zero entertainment background.

Was spotted eating with David Foster in Santa Barbara over the weekend. Prince Harry EP hitting your playlist soon!

he did want out. bringing meghan into the family was a calculated move on his part. he knew what it would do to the family. (i'm not just surmising, this was told to me). i don't think he calculated on the queen kicking him out entirely but i suspected he wanted to have his cake and eat it too.

i read years ago (possibly pre-meghan, definitely pre-wedding) that neither harry, nor kate, nor wills were particularly fond of royal duties. they all want to do as little as possible.

while the queen just goes and goes and goes. i guess that's a taurus for you.
click to expand



yeah thats what I'm saying.

Like for sure they fell in love and blah blah blah. But her being an actor and having those connections to get him in the door was the cherry on top. So he put a ring on it.
Profile picture of Parkourler
Parkourler
@Parkourler
9 Years1,000+ PostsTaurus

Comments: 512 · Posts: 2343 · Topics: 199
Posted by LadyNeptune
Posted by Parkourler

Some people actually insisit she is a black woman that's crazy.

not crazy in America where the one drop rule went beyond social and cultural constructs and was coded into law in many states. Know your history
click to expand



Hey snarkygirl I am a German, when it comes to racism I know a fuckton about the Holocaust so I don't need American history. You guys are not admired anymore. We have golden cobblestones in front of houses with the names of deported people engraved who lived in those houses to always remind us, but I am digressing.

She looks a white so I would never call her black I guess social media outrage produces weird trends.

I would call her mixed raced but definitely not black based on how she looks. Unless white looking people all Over america have always identified as black because of their heritage prior to that Oprah interview than I believe that
Profile picture of Moloko_vellocet
Moloko_vellocet
@Moloko_vellocet
4 Years500+ Posts

Comments: 143 · Posts: 559 · Topics: 0
Posted by LadyNeptune
Posted by Parkourler

Some people actually insisit she is a black woman that's crazy.

not crazy in America where the one drop rule went beyond social and cultural constructs and was coded into law in many states. Know your history
click to expand



She’s riding her white privilege like Becky looking for handouts.

She hasn’t been oppressed or dealt with racism like a Black woman.

Sorry.
Profile picture of LadyNeptune
LadyNeptune
@LadyNeptune
10 Years25,000+ Posts

Comments: 11076 · Posts: 35718 · Topics: 110
Posted by Moloko_vellocet
Posted by LadyNeptune
Posted by Parkourler

Some people actually insisit she is a black woman that's crazy.

not crazy in America where the one drop rule went beyond social and cultural constructs and was coded into law in many states. Know your history

She’s riding her white privilege like Becky looking for handouts.

She hasn’t been oppressed or dealt with racism like a Black woman.

Sorry.
click to expand



She has a black mother, she passes as white. So yes, she's most likely experienced the privilege that comes hand in hand with that. But its not really up to us to say what she has or hasn't dealt with. We are strangers and have a very limited view on what she has or hasn't gone through.

Just the amount of racist hate she and Archie have received online, through the gossip media there, is truly disgusting. But honestly watching that interview, Harry was the more outraged one. Probably because its not something he's every experienced. And it hits closer when this hate is directed towards your wife and child.

But like I said previously in the thread... I found a lot of the complaining about 'how hard' it was to acclimate to the royal life style to be a bit tone deaf. She even compared it to being in quarantine. Woah. You weren't stuck in a studio apartment with no income and little resources. Your in a literal mansion surrounded by your family and not worrying about your next meal or fear of eviction since you can't work. So again, a bit tone deaf.

To clarify, her talking about the racism and post partum depression/suicide cry for help was absolutely heart breaking. But the, they wouldn't let me eat out with friends, ermmmm tough but don't compare that to being quarantined. Its not the same.